Skip to main content
Log in

Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accurate measurement of esophageal hiatus size is clinically important, especially when antireflux surgery is planned. We present a novel method for in vivo measurement of esophageal hiatal surface area using MDCT multiplanar reconstruction. We aimed to determine whether large hiatal area is associated with hiatal hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed subjects prospectively enrolled in the COPDGene® project. We created two test groups, one with hiatal hernia on chest CT and one with GERD on medical treatment identified by history without hernia. Matched control groups were formed. We performed CT postprocessing to define the double-oblique plane of the esophageal hiatus, on which the hiatal surface area is manually traced.

Results

Subjects with hernia (n = 48) had larger mean hiatus areas than matched controls (6.9 vs. 2.5 cm2, p < 0.0001), and were more likely to have GERD (42 vs. 10 %, p < 0.0005). Subjects with mixed (type III) hernias had larger hiatuses compared to subjects with sliding (type I) hernias, who, in turn, had larger hiatuses than subjects without hernia (p < 0.0001). Hernia-negative subjects with GERD (n = 55) did not have significantly larger mean hiatal areas compared to matched controls (3.0 vs. 2.5 cm2, p = 0.12). Twenty measurements obtained by two radiologists showed correlation of 0.93, with mean difference of 0.5 cm2 (p = 0.20).

Conclusions

We devised a method to measure in vivo esophageal hiatal surface area using MDCT reconstruction and established the normal size range for the first time. This methodology has the potential to guide decision-making in antireflux surgery technique preoperatively, and assess surgical result postoperatively. The presence of hernia correlated with large hiatuses and GERD. However, hiatal area failed to identify those with GERD in the absence of hiatal hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Collis J, Kelly T, Wiley A (1954) Anatomy of the crura of the diaphragm and the surgery of hiatus hernia. Thorax 9:175–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbosa Costa M, Ary Pires-Neto M (2004) Anatomical investigation of the esophageal and aortic hiatuses: physiologic, clinical and surgical considerations. Anat Sci Int 79:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loukas M, Wartmann ChT, Tubbs RS, Apaydin N, Louis RG Jr, Gupta AA, Jordan R (2008) Morphologic variation of the diaphragmatic crura: a correlation with pathologic processes of the esophageal hiatus? Folia Morphol (Warsz) 67:273–279

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mittal RK, Rochester DF, McCallum RW (1989) Sphincteric action of the diaphragm during a relaxed lower esophageal sphincter in humans. Am J Physiol 256:G139–G144

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordon C, Kang J, Neild P, Maxwell J (2004) The role of the hiatus hernia in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:719–732

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gryglewski A, Pena I, Tomaszewski K, Walocha J (2014) Unsolved questions regarding the role of esophageal hiatus anatomy in the development of esophageal hiatal hernias. Adv Clin Exp Med 23:639–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Batirel H, Uygur-Bayramicli O, Giral A, Ekici B, Bekiroglu N, Yildizeli B, Yüksel M (2009) The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements. J Gastrointest Surg 14:38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koch O, Kaindlstorfer A, Antoniou S, Asche K, Granderath F, Pointner R (2012) Influence of the esophageal hiatus size on the lower esophageal sphincter, on reflux activity and on symptomatology. Dis Esophagus 25:201–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Koch O, Asche K, Berger J, Weber E, Granderath F, Pointner R (2011) Influence of the size of the hiatus on the rate of reherniation after laparoscopic fundoplication and refundopilication with mesh hiatoplasty. Surg Endosc 25:1024–1030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grubnik V, Malynovskyy A (2013) Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias: new classification supported by long-term results. Surg Endosc 27:4337–4346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Granderath F (2007) Measurement of the esophageal hiatus by calculation of the hiatal surface area (HSA). Why, when and how? Surg Endosc 21:2224–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Antoniou S, Pointner R, Granderath F (2014) Hiatal surface area as a basis for a new classification of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 28:1384–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch O, Schurich M, Antoniou S, Spaun G, Kaindlstorfer A, Pointner R, Swanstrom L (2013) Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings? Hernia 18:883–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Granderath F, Schweiger U, Pointner R (2007) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area. Surg Endosc 21:542–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Granderath F, Syré G, Wayand W, Zehetner J (2010) The esophageal hiatus: what is the normal size? Surg Endosc 24:988–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Regan E, Hokanson J, Murphy J, Make B, Lynch D, Beaty T, Curran-Everett D, Silverman E, Crapo J (2010) Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD 7:32–43

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbara S, Kalan M, Lewicki A (2003) Intrathoracic stomach revisited. Am J Roentgenol 181:403–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cerillo A, Mariani M, Berti S, Glauber M (2012) Sizing the aortic annulus. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1:245–256

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sloan S, Rademaker A, Kahrilas P (1992) Determinants of gastroesophageal junction incompetence: hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter, or both? Ann Intern Med 117:977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahrilas P (2003) GERD pathogenesis, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations. Cleve Clin J Med 70:S4–S19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones M, Sloan S, Rabine J, Ebert C, Huang C, Kahrilas P (2001) Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1711–1717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franzén T (2014) Is the severity of gastroesophageal reflux dependent on hiatus hernia size? WJG 20:1582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen M, Ott D, Sinclair J, Wu W, Gelfand D (1992) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: correlation of esophageal pH testing and radiographic findings. Radiology 185:483–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saleh C, Smout A, Bredenoord A (2014) The diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease cannot be made with barium esophagograms. Neurogastroenterol Motil 27:195–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the COPDGene® investigators for access to their considerable body of data and continued support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Ouyang.

Ethics declarations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouyang, W., Dass, C., Zhao, H. et al. Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD. Surg Endosc 30, 2465–2472 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4499-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4499-9

Keywords

Navigation