Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fluorocholangiography: reincarnation in the laparoscopic era—evaluation of intra-operative cholangiography in 3635 laparoscopic cholecystectomies

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) resulted in the decline of routine intra-operative cholangiography (IOC). Common bile duct stones are being diagnosed preoperatively using magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). We aim to evaluate the use and benefits of IOC during laparoscopic biliary surgery at a high-volume biliary surgery unit.

Methods

Prospective data from 4088 patients undergoing LC over 22 years were analysed. Referral protocols allow one firm to receive the great majority of biliary emergencies and all suspected ductal stones. All patients with gall stones on ultrasound scanning, fit for surgery, will undergo LC during the index admission. MRCP and ERCP are not part of preoperative investigation. A four-port LC is performed with a size 5Fr ureteric catheter within an open cannula to obtain an IOC through right sub-costal port.

Results

Of 4088 patients, IOC was attempted in 3691 (90.2 %) and 3635 had a successful IOC (98.4 %). 75 % were females. The mean age was 59 years. Patients presented with one or more of the following: chronic biliary pain in 60 %, acute pain 26.7 %, acute cholecystitis 8.4 %, gallstone pancreatitis 7.8 % and jaundice with or without cholangitis in 19.2 %. A total of 1328 patients (36.5 %) had risk factors for CBD stones. The IOC was abnormal in 975 cases (26.8 %), recording 1599 abnormalities. IOC identified 774 patients with CBD stones (21.3 %), including previously unsuspected CBD stones in 4.7 %. IOC was false negative in 20 cases (0.5 %) found to have stones on basket exploration. A decision not to perform IOC in 453 cases (11 %) was made preoperatively in 74.2 % and intra-operatively in 12.3 %.

Conclusion

IOC can be safely and routinely performed in LC. It helps to identify CBD stones, even in patients with no known risk factors, delineate bile duct anatomy and facilitate single-stage management of CBD stones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ford JA, Soop M, Du J, Loveday BP, Rodgers M (2012) Systematic review of intraoperative cholangiography in cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 99:160–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Buddingh KT, Nieuwenhuijs VB, van Buuren L, Hulscher JB, de Jong JS, van Dam GM (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Stuart SA, Simpson TI, Alvord LA, Williams MD (1998) Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 176:632–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 289:1639–1644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu SC, Chen FC, Lo CJ (2005) Selective intraoperative cholangiography and single-stage management of common bile duct stone in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 29:1402–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giger U, Ouaissi M, Schmitz SF, Krahenbuhl S, Krahenbuhl L (2011) Bile duct injury and use of cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:391–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waage A, Nilsson M (2006) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a population-based study of 152 776 cholecystectomies in the Swedish Inpatient Registry. Arch Surg 141:1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hookman P, Unger SW, Barkin JS (2000) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be routinely performed with intraoperative cholangiography. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3299–3302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Steffen H, Lorenz D (2002) Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1098–1104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP (2001) Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: Adverse outcome or preventable error? Arch Surg 136:1287–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamouda AH, Goh W, Mahmud S, Khan M, Nassar AH (2007) Intraoperative cholangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 21:955–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierce RA, Jonnalagadda S, Spitler JA, Tessier DJ, Liaw JM, Lall SC, Melman LM, Frisella MM, Todt LM, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, Edmundowicz SA, Matthews BD (2008) Incidence of residual choledocholithiasis detected by intraoperative cholangiography at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients having undergone preoperative ERCP. Surg Endosc 22:2365–2372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A (1999) Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 229:449–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Livingston EH (2003) Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury. JAMA 290:459 (author reply 459-460)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Livingston EH, Miller JA, Coan B, Rege RV (2007) Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1162–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buddingh KT, Weersma RK, Savenije RA, van Dam GM, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2011) Lower rate of major bile duct injury and increased intraoperative management of common bile duct stones after implementation of routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 213:267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tornqvist B, Stromberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ 345:e6457

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mirizzi PL (1950) Operative cholangiography. Revista espanola de las enfermedades del aparato digestivo y de la nutricion 9:306–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Massarweh NN, Flum DR (2007) Role of intraoperative cholangiography in avoiding bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 204:656–664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nassar AHA, Ashkar KA, Mohamed AY, Hafiz AA (1995) Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy possible without video technology? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 4:63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 215:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan OA, Balaji S, Branagan G, Bennett DH, Davies N (2011) Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:362–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Knight JS, Mercer SJ, Somers SS, Walters AM, Sadek SA, Toh SK (2004) Timing of urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not influence conversion rate. Br J Surg 91:601–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teoh AY, Chong CN, Wong J, Lee KF, Chiu PW, Ng SS, Lai PB (2007) Routine early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis after conclusion of a randomized controlled trial. Br J Surg 94:1128–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nassar AH, El Shallaly G, Hamouda AH (2009) Optimising laparoscopic cholangiography time using a simple cannulation technique. Surg Endosc 23:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El Shallaly G, Seow C, Sharp C, Mughrabi A, Nassar AH (2005) Intraoperative cholangiography time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing the radiographer. Surg Endosc 19:1370–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lirici MM, Califano A (2010) Management of complicated gallstones: results of an alternative approach to difficult cholecystectomies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:304–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Samie MA, Nassar AH (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Monklands Hospital, NHS Lanarkshire, Airdrie, Lanarkshire, ML6 0JS, Scotland, UK

    Ahmad H. M. Nassar, Ahmad Mirza, Haitham Qandeel, Zubir Ahmed & Samer Zino

Authors
  1. Ahmad H. M. Nassar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Mirza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haitham Qandeel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zubir Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Samer Zino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad H. M. Nassar.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Ahmad H. M. Nassar, Ahmad Mirza, Haitham Qandeel, Zubir Ahmed and Samer Zino have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassar, A.H.M., Mirza, A., Qandeel, H. et al. Fluorocholangiography: reincarnation in the laparoscopic era—evaluation of intra-operative cholangiography in 3635 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 30, 1804–1811 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4449-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4449-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation