Skip to main content
Log in

Costs and Utilization of Intraoperative Cholangiography

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has been advocated as a viable strategy to reduce common bile duct injury (CDI) during cholecystectomy. This is predicated, in part, on the low cost of IOC, making it a cost-effective preventive strategy. Using billed hospital charges as a proxy for costs, we sought to estimate costs associated with the performance of IOC.

Methods

The 2001 National Inpatient Survey (NIS) database was assessed for IOC utilization and associated charges. Average charges for hospital admission where the primary procedure was laparoscopic cholecystectomy were compared for those associated with and without the performance of IOC.

Results

Eighteen percent of cholecystectomies were performed in facilities that never perform IOC. Routine IOC (defined as >75% of cholecystectomies performed in any one hospital having a concomitant IOC) was performed in only 11% of hospitals. In the remaining 71% of hospitals, selective IOC was performed. IOCs were associated with US $706–739 in additional hospital charges when performed in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We project a cost of US $371,356 to prevent a single bile duct injury by using routine cholangiography.

Conclusion

We conclude that only a minority of hospitals performs cholecystectomies with routine IOC. Because of the significant amount of hospital charges attributable to IOC, routine IOC is not cost-effective as a preventative measure against bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CDE:

common duct exploration

IOC:

intraoperative cholangiography

CDI:

common bile duct injury

LOS:

length of stay

References

  1. Livingston EH. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury. JAMA 2003;290:459–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP nationwide inpatient sample: Design of the HCUP nationwide inpatient sample. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–383.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1075–1079.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Flum DR, Flowers C, Veenstra DL. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:385–393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher DR. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Australia—Outcomes and costs. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1230–1235.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Traverso LW, Roush TS, Koo K. CBD stones-outcomes and costs. Laparoscopic transcystic techniques other than choledochoscopy. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1242–1244.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW. Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 1992;215:209–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Podnos YD, Gelfand DV, Dulkanchainun TS, Wilson SE, Cao S, Ji P, Ortiz JA, Imagawa DK. Is intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost effective? Am J Surg 2001;182:663–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ladocsi LT, Benitez LD, Filippone DR, Nance FC. Intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A review of 734 consecutive cases. Am Surg 1997;63:150–156.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Phillips EH. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am J Surg 1993;165:505–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Soper NJ, Dunnegan DL. Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1992;16:1133–1140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Flum DR, Koepsell T, Heagerty P, Sinanan M, Dellinger EP. Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the use of intraoperative cholangiography: Adverse outcome or preventable error? Arch Surg 2001;136:1287–1292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berci G. Static cholangiography vs digital fluoroscopy. Intraoperative cholangiography: Benefit and cost ratio. Surg Endosc 1995;9:1244–1248.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward H. Livingston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Livingston, E.H., Miller, J.A.G., Coan, B. et al. Costs and Utilization of Intraoperative Cholangiography. J Gastrointest Surg 11, 1162–1167 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0209-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0209-9

Keywords

Navigation