Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer has been described as the ultimate sphincter-saving procedure. Laparoscopic ISR has been proved safe with early postoperative benefits. Recently, some colorectal surgeons have begun to perform robot-assisted ISR to harness the advantages of the da Vinci robotic system. The authors present their short-term results for a robotic technique of ISR.

Methods

Data from 29 consecutive patients at a single institution with very low rectal cancer (<4 cm) from the anal verge who underwent robot-assisted ISR were prospectively collected between December 2007 and March 2010.

Results

The study enrolled 23 men and 6 women with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 36–82 years). Their median body mass index (BMI) was 23.3 kg/m2 (range, 17.9–32.5 kg/m2). The median distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3 cm (range, 1–4 cm). The median operative time was 325 min (range, 235–435 min), with a console time of 130 min (range, 110–210 min). There were no conversions to open surgery. A protecting ileostomy was performed for all the patients. The median blood loss was less than 50 ml (range, < 50–1,000 ml). The median size of the tumor was 3 cm (range, 0–6.9 cm), and the median number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 1–44). The median distal margin was 0.8 cm (range, 0–4 cm), and one margin was positive. The circumferential margin was negative (>2 mm) for 27 patients. Therefore, complete resection (R0) was achieved for 26 (90%) of the 29 patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 5–15 days). Nine patients experienced complications, including three anastomotic leaks (10%). All the leaks were managed conservatively. No surgical mortalities occurred.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer is feasible, and its short-term outcome is acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PWR, Monson JRT (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44:315–421

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Poulin EC, Schlachta CM, Gre’goire R, Seshadri P, Cadeddu MO, Mamazza J (2002) Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 16:989–995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Konradt J, Bärlehner E, Köhler L, Wittekind Ch, Köckerling F (2002) Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 16:7–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiser MR, Milsom JW (2000) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation. Semin Surg Oncol 19:396–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M (2000) Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:S94–S97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lezoche E, Paganini AM, Feliciotti F (1997) A new technique to facilitate laparoscopic resection of low rectal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:9–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rullier E, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, Rullier A, Gontier R, Saric J (2003) Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 90:445–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 16:1389–1402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH, Lee SK, Cheon JH, Ahn JB, Kim WH (2008) Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc 22:792–797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SH, Park IJ, Joh YG, Hahn KY (2008) Laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: a comparison of surgical and oncological outcomes between extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal disease locations. Dis Colon Rectum 51:844–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU (2009) Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1824–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kitajima M (1997) Per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection with direct coloanal anastomosis for lower rectal cancer: the ultimate sphincter-preserving operation. Dis Colon Rectum 40(10 Suppl):S43–S47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Orsenigo E, Di Palo S, Vignali A, Staudacher C (2007) Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Surg Oncol 16(Suppl 1):S117–S120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujimoto Y, Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Konishi T, Ueno M, Oya M, Yamaguchi T (2010) Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:645–650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Saric J (2003) Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 5:451–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E (2000) Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum: analysis of 31 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43:843–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Morihiro M, Kosugi C, Sato K, Kotaka M, Nomura S, Arai M, Kobatake T (2004) Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 47:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tilney HS, Tekkis PP (2008) Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 10:3–15 discussion 15–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A (2010) Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:882–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim SH, Park IJ, Joh YG, Hahn KY (2006) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients. Surg Endosc 20:1197–1202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, Smith M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2004) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 18:281–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, Pozzi S, Faso FL, Ravizza D, Zampino G, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigazzi A (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Quor M. Leong, Dong N. Son, Jae S. Cho, Se J. Baek, Jung M. Kwak, Azali H. Amar, and Seon H. Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seon H. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, Q.M., Son, D.N., Cho, J.S. et al. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 25, 2987–2992 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1657-6

Keywords

Navigation