Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Haptics is an expensive addition to virtual reality (VR) simulators, and the added value to training has not been proven. This study evaluated the benefit of haptics in VR laparoscopic surgery training for novices.

Methods

The Simbionix LapMentor II haptic VR simulator was used in the study. Randomly, 33 laparoscopic novice students were placed in one of three groups: control, haptics-trained, or nonhaptics-trained group. The control group performed nine basic laparoscopy tasks and four cholecystectomy procedural tasks one time with haptics engaged at the default setting. The haptics group was trained to proficiency in the basic tasks and then performed each of the procedural tasks one time with haptics engaged. The nonhaptics group used the same training protocol except that haptics was disengaged. The proficiency values used were previously published expert values. Each group was assessed in the performance of 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (alternating with and without haptics). Performance was measured via automatically collected simulator data.

Results

The three groups exhibited no differences in terms of sex, education level, hand dominance, video game experience, surgical experience, and nonsurgical simulator experience. The number of attempts required to reach proficiency did not differ between the haptics- and nonhaptics-training groups. The haptics and nonhaptics groups exhibited no difference in performance. Both training groups outperformed the control group in number of movements as well as path length of the left instrument. In addition, the nonhaptics group outperformed the control group in total time.

Conclusion

Haptics does not improve the efficiency or effectiveness of LapMentor II VR laparoscopic surgery training. The limited benefit and the significant cost of haptics suggest that haptics should not be included routinely in VR laparoscopic surgery training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sutherland LM, Middleton PF, Anthony A, Hamdorf J, Cregan P, Scott D, Maddern GJ (2006) Surgical simulation: a systematic review. Ann Surg 243:291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons FLS Trainer Box (2008). http://www.flsprogram.org/trainerbox.php. Retrieved 7 Feb 2010

  3. The American Board of Surgery (2008) ABS to require ACLS, ATLS and FLS for general surgery certification. http://home.absurgery.org/default.jsp?news_newreqs. Retrieved 7 Feb 2010

  4. Aggarwal R, Balasundaram I, Darzi A (2008) Training opportunities and the role of virtual reality simulation in acquisition of basic laparoscopic skills. J Surg Res 145:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Panait L, Akkary E, Bell RL, Roberts KE, Dudrick SJ, Duffy AJ (2009) The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training. J Surg Res 156:312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salkini MW, Doarn CR, Kiehl N, Broderick TJ, Donovan JF, Gaitonde K (2010) The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II. J Endourol 24:99–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189:349–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Westebring-van der Putten EP, Goossens RH, Jakimowicz JJ, Dankelman J (2008) Haptics in minimally invasive surgery: a review. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17:3–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Picod G, Jambon AC, Vinatier D, Dubois P (2005) What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy? Surg Endosc 19:95–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. van den Dobbelsteen JJ, Schooleman A, Dankelman J (2007) Friction dynamics of trocars. Surg Endosc 21:1338–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schijven M, Jakimowicz J (2003) Virtual reality surgical laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc 17:1943–1950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stefanidis D, Acker CE, Swiderski D, Heniford BT, Greene FL (2008) Challenges during the implementation of a laparoscopic skills curriculum in a busy general surgery residency program. J Surg Educ 65:4–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463 discussion 463–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thompson J, Broderick T, Doarn C, Roesch M, Henry B, Stephan Z, Davis J, Weber J, Boyden M (2010) Refined task and proficiency criteria is required for optimal virtual reality minimally invasive surgery training. J Surg Res 158:250–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallagher AG, Satava RM (2002) Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills: learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16:1746–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas SM, Zeltser IS, Bensalah K, Tuncel A, Jenkins A, Pearle MS, Cadeddu JA (2008) Training on a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator improves performance of an unfamiliar live laparoscopic procedure. J Urol 180:2588–2591 discussion 2591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayodeji ID, Schijven M, Jakimowicz J, Greve JW (2007) Face validation of the Simbionix LAP Mentor virtual reality training module and its applicability in the surgical curriculum. Surg Endosc 21:1641–1649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the data collection team including Brian Henry, MD, Mr. Zack Stephan, Ms. Janna Davis, Ms. Maria Boyden, and Mr. John Weber for their determination. Salary support for Mr. Charles Doarn and Dr. Timothy Broderick and the purchase of the Simbionix Lap Mentor II VR simulator were provided by grant W81XWH-07-2-0035 from the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and the Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center.

Disclosures

Timothy J. Broderick has a consulting relationship with Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Jonathan R. Thompson, Anthony C. Leonard, Charles R. Doarn, and Matt J. Roesch have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan R. Thompson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.R., Leonard, A.C., Doarn, C.R. et al. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surg Endosc 25, 1107–1114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1325-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1325-2

Keywords

Navigation