Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) is a low-morbidity treatment option that may be effective for refractory symptoms in patients with gastroparesis of diabetic or idiopathic etiology. During surgery to initiate GES, two electrodes are tunneled in the gastric antrum in a precise location. If these electrodes pass through the mucosa and into the gastric lumen (determined by endoscopy) they must be repositioned, often multiple times. During this procedure, extensive suturing to anchor the electrodes is necessary once properly placed. Robotic surgical systems may provide surgeons with several technical and ergonomic advantages during this procedure when compared with a standard laparoscopic approach.

Methods

Over a 26-month period, 22 GES systems were implanted. The initial procedures were performed laparoscopically. After the first 15 laparoscopic cases, a technique for robotically implanting leads was developed and employed for the remainder of the series. Demographics, operative time, and endoscopically confirmed electrode mucosal perforations were quantified and compared based on operative approach.

Results

Patients were similar demographically. Total operative time did not differ based on technique (152 ± 40 min laparoscopic versus 158 ± 38 min robotic placement; p = 0.6). Mucosal perforations on first attempt at electrode placement occurred more frequently with the laparoscopic than with the robotic technique (15/30 laparoscopic versus 1/14 robotic; p = 0.006). There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

The robotic approach to GES electrode implantation is feasible and safe. Compared with standard laparoscopic techniques, the accurate insertion and anchoring of these leads can be accomplished more efficiently and comfortably using robotic techniques. Whether robotic GES electrode placement will result in significant clinical advantages for patients will require long-term follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abell TR, McCallum RW, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anand C, Al-Juburi A, Familoni B, Rashed H, Cutts T, Abidi N, Johnson WD, Minocha A, Abell TL (2007) Gastric electrical stimulation is safe and effective: a long-term study in patients with drug-refractory gastroparesis in three regional centers. Digestion 75:83–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eagon JC, Kelly KA (1993) Effects of gastric pacing on canine gastric motility and emptying. Am J Physiol 265:767–774

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, Kelly KA (1992) Pacing the human stomach. Surgery; 111:143–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Csepel J, Goldfarb B, Shapsis A, Goff S, Gabriel N, Eng HM (2006) Electrical stimulation for gastroparesis: gastric motility restored. Surg Endosc 20:302–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Juburi A, Granger S, Barnes J, Voeller G, Beech D, Amiri H, Abell TL (2005) Laparoscopy shortens length of stay in patients with gastric electrical stimulators. JSLS 9(3):305–310

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keus F, de Jong JA, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD006231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon ML, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR, Markley S, Sierra R, Heniford BT, Scott DJ (2007) Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training? J Am Coll Surg 205(2):307–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu RC, Sabnis AA, Chand B (2007) Erosion of gastric electrical stimulator electrodes: evaluation, management, and laparoscopic techniques. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(5):438–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Becker JC, Dietl KH, Konturek JW, Domschke W, Pohle T (2004) Gastric wall perforation: a rare complication of gastric electrical stimulation. Gastrointest Endosc 59:584–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abu-Abeid S, Keidar A, Gavert N, Blanc A, Szold A (2003) The clinical spectrum of band erosion following laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 17:861–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Suter M, Giusti V, Heraief E, Calmes JM (2004) Band erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: occurrence and results after conversion to Roux en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 14:381–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin Z, Sarosiek I, Forster J, McCallum RW (2006) Symptom responses, long-term outcomes and adverse events beyond 3 years of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 18:18–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abell T, Van Cutsem E, Abrahamsson H, Huizinga JD, Konturek JW, Galmiche JP, VoelIer G, Filez L, Everts B, Waterfall WE, Domschke W, Bruley des Varannes S, Familoni BO, Bourgeois IM, Janssens J, Tougas G (2002) Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis. Digestion 66:204–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Abell T, McCallum R, Hocking M, Koch K, Abrahamsson H, Leblanc I, Lindberg G, Konturek J, Nowak T, Quigley EM, Tougas G, Starkebaum W (2003) Gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 125:421–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60(1):39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN (2003) Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17(11):1744–1748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND (2007) Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17(3):171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohr CJ, Nadzam GS, Alami RS, Sanchez BR, Curet MJ (2006) Totally robotic laparoscopic Roux en-Y Gastric bypass: results from 75 patients. Obes Surg 16(6):690–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Steinberg GD, Shalhav AL (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71(3):404–407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, H4/726 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792, USA

    Jon C. Gould & Chirag Dholakia

Authors
  1. Jon C. Gould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chirag Dholakia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jon C. Gould.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, J.C., Dholakia, C. Robotic implantation of gastric electrical stimulation electrodes for gastroparesis. Surg Endosc 23, 508–512 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0063-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0063-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation