Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The incorporation of new devices into surgical practice often requires that surgeons acquire and master new skills. We studied the learning curve for intracorporeal knot tying in robotic surgery. Methods: We developed an objective scoring system to evaluate knot tying and tested eight attending surgeons during 3 weeks of training on a surgical robot. Each performed intracorporeal knot tying tasks both before and after robotic skills training. These performances were compared to their laparoscopic knots and analyzed to determine and define skill improvement. Results: Baseline laparoscopic knot completion took 140 sec (range, 47–432), with a mean composite score of 77 (100 possible), whereas robotic knot tying took 390 sec, with a mean composite score of 40. After initial robotic training, times decreased by 65% to 139 sec and scores increased to 71. With more training, completion times and composite scores were improved and errors were reduced. Conclusion: Like any new technology, surgical robotics requires dedicated training to achieve mastery. Initially, even experienced laparoscopists may register an inferior performance. However, after adequate training, surgeons can exceed their laparoscopic performance, completing intracorporeal knots better and faster using robotics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GH Ballantyne (2002) ArticleTitleThe pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 12 1–5 Occurrence Handle12008756

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AM Derossis GM Fried M Abrahamowicz HH Sigman JS Barkun JL Meakins (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175 482–487 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00080-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czgslOjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9645777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. TR Eubanks RH Clements D Pohl N Williams DC Schaad S Horgan C Pellegrini (1999) ArticleTitleAn objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189 566–574 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00218-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FlsFGisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10589593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. A Garcia-Ruiz M Gagner JH Miller CP Steiner JF Hahn (1998) ArticleTitleManual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 133 957–961 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.9.957 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvitVaktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9749847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. LT Kohn JM Corrigan M Donaldson (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  6. MJ Mack (2001) ArticleTitleMinimally invasive and robotic surgery. JAMA 285 568–572 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.285.5.568 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7kvFKisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11176860

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MJ Moore CL Bennett (1995) ArticleTitleThe learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club. Am J Surg 170 55–59 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80252-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3MzotVc%3D Occurrence Handle7793496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D Nio WA Bemelman KT Boer MS Dunker DJ Gouma TM Gulik (2002) ArticleTitleEfficiency of manual versus robotical (Zeus) assist laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks. Surg Endosc 16 412–415 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9012-y Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387psFSitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11928018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. JC Rosser LE Rosser RS Savalgi (1997) ArticleTitleSkill acquisition and assessment for laparoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132 200–204 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiC1MvkvV0%3D Occurrence Handle9041927

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. CM Schlachta J Mamazza PA Seshadri M Cadeddu R Gregoire EC Poulin (2001) ArticleTitleDefining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum 44 217–222 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ot1Sksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11227938

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. NE Seymour AG Gallagher SA Roman MK O’Brien VK Bansal DK Andersen RM Satava (2002) ArticleTitleVirtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236 458–463 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008 Occurrence Handle12368674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. NJ Soper JG Hunter (1992) ArticleTitleSuturing and knot tying in laparoscopy. Surg Clin North Am 72 1139–1152

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strayer MP, Krause KR, Dalstrom DJ, Melvin WS (2001) Computer enhanced “robotic” telesurgery versus standard laparoscopy: performance on a skills test [Abstract]. Annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), St. Louis, MO, USA, April 2001

  14. Z Szabo J Hunter G Berci J Sackier A Cuschieri (1994) ArticleTitleAnalysis of surgical movements during suturing in laparoscopy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2 55–61 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA28zktl0%3D Occurrence Handle8081917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. P Yohannes P Rotariu P Pinto AD Smith BR Lee (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60 39–45 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the US Surgical Corporation, a division of Tyco Healthcare, and by Computer Motion, Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356410, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

    L. Chang, R. M. Satava, C. A. Pellegrini & M. N. Sinanan

Authors
  1. L. Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. M. Satava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. A. Pellegrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. N. Sinanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Chang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, L., Satava, R., Pellegrini, C. et al. Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc 17, 1744–1748 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation