Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We report the results of patients treated from January 2000 to June 2004 for full-thickness rectal prolapse with trans-abdominal surgery in Helsinki.

Methods

Sixty-five of 75 patients were treated laparoscopically, with a 6% conversion rate. Ten patients were operated on openly. Half of the patients were scored as American Society for Anesthesiologists III or IV.

Results

The operation time was similar in the laparoscopic and the open rectopexy procedures (p = 0.15), whereas laparoscopic resection rectopexy was more time-consuming compared to the open procedure (p = 0.007). Intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic surgery was minimal in comparison to open surgery (p = 0.006). Patients treated laparoscopically had a shorter median hospital stay than those treated with an open procedure (rectopexy, 3 and 7 days, respectively; resection rectopexy, 4 and 7.5 days, respectively) (p < 0.00001). There was no mortality and minor morbidity. During follow-up, there were two prolapse recurrences. All surgical techniques improved fecal continence considerably. Eighty-four percent of rectopexy patients and 92% of resection rectopexy patients considered the surgical outcome to be excellent or good.

Conclusions

Both rectopexy and resection rectopexy cure prolapse with good results and can be performed safely in older and debilitated patients. The laparoscopic approach enables a shortened hospital stay and is well tolerated in elderly patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aitola PT, Hiltunen KM, Matikainen MJ (1999) Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period: emphasis on transabdominal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 42: 655–660

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA (1995) Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection. Rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 38: 199–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S, Chang A, Darzi A (2001) Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg 182: 168–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cirocco WC, Brown AC (1993) Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20-year experience. Am Surg 59: 265–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Demirbas S, Ogun I, Celenk T, Akin ML, Erenoglu C, Yldz M (2004) Early outcomes of laparoscopic procedures performed on military personnel with total rectal prolapse and follow-up. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14: 194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1989) A comparison between Marlex and resection rectopexy. Neth J Surg 41: 136–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 79: 107–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (1997) Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 84: 904–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB (1992) Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram. Br J Surg 79: 439–440

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DC (1994) Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 743–746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M (1991) Clinical results of abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Ann Chir Gynaecol 80: 263–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M (1992) Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 7: 8–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR (1995) Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 19: 138–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Husa A, Sainio P, von Smitten K (1988) Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman–Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand 154: 221–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA (1997) The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 77: 49–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH (2003) Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short-term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 46: 353–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaiwa Y, Kurokawa Y, Namiki K, Myojin T, Ansai M, Satomi S (2004) Outcome of laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse in patients older than 70 years versus younger patients. Surg Today 34: 742–746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T (2000) Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 14: 634–640

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H (1992) Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 7: 219–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Madden MV, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Santhanam AN, Cabot R, Speakman CT (1992) Abdominal rectopexy for complete prolapse: prospective study evaluating changes in symptoms and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 35: 48–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM (1992) Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 87: 101–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Matheson DM, Keighley MR (1981) Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Gut 22: 126–129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlback SO, Holmstrom B (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 1133–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V (1988) Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 155: 206–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA (1994) Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 81: 904–906

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rose J, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Yildirim C, Bruch HP, Konradt J, Barlehner E, Kockerling F (2002) Laparoscopic treatment of rectal prolapse: experience gained in a prospective multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387: 130–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M (2004) Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 91: 1188–1191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR (1990) Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 77: 143–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30: 1737–1749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA (2002) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 89: 35–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA (1991) Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78: 1431–1433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milsom JW, Oakley JR, Lavery IC (1993) Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 36: 501–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J, Bunte H (1993) Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal prolapse. Eur J Surg 159: 301–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zittel TT, Manncke K, Haug S, Schafer JF, Kreis ME, Becker HD, Jehle EC (2000) Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 4: 632–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank information specialist Juhani Lassander, head nurses Reija Sjöholm and Marcus Nilson, as well as secretary Riitta Ristola for skillful technical assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Lapinlahdenkatu 16, 00290 HUS, Helsinki, Finland

    M. Carpelan-Holmström, O. Kruuna & T. Scheinin

Authors
  1. M. Carpelan-Holmström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Kruuna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Scheinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Carpelan-Holmström.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpelan-Holmström, M., Kruuna, O. & Scheinin, T. Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients. Surg Endosc 20, 1353–1359 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0217-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0217-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation