Skip to main content
Log in

Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period

Emphasis on transabdominal approach

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: A variety of surgical procedures have been developed to treat rectal prolapse, but there is still no consensus on the operation of choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse during an 11-year period in our department. METHODS: All patients treated for complete rectal prolapse during an 11-year period, from 1985 to 1995, in a single university hospital were included. Of the 123 patients, 22 were men, and the mean age was 59 (range, 15–88) years. The medical records of all patients were reviewed retrospectively, and a questionnaire on bowel symptoms before and after surgery was sent to all 95 living patients. RESULTS: The majority of the procedures (91 percent) were performed by abdominal approach, and the most frequently used open technique was posterior rectopexy with mesh (78 percent). Of the incontinent patients, 35 (63 percent), all those less than 40 years of age and 64 percent of those 40 years or older, were continent postoperatively (P=0.0001) after a median follow-up of five (range, 1–72) months. According to the questionnaire, after a median follow-up of 85 (range, 16–144) months, only 38 percent of the incontinent patients in the mesh or suture group, 78 percent of patients less than 40 years of age (n=18), and 52 percent of those 40 years or older (n=47) claimed to be continent postoperatively. The proportion of patients with constipation was greater after the operation than preoperatively (P=0.02) and more patients used medication for constipation after than before the operation (P=0.0001). The overall complication rate was 15 percent, and the mortality rate was 1 percent (1/123). In the mesh or suture group there were 6 (6 percent) recurrent complete prolapses and 11 (12 percent) mucous prolapses. CONCLUSION: Posterior rectopexy with mesh gave good results in our hands. Older age and longer follow-up seem to have a negative effect on the functional outcome of the operation and on the recurrence rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:49–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boylos PB, Stryker SJ, Nicholls RJ. The long term results of polyvinyl alcohol (Ivalon) sponge for rectal prolapse in young patients. Br J Surg 1984;71:213–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapse: the anatomic and functional results of treatment by an extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75:34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Husa A, Sainio P, Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Fykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:221–4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M, Auvinen O, Hietanen P. Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1986;151:489–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Clinical results of abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Ann Chir Gynecol 1991;80:263–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Järvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:219–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tjandra JJ, Fazio VW, Church JM, Milsom JW, Oakley JR, Lavery IC. Ripstein procedure is an effective treatment for rectal prolapse without constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:501–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cuschieri A, Shimi SM, Vander Velpen G, Banting S, Wood RA. Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:138–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Keighley MR. Rectal prolapse. In: Keighley MR, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London: WB Saunders, 1993:675–719.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshioka K, Heyen F, Keighley MR. Functional results after posterior abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:835–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: result of a prospective randomised study. Br J Surg 1991;78:1431–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:904–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Senapati A, Nicholls RJ, Thomson JP, Phillips RK. Results of Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse. Dis Col Rectum 1994;37:456–60.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oliver GC, Vachon D, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. Delormes's procedure for complete rectal prolapse in severely debilitated patients: an analysis of 41 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:461–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Medical Research Fund of the Tampere University Hospital.

About this article

Cite this article

Aitola, T., Hiltunen, KM. & Matikainen, M.J. Functional results of operative treatment of rectal prolapse over an 11-year period. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 655–660 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234145

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234145

Key words

Navigation