Advertisement

Computer Science - Research and Development

, Volume 33, Issue 1–2, pp 169–175 | Cite as

Integrating distribution system operator system landscapes

  • Dominik Ascher
  • Denis Bytschkow
Special Issue Paper

Abstract

With efforts to establish smart energy systems (SES), distribution system operators (DSO) have seen technological and political challenges, which will require fundamental changes towards their operational and organizational structures as well as their underlying information system landscapes. We propose a model-based approach for integrating the system landscapes of DSOs in order to establish SES and utilize domain-wide standards. For this, we define a middleware architecture, which utilizes the Common Information Model (CIM) and assists DSO system landscape migration from system landscapes employing application-specific interfaces towards system landscapes employing application-independent interfaces.

Keywords

Model-driven engineering Domain modeling Distribution system operation Smart energy systems Common information model (CIM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the results presented in this work has been conducted within the German federal research initiative Future-proof Power Grids and funding by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Andrén F, Stifter M, Strasser T (2013) Towards a semantic driven framework for smart grid applications: model-driven development using CIM, IEC 61850 and IEC 61499. Inform Spektrum 36(1):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ascher D, Hackenberg G (2016) The TRANSP-0 framework for integrated transportation and power system design. In: 2016 IEEE 19th international conference on intelligent transportation systems. IEEE, pp 945–952Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Atkinson C, Kühne T (2003) Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE software 20(5):36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bredillet P, Lambert E, Schultz E (2010) Cim, 61850, cosem standards used in a model driven integration approach to build the smart grid service oriented architecture. In: 2010 First IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm). IEEE, pp 467–471Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dänekas C, Neureiter C, Rohjans S, Uslar M, Engel D (2014) Towards a model-driven-architecture process for smart grid projects. Digit Enterp Des Manag 261:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fan Z, Kulkarni P, Gormus S, Efthymiou C, Kalogridis G, Sooriyabandara M, Zhu Z, Lambotharan S, Chin WH (2013) Smart grid communications: Overview of research challenges, solutions, and standardization activities. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(1):21–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fang X, Misra S, Xue G, Yang D (2012) Smart grid — the new and improved power grid: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 14(4):944–980Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goering A, Meister J, Lehnhoff S, Jung M, Rohr M, Herdt P (2016) Architecture and quality standards for the joint development of modular open source software for power grid distribution management systems. In: 5th DA-CH+ Energy informatics conference in conjunction with 7th symposium on communications for energy systems (ComForEn), p 36Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gungor VC, Sahin D, Kocak T, Ergut S, Buccella C, Cecati C, Hancke GP (2013) A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 9(1):28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haq E, Haller D, Rahman KA, Iverson B (2011) Use of common information model (cim) in electricity market at california iso. In: 2011 IEEE power and energy society general meeting. IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kent S (2002) Model driven engineering. In: Butler M, Petre L, Sere K (eds) Proceedings of the third international conference on integrated formal methods, IFM ’02. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp 286–298Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lara JD, Guerra E, Cuadrado JS (2014) When and how to use multilevel modelling. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol (TOSEM) 24(2):12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lefebvre T, Englert H (2013) Current and future smart grid standardization activities of IEC TC57-power system management and associated information exchange. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.iec.ch/resources/tcdash/IEC_TC57_Scope_and_current_work_2013.pdf
  14. 14.
    Object Management Group (OMG) (2006) Meta-Object Facility (MOF) Specification, Version 2.0. OMG Document Number formal/2006-01-01 (http://www.omg.org/spec/MOF/2.0)
  15. 15.
    Rohjans S, Uslar M, Bleiker R, González J, Specht M, Suding T, Weidelt T (2010) Survey of smart grid standardization studies and recommendations. In: 2010 first IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm). IEEE, pp 583–588Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shao S, Pipattanasomporn M, Rahman S (2012) Grid integration of electric vehicles and demand response with customer choice. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 3(1):543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smart Grid Coordination Group (2012) Smart grid reference architecture. CEN-CENELEC-ETSIGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uslar M, Rohjans S, Bleiker R, González J, Specht M, Suding T, Weidelt T (2010) Survey of smart grid standardization studies and recommendations–part 2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fakultät für InformatikTechnische Universität MünchenGarchingGermany
  2. 2.fortiss GmbHMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations