Paleogene phreatomagmatic volcanism on the western main fault of the northern Upper Rhine Graben (Kisselwörth diatreme and Nierstein–Astheim Volcanic System, Germany)
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Lutz, H., Lorenz, V., Engel, T. et al. Bull Volcanol (2013) 75: 741. doi:10.1007/s00445-013-0741-2
- 1.8k Downloads
At the western margin of the northern Upper Rhine Graben, Germany, six deeply eroded vents make up the Nierstein–Astheim Volcanic System. Among these vents the phreatomagmatic Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano erupted directly on, or at least very close to, the western main fault of the Upper Rhine Graben, which is still active today. This sheds new light on the early formation of one of the most conspicuous grabens of the European Cenozoic Rift System: While the oldest sediments within the northern end of the graben were biostratigraphically dated to Late Eocene/Early Oligocene (36–33 Ma), the Kisselwörth maar-diatreme was 40Ar/39Ar dated to 55.8 ± 0.2 Ma. Thus, c. 20 million years before subsidence started the western main graben fault not only provided a path for rising magma but was also hydraulically active to allow phreatomagmatic eruptions.
KeywordsPhreatomagmatic volcanism Diatreme Paleogene Upper Rhine Graben Nierstein Horst
To our knowledge, the Kisselwörth diatreme has been sampled for the first time by Karl Stapf, Mainz, in 1985. However, his specimen which is now kept in the Naturhistorisches Museum Mainz/Landessammlung für Naturkunde Rheinland-Pfalz (MNHM G 2011/131-LS) was labelled as “basalt” and has never been studied. In 2003, additional samples have been collected by the Geological Survey of Rhineland-Palatinate and were briefly studied petrographically, but they have not been discussed in a regional geological context and remained unpublished.
Materials and methods
In May and November 2011, we sampled more than 150 kg of the Kisselwörth pyroclastic rocks at 12 different locations in the diatreme where they were not covered by recent river sediments or by embankment constructions (Fig. 2). The accessible margins of the diatreme and all sampling points were mapped with a GPS receiver (Garmin GPSmap 60CSx). We also measured 43 joints scattered all over the well-exposed western part of the diatreme (Fig. 3b) and 21 joints in the adjacent Rotliegend country rock (Fig. 3c). This was done with a geological compass (Freiberger Präzisionsmechanik) and a 3-m long batten.
Rock samples were cut with a diamond saw and smoothened by hand on sandpapers and then polished with grinding powders down to a grit of 800. Photos were taken under water immersion using the digital camera Sony Nex 5. Thin sections were made with a Logitech PM4, digitally photographed with a Leica DFC 450 and finished with Leica Application Suite (LAS V.3.8). With respect to stratigraphic names and timescales we follow the monographs edited by the German Stratigraphic Commission (Deutsche Stratigraphische 2002, 2011, 2012).
Since the lapilli tuff within the maar-diatreme volcano contains amphibole phenocrysts 40Ar/39Ar dating was done on one of these phenocrysts at the BGC Berkeley Geochronology Center. The measurement yielded an integrated age of 55.8 ± 0.2 (1 sigma; Mertz DF and Renne PR, personal communication).
Petrography and lithology
The heterolithic composition of the lapilli tuff of the Kisselwörth diatreme (c. 50 % of the pyroclastic rocks consist of country rock clasts), the occurrence of sideromelane lapilli as well as the lack of vesicles in the juvenile lapilli, respectively the occurrence of only incipient vesicularity in some juvenile lapilli, all these features jointly suggest that the diatreme can be considered to have been phreatomagmatic in origin.
Tectonics and neighbouring volcanoes
Tectonics along and within the URG have intensively been studied since decades (e.g. Illies and Fuchs 1974; Schmitt 1974a; Stapf 1988; Dürr and Grimm 2011). Nevertheless, it has remained unclear why the Rotliegend sediments of the Nierstein Horst c. 250 m to the west of the Kisselwörth diatreme continue towards the northeast into the Astheim Block which has been eroded intensively by the Rhine River and is covered by several meters of Pleistocene and Holocene Rhine sediments today (Schmitt and Meisl 1974). The north-western and south-eastern margins of this Astheim Block are well documented by a large number of boreholes (Schmitt 1974a) and show three major fault directions (Fig. 3a). Its south-eastern margin is defined as the western main fault of the URG and strikes in a Rhenish direction, i.e. NNE/SSW. The other faults show Variscan (NE-SW) and Eggish (NNW-SSE, 160–175°) directions. The same structural trends are also shown by the joints within the diatreme lapilli tuff (Fig. 4b). Though it is not the most prominent one within the diatreme, the Eggish direction is of special interest since “it shows a very characteristic connection with magmatic activities” (Richter-Bernburg 1974, 20), an observation which also applies to the region studied in this paper.
The joints in the surrounding country rock predominantly follow the Hercynian direction (NW-SE, 110–130°) while the Variscan and Rhenish directions occur only subordinately (Fig. 4c). Hercynian faults are frequently observed in the Mainz Basin (Falke 1960) and are common in the adjacent Saar–Nahe Basin, where they are oriented perpendicular to its long axis (e.g. Schindler 2007). The maximum compressive component of the present regional stress field (Baumann and Illies 1983; Sass et al. 2011) corresponds with this Hercynian orientation of the joints in the Rotliegend country rocks. Despite the fact that in the Central European Volcanic Province Hercynian faults generally show the highest frequency being followed by Rhenish and Eggish directions (39, 24 and 23 %: Richter-Bernburg 1974, 17), they are practically absent within the diatreme (Fig. 3b).
Thus, the joints within the lapilli tuff of the diatreme at the level of its actual transect reflect the regional tectonic development in a changing regional stress field since its consolidation. Since tuff within a diatreme subsides and alters diagenetically over millions of years (Suhr et al. 2006, 2012), it is likely that the joints measured developed long after the eruption of the Kisselwörth volcano. It seems that the Hercynian faults which are dominating in the surrounding regions had no influence on the formation of joints within the diatreme, i.e. these faults have possibly not been active within the last c. 35–55 Ma. The Variscan faults, however, are dominating the joint pattern in the lapilli tuff indicating that this direction plays an important role until today.
In addition, we can ascertain that the joints inside the diatreme do not result from syn- or posteruptive subsidence as one might have expected since this would have produced at least some radial and concentric joints, i.e. joints running parallel to the diatreme walls (Suhr et al. 2006, 2012).
There are five other vents associated with the Kisselwörth diatreme that have been discovered (Fig. 4a): Near its northern margin the Rotliegend sediments of the Astheim Block host a c. 90 × 60 m large plug of nepheline-analcime-leucite-basanite composition (Schmitt and Meisl 1974, 32), trapezoidally elongated in an Eggish direction (NNW-SSE). It is covered by up to 4.4 m of Pleistocene and Holocene fluvial sand and gravel (Schmitt and Meisl 1974, 32). We assume that the emplacement of this plug followed the initial formation of a maar-diatreme volcano into which the plug could intrude in a second magmatic phase.
Three more vents have been found in 1957 and 1972–1973 during excavation activities to deepen the Rhine river bed. Unfortunately, of none of them we know the diameter. One of them, near the southern tip of the Nonnenau/Jakobsbergerau Island, has been described as an alkali-basaltic dyke or plug (Schmitt and Meisl 1974, 33) while the two others have been classified as strongly weathered basaltic rocks and were tentatively interpreted as melaphyre (Schmitt 1974b), i.e. a volcanic rock typical for the Lower Permian in the Saar–Nahe Basin. Unfortunately, no further details are known about these outcrops. In contrast to Schmitt’s assumption that these tuff outcrops could be weathered Permian melaphyre we consider that they are most likely of Tertiary age, too. Our reason is that no volcanic activity has been recorded so far for the Late Rotliegend. During formation of the Saar–Nahe Basin volcanic activity is only known from the volcanic syn-rift stage, i.e. the Lower Permian Donnersberg-Formation (e.g. Lorenz and Haneke 2004). The top of the Donnersberg Formation in drill-hole Olm 1 (c. 11.7 km WNW of the Kisselwörth diatreme) lies 1,284 m beneath sediments which tentatively have been interpreted as the Nierstein Formation. On the other hand, basaltic dykes and vents of Tertiary age are known to occur within the Rotliegend (and other) country rocks of different stratigraphic position at many places around the URG (Anderle 1974; Liebig and Gruber 2002; Schindler 2007; Becker at al. 2012).
Taking all this into account, we consider volcanoes associated with the Kisselwörth diatreme on the Nierstein Horst and on the Astheim Block to be Tertiary in age. The two strongly weathered tuff outcrops in the river bed are interpreted as diatremes which together with the basalt plug are aligned along a NNW-SSE trending Eggish lineament. Therefore, we suppose that they have erupted on a fault which separates the Astheim Block from the Nierstein Horst. This fault has already been postulated and mapped by Stoltz (1909) but has not been shown on later maps. Like the western main fault also this fault is assumed to have been, at least partly, hydraulically active allowing for potential phreatomagmatic eruptions.
This fault would also allow understanding why Pleistocene and Holocene sediments of the Rhine River are covering the spur-like Astheim Block while the adjacent Rotliegend rocks of the Nierstein Horst form a steep cuesta. Both behaved in a tectonically different fashion. Since any lithostratigraphic information is missing it remains unclear how much the Astheim Block subsided with respect to the Nierstein Horst and/or how much the latter has been uplifted relative to the Astheim block.
Only 1.3 km southwest of Kisselwörth—on top of the Nierstein Horst (field name “Auf der Schmidt”)—in the early nineteenth century basalt of Eocene age (“Limburgit” in Schmitt and Meisl 1974) associated with tuff (Noeggerath 1842; Ludwig 1864) had been quarried. This was dated to 47.51 Ma (Lippolt et al. 1974). This outcrop was abandoned and filled with waste in the late nineteenth century. Fortunately, an old vineyard was cleared in 2011 bringing to daylight a large number of basalt, tuff fragments and small boulders that subsequently have been sampled. Two different types of calcitic joint fillings (fibrous and sparry) were also sampled that compare well with those described by Noeggerath (1842, 360). Thus, all regional volcanic occurrences, where tuffs similar to the Kisselwörth diatreme have been found, point to phreatomagmatic activities, i.e. an explosive magma–groundwater interaction.
Reconstruction of the Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano
Today, the eroded diatreme has a diameter of c. 150 m. Assuming an angle of 80° for its inner walls (hard rocks), we obtain a depth of c. 425 m for the bottom of the cone-shaped diatreme. Assuming a wall angle of 75°, the diatreme would have had a depth of c. 280 m, and with an angle of 85° it might have reached c. 860 m. Below the lower diatreme end the root zone could have extended downwards for another several tens to several hundred meters (Lorenz and Kurszlaukis 2007). The Nierstein Formation reaches at least 770 m in thickness whereas the Standenbühl Formation may be 1,500 to 1,700 m thick (Boy et al. 2005, 2012; Schindler 2007). Only 11.7 km WNW of Kisselwörth, the research drill hole Olm 1 did not reach the base of Rotliegend sediments (final depth, 3,069.2 m). Thus, the preserved Rotliegend has a thickness of more than 2,900 m. Based on a correlation of the Olm 1 drill hole with four other drill holes located within the URG, a total thickness of 2,000–3,000 m has been reconstructed for the Rotliegend in the studied area (Becker et al. 2012). This implies that the lower diatreme end and even its underlying root zone are located within Rotliegend country rocks as indicated by absence of accessory lithic clasts from older stratigraphic units.
We can estimate the size of the preserved parts of the Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano. But how much has been eroded from its upper levels since its formation remains uncertain. As the lapilli tuff contains only xenolithic clasts from Rotliegend sediments, these must have reached the syneruptive surface. Since there is no indication of an additional fault between the Kisselwörth diatreme and the Nierstein Horst cuesta, which is only c. 250 m to the west, the diatreme must have been eroded for at least the difference between its actual top at 82 m a.s.l. and the preserved top of the Nierstein Horst at 172 m a.s.l., i.e., by at least 90 m. If we take the height of the Nierstein Horst in the SW near Hillesheim (230 m a.s.l. in a distance of 15.3 km) or even further to the SW between Gau-Heppenheim and Hochborn (293 m a.s.l., distance, 22 km) we can expect a post-eruptive erosion of at least 210 m. However, we have to take into account that over this distance the horst is cut by several (Eggish) faults increasing this uncertainty of how many meters the syneruptive surface has been eroded during the last 55 Ma. Post-eruptive erosion took place during a first phase until subsidence started c. 35 Ma ago. Since then the Nierstein Horst has been covered by up to 270 m of Tertiary sediments (Sonne 1969). Sedimentation continued until the Late Early Miocene (Burdigalian, c. 20 Ma) when the Nierstein Horst was uplifted and gradually denuded from its Tertiary sediment cover. The main uplift occurred as late as in the Pleistocene (Fuchs et al. 1983). Thus, erosion affected the Kisselwörth diatreme for a second time mainly within the last 2–3 Ma, a fact which might explain the rather fresh appearance of hornblende phenocrysts in the diatreme lapilli tuff.
On the Sprendlingen Horst c. 30 km east of Kisselwörth, i.e. on the corresponding eastern shoulder of the URG and northern continuation of the Odenwald Mountains with a tectonic history similar to that of the Nierstein Horst, the Middle Eocene (47 Ma) Messel Maar also contains pyroclastic rocks in its diatreme without any country-rock clasts younger than Rotliegend. This also applies to the Steinbuckel volcano, c. 8.5 km SSW of Messel, where only contact-metamorphosed blocks of Rotliegend sediments have been found enclosed in a columnar jointed nepheline-basanite (e.g. Klemm 1910). For this volcano K-Ar dating indicates an age near the Eocene–Oligocene transition of c. 35 Ma (Horn et al. 1972; Lippolt et al. 1974; Nickel et al. 1979). The lack of sediment clasts younger than Rotliegend above the mentioned diatremes documents that all Mesozoic sediments which had been deposited in this part of Germany, i.e. at the northern end of the URG south of the Hunsrück–Taunus fault and between the Mainz Basin in the west and the north-western Spessart Mountains in the east, have been eroded completely until the late Paleocene. Since then Rotliegend rocks formed erosional surface of the landscape.
For the Messel Maar we have to reckon a post-eruptive erosion of 380 m or more, as recently reconstructed by Büchel et al. (2010). Thus, the question arises if we have to expect more than 380 m of post-eruptive erosion for the Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano since it is 8 Ma older than Messel.
The Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano and the initial formation of the Upper Rhine Graben
The Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano is 55.8 ± 0.2 Ma old, i.e. the volcano erupted near the Paleocene/Eocene boundary. This was well before the start of sedimentation indicating initial rifting in the southernmost URG between the Black Forest and the Vosges Mountains. There, terrestrial sediments are up to 52 Ma old while limnic sedimentation started 46 Ma ago. First brackish conditions established later around 45 Ma (e.g. Grimm et al. 2011). This onset of an initial graben formation in the southern URG is predated by volcanic activity at Trois Epis near Colmar on the eastern flank of the Vosges Mountains. Here, by 40Ar/39Ar single crystal laser dating of amphibole phenocrysts from an olivine-melilitite dyke an age of 60.9 ± 0.6 Ma has been determined. This predates first subsidence in this region by c. 15 Ma (Keller et al. 2002; Wilson & Downes 2006).
At the northern end of the URG subsidence started much later: First limnic sediments occurred at c. 35 Ma and first brackish 2 Ma later (e.g. Grimm et al. 2011). Thus, the eruption of the Kisselwörth maar-diatreme volcano predates the start of subsidence-inducing rifting in the northern URG by c. 20 Ma and the first subsidence at the southern end of the URG still by c. 10 Ma.
As far as we know today, the Kisselwörth diatreme is the only volcano that erupted on a fault which later became the western main fault of the URG. This implies that this fault enabled the rise of magma and was at the same time already under tension and consequently at least locally hydraulically active allowing explosive phreatomagmatic activity long before this fault became the western main fault of the graben. Of course, this also applies to the three volcanoes on the Eggish striking fault separating the Nierstein Horst from the Astheim Block.
Implications and perspectives
Wherever Pre-Tertiary rocks, i.e. mostly Rotliegend sediments (at the horsts of Hillesheim, Nierstein and Sprendlingen) but also rocks of the crystalline Variscan basement (e.g. the granitic Melibocus Mountain at the western edge of the Odenwald Mountains) and metamorphic Lower Devonian sandstones (i.e. the Taunus quartzite in the Hunsrück–Taunus Mountain Range) are cropping out today at the northern end of the URG, we find a considerable number of deeply eroded Paleogene volcanoes (basaltic dykes, plugs and diatremes). This suggests that many more of such eroded Paleogene volcanoes might exist below Oligocene and younger sediments of both the URG and the Mainz Basin as already assumed by Liebig and Gruber (2002).
A nice example for such a volcano is provided by the oil exploration drill hole Stockstadt-5 which penetrated “oilshale” at a depth of 1,709–1,723 m in the early 1950s (Straub 1955). This site is located c. 20 km south-east of the Kisselwörth diatreme in the URG. Comparing the log of the c. 60 m described by Straub (1955) with sediment cores that have been drilled in Tertiary maar lake deposits in recent years (e.g. Mingram 1998; Pirrung 1998; Fischer et al. 2000; Schulz et al. 2002; Pirrung et al. 2003; Goth and Suhr 2007; Kaulfuss et al. 2008; Lutz et al. 2010), it seems at least highly conceivable that drill hole Stockstadt-5 by chance penetrated into the sediments of the early stages of a Late Middle to Upper Eocene maar lake (age assignment is based on palynological evidence analysed by V. Wilde and M. Hottenrott, personal communication, April 2012). Since this “maar-hypothesis” has been proposed for the Stockstadt-5 location, it turned out that the Stockstadt-5 cores are in parts still stored in the core repository of the ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH. With kind permission we recently studied and sampled the remaining cores and now can confirm this interpretation (to be published elsewhere).
Over a time span of possibly up to 10 Ma this Eocene Stockstadt-5 maar-diatreme volcano was eroded down to its early lake beds when, due to the onset of subsidence of the northern URG, it discordantly was covered by younger sediments, i.e. Pechelbronn beds of Late Eocene (Upper Priabonian) to Early Oligocene (Lower Rupelian) age (c. 35 Ma). During that time not only the tuff ring and the syneruptive surface but also all juvenile volcanics in the tuffitic sediments surrounding the central argillaceous organic rich crater lake sediments as a coarse marginal facies and presumably also the upper parts of the diatreme tuff underlying these lake sediments had already weathered to clays as it is the case for the 44 Ma old Eckfeld Maar (e.g. Pirrung et al. 2003, Lutz et al. 2010). Due to the load of the c. 1,700-m thick Post-Eocene sediments, the “oilshale” facies has been compressed, dehydrated (today it consists of up to 90 % of organic matter: Straub 1955) and the weathered volcanic clasts have been altered diagenetically. The sediments underlying this oilshale are by no means ascertained as in situ Rotliegend as Straub (1955) had supposed. Instead, these sediments are typical for the early stages of maar lakes when gravity induced event sedimentation (debris flows, turbidity currents) prevails (e.g. Fischer et al. 2000).
Like the Kisselwörth and the Stockstadt-5 maar-diatreme volcanoes such volcanoes are potential sources for radiometric or biostratigraphical age determinations and, considering their individual stage of erosion and lithostratigraphically relevant xenolithic clasts, they provide a time frame for the evolution of the regional palaeorelief since the Late Cretaceous.
Last but not least, for the planning of future research drill holes it seems of high interest to keep in mind the possibility of more or less eroded Paleogene maar-diatreme volcanoes, tuff rings and scoria cones hidden today by a sequence of up to 3,000-m thick younger sediments in the URG. This applies for drill holes for geothermal energy since the hydrology within diatremes filled with tuff and surrounded by a halo of fragmented country rock differs considerably from undisturbed country rock. It also applies if research drill holes are carried out with the aim of detecting crude oil resources, because it likewise should be taken into account that drilling into bituminous sediments of a former maar lake ends without any commercial value.
We enjoyed various support from the “Ministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Weiterbildung und Kultur Rheinland-Pfalz” represented by the “Generaldirektion Kulturelles Erbe Rheinland-Pfalz”, the “Ministerium für Wirtschaft, Klimaschutz, Energie und Landesplanung Rheinland-Pfalz” and the “Ministerium des Innern, für Sport und Infrastruktur Rheinland-Pfalz”. Harald Brock (Water Police Rheinland-Pfalz) and Ingo Braun (Police Rheinland-Pfalz, Helicopter Squadron Winningen) helped us unconventionally. Dieter Mertz (Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz) and Paul Renne (BGC Berkeley Geochronology Center) provided an unpublished age determination, and Volker Wilde (Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Frankfurt a. M.) and Martin Hottenrott (Hessisches Landesamt für Umwelt und Geologie, Wiesbaden) provided palynological age assignments for the Stockstadt-5 oilshale. Michael Greller and Winfried Kuhn (both “Landesamt für Geologie und Bergbau Rheinland-Pfalz”) assisted with first petrographic analyses and photos. Georg Meyer (Mainz) called one of us (HL) in 2003 to pay attention to the Kisselwörth locality and Gabriele Gruber (Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt) provided information on the Sprendlingen Horst and the Messel Maar. Franz-Jürgen Harms (Hannover) drew our attention to the still existing cores from drill hole Stockstadt-5 and participated in their first examination. ExxonMobil Production Deutschland GmbH kindly permitted and supported our studies of these important cores. All this generous help and cooperation are gratefully acknowledged. Last but not least our sincerest thanks go to two anonymous reviewers for their critical and constructive comments and for linguistic corrections and to James D.L. White, Executive Editor, and Károly Nemeth, Associate Editor, for additional precious suggestions.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.