Abstract
Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) represent a key threat for millions of humans and animals worldwide, vectoring important pathogens and parasites, including malaria, dengue, filariasis, and Zika virus. Besides mosquito-borne diseases, cancers figure among the leading causes of mortality worldwide. It is expected that annual cancer cases will rise from 14 million in 2012 to 22 million within the next two decades. Notably, there are few contrasting evidences of the relationship between cancer and mosquito-borne diseases, with special reference to malaria. However, analogies at the cellular level for the two diseases were reported. Recently, a significant association of malaria incidence with all cancer mortality in 50 USA states was highlighted and may be explained by the ability of Plasmodium to induce suppression of the immune system. However, it was hypothesized that Anopheles vectors may transmit obscure viruses linked with cancer development. The possible activation of cancer pathways by mosquito feeding events is not rare. For instance, the hamster reticulum cell sarcoma can be transmitted through the bites of Aedes aegypti by a transfer of tumor cells. Furthermore, mosquito bites may influence human metabolic pathways following different mechanisms, leading to other viral infections and/or oncogenesis. Hypersensitivity to mosquito bites is routed by a unique pathogenic mechanism linking Epstein–Barr virus infection, allergy, and oncogenesis. During dengue virus infection, high viral titers, macrophage infiltration, and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in the local tissues are the three key important events that lead to hemorrhage. Overall, basic epidemiological knowledge on the relationships occurring between mosquito vector activity and the spread of cancer is urgently needed, as well as detailed information about the ability of Culicidae to transfer viruses or tumor cells among hosts over time. Current evidences on nanodrugs with multipotency against mosquito-borne diseases and cancers are reviewed, with peculiar attention to their mechanisms of action.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) represent a key threat for millions of humans and animals worldwide, since they act as vectors for important pathogens and parasites, including agents of malaria, yellow fever, dengue, West Nile fever, chikungunya, filariasis, and Zika virus (Jensen and Mehlhorn 2009; Dobler and Aspöck 2010; Mehlhorn et al. 2012; Liang et al. 2015; Benelli and Mehlhorn 2016; Li et al. 2016; Pastula et al. 2016; Saxena et al. 2016). Therefore, the development of effective and eco-friendly control tools against Culicidae populations is a challenge of huge public health importance (Benelli 2015a, b). Malaria killed an estimated 306,000 under-fives globally, including 292,000 children in the African region. Between 2000 and 2015, the mortality rate among children fewer than five fell by 65 % worldwide and by 71 % in Africa (White 2015; WHO 2015a). Furthermore, 390 million dengue infections per year (95 % credible interval 284–528 million) have been calculated, of which 96 million (67–136 million) manifest clinically (with any severity of disease) (Bhatt et al. 2013). An additional research on the prevalence of dengue estimates that 3900 million people, in 128 countries, are at risk of infection with dengue viruses (Brady et al. 2012).
The recent outbreaks of Zika virus infection mainly vectored by Aedes mosquitoes, occurring in South America, Central America, and the Caribbean, represents the most recent public health challenge in this field (Attar 2016; Benelli and Mehlhorn 2016). Even if Zika symptoms last only a few days in adult persons and are similar to other arbovirus infections, such as dengue (i.e., fever, skin rashes, conjunctivitis, muscle and joint pain, malaise, and headache), the surveys conducted on the high numbers of cases of Zika virus infections in French Polynesia (2013) and Brazil (2015) highlighted potential neurological and autoimmune complications. Indeed, during the Zika virus outbreaks in French Polynesia, a concomitant epidemic of 73 cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome and other neurologic conditions was observed in a population of about 270,000 people (Oehler et al. 2014). In northeast Brazil, during 2015, the increase in Zika virus infections has been reported in close concurrence of an increase in babies born with microcephaly. However, further research is urgently needed to shed light on the relationship between these potential complications and Zika virus infections (Benelli and Mehlhorn 2016).
Besides mosquito-borne diseases, cancers figure among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with approximately 14 million new cases and 8.2 million cancer-related deaths in 2012 (WHO 2015b). Among men, the five most common sites of cancer diagnosed in 2012 were lung, prostate, colorectum, stomach, and liver. Among women, the five most common diagnoses were breast, colorectum, lung, cervix, and stomach cancer. More than 60 % of world’s total new annual cases occur in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America. These regions account for 70 % of the world’s cancer deaths. It is expected that annual cancer cases will rise from 14 million in 2012 to 22 million within the next two decades (WHO 2015b; Murugan et al. 2016).
Mosquito-borne diseases and cancer: what do we really know?
To the best of our knowledge, there are rather few studies concerning the relationship between some types of cancer and mosquito-borne diseases, with special reference to malaria. Suresh et al. (2005) reported analogies at the cellular level for the two diseases, while Welsh et al. (1976) observed no relationship between malaria rates and primary liver cancer. The association between malaria and cancer mortality may be explained by the well-established ability of Plasmodium to induce suppression of the immune system. However, a second explanation has been recently published by Lehrer (2010a, b) hypothesizing that the Anopheles mosquitoes, which include vectors of malaria (Fig. 1a), might represent a source of brain tumor viruses. The evidence of an association of Anopheles bites with brain tumors was outlined in the relationship between malaria outbreaks in USA (Skarbinski et al. 2006) and reports of brain tumor incidence (CBTRUS 2008). Indeed, a significant association between US malaria outbreaks in 2004 and the reports of brain tumor incidence 2000–2004 from 19 USA states was highlighted by Lehrer (2010a, b), which also pointed out highly significant correlations between malaria and malignant brain tumors, as well as malaria and benign brain tumors. Since the increased numbers of both malaria cases and brain tumors could be due solely to the fact that some states, such as New York, have much larger populations than other states, such as North Dakota, multiple linear regression was performed with number of brain tumors as the dependent variable and malaria and population as independent variables. The effect of malaria was significant and independent of the effect of population (Lehrer 2010a). More generally, it was found a significant association of malaria incidence with all cancer mortality in 50 US states and the District of Columbia. The association was independent of state population size, percentage black population by state, and median population age (Lehrer 2010b). In this scenario, it was formulated that Anopheles mosquito may be able to transmit an obscure virus that initially causes only a mild transitory illness but much later induces a brain tumor (Lehrer 2010a). Further research on this point is urgently needed since, if the mosquito-transmitted brain tumor viruses will be identified, the development of a brain tumor vaccine might be possible (Lehrer 2010a).
Although Anopheles mosquitoes are mainly known as the vectors of malaria parasites, they may also spread arboviruses, including those of the West Nile fever and Japanese encephalitis, while Aedes mosquitoes act as vectors of a wider range of arboviruses, such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika virus (Attar 2016; Fauci and Morens 2016; Li et al. 2016; Pastula et al. 2016; Rodriguez-Morales et al. 2016). Concerning Aedes mosquitoes and cancer, the hamster reticulum cell sarcoma, TM, can be transmitted through the mosquito vector Aedes aegypti (Fig. 1b) by a transfer of tumor cells (Banfield et al. 1965, 1966). Tumor cells of TM remained viable up to 8 h after the ingestion by Ae. aegypti adults. Feeding on or off the tumor did not influence the rate of transmission (i.e., 10 % in a series of experiments and 5 % in another) (Banfield et al. 1966). Tumor cells were transmitted by 1 to 2 % of the mosquitoes. Notably, an attempt to transmit the Rauscher virus leukemia by Ae. aegypti failed, and there is no evidence of immunity to the Rauscher virus conferred by a subclinical infection. In addition, there is no evidence of multiplication in Ae. aegypti of an agent from TM or of the Rauscher virus (Banfield et al. 1966, but see also Kilham 1955).
However, mosquito bites may influence human metabolic pathways following different mechanisms and leading to other viral infections and/or oncogenesis. For instance, the Epstein–Barr virus-related Burkitt’s lymphoma is believed to require cofactors, such as components occurring during malaria infections, for tumor development (Usherwood et al. 1996). Later on, a further example has been elucidated by Tokura et al. (2001) and Asada (2007), which reviewed the hypersensitivity to mosquito bites as a unique pathogenic mechanism linking Epstein–Barr virus infection, allergy, and oncogenesis. Hypersensitivity to mosquito bites is a disorder reported to occur in Japanese patients (being proven in 58 patients by Tokura et al. 2001 in the first two decades of life). The skin lesion at bite sites is typically a bulla that develops into necrosis. Patients simultaneously exhibit high temperatures and general malaise and subsequently may develop lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly (Tokura et al. 2001). Half of the patients reported died as a consequence of a hemophagocytic syndrome or due to lymphocyte proliferative disorders. Clinical and laboratory studies showed that the hypersensitivity to mosquito bites occurs in association with natural killer (NK) cell lymphocytosis related to chronic Epstein–Barr virus infection (Tsuge et al. 1999; Kawa et al. 2001; Tokura et al. 2001; Asada 2007). Recent studies investigated the unique pathogenic mechanism of this mysterious disease and demonstrated the close relationship between the hypersensitivity to mosquito bites and Epstein–Barr virus-carrying NK cell lymphocytosis, i.e., CD4+ T cells from the patients markedly responded to mosquito salivary gland extracts, and the CD4+ T cells stimulated by mosquito bites may play a crucial role in the development of hypersensitivity to mosquito bites and NK cell oncogenesis. This occurs apparently via the induction of Epstein–Barr virus reactivation and Epstein–Barr virus-oncogene expression, respectively (Asada 2007).
With respect to dengue virus infections, Espina et al. (2003) observed an increased number of apoptotic cells and increased production of tumor necrosis factor alpha in dengue (serotype DEN-2)-infected human monocyte cultures, with no increase in production of nitric oxide. These findings were related to early primary dengue viral infection, during which the dengue virus could induce apoptosis in monocytes, but monocytes may contribute to host defense mechanisms against viruses by viral phagocytosis, phagocytosis of infected apoptotic cells, and the release of proinflammatory cytokines (Espina et al. 2003). Later on, Chen et al. (2007) shed further light on this issue, observing that high viral DEN-2 titer, macrophage infiltration, and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in the local tissues are three important events that lead to hemorrhages. In vitro assays highlighted that mouse primary microvascular endothelial cells were susceptible to dengue viruses but that tumor necrosis factor alpha enhanced dengue virus-induced apoptosis. Therefore, intra-dermal inoculation of high titers of dengue virus predisposes endothelial cells to be susceptible to tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced cell death, which leads to endothelium damage and hemorrhage development (Chen et al. 2007; Yen et al. 2008).
Multipotent nanodrugs in the fight against cancer and mosquito-borne diseases
To combat mosquito-borne diseases and cancer outbreaks, a growing number of nanodrugs, including those synthesized using natural products, have been investigated separately against the cancer cells, mosquito vectors, and mosquito-borne diseases (i.e., mainly against Plasmodium parasites and dengue DEN-2 serotypes) (Majumder 2006; Barik et al. 2008; Benelli 2016a, b). However, to the best of our knowledge, limited information is available about nanoformulates synthesized using natural products showing multipotency against both public health concerns (Jaganathan et al. 2016).
Concerning plant-borne molecules, a noteworthy study case is represented by artesunate, a semi-synthetic derivative of artemisinin (the active principle of Artemisia annua), which has remarkable activity against multidrug-resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax. Efferth et al. (2001) studied artesunate for its anticancer activity against 55 cell lines of the Developmental Therapeutics Program of the National Cancer Institute, USA. Notably, artesunate was the most active against leukemia and colon cancer cell lines (mean GI50 values 1.11 ± 0.56 and 2.13 ± 0.74 μM, respectively). Non-small cell lung cancer cell lines showed the highest mean GI50 value (25.62 ± 14.95 μM) indicating the lowest sensitivity toward artesunate in this test panel. Intermediate GI50 values were obtained for melanomas, breast, ovarian, prostate, CNS, and renal cancer cell lines (Efferth et al. 2001; Efferth 2006; Chaturvedi et al. 2010).
As regards to nanodrugs, Rajasekharreddy and Rani (2014) proposed an eco-friendly process for the synthesis of silver-(protein-lipid) nanoparticles (Ag-PL NPs) (core shell) using the seed extract from wild Indian almond tree, Sterculia foetida. MTT assays testing the S. foetida-synthesized Ag-PL NPs on cervical cancer cell lines (HeLa) showed that HeLa cell proliferation was significantly inhibited (N90%) by Ag-PL NPs at the dose of 16 μg/ml at 24 h for nanoparticles synthesized at the temperature of 80 °C. Post-exposure to 1, 2, and 4 mg/ml of Ag-PL NPs, HeLa cell toxicity was ~15, 35, and 55 %. Post-exposure to 8 and 16 mg/ml of Ag-PL NPs, key morphological changes such as cell shrinking, rounding, and partial detachment, which may be due to the Ag-PL NP penetration through the ion channels, have been observed (Rajasekharreddy and Rani 2014). Furthermore, these Ag-PL NPs showed LC50 values lower than 4.5 ppm against larvae of Anopheles stephensi, Ae. aegypti, and Culex quinquefasciatus (Rajasekharreddy and Rani 2014).
Later on, titanium dioxide nanoparticles produced via hydrothermal synthesis exhibited dose-dependent cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and normal breast epithelial cells (HBL-100). After 24-h incubation, the inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were 60 and 80 μg/ml, for MCF-7 and normal HBL-100 cells, respectively (Murugan et al. 2016). Morphological changes were observed in nanoparticle-treated MCF-7 cells when compared with untreated cells. The most relevant morphological changes of titanium dioxide nanoparticle-treated cells observed in this study were the cytoplasmic condensation, cell shrinkage, production of numerous cell surface protuberances at the plasma membrane, and the aggregation of the nuclear chromatin into dense masses beneath the nuclear membrane (Murugan et al. 2016). Induction of apoptosis was evidenced by acridine orange (AO)/ethidium bromide (EtBr) and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) staining. Acridine orange penetrated the normal cell membrane, and the cells were observed as green fluorescence. Apoptotic cells and apoptotic bodies were formed because of nuclear shrinkage and blebbing and were observed as orange-colored bodies, whereas necrotic cells were observed as red color fluorescence due to their loss of membrane integrity when viewed under a fluorescence microscope (Murugan et al. 2016). The nanoparticle-induced nuclear fragmentation can be observed when DAPI staining. The untreated cells showed normal nuclei, whereas after treatment of MCF-7 cells with titanium dioxide nanoparticles, the apoptotic nuclei (condensed or fragmented chromatin) were observed. Nuclear morphology analysis showed characteristic apoptotic changes, such as chromatin condensation, fragmentation of the nucleus, and formation of apoptotic bodies in the MCF-7 cells (Murugan et al. 2016). Similarly, Sanpui et al. (2011) also showed that silver nanoparticles could induce DNA damage and apoptosis in cancer cells. In a recent study by Murugan et al. (2016), increasing the concentration of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, the number of apoptotic cells increased, suggesting that these nanoparticles induce cell apoptosis. Cell death via apoptosis is an important event in a number of immunological processes, as most of the anticancer drugs are believed to trigger apoptosis via a mitochondria-mediated pathway (Shanthi et al. 2015). Therefore, it has been proposed that, as a new hybrid system, titanium dioxide nanoparticles might also initiate the apoptosis via mitochondria-mediated pathway. This may be linked to the changes of the levels of mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic protein cytochrome c and β-actin. Western blot was used to confirm cell apoptosis, analyzing the expression profiles of cytochrome c and β-actin. Western blot revealed the activation of cytochrome c expression profiles of these proteins in MCF-7 cells treated with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. The expression of the cytochrome c proteins was significantly upregulated in cells cultured with titanium dioxide nanoparticles for 24 h when compared to untreated control β-actin (Murugan et al. 2016). In agreement with these data, the expression of both mRNA and protein levels of cell cycle checkpoint gene p53 and proapoptotic gene (Bax and caspase-3) upregulated and Bcl-2 downregulated in HepG2 cell due to silica nanoparticle exposure (Gopinath et al. 2010).
Concerning the antivectorial potential of the abovementioned titanium dioxide nanoparticles, which was tested in larvicidal and pupicidal experiments conducted against the primary dengue mosquito Ae. aegypti, TiO2 nanoparticles were highly effective against young instars, showing LC50 values of 4.02 ppm (larva I), 4.962 ppm (larva II), 5.671 ppm (larva III), 6.485 ppm (larva IV), and 7.527 ppm (pupa). These findings highlighted that titanium dioxide nanoparticles may be considered as a novel tool to build safer and highly effective mosquito larvicides and pupicides, as well as chemotherapeutic agents with little systemic toxicity (Murugan et al. 2016).
Notably, earthworm-based silver nanoparticles have been recently synthesized using Eudrilus eugeniae and tested against HepG2 cells (Jaganathan et al. 2016), a highly differentiated human hepatoma cell line that retains many of the cellular functions often lost by cells in culture (Knowles et al. 1980), including some of the xenobiotic metabolizing capacity of normal hepatocytes (Bao et al. 2012). Earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles achieved an IC50 value of 25.96 μg/ml against HepG2 cells. This value falls within the standard limit of activity established by the American National Cancer Institute guidelines (i.e., 30 mg/ml after an exposure time of 24 h) (Suffness and Pezzuto 1990). Analysis of DNA content revealed that earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles could induce apoptosis of HepG2 cells and showed a dose-dependent response when compared to control. The difference in apoptotic rates was significantly increased with increasing concentration (Jaganathan et al. 2016; Murugan et al. 2016). Since nuclear fragmentation is a hallmark of apoptosis, the nuclear DNA staining is a measure of cells treated with sample and serves as an indicator of cell apoptosis (Bao et al. 2012). Jaganathan et al. (2016) showed that, owing to the reduced DNA content, apoptotic cells were separated from normal cells by flow cytometry at 488 nm. The apoptosis in HepG2 cell lines was induced by nanoparticle treatment. At doses from 1.88 to 30 μg/ml, the apoptotic percentage among tested cells increased significantly from 1.6 to 7.8 %. Therefore, it was hypothesized that earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles may lead to a decline in cell proliferation by enhancing the apoptosis by initiating Bax/Bcl-2/cytochrome c/caspase-3 signaling pathway of hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (Jaganathan et al. 2016). However, further studies using in vivo mice models are ongoing to establish these nanocomposites as safe and effective agents for hepatocarcinoma therapy.
With respect to the antiplasmodial potential, Jaganathan et al. (2016) showed that the earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles were toxic against CQ-resistant (CQ-r) and CQ-sensitive (CQ-s) strains of P. falciparum. The IC50 earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles were 49.3 μg/ml (CQ-s) and 55.5 μg/ml (CQ-r), while chloroquine IC50 were 81.5 μg/ml (CQ-s) and 86.5 μg/ml (CQ-r). Moreover, acute toxicity of the earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles was reported toward young instars of the malaria vector An. stephensi. LC50 were 4.8 ppm (larva I), 5.8 ppm (larva II), 6.9 ppm (larva III), 8.5 ppm (larva IV), and 15.5 ppm (pupa). Notably, little non-target effects of earthworm-synthesized silver nanoparticles against mosquito natural enemies were found. Indeed, the predation efficiency of the mosquitofish Gambusia affinis toward the II and II instar larvae of An. stephensi was 68.50 % (II) and 47.00 % (III), respectively, while in nanoparticle-contaminated environments, predation was boosted to 89.25 % (II) and 70.75 % (III), respectively. Taken all together, these findings show that earthworm-synthesized silver nanocomposites may be potentially helpful to develop novel drugs against hepatocellular carcinoma, P. falciparum parasites, and Anopheles vectors, with negligible detrimental effects on mosquito natural enemies (Jaganathan et al. 2016).
Conclusions and perspectives
Overall, there are few contrasting evidences of the relationship between cancer and mosquito-borne diseases, with special reference to malaria. Analogies at the cellular level for the two diseases have been reported, and a recent significant association of malaria incidence with all cancer mortality in 50 USA states was highlighted (Lehrer 2010a, b). This may be explained by the ability of Plasmodium stages to induce suppression of the immune system. The additional hypothesis that Anopheles vectors may transmit obscure viruses linked with cancer development needs further research. Furthermore, the potential activation of cancer pathways by mosquito-feeding events is not uncommon, since hamster reticulum cell sarcoma can be transmitted during bites of Ae. aegypti due to a transfer of tumor cells (Banfield et al. 1966). In addition, mosquito bites may influence human metabolic pathways to follow different mechanisms, leading to other viral infections and/or oncogenesis. For instance, the hypersensitivity to mosquito bites is routed by a unique pathogenic mechanism linking Epstein–Barr virus infection, allergy, and oncogenesis (Asada 2007). Even during dengue virus infection, high viral titers, macrophage infiltration, and tumor necrosis factor alpha production in the local tissues are the three important key events that may lead to hemorrhages (Chen et al. 2007). In this scenario, basic epidemiological knowledge on the relationships occurring between mosquito vector activity and the spread of cancer is urgently needed, as well as further detailed information about the ability of Culicidae to transfer viruses or tumor cells among hosts over time.
Further studies evaluating nanodrugs with multipotency against mosquito-borne diseases and cancers are required. In particular, a focus on effectiveness and non-target effects of metal nanoparticles synthesized using natural products as reducing agents (Benelli 2016a; Benelli and Mehlhorn 2016) may lead to the development of novel antiplasmodial, mosquitocidal, and anticancer tools.
References
Asada H (2007) Hypersensitivity to mosquito bites: a unique pathogenic mechanism linking Epstein-Barr virus infection, allergy and oncogenesis. J Dermatol Sci 45:153–160
Attar N (2016) ZIKA virus circulates in new regions. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:62. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2015.28
Banfield WG, Woke PA, Mackay CM, Cooper HL (1965) Mosquito transmission of a reticulum cell sarcoma of hamsters. Science 148:1239–1240
Banfield WG, Woke PA, Mackay CM (1966) Mosquito transmission of lymphomas. Cancer 19:1333–1336
Bao SR, Xi ZG, Yan J, Yang HL (2012) Cytotoxicity and apoptosis induction in human HepG2 hepatoma cells by decabromodiphenyl ethane. Biomed Environ Sci 25:495–501
Barik TK, Sahu B, Swain V (2008) Nanosilica—from medicine to pest control. Parasitol Res 103:253–258
Benelli G (2015a) Research in mosquito control: current challenges for a brighter future. Parasitol Res 114:2801–2805
Benelli G (2015b) Plant-borne ovicides in the fight against mosquito vectors of medical and veterinary importance: a systematic review. Parasitol Res 114:3201–3212
Benelli G (2016a) Plant-mediated biosynthesis of nanoparticles as an emerging tool against mosquitoes of medical and veterinary importance: a review. Parasitol Res 115:23–34
Benelli G (2016b) Plant-mediated synthesis of nanoparticles: a newer and safer tool against mosquito-borne diseases? Asia Pacif J Trop Biomed. doi:10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.10.015
Benelli G, Mehlhorn H (2016) Declining malaria, rising dengue and Zika virus: insights for mosquito vector control. Parasitol Res. doi:10.1007/s00436-016-4971-z
Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL et al (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496:504–507
Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG et al (2012) Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6:e1760
CBTRUS (2008) Statistical report: primary brain tumors in the United States, 2000–2004. Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, Illinois, pp 1–57
Chaturvedi D, Goswami A, Saikia PP, Barua NC, Rao PG (2010) Artemisinin and its derivatives: a novel class of anti-malarial and anti-cancer agents. Chem Soc Rev 39:435–454
Chen HC, Hofman FM, Kung JT, Lin YD, Wu-Hsieh BA (2007) Both virus and tumor necrosis factor alpha are critical for endothelium damage in a mouse model of dengue virus-induced hemorrhage. J Virol 81:5518–5526
Dobler G, Aspöck H (2010) Sick through arthropods. In: H. Aspöck (ed) Mosquito-transmitted arboviruses. Denisia 30:501–554
Efferth T, Dunstan H, Sauerbrey A, Miyachi H, Chitambar CR (2001) The anti-malarial artesunate is also active against cancer. Int J Oncol 18:767–773
Efferth T (2006) Molecular pharmacology and pharmacogenomics of artemisinin and its derivatives in cancer cells. Curr Drug Targets 7:407–421
Espina LM, Valero NJ, Hernández JM, Mosquera JA (2003) Increased apoptosis and expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha caused by infection of cultured human monocytes with dengue virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg 68:48–53
Fauci AS, Morens DM (2016) Zika virus in the Americas—yet another arbovirus threat. N Engl J Med 374:601–604
Gopinath P, Gogoi SK, Sunpui P, Pual A, Chattupadhyay A, Ghosh SS (2010) Signaling gene cascade in silver nanoparticle induced apoptosis. Colloids Surf B 77:240–245
Jaganathan A, Murugan K, Panneerselvam C, Madhiyazhagan P, Dinesh D, Vadivalagan C, Aziz AT, Chandramohan B, Suresh U, Rajaganesh R, Subramaniam J, Nicoletti M, Higuchi A, Alarfaj AA, Munusamy MA, Kumar S, Benelli G (2016) Earthworm-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles: a potent tool against hepatocellular carcinoma, pathogenic bacteria, Plasmodium parasites and malaria mosquitoes. Parasitol Int 65:276–284
Jensen M, Mehlhorn H (2009) Seventy-five years of Resochin® in the fight against malaria. Parasitol Res 105:609–627
Kawa K, Okamura T, Yagi K, Takeuchi M, Nakayama M, Inoue M (2001) Mosquito allergy and Epstein-Barr virus–associated T/natural killer–cell lymphoproliferative disease. Blood 98:3173–3174
Kilham L (1955) Metastasizing viral fibromas of grey squirrels: pathogenesis and mosquito transmission. Am J Epidemiol 6155-6163
Knowles BB, Howe CC, Aden DP (1980) Human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines secrete the major plasma proteins and hepatitis B surface antigen. Science 209(4455):497–499
Li XT, Han JF, Shi PY, Quin CF (2016) Zika virus: a new threat from mosquitoes. Sci China Life Sci. doi:10.1007/s11427-016-5020-y
Liang G, Gao X, Gould A (2015) Factors responsible for the emergence of arboviruses; strategies, challenges and limitations for their control. Emerg Microbes Infect 4(3):e18. doi:10.1038/emi.2015.18
Lehrer S (2010a) Anopheles mosquito transmission of brain tumor. Med Hypotheses 74:167–168
Lehrer S (2010b) Association between malaria incidence and all cancer mortality in fifty U.S. states and the district of Columbia. Anticancer Res 30:1371–1373
Majumder DD, Banerjee R, Mukhopadhayay SK, Ulrichs C, Mewis I, Samanta A, Das A, Adhikary S, Goswami A (2006) Nano-fabricated materials in cancer treatment and agri-biotech applications: Buckyballs in quantum holy grails. IETE J Res 52:339–356
Mehlhorn H, Al-Rasheid KA, Al-Quraishy S, Abdel-Ghaffar F (2012) Research and increase of expertise in arachno-entomology are urgently needed. Parasitol Res 110:259–265
Murugan K, Dinesh D, Kavithaa K, Paulpandi M, Ponraj T, Saleh Alsalhi M, Devanesan S, Subramaniam J, Rajaganesh R, Wei H, Suresh K, Nicoletti M, Benelli G (2016) Hydrothermal synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: mosquitocidal potential and anticancer activity on human breast cancer cells (MCF-7). Parasitol Res 115:1085–1096
Oehler E, Watrin L, Larre P, Leparc-Goffart, Lastère S, Valour F, Baudoulin L, Mallet HP, Musso D, Ghawche F (2014) Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barré syndrome – case report, French Polynesia. Euro Surveill 19(9)
Pastula DM, Smith DE, Beckham JD, Tyler KL (2016) Four emerging arboviral diseases in North America: Jamestown Canyon, Powasson, chikungunya and Zika virus diseases. J Neurovirol. doi:10.1007/s13365-016-0428-5
Rajasekharreddy P, Rani PU (2014) Biofabrication of Ag nanoparticles using Sterculia foetida L. seed extract and their toxic potential against mosquito vectors and HeLa cancer cells. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 39:203–212
Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Bandeira AC, Franco-Pareides C (2016) The expanding spectrum of modes of transmission of Zika virus: a global concern. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 15:13. doi:10.1186/s12941-016-0128-2
Sanpui P, Chattopadhyay A, Ghosh SS (2011) Induction of apoptosis in cancer cells at low silver nanoparticle concentrations using chitosan nanocarrier. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:218–228
Saxena SK, Elahi A, Gadugu S, Prasad AK (2016) Zika virus outbreak: an overview of the experimental therapeutics and treatment. Virus Dis. doi:10.1007/s13337-016-0307-y
Shanthi K, Vimala K, Gopi D, Kannan S (2015) Fabrication of pH responsive DOX conjugated PEGylated palladium nanoparticle mediated drug delivery system: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation. RSC Adv 5:44998–45014
Skarbinski J, James EM, Causer LM, Barber AM, Mali S, Nguyen-Dinh P et al (2006) Malaria surveillance—United States. MMWR Surveill Summ 55(4):23–37
Suffness M, Pezzuto JM (1990) Assays related to cancer drug discovery. In: Hostettmann K (ed) Methods in plant biochemistry: assays for bioactivity, vol 6. Academic Press, London, pp 71–133
Suresh S, Spatz J, Mills JP, Micoulet A, Dao M, Lim CT, Beil M, Seufferlein T (2005) Connections between single-cell biomechanics and human disease states: gastrointestinal cancer and malaria. Acta Biomater 1:15–30
Tokura Y, Ishihara S, Tagawa S, Seo N, Ohshima K, Takigawa M (2001) Hypersensitivity to mosquito bites as the primary clinical manifestation of a juvenile type of Epstein-Barr virus-associated natural killer cell leukemia/lymphoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 45:569–578
Tsuge I, Morishima T, Morita M, Kimura H, Kuzushima K, Matsuoka H (1999) Characterization of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-infected natural killer (NK) cell proliferation in patients with severe mosquito allergy; establishment of an IL-2-dependent NK-like cell line. Clin Exp Immunol 115:385–392
Usherwood EJ, Stewart JP, Nash AA (1996) Characterization of tumor cell lines derived from murine gammaherpesvirus-68-infected mice. J Virol 70(9):6516–6518
Welsh JD, Brown JD, Arnold K, Mathews HM, Prince AM (1976) Hepatitis BS antigen, malaria titers, and primary liver cancer in South Vietnam. Gastroenterology 70(3):392–396
White NJ (2015) Declining malaria transmission and pregnancy outcomes in Southern Mozambique. N Engl J Med 373:1670–1671
WHO (2015a) Fact sheet: world malaria report 2015. Updated 9 December 2015
WHO (2015b) Cancer. Fact sheet N°297, Updated February 2015
WHO (2016) Zika virus. Fact sheet N°1. Updated January 2016
Yen YT, Chen HC, Lin YD, Shieh CC, Wu-Hsieh BA (2008) Enhancement by tumor necrosis factor alpha of dengue virus-induced endothelial cell production of reactive nitrogen and oxygen species is key to hemorrhage development. J Virol 82:12312–12324
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to M. Nicoletti and K. Murugan for helpful discussions on the topic. G. Benelli is supported by PROAPI (PRAF 2015) and University of Pisa, Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment (Grant ID COFIN2015_22). Funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Heinz Mehlhorn and Giovanni Benelli are Editor in Chief and Editorial Board Member of Parasitology Research, respectively. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the Parasitology Research policies on sharing data and materials.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benelli, G., Lo Iacono, A., Canale, A. et al. Mosquito vectors and the spread of cancer: an overlooked connection?. Parasitol Res 115, 2131–2137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5037-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5037-y