Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to construct a novel clinical prediction model to predict the risk of distant metastases (DM) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods
We included 3869 HCC patients, comprising 3076 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 793 patients from a hospital in China. Variables with a P-value < 0.05 in the univariate logistic analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis to determine the independent predictive factors for DM in HCC. A nomogram was created based on the independent predictive factors. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curves, and clinical impact curve analysis (CIC). Additionally, we developed a user-friendly web-based calculator based on the model.
Results
The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor size (P < 0.001), type of treatment (P < 0.001), T stage (P = 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), and grade (P = 0.043) were identified as independent predictive factors. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors. The area under the ROC curves (AUC) value was 0.845 (95% CI 0.815–0.874) for the training set, 0.818 (95% CI 0.774–0.863) for the internal validation set, and 0.823 (95% CI 0.770–0.876) for the external validation set. Moreover, DCA analysis, calibration curves, and CIC analysis demonstrated the favorable predictive performance of the nomogram. Finally, a more user-friendly web-based calculator was developed.
Conclusion
We developed a nomogram and showed its favorable predictive performance in predicting DM in HCC. Furthermore, we developed a more user-friendly web-based calculator, which has the potential to aid clinicians in individualized diagnosis and make better clinical decisions for HCC patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- DM:
-
Distant metastases
- SEER:
-
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- DCA:
-
Decision curve analysis
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- OR:
-
Odds ratio
- HCC:
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma
- AFP:
-
Alpha-fetoprotein
- SR:
-
Surgical resection
- LT:
-
Liver transplantation
References
Ahn KS, Kang KJ (2019) Appropriate treatment modality for solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma: radiofrequency ablation vs. resection vs. transplantation? Clin Mol Hepatol 25(4):354–359
Bhoori S, Sposito C, Germini A, Coppa J, Mazzaferro V (2010) The challenges of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis. Transpl Int 23(7):712–722
Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42(5):1208–1236
Bruix J, Reig M, Sherman M (2016) Evidence-based diagnosis, staging, and treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 150(4):835–853
Chan AC, Fan ST, Poon RT, Cheung TT, Chok KS, Chan SC et al (2013) Evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for patients undergoing curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the development of a refined staging system. HPB (oxford) 15(6):439–448
Chen S, Cao Q, Wen W, Wang H (2019) Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: challenges and opportunities. Cancer Lett 460:1–9
Chidambaranathan-Reghupaty S, Fisher PB, Sarkar D (2021) Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): epidemiology, etiology and molecular classification. Adv Cancer Res 149:1–61
Ding J, Wen Z (2021) Survival improvement and prognosis for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of the SEER database. BMC Cancer 21(1):1157
El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL (2007) Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology 132(7):2557–2576
Facciuto ME, Koneru B, Rocca JP, Wolf DC, Kim-Schluger L, Visintainer P et al (2008) Surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria. Results of liver resection, salvage transplantation, and primary liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol 15(5):1383–1391
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J (2018) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 391(10127):1301–1314
Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ et al (2017) Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin 67(4):290–303
Izzo F, Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Palaia R, Delrio P et al (2019) Radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in liver tumors: an update. Oncologist 24(10):e990–e1005
Johnson P, Zhou Q, Dao DY, Lo YMD (2022) Circulating biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 19(10):670–681
Kanda M, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, Sato T, Masuzaki R, Ohki T et al (2008) Extrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence and risk factors. Liver Int 28(9):1256–1263
Katyal S, Oliver JH 3rd, Peterson MS, Ferris JV, Carr BS, Baron RL (2000) Extrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 216(3):698–703
Levy C, Martin P (2011) Liver transplant: reaching the half century. Clin Liver Dis 15(4):xi–xii
Li H, Ge C, Zhao F, Yan M, Hu C, Jia D et al (2011) Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha-activated angiopoietin-like protein 4 contributes to tumor metastasis via vascular cell adhesion molecule-1/integrin β1 signaling in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 54(3):910–919
Liao S, Chen H, Liu M, Gan L, Li C, Zhang W et al (2020) Aquaporin 9 inhibits growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Aging (albany NY) 12(2):1527–1544
Llovet JM, Bruix J (2008) Molecular targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 48(4):1312–1327
Minagawa M, Ikai I, Matsuyama Y, Yamaoka Y, Makuuchi M (2007) Staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment of the Japanese TNM and AJCC/UICC TNM systems in a cohort of 13,772 patients in Japan. Ann Surg 245(6):909–922
Piñero F, Dirchwolf M, Pessôa MG (2020) Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response assessment. Cells 9(6):1370
Research EO (2012) EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 56(4):908–943
Reticker-Flynn NE, Zhang W, Belk JA, Basto PA, Escalante NK, Pilarowski GOW et al (2022) Lymph node colonization induces tumor-immune tolerance to promote distant metastasis. Cell 185(11):1924–1942.e23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.019
Shao Y, Zhu B, Zheng R, Zhao X, Yin P, Lu X et al (2015) Development of urinary pseudotargeted LC-MS-based metabolomics method and its application in hepatocellular carcinoma biomarker discovery. J Proteome Res 14(2):906–916
Uchino K, Tateishi R, Shiina S, Kanda M, Masuzaki R, Kondo Y et al (2011) Hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastasis: clinical features and prognostic factors. Cancer 117(19):4475–4483
Villanueva A (2019) Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 380(15):1450–1462
Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A (2022) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 400(10360):1345–1362
Xu X, Zhang HL, Liu QP, Sun SW, Zhang J, Zhu FP et al (2019) Radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced CT predicts microvascular invasion and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 70(6):1133–1144
Ye Q, Ling S, Zheng S, Xu X (2019) Liquid biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma: circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Mol Cancer 18(1):114
Zhang C, Peng L, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Li W, Chen S et al (2017) The identification of key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma by bioinformatics analysis of high-throughput data. Med Oncol 34(6):101
Zhang BH, Yang J, Jiang L, Lyu T, Kong LX, Tan YF et al (2020) Development and validation of a 14-gene signature for prognosis prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genomics 112(4):2763–2771
Zhou YM, Li B, Xu DH, Yang JM (2011) Safety and efficacy of partial hepatectomy for huge (≥10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Med Sci Monit 17(3):Ra76-83
Zhuang BW, Li W, Wang W, Li B, Lu MD, Kuang M et al (2021) Treatment effect of radiofrequency ablation versus liver transplantation and surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a population-based study. Eur Radiol 31(7):5379–5389
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by GS, ZF, and WQ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by GS. GL was responsible for revising and finalizing the manuscript. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
This is an observational study. The ethics committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Shao, G., Fan, Z., Qiu, W. et al. Development and validation of a model to predict the risk of distant metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world retrospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 16489–16499 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05361-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05361-2