Abstract
The ventrolateral thalamic nucleus (VL), as part of the ‘motor thalamus’, is main relay station of cerebellar and pallidal projections. It comprises anterior (VLa) and posterior (VLpd and VLpv) subnuclei. Though the fibre architecture of cerebellar and pallidal projections to of the VL nucleus has already been focus in a numerous amount of in vitro studies mainly in animals, probabilistic tractography now offers the possibility of an in vivo comparison in healthy humans. In this study we performed a (a) qualitative and (b) quantitative examination of VL-cerebellar and VL-pallidal pathways and compared the probability distributions between both projection fields in the VL after an (I) atlas-based and (II) manual-based segmentation procedure. Both procedures led to high congruent results of cerebellar and pallidal connectivity distributions: the maximum of pallidal projections was located in anterior and medial parts of the VL nucleus, whereas cerebellar connectivity was more located in lateral and posterior parts. The median connectivity for cerebellar connections in both approaches (manual and atlas-based segmentation) was VLa > VLpv > VLpd, whereas the pallidal median connectivity was VLa ~ VLpv > VLpd in the atlas-based approach and VLpv > VLa > VLpd in the manual approach.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The ventrolateral (VL) thalamic nucleus is main relay station of cerebellar and basal ganglia (BG) projections to the cortex (Asanuma et al. 1983; Sidibe et al. 1997).
Both, the deep cerebellar nuclei (esp. dentate nucleus and interposed nuclei) and output nuclei of the basal ganglia (substantia nigra, reticulate part, and the globus pallidus, internal part) project to the thalamus with a considerable amount of overlap, as shown in the monkey and human species (Pelzer et al. 2016; Sakai et al. 1996). In this study we specifically analysed the qualitative and quantitative fibre distribution of pallidal and cerebellar connections in a (i) manual- and (ii) atlas-based segmentation of VL nucleus. By the use of probabilistic tractography we present a detailed in vivo description and a quantitative comparison between these fibre projections.
Results
12 healthy right-handed (> 7th percentile) native German speakers (10 women, 2 men) with a mean age of 25 (± 4.4) years, without history or signs of neurological disease, were included in the MR analysis. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. For overview of methods please see Supplementary Material.
Interestingly, atlas-based segmentation procedure revealed a 41% (SD 2.70) bigger VL masks on the left side and 42% (SD 2.28) bigger VL masks on the right side than the manual outlining procedure; differences were mainly located in top and bottom border regions. In the VL both, manual and atlas-based segmentation, yielded to highly congruent specific patterns in the qualitative analysis of fibre architecture: (1) pallidal connectivity had a maximum in more anterior and medial parts of the VL, whereas cerebellar connectivity was more located in lateral and posterior parts (see Figs. 1 and 2). In a second step we quantified thalamic connectivity for both, the manual and atlas-based method: Both methods showed a considerable amount of overlap between cerebellar and pallidal projections (see Fig. 3), with a medial-to lateral decreasing quotient of pallidal compared to cerebellar connectivity (see Fig. 3a), an inferior-to-superior (see Fig. 3c) increase of pallidal connectivity compared to cerebellar connectivity and a posterior to anterior increase of pallidal compared to cerebellar connectivity (see Fig. 3b). As one example of descriptive statistics we determined the median connectivity values in both, manual and atlas-based segmentation of the VL. For cerebellar connections, both approaches revealed a similar connectivity pattern (VLa > VLpv > VLpd), whereas the pallidal median connectivity values differed between the atlas-based (VLa ~ VLpv > VLpd) and the manual (VLpv > VLa > VLpd) approach.
Discussion
(1) We found high connectivity values to the VLa and VLp regions for both projection systems, with an anterior-posteriorly increasing gradient for cerebellar projections and a posterior-anteriorly increasing gradient for cerebellar projections. Our results fit well with the current anatomical knowledge [see Fig. 6 in Sakai et al. (1996)]. The pallido-thalamic territory includes VApc (not part of our investigation), VLa and dorsal part of VLp, and occasional patches of pallidal label in VLpv and the anteromedial part of VLp. The density of pallido-thalamic projections decreases along an anterior to posterior gradient. Conversely, the density of cerebello-thalamic projections increases along the same gradient, with the cerebello-thalamic territory extending anteriorly beyond the cell-sparse zones of the ventral part of VLp, anteromedial part of VLp, dorsal part of VLp to include VLa and VApc also (Sakai et al. 1996). We found large differences in the resulting amount of voxels, which were included in the segmentation procedure between the atlas-based and manual segmentation; still the (1) qualitative and (2) quantitative visualization remained stable. However the descriptive statistic, as here shown for the median connectivity values per subnuclei, evoked remarkable differences between both segmentation procedures; this yields to the conclusion that next to hard segmentation procedures, a common feature in probabilistic tractography, also the examination of the individual connectivity values seems absolutely necessary to depict the whole truth of fiber distribution via probabilistic tractography (Jbabdi et al. 2015).
The ventrolateral thalamus is one of the main target regions in stereotactic treatments for movement disorders like essential tremor (Vaillancourt et al. 2003) or Parkinsonian tremor (Benabid et al. 1996).
For neurosurgeons, problems in optimal targeting already begin in the diverse nomenclatures of the ventrolateral thalamus, for overview please see Krack et al. (2002). The most commonly used nomenclatures in humans are e.g. the ones proposed by Hassler (1982) and Hirai et al. (1989). The most commonly used nomenclatures in primates are e.g. the ones proposed by Ilinsky and Kultas-Ilinsky (2002), Olszewski (1952) and Macchi and Jones (1997). These diverse nomenclatures make the interpretation of cerebellar and basal ganglia fibre distributions and optimal targeting of stereotactic surgery in the ventrolateral thalamus challenging.
Beside, also the distribution and the “communication” between the cerebellar and pallidal projection system in the ventrolateral thalamus are discussable. Whereas some researchers claim a strong segregation of cerebellar and basal ganglia projections, we recently found hints for an informational exchange between these two systems [for detailed discussion please see Hintzen et al. (2018)].
Another fact is, that the thalamic target for stereotactic surgery in the treatment of e.g. tremor is not readily visible on conventional magnetic resonance imaging. Knowledge is based on anatomy by diverse animals and methods (e.g. immunhistochemistry or myelin staining) or post-mortem analyses [for detailed overview please see Hintzen et al. (2018)]. Diffusion MRI and tractography nowadays offers the opportunity to depict anatomical connections in vivo in the human species [e.g. Jbabdi et al. (2015); Lerch et al. (2017)]. But we claim to be cautious in the application of hard segmentation procedures without including knowledge of anatomical in vitro animal studies and postmortem studies regarding the fibre distribution in the ventrolateral thalamus. The exact targeting of cerebellar termination fields in stereotactic surgery is though of utmost importance: For example regarding essential tremor, tremor-related activity is most prominent in cerebellar recipient subdivisions of the ventrolateral thalamus, that is in Jones’ nomenclature, the VLp [for a review see Hamani et al. (2006)]. A functional micro-electrode mapping of ventral thalamus in essential tremor, for example, showed that the inferior posterior ventrolateral thalamus and its border region plays a key role in essential tremor pathophysiology (Pedrosa et al. 2018); stereotactic lesioning in exactly this localisation may relieve symptoms and will reduce the cause of relevant side effects most effectively. Additionally the higher variability in the z-values in the manual based segmentation in Fig. 3 shows, that due to the less contrast and the higher difficulty in finding the boundaries of the ventrolataral thalamus a higher variability in connectivity values derived. A fact that also has high implications for the planning of stereotactic coordinates in neurosurgery in the ventrolateral thalamus because reducing effectiveness and increasing side effects.
References
Asanuma C, Thach W, Jones E (1983) Distribution of cerebellar terminations and their relation to other afferent terminations in the ventral lateral thalamic region of the monkey. Brain Res Rev 5:237–265
Benabid ALA et al (1996) Chronic electrical stimulation of the ventralis intermedius nucleus of the thalamus as a treatment of movement disorders. J Neurosurg 84:203–214
Hamani C, Dostrovsky JO, Lozano AM (2006) The motor thalamus in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 58:146–158 (discussion 146-58)
Hassler R (1982) Architectonic organization of the thalamic nuclei. In: Walker AE (eds) Stereotaxy of the human brain. Anatomical physiological and clinical applications, pp 140–180
Hintzen A, Pelzer EA, Tittgemeyer M (2018) Thalamic interactions of cerebellum and basal ganglia. Brain Struct Funct 223:569–587
Hirai T et al (1989) Cytometric analysis of the thalamic ventralis intermedius nucleus in humans. J Neurophysiol 61:478–487
Ilinsky IA, Kultas-Ilinsky K (2002) Motor thalamic circuits in primates with emphasis on the area targeted in treatment of movement disorders. Mov Disorders Off J Mov Disorder Soc 17(Suppl 3):S9–14
Jbabdi S et al (2015) Measuring macroscopic brain connections in vivo. Nat Neurosci 18:1546–1555
Krack P et al (2002) Surgery of the motor thalamus: problems with the present nomenclatures. Mov Disorders Off J Mov Disorder Soc 17(Suppl 3):S2–8
Lerch JP et al (2017) Studying neuroanatomy using MRI. Nat Neurosci 20:314–326
Macchi G, Jones EG (1997) Toward an agreement on terminology of nuclear and subnuclear divisions of the motor thalamus. J Neurosurg 86:670–685
Olszewski J (1952) The thalamus of the Macaca mulatta. An atlas for use with the stereotaxic instrument. Karger, Basel
Pedrosa DJ et al (2018) A functional micro-electrode mapping of ventral thalamus in essential tremor. Brain J Neurol 223:50
Pelzer EA et al (2016) Basal ganglia and cerebellar interconnectivity within the human thalamus. Brain Struct Funct 222:382–392
Sakai S, Inase M, Tanji J (1996) Comparison of cerebellothalamic and pallidothalamic projections in the monkey (Macaca fuscata): a double anterograde labeling study. Journal of Comparative Neurology 368:215–228
Sidibe M et al (1997) Efferent connections of the internal globus pallidus in the squirrel monkey: I. Topography and synaptic organization of the pallidothalamic projection. J Comp Neurol 382:323–347
Vaillancourt DE et al (2003) Deep brain stimulation of the VIM thalamic nucleus modifies several features of essential tremor. Neurology 61:919–925
Acknowledgement
Open Access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.
Funding
The study was supported by the German Research Foundation (grant number KFO 219). K. A. M. Pauls and Nina Braun was supported by a Köln Fortune Grant (grant no. 185/2016) from the University of Cologne Medical Faculty.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Esther Pelzer has no disclosures. Amande Pauls has no disclosures. Nina Braun has no disclosures. Marc Tittgemeyer has no disclosures. Lars Timmermann reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Medtronic, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boston Scientific, personal fees and non-financial support from SAPIENS, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from St. Jude Medical, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Bayer Healthcare, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from UCB Schwarz Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Archimedes Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from TEVA Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Lundbeck Pharma, personal fees from Medas Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Desitin Pharma, personal fees and non-financial support from GlaxoSmithKline, personal fees and non-financial support from Orion Pharma, grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Abbvie, personal fees from TAD Pharma, grants from zur Rose Pharma, outside the submitted work.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of medical faculty of the University Cologne; study number: 12-286 and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pelzer, E.A., Pauls, K.A.M., Braun, N. et al. Probabilistic tractography in the ventrolateral thalamic nucleus: cerebellar and pallidal connections. Brain Struct Funct 225, 1685–1689 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02076-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02076-9