Abstract
The inner ear is a complex three-dimensional sensory structure with auditory and vestibular functions. It originates from the otic placode, which generates the sensory elements of the membranous labyrinth and all the ganglionic neuronal precursors. Neuroblast specification is the first cell differentiation event. In the chick, it takes place over a long embryonic period from the early otic cup stage to at least stage HH25. The differentiating ganglionic neurons attain a precise innervation pattern with sensory patches, a process presumably governed by a network of dendritic guidance cues which vary with the local micro-environment. To study the otic neurogenesis and topographically-ordered innervation pattern in birds, a quail–chick chimaeric graft technique was used in accordance with a previously determined fate-map of the otic placode. Each type of graft containing the presumptive domain of topologically-arranged placodal sensory areas was shown to generate neuroblasts. The differentiated grafted neuroblasts established dendritic contacts with a variety of sensory patches. These results strongly suggest that, rather than reverse-pathfinding, the relevant role in otic dendritic process guidance is played by long-range diffusing molecules.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abello G, Alsina B (2007) Establishment of a proneural field in the inner ear. Int J Dev Biol 51:483–493
Abelló G, Khatri S, Giráldez F, Alsina B (2007) Early regionalization of the otic placode and its regulation by the Notch signaling pathway. Mech Dev 124:631–645
Adam J, Myat A, Le Roux I, Eddison M, Henrique D, Ish-Horowicz D, Lewis J (1998) Cell fate choices and the expression of Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues in the chick inner ear: parallels with Drosophila sense-organ development. Development 125:4645–4654
Alsina B, Whitfield TT (2017) Sculpting the labyrinth: morphogenesis of the developing inner ear. Semin Cell Dev Biol 65:47–59
Alsina B, Giraldez F, Varela-Nieto I (2003) Growth factors and early development of otic neurons: interactions between intrinsic and extrinsic signals. Curr Top Dev Biol 57:177–206
Alsina B, Abelló G, Ulloa E, Henrique D, Pujades C, Giraldez F (2004) FGF signaling is required for determination of otic neuroblasts in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 267:119–134
Alsina B, Giraldez F, Pujades C (2009) Patterning and cell fate in ear development. Int J Dev Biol 53:1503–1513
Alvarado-Mallart RM, Sotelo C (1984) Homotopic and heterotopic transplantations of quail tectal primordia in chick embryos: organization of the retinotectal projections in the chimeric embryos. Dev Biol 103:378–398
Alvarez IS, Martín-Partido G, Rodríguez-Gallardo L, González-Ramos C, Navascués J (1989) Cell proliferation during early development of the chick embryo otic anlage: quantitative comparison of migratory and nonmigratory regions of the otic epithelium. J Comp Neurol 290:278–288
Begbie J, Ballivet M, Graham A (2002) Early steps in the production of sensory neurons by the neurogenic placodes. Mol Cell Neurosci 21:502–511
Beisel KW, Wang-Lundberg Y, Maklad A, Fritzsch B (2005) Development and evolution of the vestibular sensory apparatus of the mammalian ear. J Vestib Res 15:225–241
Bell D, Streit A, Gorospe I, Varela-Nieto I, Alsina B, Giraldez F (2008) Spatial and temporal segregation of auditory and vestibular neurons in the otic placode. Dev Biol 322:109–120
Bermingham NA, Hassan BA, Price SD, Vollrath MA, Ben-Arie N, Eatock RA, Bellen HJ, Lysakowski A, Zoghbi HY (1999) Math1: an essential gene for the generation of inner ear hair cells. Science 284:1837–1841
Bok J, Chang W, Wu DK (2007) Patterning and morphogenesis of the vertebrate inner ear. Int J Dev Biol 51:521–533
Carney PR, Silver J (1983) Studies on cell migration and axon guidance in the developing distal auditory system of the mouse. J Comp Neurol 215:359–369
Chen J, Streit A (2013) Induction of the inner ear: stepwise specification of otic fate from multipotent progenitors. Hear Res 297:3–12
Coate TM, Kelley MW (2013) Making connections in the inner ear: recent insights into the development of spiral ganglion neurons and their connectivity with sensory hair cells. Semin Cell Dev Biol 24:460–469
Coate TM, Spita NA, Zhang KD, Isgrig KT, Kelley MW (2015) Neuropilin-2/Semaphorin-3F-mediated repulsion promotes inner hair cell innervation by spiral ganglion neurons. Elife 4
D’Amico-Martel A (1982) Temporal patterns of neurogenesis in avian cranial sensory and autonomic ganglia. Am J Anat 163:351–372
D’Amico-Martel A, Noden DM (1983) Contributions of placodal and neural crest cells to avian cranial peripheral ganglia. Am J Anat 166:445–468
Delacroix L, Malgrange B (2015) Cochlear afferent innervation development. Hear Res 330:157–169
Deng X, Wu DK (2016) Temporal coupling between specifications of neuronal and macular fates of the inner ear. Dev Biol 414:21–33
Dvorakova M, Jahan I, Macova I, Chumak T, Bohuslavova R, Syka J, Fritzsch B, Pavlinkova G (2016) Incomplete and delayed Sox2 deletion defines residual ear neurosensory development and maintenance. Sci Rep 6:38253
Dyballa S, Savy T, Germann P, Mikula K, Remesikova M, Špir R, Zecca A, Peyriéras N, Pujades C (2017) Distribution of neurosensory progenitor pools during inner ear morphogenesis unveiled by cell lineage reconstruction. eLife 6:e22268
Echteler SM (1992) Developmental segregation in the afferent projections to mammalian auditory hair cells. PNAS 89:6324–6327
Elliott KL, Fritzsch B (2018) Ear transplantations reveal conservation of inner ear afferent pathfinding cues. Sci Rep 8:13819
Fariñas I, Jones KR, Tessarollo L, Vigers AJ, Huang E, Kirstein M, de Caprona DC, Coppola V, Backus C, Reichardt LF, Fritzsch B (2001) Spatial shaping of cochlear innervation by temporally regulated neurotrophin expression. J Neurosci 21:6170–6180
Fekete DM, Campero AM (2007) Axon guidance in the inner ear. Int J Dev Biol 51:549–556
Fekete DM, Wu DK (2002) Revisiting cell fate specification in the inner ear. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:35–42
Freyer L, Aggarwal V, Morrow BE (2011) Dual embryonic origin of the mammalian otic vesicle forming the inner ear. Development 138:5403–5414
Fritzsch B (1993) Fast axonal diffusion of 3000 molecular weight dextran amines. J Neurosci Methods 50:95–103
Fritzsch B (2003) Development of inner ear afferent connections: forming primary neurons and connecting them to the developing sensory epithelia. Brain Res Bull 60:423–433
Fritzsch B, Beisel KW, Jones K, Fariñas I, Maklad A, Lee J, Reichardt LF (2002) Development and evolution of inner ear sensory epithelia and their innervation. J Neurobiol 53:143–156
Fritzsch B, Tessarollo L, Coppola E, Reichardt LF (2004) Neurotrophins in the ear: their roles in sensory neuron survival and fiber guidance. Prog Brain Res 146:265–278
Fritzsch B, Pauley S, Matei V, Katz DM, Xiang M, Tessarollo L (2005) Mutant mice reveal the molecular and cellular basis for specific sensory connections to inner ear epithelia and primary nuclei of the brain. Hear Res 206:52–63
Fritzsch B, Pauley S, Beisel KW (2006) Cells, molecules and morphogenesis: the making of the vertebrate ear. Brain Res 1091:151–171
Fritzsch B, Eberl DF, Beisel KW (2010) The role of bHLH genes in ear development and evolution: revisiting a 10-year-old hypothesis. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:3089–3099
Fritzsch B, Pan N, Jahan I, Elliott KL (2015) Inner ear development: building a spiral ganglion and an organ of Corti out of unspecified ectoderm. Cell Tissue Res 361:7–24
Gálvez H, Abelló G, Giraldez F (2017) Signaling and Transcription factors during inner ear development: the generation of hair cells and otic neurons. Front Cell Dev Biol 5:21
Groves AK, Fekete DM (2012) Shaping sound in space: the regulation of inner ear patterning. Development 139:245–257
Groves AK, Zhang KD, Fekete DM (2013) The genetics of hair cell development and regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 36:361–381
Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1992) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. Dev Dyn 195:231–272
Hemond SG, Morest DK (1991) Ganglion formation from the otic placode and the otic crest in the chick embryo: mitosis, migration, and the basal lamina. Anat Embryol 184:1–13
Hemond SG, Morest DK (1992) Tropic effects of otic epithelium on cochleo-vestibular ganglion fiber growth in vitro. Anat Rec 232:273–284
Holt JC, Lysakowski A, Goldberg JM (2011) The efferent vestibular system. In: Ryugo DK, Fay RR (eds) Auditory and vestibular efferents. Springer, New York, pp 135–186
Jahan I, Kersigo J, Pan N, Fritzsch B (2010) Neurod1 regulates survival and formation of connections in mouse ear and brain. Cell Tissue Res 341:95–110
Kawamoto K, Ishimoto S-I, Minoda R, Brough DE, Raphael Y (2003) Math1 gene transfer generates new cochlear hair cells in mature guinea pigs in vivo. J Neurosci 23:4395–4400
Kersigo J, Fritzsch B (2015) Inner ear hair cells deteriorate in mice engineered to have no or diminished innervation. Front Aging Neurosci 7:33
Koundakjian EJ, Appler JL, Goodrich LV (2007) Auditory neurons make stereotyped wiring decisions before maturation of their targets. J Neurosci 27:14078–14088
Lassiter RNT, Stark MR, Zhao T, Zhou CJ (2014) Signaling mechanisms controlling cranial placode neurogenesis and delamination. Dev Biol 389:39–49
Li H, Liu H, Sage C, Chen ZY, Heller S (2004) Islet-1 expression in the developing chicken inner ear. J Comp Neurol 477:1–10
Liu M, Pereira FA, Price SD, Chu MJ, Shope C, Himes D, Eatock RA, Brownell WE, Lysakowski A, Tsai MJ (2000) Essential role of BETA2/NeuroD1 in development of the vestibular and auditory systems. Genes Dev 14:2839–2854
Liu H, Li Y, Chen L, Zhang Q, Pan N, Nichols DH, Zhang WJ, Fritzsch B, He DZ (2016) Organ of corti and stria vascularis: is there an Interdependence for survival? PLoS One 11:e0168953
Ma Q, Chen Z, del Barco Barrantes I, de la Pompa JL, Anderson DJ (1998) neurogenin1 is essential for the determination of neuronal precursors for proximal cranial sensory ganglia. Neuron 20:469–482
Ma Q, Anderson DJ, Fritzsch B (2000) Neurogenin 1 null mutant ears develop fewer, morphologically normal hair cells in smaller sensory epithelia devoid of innervation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 1:129–143
Mahmoud A, Reed C, Maklad A (2013) Central projections of lagenar primary neurons in the chick. J Comp Neurol 521:3524–3540
Maklad A, Fritzsch B (2003) Development of vestibular afferent projections into the hindbrain and their central targets. Brain Res Bull 60:497–510
Maklad A, Kamel S, Wong E, Fritzsch B (2010) Development and organization of polarity-specific segregation of primary vestibular afferent fibers in mice. Cell Tissue Res 340:303–321
Mao Y, Reiprich S, Wegner M, Fritzsch B (2014) Targeted deletion of Sox10 by Wnt1-cre defects neuronal migration and projection in the mouse inner ear. PLoS One 9:e94580
Matei V, Pauley S, Kaing S, Rowitch D, Beisel KW, Morris K, Feng F, Jones K, Lee J, Fritzsch B (2005) Smaller inner ear sensory epithelia in Neurog 1 null mice are related to earlier hair cell cycle exit. Dev Dyn 234:633–650
Meas SJ, Zhang C-L, Dabdoub A (2018) Reprogramming glia into neurons in the peripheral auditory system as a solution for sensorineural hearing loss: lessons from the central nervous system. Front Mol Neurosci 11:77
Nichols DH, Pauley S, Jahan I, Beisel KW, Millen KJ, Fritzsch B (2008) Lmx1a is required for segregation of sensory epithelia and normal ear histogenesis and morphogenesis. Cell Tissue Res 334:339–358
Noden DM, van de Water T (1986) The developing ear: tissue origins and interactions. Biol Change Otolaryngol 15–46
Pauley S, Wright TJ, Pirvola U, Ornitz D, Beisel K, Fritzsch B (2003) Expression and function of FGF10 in mammalian inner ear development. Dev Dyn 227:203–215
Puligilla C, Dabdoub A, Brenowitz SD, Kelley MW (2010) Sox2 induces neuronal formation in the developing mammalian cochlea. J Neurosci 30:714–722
Radde-Gallwitz K, Pan L, Gan L, Lin X, Segil N, Chen P (2004) Expression of Islet1 marks the sensory and neuronal lineages in the mammalian inner ear. J Comp Neurol 477:412–421
Radosevic M, Robert-Moreno A, Coolen M, Bally-Cuif L, Alsina B (2011) Her9 represses neurogenic fate downstream of Tbx1 and retinoic acid signaling in the inner ear. Development 138:397–408
Raft S, Groves AK (2015) Segregating neural and mechanosensory fates in the developing ear: patterning, signaling, and transcriptional control. Cell Tissue Res 359:315–332
Raft S, Nowotschin S, Liao J, Morrow BE (2004) Suppression of neural fate and control of inner ear morphogenesis by Tbx1. Development 131:1801–1812
Raft S, Koundakjian EJ, Quinones H, Jayasena CS, Goodrich LV, Johnson JE, Segil N, Groves AK (2007) Cross-regulation of Ngn1 and Math1 coordinates the production of neurons and sensory hair cells during inner ear development. Development 134:4405–4415
Rubel EW, Fritzsch B (2002) Auditory system development: primary auditory neurons and their targets. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:51–101
Sanchez-Calderon H, Milo M, Leon Y, Varela-Nieto I (2007) A network of growth and transcription factors controls neuronal differentation and survival in the developing ear. Int J Dev Biol 51:557–570
Sánchez-Calderón H, Francisco-Morcillo J, Martín-Partido G, Hidalgo-Sánchez M (2007) Fgf19 expression patterns in the developing chick inner ear. Gene Expr Patterns 7:30–38
Sánchez-Guardado LO, Ferran JL, Mijares J, Puelles L, Rodríguez-Gallardo L, Hidalgo-Sánchez M (2009) Raldh3 gene expression pattern in the developing chicken inner ear. J Comp Neurol 514:49–65
Sánchez-Guardado LÓ, Puelles L, Hidalgo-Sánchez M (2013) Fgf10 expression patterns in the developing chick inner ear. J Comp Neurol 521:1136–1164
Sánchez-Guardado LÓ, Puelles L, Hidalgo-Sánchez M (2014) Fate map of the chicken otic placode. Development 141:2302–2312
Sapède D, Dyballa S, Pujades C (2012) Cell lineage analysis reveals three different progenitor pools for neurosensory elements in the otic vesicle. J Neurosci 32:16424–16434
Satoh T, Fekete DM (2005) Clonal analysis of the relationships between mechanosensory cells and the neurons that innervate them in the chicken ear. Development 132:1687–1697
Schneider-Maunoury S, Pujades C (2007) Hindbrain signals in otic regionalization: walk on the wild side. Int J Dev Biol 51:495–506
Simmons D, Duncan J, de Caprona DC, Fritzsch B (2011) Development of the inner ear efferent system. In: Ryugo DK, Fay RR (eds) Auditory and vestibular efferents. Springer, New York, pp 187–216
Stevens CB, Davies AL, Battista S, Lewis JH, Fekete DM (2003) Forced activation of Wnt signaling alters morphogenesis and sensory organ identity in the chicken inner ear. Dev Biol 261:149–164
Stone JS, Shang J-L, Tomarev S (2003) Expression of Prox1 defines regions of the avian otocyst that give rise to sensory or neural cells. J Comp Neurol 460:487–502
Straka H, Baker R (2013) Vestibular blueprint in early vertebrates. Front Neural Circuits 7:182
Tanaka H, Kinutani M, Agata A, Takashima Y, Obata K (1990) Pathfinding during spinal tract formation in the chick-quail chimera analysed by species-specific monoclonal antibodies. Development 110:565–571
Vaage S (1969) The segmentation of the primitive neural tube in chick embryos (Gallus domesticus). A morphological, histochemical and autoradiographical investigation. Ergeb Anat Entwicklungsgesch 41:3–87
Vázquez-Echeverría C, Dominguez-Frutos E, Charnay P, Schimmang T, Pujades C (2008) Analysis of mouse kreisler mutants reveals new roles of hindbrain-derived signals in the establishment of the otic neurogenic domain. Dev Biol 322:167–178
Whitfield TT, Hammond KL (2007) Axial patterning in the developing vertebrate inner ear. Int J Dev Biol 51:507–520
Wu DK, Kelley MW (2012) Molecular mechanisms of inner ear development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a008409
Xiang M, Maklad A, Pirvola U, Fritzsch B (2003) Brn3c null mutant mice show long-term, incomplete retention of some afferent inner ear innervation. BMC Neurosci 4:2
Yang T, Kersigo J, Jahan I, Pan N, Fritzsch B (2011) The molecular basis of making spiral ganglion neurons and connecting them to hair cells of the organ of Corti. Hear Res 278:21–33
Zhang KD, Coate TM (2017) Recent advances in the development and function of type II spiral ganglion neurons in the mammalian inner ear. Semin Cell Dev Biol 65:80–87
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to Dr Tanaka for providing us with QN antibodies.
Funding
This work was supported by the following Grant sponsors: Spanish Ministry of Science, BFU2010-1946; Junta de Extremadura, GR10152, GR15158 and IB18046 (to M.H.-S.); Spanish MICINN Grant BFU2014-57516P; SENECA Foundation contract 19904/GERM/15 (to L.P.); Junta de Extremadura pre-doctoral studentshipvaage; Grant number PRE/08031 (to L.-O.S.-G.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MH-S, L-OS-G and LP designed experiments. L-OS-G and MH-S performed experiments. MH-S, L-OS-G and LP analysed data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice where the studies were conducted.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
S1 Figure. Related to Figure 4. Grafted area of Type 1 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 1 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the macula utriculi area. (b-g) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 1 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the macula utriculi (between arrowheads in b, d) and a contiguous small area in the utricle wall (arrows in b, d). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (ac, pc, and mn in c, c’; lc and mu in d, d’; bp in e-g; ml in g). Differentiated neurons from the grafted area were also observed (arrows in e, f). (h, i) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 1 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in h and i. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral. (TIFF 14975 kb)
S2 Figure. Related to Figure 5. Grafted area of Type 2 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 2 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the macula sacculi area. (b-e) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 2 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the macula sacculi (between arrowheads in b, d) and a contiguous small area in the saccule wall (arrows in b, d). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (ac, pc, and mn in c, c’; lc and mu in d; bp in e; ml, not shown). (f, g) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 2 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in f and g. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral. (TIFF 15385 kb)
S3 Figure. Related to Figure 6. Grafted area of Type 3 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 3 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the entire basilar papilla area. (b-e) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 3 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the basilar papilla (between arrowheads in b, e) and a contiguous small area in the cochlear duct wall (arrows in b, e). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (ac, pc, and mn in c, c’; lc, mu, and ms in d; ml in f). (f, g) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 3 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in f and g. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral (TIFF 16438 kb)
S4 Figure. Related to Figure 7. Grafted area of Type 4 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 4 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the macula lagena and macula neglecta areas. (b-f) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 4 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the macula lagena and macula neglecta areas (between arrowheads in b, c) and their contiguous non-sensory areas (arrows in b, c, d). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (ac and pc in d; lc, mu, and ms in e; bp in f). Differentiated neurons from the grafted area were also observed (arrow in f). The graft formed a dorsoventrally arranged band in the cochlear duct (arrowheads in e, f). (g, h) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 4 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in g and h. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral. (TIFF 16723 kb)
S5 Figure. Related to Figure 8. Grafted area of Type 5 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 5 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the anterior and lateral cristae area. (b-e) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 5 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the anterior and lateral cristae area (between arrowheads in b, c, d) and their contiguous non-sensory areas (arrows in b, c, d). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (pc in d’; lc, mu, and ms in d; bp in e, f; ml in f). Some QCPN-stained cells from the grafted mesenchyme were also observed (short arrows in f). Differentiated neurons from the grafted area were also observed (large arrows in f, e). (g, h) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 5 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in g and h. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral. (TIFF 17270 kb)
S6 Figure. Related to Figure 9. Grafted area of Type 6 graft.
(a) Schematic representation of the Type 6 experiment at the 10-somite stage, involving the posterior crista area. (b-e) Horizontal sections through a representative Type 6 chimaeric embryo at 10 days of incubation (E10). The QCPN-positive grafted area contained exclusively the posterior crista area (between arrowheads in b, c) and its contiguous non-sensory areas (arrows in b, c). The rest of the sensory and non-sensory elements were completely devoid of QCPN-positive grafted quail cells (ac and mn in c; lc, mu, and ms in d; bp and ml in e). (f, g) Three-dimensional diagrams of a chimaeric inner ear summarising the Type 6 grafted-cell distribution. The horizontal sections are indicated in f and g. Abbreviations: C, caudal; D, dorsal; M, medial; R, rostral. (TIFF 13497 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sánchez-Guardado, L.Ó., Puelles, L. & Hidalgo-Sánchez, M. Origin of acoustic–vestibular ganglionic neuroblasts in chick embryos and their sensory connections. Brain Struct Funct 224, 2757–2774 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01934-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01934-5