Abstract
The link between the local structure of the primary motor cortex and motor function has been well documented. However, motor function relies on a network of interconnected brain regions and the link between the structural properties characterizing these distributed brain networks and motor function remains poorly understood. Here, we examined whether distributed patterns of brain structure, extending beyond the primary motor cortex can help classify two forms of motor function: corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition. To this effect, we recorded high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging scans in 25 healthy volunteers. To measure corticospinal excitability and inhibition in the same volunteers, we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in a separate session. Support vector machine (SVM) pattern classification was used to identify distributed multi-voxel gray-matter areas, which distinguished subjects who had lower and higher MEPs and SICIs. We found that MEP and SICI classification could be predicted based on a widely distributed, largely non-overlapping pattern of voxels in frontal, parietal, temporal, occipital, and cerebellar regions. Thus, structural properties distributed over the brain beyond the primary motor cortex relate to motor function.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander GE, DeLong MR, Strick PL (1986) Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 9:357–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041
Alexander-Bloch A, Giedd JN, Bullmore E (2013) Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:322–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3465
Bestmann S, Krakauer JW (2015) The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour. Exp Brain Res 233:679–689
Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer, Berlin
Boser BE, Guyon IM, Vapnik VN (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory. ACM, pp 144–152
Bullmore ET, Bassett DS (2011) Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 7:113–140. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934
Conde V, Vollmann H, Sehm B, Taubert M, Villringer A, Ragert P (2012) Cortical thickness in primary sensorimotor cortex influences the effectiveness of paired associative stimulation. Neuroimage 60:864–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.052
Darling WG, Wolf SL, Butler AJ (2006) Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation. Exp Brain Res 174:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0468-9
Daskalakis ZJ, Paradiso GO, Christensen BK, Fitzgerald PB, Gunraj C, Chen R (2004) Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans. J Physiol 557:689–700
Dayan E, Censor N, Buch ER, Sandrini M, Cohen LG (2013) Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back. Nat Neurosci 16:838–844. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3422
Dayan E, Hamann JM, Averbeck BB, Cohen LG (2014) Brain structural substrates of reward dependence during behavioral performance. J Neurosci 34:16433–16441. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3141-14.2014
Ecker C, Marquand A, Mourão-Miranda J, Johnston P, Daly EM, Brammer MJ, Maltezos S, Murphy CM, Robertson D, Williams SC et al (2010a) Describing the brain in autism in five dimensions—magnetic resonance imaging-assisted diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder using a multiparameter classification approach. J Neurosci 30:10612–10623
Ecker C, Rocha-Rego V, Johnston P, Mourao-Miranda J, Marquand A, Daly EM, Brammer MJ, Murphy C, Murphy DG (2010b) Investigating the predictive value of whole-brain structural MR scans in autism: a pattern classification approach. Neuroimage 49:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.024
Fougnie D (2008) The relationship between attention and working memory. New Res Short Term Mem 1:45
Fox MD, Corbetta M, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Raichle ME (2006) Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:10046–10051
Garry MI, Thomson RHS (2009) The effect of test TMS intensity on short-interval intracortical inhibition in different excitability states. Exp Brain Res 193:267
Goetz SM, Luber B, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV (2014) A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 7:541–552
Guye M, Parker GJM, Symms M, Boulby P, Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Salek-Haddadi A, Barker GJ, Duncan JS (2003) Combined functional MRI and tractography to demonstrate the connectivity of the human primary motor cortex in vivo. Neuroimage 19:1349–1360
Hallett M (2007) Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer. Neuron 55:187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.026
Hasan A, Galea JM, Casula EP, Falkai P, Bestmann S, Rothwell JC (2013) Muscle and timing-specific functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the primary motor cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 25:558–570. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00338
He BJ, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, Epstein A, Shulman GL, Corbetta M (2007) Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 53:905–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.013
Johansen-Berg H, Della-Maggiore V, Behrens TEJ, Smith SM, Paus T (2007) Integrity of white matter in the corpus callosum correlates with bimanual co-ordination skills. Neuroimage 36:T16–T21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.041
Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Kuhnke NG, Hauschke D, Stolle S, Mall V (2010) Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 3:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.003
Kanai R, Rees G (2011) The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci 12:231–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3000
Kelly RM, Strick PL (2003) Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate. J Neurosci 23:8432–8444
Kiers L, Cros D, Chiappa KH, Fang J (1993) Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 89:415–423
Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519
Liew S-L, Santarnecchi E, Buch ER, Cohen LG (2014) Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation: local and distant effects for motor recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00378
Lu MT, Preston JB, Strick PL (1994) Interconnections between the prefrontal cortex and the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol 341:375–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903410308
Marquand A, Howard M, Brammer M, Chu C, Coen S, Mourão-Miranda J (2010) Quantitative prediction of subjective pain intensity from whole-brain fMRI data using Gaussian processes. Neuroimage 49:2178–2189
Mars RB, Bestmann S, Rothwell JC, Haggard P (2007) Effects of motor preparation and spatial attention on corticospinal excitability in a delayed-response paradigm. Exp Brain Res 182:125–129
Matsumoto R, Nair DR, LaPresto E, Bingaman W, Shibasaki H, Luders HO (2006) Functional connectivity in human cortical motor system: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study. Brain 130:181–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl257
Mourão-Miranda J, Bokde AL, Born C, Hampel H, Stetter M (2005) Classifying brain states and determining the discriminating activation patterns: support vector machine on functional MRI data. Neuroimage 28:980–995
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Picard N, Strick PL (1996) Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex 6:342–353
Pitcher JB, Ogston KM, Miles TS (2003) Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input–output characteristics. J Physiol 546:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2002.029454
Ramnani N (2006) The primate cortico-cerebellar system: anatomy and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:511–522. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1953
Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC (2004) The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex: muscle vibration and sensorimotor organization. J Physiol 561:307–320. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2004.069328
Roshan L, Paradiso GO, Chen R (2003) Two phases of short-interval intracortical inhibition. Exp Brain Res 151:330–337
Rothwell JC (1997) Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Neurosci Methods 74:113–122
Rothwell JC, Hallett M, Berardelli A, Eisen A, Rossini P, Paulus W (1999) Magnetic stimulation: motor evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 52:97–103
Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Kujirai T (2009) Short latency intracortical inhibition: one of the most popular tools in human motor neurophysiology. Perspect J Physiol 587:11–12. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2008.162461
Sakai K, Ugawa Y, Terao Y, Hanajima R, Furubayashi T, Kanazawa I (1997) Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. Exp Brain Res 113:24–32
Sanger TD, Garg RR, Chen R (2001) Interactions between two different inhibitory systems in the human motor cortex. J Physiol 530:307–317
Smolker HR, Depue BE, Reineberg AE, Orr JM, Banich MT (2015) Individual differences in regional prefrontal gray matter morphometry and fractional anisotropy are associated with different constructs of executive function. Brain Struct Funct 220:1291–1306
Taylor JL, Gandevia SC (2001) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and human muscle fatigue. Muscle Nerve 24:18–29
Temesi J, Rupp T, Martin V, Arnal PJ, FéAsson L, Verges S, Millet GY (2014) Central fatigue assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation in ultratrail running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46:1166–1175. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000207
Thomson RHS, Garry MI, Summers JJ (2008) Attentional influences on short-interval intracortical inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 119:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.060
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M (2002) Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 15:273–289. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0978
van Gaal S, Scholte HS, Lamme VAF, Fahrenfort JJ, Ridderinkhof KR (2011) Pre-SMA gray-matter density predicts individual differences in action selection in the face of conscious and unconscious response conflict. J Cogn Neurosci 23:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21444
Vemuri P, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, Whitwell JL, Kantarci K, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, Jack CR (2008) Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis in individual subjects using structural MR images: validation studies. Neuroimage 39, 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.073
Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR (2014) Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist 20:150–159
Westlye LT, Grydeland H, Walhovd KB, Fjell AM (2010) Associations between regional cortical thickness and attentional networks as measured by the attention network test. Cereb Cortex 21:345–356
Zatorre RJ, Fields RD, Johansen-Berg H (2012) Plasticity in gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat Neurosci 15:528–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3045
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health. Virginia López-Alonso was supported by an FPU fellowship from Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte, Spain. Sook-Lei Liew acknowledges funding by the NIH Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD091283, HD055929). The study utilized the high-performance computational capabilities of the Biowulf Linux cluster at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (http://biowulf.nih.gov) We thank Ryan Thompson for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors designed the study; VLA and SLL performed the experiments. ED and VLA analyzed the data. All authors wrote and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dayan, E., López-Alonso, V., Liew, SL. et al. Distributed cortical structural properties contribute to motor cortical excitability and inhibition. Brain Struct Funct 223, 3801–3812 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1722-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-018-1722-1