Abstract
The application of molecular profiling has made substantial impact on the classification of urogenital tumors. Therefore, the 2022 World Health Organization incorporated the concept of molecularly defined renal tumor entities into its classification, including succinate dehydrogenase–deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC), FH-deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, ELOC-mutated RCC, and renal medullary RCC, which are characterized by SMARCB1-deficiency. This review aims to provide an overview of the most important molecular alterations in renal cancer, with a specific focus on the diagnostic value of characteristic genomic aberrations, their chromosomal localization, and associations with renal tumor subtypes. It may not yet be the time to completely shift to a molecular RCC classification, but undoubtedly, the application of molecular profiling will enhance the accuracy of renal cancer diagnosis, and ultimately guide personalized treatment strategies for patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The rapid evolution in renal cancer management highlights the importance of incorporating multiple specialties in decision-making processes, particularly in utilizing novel molecular technologies to enhance personalized diagnosis and treatment approaches [1]. In the past, the classification of kidney cancer has been mainly based on histomorphological characteristics and the corroborating immunohistochemical profile. The increasing knowledge of molecular alterations in renal cancer, coupled with the global adoption of next generation sequencing (NGS), is driving a significant shift in the diagnostic approach from morphology to molecular analysis. Therefore, further stratification and new definition of tumor entities have been proposed [2]. In 2022, the fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of “Urinary and Male Genital Tumours” took these novel developments into account, introducing a classification of renal tumors partly based on molecular features [3]. Such novel molecularly defined epithelial renal tumors include succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)–deficient RCC, FH-deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, ALK-rearranged RCC, SMARCB1-deficient medullary RCC, and ELOC-mutated RCC. In addition, characteristic gene alterations are recognized in emerging renal tumor entities for which the collection of evidence is ongoing and key features have yet to be defined. These include papillary neoplasms with reverse polarity that are associated with recurrent mutations of KRAS [4], biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC that show NF2 mutations [5], somatic TSC2-inactivating mutations that are identified in eosinophilic vacuolated tumors (EVT), and low-grade oncocytic tumors that may be characterized by MTOR mutations [6, 7]. EWSR1::PATZ1 fusions have been recurrently identified in thyroid-like follicular carcinomas [8].
Therefore, the diagnostic workup of rare or unusual renal tumors frequently requires the analysis of complex molecular alterations, including different genetic and genomic alterations. Ideally, the molecular subtyping of renal tumors does not only contribute to the accurate diagnosis, but also provides a basis for personalized treatment. In this review, we discuss the value of specific molecular alterations for the diagnosis of novel and emerging renal tumor types and as a screening tool for hereditary tumor syndromes. As shown in Fig. 1, we outline molecular alterations (mutations, copy number variations, and gene fusions) in renal cancer in the order of chromosomes. We perceive that this will assist pathologists and molecular biologists who interpret molecular tumor analysis or investigate distinct aberrations as part of their translational research. For those, looking for the molecular alterations in a distinct renal cancer entity, we have summarized these in Table 1.
Molecular alterations in the diagnosis of renal cancer
Chromosome 1
Fumarate hydratase
The fumarate hydratase (FH) gene, located on chromosome 1q42, encodes for one of the key enzymes involved in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Its main function is to catalyze fumarate into l-malate [16]. Its (bi-allelic) mutation and/or deletion is considered the main molecular event in FH-deficient RCC, formerly classified as hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma RCC (HLRCC-RCC). Cases presenting with FH germline mutations are often characterized by aggressive RCCs as well as cutaneous and uterine leiomyomas. However, recent evidence suggests that these carcinomas can occur sporadically; thus, in the 2022 WHO classification, FH-deficient RCC includes sporadic and hereditary cases [17]. Notably, widespread use of genetic testing has identified more patients with germline FH mutations, suggesting that the prevalence of familial FH deficiency may be higher than previously estimated [18]. FH-deficient RCC can show a broad spectrum of morphologies, more commonly depicting papillary and tubulocystic growth pattern with very prominent, viral-inclusion like nucleoli [19]. Figure 2A shows a representative case of the histology of an FH-deficient RCC, which we have published before [19], that requires molecular analysis for diagnosis. In addition, oncocytic (“low-grade”) differentiated RCCs associated with FH-loss have been described [20]. For diagnostic purposes, complete immunohistochemical loss of FH protein expression can be used to identify respective cases [21, 22], but in cases harboring a single nucleotide variant (SNV), FH protein expression might be preserved making genomic testing mandatory in suspicious cases [11, 23].
Succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B
Inactivation of succinate dehydrogenase complex iron sulfur subunit B (SDHB) on chromosome 1 [24] leads to the deficiency of the enzyme complex and accumulation of oncometabolites that are also linked to the TCA cycle. This inactivation is associated with SDH-deficient RCC [25]. SDH-deficient RCC usually shows proliferation of bland eosinophilic cells with bubbly cytoplasmic changes and sometimes cytoplasmic inclusions [3]. Importantly, the expression of SDHB is lost in all SDH-deficient neoplasms irrespective of the specific SDH subunit (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD) affected by a genetic mutation. Thus, SDHB immunohistochemistry (IHC) can aid diagnosis [24].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 1
Losses on chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, 21, and Y are common in chromophobe RCC (chrRCC) [26]. Alterations on chromosome 1 also exist in clear cell RCC (ccRCC), collecting duct carcinoma (CDC), nephroblastomas, mucinous tubular and spindle cell RCC (MTSC-RCC), and oncocytomas. Loss of 1p36 can be found in ccRCC indicating worse prognosis [27]. In CDC, losses of 1p, 6, 8, 9, 14, and 22 have been observed [14, 15], which can help to distinguish CDC from other types of RCC and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Moreover, concurrent loss of chromosomes 1p and 16q indicate a poor prognosis in nephroblastoma and can serve as a rationale for a more intensive chemotherapy [28]. Multiple chromosomal losses involving chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22 can be found in MTSC-RCC [12]. Additionally, oncocytomas often show recurrent chromosomal losses in chromosomes 1, 14, 21, X, and Y [12]. In contrast, gain of chromosome 1q is associated with a poor prognosis and has been used as a prognostic marker for nephroblastomas in prospective studies [29, 30].
Chromosome 2
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase
Among the novel renal epithelial tumors included into the 2022 WHO classification, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged RCC has been defined as a separate subtype [3]. Chromosomal rearrangements such as those involving the ALK gene on chromosome 2p23 can form fusions that produce chimeric proteins. These harbor novel functions and are often both overexpressed and more active than their normal counterparts [31]. The wild-type ALK protein is a receptor tyrosine kinase with strictly confined expression patterns. ALK gene fusions lead to chimeric proteins that harbor oncogenic activity.
ALK-rearranged RCC appear to be very rare representing less than 1% of all RCC cases but some of the cases described were associated with poor clinical outcomes [32]. Consistently, a diverse set of ALK fusion partners have been identified including VCL, TPM3, EML4, STRN, and HOOK1 [32]. Among these, vinculin (VCL)::ALK gene fusions seem to be distinctive in pediatric patients [33, 34]. Additionally, ALK::STRN and ALK::PLEKHA7 gene fusions have been described in tumors mimicking metanephric adenoma, corroborating the notion that gene fusion partners might impact morphology and even clinical outcomes [32, 35].
Diagnostic testing for ALK translocations encompasses primarily fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and NGS. IHC can indicate ALK rearrangements displaying strong expression of the fusion protein. However, high ALK protein expression can result from other sources than gene translocation, making molecular testing mandatory [36]. Correctly diagnosing RCC with ALK fusions is of high clinical significance as aberrantly active ALK proteins are promising targets for therapy with ALK inhibitors like crizotinib [37].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 2
As mentioned for chromosome 1, loss of chromosome 2 is one of the common genetic alteration in chrRCC [26].
Chromosome 3
3p loss and VHL inactivation
Biallelic inactivation of the VHL tumor suppressor encoded on chromosome 3p25-26 is a hallmark of ccRCC. Inactivation occurs by mutation, copy number loss, or promoter hyper-methylation and causes accumulation of HIF1A and overexpression of HIF target genes [38, 39]. Due to its prevalence, VHL mutations can be used as a corroborating marker in the diagnosis of ccRCC. However, VHL mutations have also been described in several other subtypes of renal cancer; for instance, tubulocystic RCC (TC-RCC) (17%) [13], papillary RCC (papRCC) (1.1%) [40], chrRCC (1.5%) [9], and FH-deficient RCC (1.8%) [41]. Taken together, VHL mutations are typical (> 80% of ccRCC) [42] but not specific for ccRCC. Moreover, they are largely unrelated to prognostic or predictive parameters thus limiting their diagnostic potential. Most importantly, novel therapies for renal cancer have been developed targeting the VHL-HIF pathway; thus, broad profiling of VHL aberrations may open the possibility to administer these drugs to a wide range of patients [43,44,45].
PBRM1, SETD2, and BAP1
CcRCCs frequently show simultaneous loss of three other tumor suppressor genes located on chromosome 3p in close proximity to VHL: PBRM1 (in about 50% of cases), SETD2 (in about 20% of cases), and BAP1 (in about 15% of cases). Like VHL, mutations of PBRM1 tend to occur early in tumor development. Mutations in PBRM1 and SETD2 often co-exist while mutations in PBRM1 and BAP1 seem mutually exclusive at the clone level, with distinct tumor phenotypes [46, 47]. Recently, it has been shown that multiple subclonal drivers including PBRM1, SETD2, or BAP1 mutations contribute to high genetic intra-tumor diversity in ccRCC and impact on clinical outcomes [47]. Albeit still under investigation, it is perceivable that detailed analysis of genetic subclonal architecture may be part of ccRCC diagnosis and influence clinical decision-making in the future.
Chromosome 5
SDHA
SDHA is another member of the SDH complex. A gene located on chromosome 5 encodes for it. Similar to SDHB, inactivation of SDHA causes SDH-deficient RCC. Germline pathogenic variants in the SDHA gene exist but occur in less than 0.3% of the population. As they have a lifetime penetrance of only approximately 1.7%, SDHA mutations identified by large NGS test are generally considered incidental findings unrelated to renal tumors. Importantly, SDHA-deficient RCCs show negativity for both SDHA and SDHB in IHC analysis [24].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 5
Studies have reported that structural aberrations in chromosome 5q, 8p, 9p, and 14 may have an impact on the prognosis of ccRCC [48]. Copy number gains in the chromosome 5q region are associated with good prognosis, whereas deletions are associated with adverse effects [49].
Chromosome 6
Transcription factor EB
A gene fusion involving the transcription factor EB (TFEB) 6p21 locus was first described in 2001 in a pediatric renal neoplasm [50]. Based on similar morphologies, immunohistochemical profiles and related molecular pathologies TFEB-rearranged renal neoplasms were initially grouped together with transcription factor binding to IGHM enhancer 3 (TFE3)-rearranged RCCs into the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MiT) family translocation carcinoma subtype in the 2016 WHO classification [51]. Besides TFEB and TFE3, this subfamily of transcription factors includes TFEC and MiTF [52]. Except for TFEC, gene translocations involving all of these factors have been identified in RCC [53]. In the 2022 WHO classification, TFEB-altered renal cell carcinomas became a separate entity that also includes RCCs with TFEB amplifications [3]. The majority of TFEB-translocation RCC have been described in children and young adults [54].
The most frequent 5′ fusion partner of TFEB is the MALAT1 gene on chromosome 11 (t(6;11)(p21;q12) translocation). Interestingly, MALAT1 encodes for a long noncoding RNA that drives overexpression of the intact TFEB protein [55]. Several other fusion partners have recently been described including KHDRBS2, COL21A1, CADM2, CLTC, EWSR1, and ACTB [54, 56].
However, TFEB-tRCC is a particularly rare disease that is likely underdiagnosed because it includes a variety of nonspecific morphologies and requires molecular confirmation by RT-PCR, FISH, or RNA sequencing. A TFEB break-apart FISH probe can be applied for diagnosing RCCs with TFEB translocations. However, RNA sequencing can provide a more efficient approach as it can also detect paracentric inversions that have been described in translocations such as PPP1R10::TFEB [56]. These aberrations will yield a false-negative FISH result. Strong nuclear immunoreactivity of the TFEB protein can suggest the presence of a TFEB fusion or, in very rare cases, also result from TFEB amplification. TFEB-amplified RCC shows a broad spectrum of morphology and is therefore even more easily misclassified. Importantly, in these cases, TFEB amplification occurs without TFEB rearrangements. Instead, chromosome 6p amplification including the TFEB gene have been described [57, 58]. This raises the possibility to diagnose such cases based on mRNA expression or large-scale NGS that facilitates copy number analysis [59].
Chromosome 7
Mesenchymal epithelial transition gene
Mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) gene is located on human chromosome 7q31 and encodes the MET receptor tyrosine kinase, which acts downstream of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). It has important roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival [60]. As a proto-oncogene, mutations in the MET gene lead to constitutive activation of the c-Met protein [60]. Often, germline MET mutations are observed in the context of hereditary papillary renal carcinoma (HPRCC) [61]. MET upregulation is defined as MET and/or HGF amplification, chromosome 7 copy number gain (the gene locus of both MET and HGF), and/or MET kinase domain mutations. MET upregulation is reported in up to 80% of papRCC [62], whereas MET gene alterations are rather rare in sporadic papRCC (< 10%; Table 1) [40]. Consequently, MET inhibitors have shown efficacy in a subset of MET-driven papRCCs [62].
BRAF
The BRAF gene is located on human chromosome 7q34 and encodes the BRAF tyrosine kinase. The most common BRAF mutation is p.V600E, which confers a persistent increase in kinase activity. The mutation triggers abnormal cell proliferation and survival signals that promote tumor development and progression. Frequently, BRAF p.V600E mutations have been detected in metanephric adenoma, metanephric adenofibroma, and metanephric stromal tumors [12]. However, despite of this distinct driver mutation, these entities are still morphologically defined tumors.
Notably, in a composite case of metanephric adenofibroma-papillary renal cell carcinoma, both the adenoma and carcinoma components have shown the same BRAF p.V600E mutation [63]. In addition, epithelial-dominant nephroblastomas can also harbor BRAF p.V600E [64]. Importantly, BRAF p.V600E has not been found in clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, congenital mesodermal nephroma, or infantile ossifying renal tumors of infancy. Since it is present in most metanephric stromal tumors, BRAF p.V600E detection may support the differential diagnosis of difficult cases [65].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 7
PapRCC is frequently characterized by gains of chromosomes 7 and 17. Trisomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 is observed already in small papillary renal tumors suggesting the potential involvement of this amplification in the early stages of tumor development [66]. Notably, gains on chromosomes 7 and mutations or duplications of the MET gene have been implicated in synergistically enhance its oncogenic effects [48, 67]. Overall, the presence of chromosomal aberrations involving chromosomes 7 and 17 has emerged as a distinctive feature of papRCC, while the significance of other chromosomal alterations may be less pronounced.
Chromosome 8
Elongin C complex
ELOC (formerly TCEB1) encodes the elongin C protein, a crucial component of the VHL complex that plays a role in the physiological ubiquitinylation and inactivation of HIF1a. ELOC mutation frequently occurs in the VHL-binding site at residue Y79 disrupting the VHL-Elongin C complex and causing Hif1a stabilization and the activation of oncogenic downstream pathways [68]. Importantly, in a recent study, biallelic ELOC and VHL aberrations were mutually exclusive. Notably, there were no mutations detected in TSC1, TSC2, or mTOR in RCCs with biallelic ELOC inactivation [69]. To confirm the diagnosis of ELOC-mutant RCC, proof of ELOC mutation is necessary (Fig. 2B).
Copy number alterations of chromosome 8
Changes in chromosome 8p may have an impact on the prognosis of ccRCC [48]. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in 8p has been correlated with advanced tumor stage, indicating its potential role in tumor development and metastasis [70]. Additionally, loss of chromosome 8 can also exist in MTSC [12].
Chromosome 9
CDKN2A/B
The CDKN2A/B gene is located on human chromosome 9p21.3 and encodes three important tumor suppressor proteins, p16INK4a, p14ARF, and p15INK4b. These proteins play key roles in cell cycle regulation and suppression of tumor development. The p16INK4a protein inhibits the activity of CDK4/6 enzymes, prevents cell cycle progression, and inhibits cell proliferation [71]. The mutation, deletion, or hyper-methylation of the CDKN2A/B gene will inactivate the function of these inhibitory proteins, thereby promoting the development of tumors [72]. CDKN2A alterations can occur in ccRCC, high-grade papRCC, and CDC [12]. CDKN2A or CDKN2B deletions and other complex genomic abnormalities typically occur in high-grade RCC tumors [73].
Tuberous sclerosis complex 1
Tuberous sclerosis complex 1 (TSC1) gene is located on human chromosome 9q34 and encodes the TSC1 protein. TSC1 is a component of the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and interacts with the TSC2 protein (encoded by the TSC2 gene, located on chromosome 16p13.3) to jointly regulate the activity of mTOR signaling [74]. Mutations in TSC1/2 lead to mTOR pathway hyperactivation that drives proliferation and growth of cells that form tumors in the kidney [74].
Biallelic inactivation of TSC1 or TSC2 is present in more than 90% of angiomyolipomas. Additionally, TSC1/2 alterations have been described in novel and emerging renal tumor subtypes including ESC-RCC, eosinophilic vacuolated tumors, TFEB-altered RCC, low-grade oncocytic tumors (LOT), and eosinophilic vacuolated tumors (EVT) [75,76,77,78]. Interestingly, tumors exhibiting diffuse CK7 positivity and fibromyomatous stroma may also harbor mutations in the TSC/mTOR pathway, with some cases associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. The debate about whether or not tumors with TSC alterations represent a distinct pathologic entity is not fully resolved to date. A significant number of tumors within the RCC “Not otherwise specified (NOS)” category show somatic mutations of TSC2 or activating mutations of MTOR implying that these factors could be distinct tumor drivers [12]. Additionally, TSC1/2 mutations are commonly detected in RCCs characterized by prominent leiomyomatous stroma [12]. Taken together, a broad spectrum of RCC is associated with TSC1/2 mutations. Hence, the detection of these mutations alone cannot be used to classify renal tumors. However, sequencing of TSC1/2 genes can be significant to corroborate the diagnosis of certain subtypes of RCC (e.g., ESC-RCC) [12].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 9
Loss of chromosome 9 has been reported in TC-RCC. LOH events affecting chromosomal regions of 9p have been implicated in unfavorable prognosis and tumor recurrence in ccRCC [79].
Chromosome 10
Phosphatase and tensin homolog gene
The phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene is located on chromosome 10q23 and encodes a phosphatase that negatively regulates cell proliferation, growth, and survival. Mutations in the PTEN gene result in over-activation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway [80] and are common in different subtypes of RCC, especially in ccRCC and chrRCC [12].
Cowden syndrome, a hereditary multi-system disorder, is characterized by mutations in PTEN and pre-disposes patients to RCC, in particular with chromophobe-like morphology [81].
Chromosome 11
Wilms tumor gene 1
The WT1 gene is located on human chromosome 11p13 and encodes the WT1 transcription factor that plays a key role in embryonic kidney development. In renal cancer, the WT1 gene mutation is one of the common genetic alterations and has been reported in several subtypes of renal cancer, including ccRCC and in particular nephroblastoma. Approximately 20% of sporadic nephroblastomas exhibit WT1 gene mutations [12].
In addition, WAGR syndrome is caused by a germline deletion of chromosome band 11p13, which contains the WT1 gene. In 45–60% of the cases, patients with WAGR syndrome present with nephroblastoma. Denys-Drash syndrome is linked to a germline WT1 gene mutation, with a 90% risk of nephroblastoma [12].
Chromosome 12
KRAS
The KRAS gene is located on human chromosome 12p12.1 and mutations lead to a sustained increase in the activity of the KRAS protein, causing abnormal cell proliferation and survival signaling [82]. In renal cancer, KRAS mutations are rare [83]. Recent evidence suggests they are characteristic for the emerging subtype of papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (PRNRP) [84, 85]; thus, their detection may become relevant for papRCC diagnosis in the future [3].
Chromosome 17
TP53
The TP53 gene is located on chromosome 17p13.1 and encodes a well-known tumor suppressor that has essential functions in the cellular stress response and genome stability maintenance. Inactivating mutations in TP53 cause abnormal cell proliferation and tumor formation [86]. In ccRCC, papRCC, chrRCC, and nephroblastomas, TP53 mutations may be additional tumor drivers, and are associated with tumor progression (“second hit”) [10, 87,88,89]. Because chemotherapy-induced apoptosis depends on functional p53, TP53 mutations may be associated with chemotherapy resistance [90].
Copy number alterations of chromosome 17
Gains of chromosome 17 frequently occur in papRCC [3, 91] but have been reported also in TC-RCC [3].
Chromosome 22
SMARCB1
The SMARCB1 (also known as INI1, SNF5, or BAF47) gene is located on human chromosome 22q11.23 and encodes a subunit of the SWI/SNF complex that is involved in the regulation of chromatin structure and gene expression. Consequently, mutations in SMARCB1 drive aberrant gene expression programs thereby promoting tumor cell proliferation and metastasis [92]. Most commonly, SMARCB1 inactivation occurs by chromosomal translocations or deletion. Importantly, almost all renal rhabdoid tumors show biallelic loss of SMARCB1 and thus this is one of the universal features of this tumor type [12]. In addition, SMARCB1 mutations are found in SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and are accompanied by loss of SMARCB1 protein (INI1) expression on IHC [12]. Moreover, assessment of INI1 loss aids the differential diagnosis between SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and high-grade invasive urothelial carcinoma or collecting duct carcinoma. However, it is necessary to keep in mind, that other RCCs presenting with SMARCB1 deficiency as a secondary event may exist [93, 94].
Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene
The Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 gene (EWSR1) on chromosome 22q12 is rearranged in Ewing sarcomas, an aggressive cancer that can sporadically occur in the kidney [95, 96]. Primary Ewing sarcoma of the kidney are very rare but highly malignant, metastasizing early or recurring quickly. Therefore, it is of crucial importance to distinguish them from other predominantly pediatric renal tumors like Wilms tumor, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, or clear cell sarcoma of the kidney [97].
Ewing sarcoma of the kidney often present with a small cell histology but for an unequivocal diagnosis, molecular analysis is imperative. Between 80 and 95% of patients harbor a chromosomal translocation between t(11;22) (q24;q12) resulting in a fusion between the N-terminal transactivation domain of EWSR1 and the C-terminal DNA-binding domain of the FLI1 gene. The chimeric EWSR1/FLI1 protein acts as a powerful transcriptional activator that promotes cell proliferation and causes genomic instability [98]. Other fusion partners include WT1, ERG, ETV1, E1AF, and FEV. Importantly, cases with EWSR1::TFE3 tRCC have recently been reported showing that EWSR1 gene rearrangements may play a role in MiT family translocation RCC [99, 100]. IHC expression of the protein most common fusion partner FLI1 may suggest the presence of a EWSR1-rearranged Ewing sarcoma of the kidney in about 60% of the cases, but is insufficient for diagnosis [97]. EWSR1 translocations can be detected directly by FISH or RT-PCR. However, as these routine methods can only identify a limited number of fusion partners, are low-throughput and labor-intensive, they are increasingly replaced by NGS-based techniques that are robust, are more sensitive, and require no previous knowledge of the fusion partner.
In addition, EWSR1 gene fusions partnering with PATZ1 have been recurrently identified in thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma (TFRCC), which was considered a provisional entity in the 2016 WHO classification [51]. The name results from the follicular arrangement of tubular cells with colloid-like that are reminiscent of thyroid follicles. In general, these tumors are of low-grade and show an indolent biological behavior [8]. However, recently, a case of TFRCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and aggressive behavior has been documented, also harboring the EWSR1::PATZ1 gene fusion [101].
Chromosome X
Transcription factor E3
The transcription factor E3 (TFE3) gene resides on the Xp11.2 gene locus and the associated protein belongs to the MiT-subfamily of transcription factors. Translocations involving TFE3 are the characteristic event in TFE3-rearranged RCC that has first been recognized in the 2004 WHO classification [102]. TFE3 is rearranged in around 1–4% of adult RCCs but as it is more prevalent in RCCs of children. It is a rare but often aggressive disease [103]. TFE3-rearranged RCCs exhibit a wide spectrum of morphologies making it challenging to diagnose based on histological criteria alone (Fig. 2C). Due to this reason, TFE3-rearranged RCC may be particularly under-recognized among older (> 45 years) patients.
Many fusion partners have been described for TFE3-rearranged RCCs [104, 105]. As the exact breakpoint site in TFE3 fusions is usually in-frame, pre-mRNA splicing generates a chimeric mRNA transcript fused at exon–exon junctions [104]. These transcripts encode the N-terminal portion of the fusion partner linked to a range of C-terminal encoding exons of TFE3. The three most common translocations include t(X;1)(p11.2;q21), fusing the PRCC and TFE3 genes; t(X;17)(p11.2;q25), fusing the ASPSCR1 and TFE3 genes; and t(X;1)(p11.2;p34), fusing the SFPQ and TFE3 genes. Leveraging RNAseq technologies, many more fusion partners have been recently identified, including NONO, RBM10, DVL2, PARP14, GRIPAP1, MED15, KATA6A, NEAT1, EWSR1, and CLTC [53, 105]. TFE3 fusion partners often involve genes related to RNA splicing and processing, suggesting their potential role in TFE3-rearranged RCC tumorigenesis. These fusions can activate TFE3 continuously or affect its nuclear localization, driving its oncogenic activity [104, 106]. Nevertheless, the variety of known TFE3 gene fusions is considerable and likely contributes to the high degree of heterogeneity of TFE3-rearranged RCC, both morphologically and clinically. Moreover, the prognosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC has been shown to depend on the TFE3 fusion partner highlighting the importance of its accurate molecular detection [104]. Currently, there is no standardized diagnostic work-up for TFE3-rearranged RCC and TFE3 IHC often yields unreliable results [107]. FISH using break-apart probes for TFE3 has been the gold standard for diagnosis but similar to TFEB-tRCC, small intrachromosomal gene inversions such as RBM10::TFE3, GRIPAP1::TFE3, RBMX::TFE3, and NONO::TFE3 are impossible to detect by this test [53, 108]. NGS-based technologies that can identify gene fusion events in a partner-agnostic manner have been shown to enable accurate molecular diagnosis of TFE3-rearranged RCC and may be even more broadly adopted in the diagnostic routine in the future [59].
Conclusion
Molecular alterations are increasingly used for classification of renal cancers, particularly in challenging cases involving small biopsies, atypical high-grade tumors, and metastatic tumors with unknown origins. However, these alterations are often not exclusive to one type of renal cancer and unequivocal diagnostics may require the analysis of mutations, copy number aberrations, and translocations with specifically designed NGS panels. The emerging field of precision medicine prioritizes the alignment of patients and treatments based on their genomic characteristics. While the detection of VHL mutations alone has neither diagnostic nor prognostic significance, recent studies have shown that 49% of patients with VHL-associated RCC have achieved a substantial response to treatment with Belzutifan, a novel HIF-2α inhibitor [43,44,45]. This suggest that detection of molecular alterations in the VHL/HIF axis could have predictive potential and may be considered in the future to guide treatment decisions.
As sequencing technologies evolve and our knowledge about molecular markers advances, genetic and genomic testing becomes more and more important enhancing the precise classification of renal cancers and aid clinical decision-making. However, correlation with morphological features is mandatory for a comprehensive diagnosis.
References
Stewart GD, Klatte T, Cosmai L, Bex A, Lamb BW, Moch H, Sala E, Siva S, Porta C, Gallieni M (2022) The multispeciality approach to the management of localised kidney cancer. Lancet 400:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01059-5
Alaghehbandan R, Perez Montiel D, Luis AS, Hes O (2019) Molecular genetics of renal cell tumors: a practical diagnostic approach. Cancers (Basel) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010085
Moch H, Amin MB, Berney DM, Comperat EM, Gill AJ, Hartmann A, Menon S, Raspollini MR, Rubin MA, Srigley JR, Hoon Tan P, Tickoo SK, Tsuzuki T, Turajlic S, Cree I, Netto GJ (2022) The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part A: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 82:458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.016
Al-Obaidy KI, Eble JN, Nassiri M, Cheng L, Eldomery MK, Williamson SR, Sakr WA, Gupta N, Hassan O, Idrees MT, Grignon DJ (2020) Recurrent KRAS mutations in papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. Mod Pathol 33:1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0362-1
Argani P, Reuter VE, Eble JN, Vlatkovic L, Yaskiv O, Swanson D, Dickson BC, Antonescu CR, Matoso A, Gagan J, Palsgrove DN (2020) Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma (BHP RCC): a distinctive neoplasm associated with somatic NF2 mutations. Am J Surg Pathol 44:901–916. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001467
Farcas M, Gatalica Z, Trpkov K, Swensen J, Zhou M, Alaghehbandan R, Williamson SR, Magi-Galluzzi C, Gill AJ, Tretiakova M, Lopez JI, Montiel DP, Sperga M, Comperat E, Brimo F, Yilmaz A, Siadat F, Sangoi A, Gao Y, Ptakova N, Kuthi L, Pivovarcikova K, Rogala J, Agaimy A, Hartmann A, Fraune C, Rychly B, Hurnik P, Durcansky D, Bonert M, Gakis G, Michal M, Hora M, Hes O (2022) Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/MTOR mutations: next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases. Mod Pathol 35:344–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00923-6
Williamson SR, Hes O, Trpkov K, Aggarwal A, Satapathy A, Mishra S, Sharma S, Sangoi A, Cheng L, Akgul M, Idrees M, Levin A, Sadasivan S, San Miguel Fraile P, Rogala J, Comperat E, Berney DM, Bulimbasic S, McKenney JK, Jha S, Sampat NY, Mohanty SK (2023) Low-grade oncocytic tumour of the kidney is characterised by genetic alterations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR or PIK3CA and consistent GATA3 positivity Histopathology 82:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14816
Al-Obaidy KI, Bridge JA, Cheng L, Sumegi J, Reuter VE, Benayed R, Hameed M, Williamson SR, Hes O, Alruwaii FI, Segal JP, Wanjari P, Idrees MT, Nassiri M, Eble JN, Grignon DJ (2021) EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion renal cell carcinoma: a recurrent gene fusion characterizing thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 34:1921–1934. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00833-7
Ricketts CJ, De Cubas AA, Fan H, Smith CC, Lang M, Reznik E, Bowlby R, Gibb EA, Akbani R, Beroukhim R, Bottaro DP, Choueiri TK, Gibbs RA, Godwin AK, Haake S, Hakimi AA, Henske EP, Hsieh JJ, Ho TH, Kanchi RS, Krishnan B, Kwiatkowski DJ, Lui W, Merino MJ, Mills GB, Myers J, Nickerson ML, Reuter VE, Schmidt LS, Shelley CS, Shen H, Shuch B, Signoretti S, Srinivasan R, Tamboli P, Thomas G, Vincent BG, Vocke CD, Wheeler DA, Yang L, Kim WY, Robertson AG, Spellman PT, Rathmell WK, Linehan WM (2018) The Cancer Genome Atlas Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Cell Reports 23:313-326.e315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.075
Davis CF, Ricketts CJ, Wang M, Yang L, Cherniack AD, Shen H, Buhay C, Kang H, Kim SC, Fahey CC, Hacker KE, Bhanot G, Gordenin DA, Chu A, Gunaratne PH, Biehl M, Seth S, Kaipparettu BA, Bristow CA, Donehower LA, Wallen EM, Smith AB, Tickoo SK, Tamboli P, Reuter V, Schmidt LS, Hsieh JJ, Choueiri TK, Hakimi AA, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Chin L, Meyerson M, Kucherlapati R, Park WY, Robertson AG, Laird PW, Henske EP, Kwiatkowski DJ, Park PJ, Morgan M, Shuch B, Muzny D, Wheeler DA, Linehan WM, Gibbs RA, Rathmell WK, Creighton CJ (2014) The somatic genomic landscape of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma Cancer Cell 26:319-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.014
Sun G, Zhang X, Liang J, Pan X, Zhu S, Liu Z, Armstrong CM, Chen J, Lin W, Liao B, Lin T, Huang R, Zhang M, Zheng L, Yin X, Nie L, Shen P, Zhao J, Zhang H, Dai J, Shen Y, Li Z, Liu J, Chen J, Liu J, Wang Z, Zhu X, Ni Y, Qin D, Yang L, Chen Y, Wei Q, Li X, Zhou Q, Huang H, Yao J, Chen N, Zeng H (2021) Integrated molecular characterization of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 27:1734–1743. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3788
Board WCotE (2022) Classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. ed. 5 Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer
Lawrie CH, Armesto M, Fernandez-Mercado M, Arestin M, Manterola L, Goicoechea I, Larrea E, Caffarel MM, Araujo AM, Sole C, Sperga M, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Michal M, Hes O, Lopez JI (2018) Noncoding RNA expression and targeted next-generation sequencing distinguish tubulocystic renal cell carcinoma (TC-RCC) from other renal neoplasms. J Mol Diagn : JMD 20:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.09.002
Becker F, Junker K, Parr M, Hartmann A, Fussel S, Toma M, Grobholz R, Pflugmann T, Wullich B, Strauss A, Behnes CL, Otto W, Stockle M, Jung V (2013) Collecting duct carcinomas represent a unique tumor entity based on genetic alterations. PLoS ONE 8:e78137. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078137
Wang J, Papanicolau-Sengos A, Chintala S, Wei L, Liu B, Hu Q, Miles KM, Conroy JM, Glenn ST, Costantini M, Magi-Galluzzi C, Signoretti S, Choueiri T, Gallucci M, Sentinelli S, Fazio VM, Poeta ML, Liu S, Morrison C, Pili R (2016) Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney is associated with CDKN2A deletion and SLC family gene up-regulation. Oncotarget 7:29901–29915. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9093
Trpkov K, Hes O, Agaimy A, Bonert M, Martinek P, Magi-Galluzzi C, Kristiansen G, Lüders C, Nesi G, Compérat E, Sibony M, Berney DM, Mehra R, Brimo F, Hartmann A, Husain A, Frizzell N, Hills K, Maclean F, Srinivasan B, Gill AJ (2016) Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma is strongly correlated with fumarate hydratase mutation and hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 40:865–875. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000617
Kuroda N, Tsutsui M, Iguchi M, Nobuoka E, Uehara T, Sonobe Y, Morinaga Y, Shibuya S, Oda W, Yanai H, Kawada C, Karashima T, Yamasaki I, Inoue K, Nagashima Y (2020) Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of seven cases including hereditary and sporadic forms. Ann Diagn Pathol 49:151599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151599
Lu E, Hatchell KE, Nielsen SM, Esplin ED, Ouyang K, Nykamp K, Zavoshi S, Li S, Zhang L, Wilde BR, Christofk HR, Boutros PC, Shuch B (2022) Fumarate hydratase variant prevalence and manifestations among individuals receiving germline testing. Cancer 128:675–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33997
Wyvekens N, Valtcheva N, Mischo A, Helmchen B, Hermanns T, Choschzick M, Hotker AM, Rauch A, Muhleisen B, Akhoundova D, Weber A, Moch H, Rupp NJ (2020) Novel morphological and genetic features of fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma in HLRCC syndrome patients with a tailored therapeutic approach. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 59:611–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22878
Hamza A, Sirohi D, Smith SC, Amin MB (2021) Low-grade oncocytic fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: an update on biologic potential, morphologic spectrum, and differential diagnosis with other low-grade oncocytic tumors. Adv Anat Pathol 28:396–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000321
Mannan R, Wang X, Bawa PS, Chugh S, Chinnaiyan AK, Rangaswamy R, Zhang Y, Cao X, Smith SC, Trpkov K, Williamson SR, Sangoi AR, Mohanty S, McKenney JK, Gupta S, Magi-Galluzzi C, Argani P, Osunkoya AO, Chinnaiyan AM, Dhanasekaran SM, Mehra R (2023) Characterization of protein S-(2-succino)-cysteine (2SC) succination as a biomarker for fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Hum Pathol 134:102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2022.12.013
Zheng LM, Zhang XM, Pan XY, Zhou Q, Zeng H, Chen N (2023) AKR1B10 is a new sensitive and specific marker for fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Lab Invest 103:S840–S841
Lau HD, Chan E, Fan AC, Kunder CA, Williamson SR, Zhou M, Idrees MT, Maclean FM, Gill AJ, Kao CS (2020) A clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma in 32 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 44:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001372
Gill AJ (2018) Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia. Histopathology 72:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13277
Tsai TH, Lee WY (2019) Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 143:643–647. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0024-RS
Brunelli M, Delahunt B, Gobbo S, Tardanico R, Eccher A, Bersani S, Cossu-Rocca P, Parolini C, Balzarini P, Menestrina F, Cheng L, Eble JN, Martignoni G (2010) Diagnostic usefulness of fluorescent cytogenetics in differentiating chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma: a validation study combining metaphase and interphase analyses. Am J Clin Pathol 133:116–126. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPSATJTKBI6J4N
Lichner Z, Scorilas A, White NM, Girgis AH, Rotstein L, Wiegand KC, Latif A, Chow C, Huntsman D, Yousef GM (2013) The chromatin remodeling gene ARID1A is a new prognostic marker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 182:1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.01.007
Grundy PE, Breslow NE, Li S, Perlman E, Beckwith JB, Ritchey ML, Shamberger RC, Haase GM, D’Angio GJ, Donaldson M, Coppes MJ, Malogolowkin M, Shearer P, Thomas PR, Macklis R, Tomlinson G, Huff V, Green DM, National Wilms Tumor Study G (2005) Loss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 1p and 16q is an adverse prognostic factor in favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23:7312–7321. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2799
Chagtai T, Zill C, Dainese L, Wegert J, Savola S, Popov S, Mifsud W, Vujanic G, Sebire N, Le Bouc Y, Ambros PF, Kager L, O’Sullivan MJ, Blaise A, Bergeron C, Mengelbier LH, Gisselsson D, Kool M, Tytgat GA, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Graf N, van Tinteren H, Coulomb A, Gessler M, Williams RD, Pritchard-Jones K (2016) Gain of 1q as a prognostic biomarker in Wilms tumors (WTs) treated with preoperative chemotherapy in the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) WT 2001 Trial: A SIOP Renal Tumours Biology Consortium Study. J Clin Oncol 34:3195–3203. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.0001
Gratias EJ, Dome JS, Jennings LJ, Chi YY, Tian J, Anderson J, Grundy P, Mullen EA, Geller JI, Fernandez CV, Perlman EJ (2016) Association of chromosome 1q gain with inferior survival in favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 34:3189–3194. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.66.1140
Zheng J (2013) Oncogenic chromosomal translocations and human cancer (review). Oncol Rep 30:2011–2019. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2677
Kuroda N, Trpkov K, Gao Y, Tretiakova M, Liu YJ, Ulamec M, Takeuchi K, Agaimy A, Przybycin C, Magi-Galluzzi C, Fushimi S, Kojima F, Sibony M, Hang JF, Pan CC, Yilmaz A, Siadat F, Sugawara E, Just PA, Ptakova N, Hes O (2020) ALK rearranged renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC): a multi-institutional study of twelve cases with identification of novel partner genes CLIP1, KIF5B and KIAA1217. Mod Pathol 33:2564–2579. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0578-0
Wangsiricharoen S, Zhong M, Ranganathan S, Matoso A, Argani P (2021) ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a report of 2 cases and review of the literature emphasizing the distinction between VCL-ALK and non-VCL-ALK RCC. Int J Surg Pathol 29:808–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/10668969211003660
Cajaiba MM, Jennings LJ, George D, Perlman EJ (2016) Expanding the spectrum of ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinomas in children: identification of a novel HOOK1-ALK fusion transcript Genes Chromosomes. Cancer 55:814–817. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22382
Hang JF, Chung HJ, Pan CC (2020) ALK-rearranged renal cell carcinoma with a novel PLEKHA7-ALK translocation and metanephric adenoma-like morphology. Virchows Arch 476:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02752-5
Gallagher KPD, Roza A, Tager E, Mariz B, Soares CD, Rocha AC, Abrahao AC, Romanach MJ, Carlos R, Hunter KD, Lopes MA, Vargas PA, Santos-Silva AR (2023) Rhabdomyosarcoma with TFCP2 rearrangement or typical co-expression of AE1/AE3 and ALK: report of three new cases in the head and neck region and literature review. Head Neck Pathol. 17:546–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-022-01507-9
Zhou S, Sun G, Wang J, Zhang H (2020) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement in adult renal cell carcinoma with lung metastasis: a case report and literature review. Trans Androl Urol 9:2855–2861. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-1343
Gossage L, Eisen T, Maher ER (2015) VHL, the story of a tumour suppressor gene. Nat Rev Cancer 15:55–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3844
Baldewijns MM, van Vlodrop IJ, Vermeulen PB, Soetekouw PM, van Engeland M, de Bruine AP (2010) VHL and HIF signalling in renal cell carcinogenesis. J Pathol 221:125–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2689
Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Linehan WM, Spellman PT, Ricketts CJ, Creighton CJ, Fei SS, Davis C, Wheeler DA, Murray BA, Schmidt L, Vocke CD, Peto M, Al Mamun AA, Shinbrot E, Sethi A, Brooks S, Rathmell WK, Brooks AN, Hoadley KA, Robertson AG, Brooks D, Bowlby R, Sadeghi S, Shen H, Weisenberger DJ, Bootwalla M, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Cherniack AD, Saksena G, Haake S, Li J, Liang H, Lu Y, Mills GB, Akbani R, Leiserson MD, Raphael BJ, Anur P, Bottaro D, Albiges L, Barnabas N, Choueiri TK, Czerniak B, Godwin AK, Hakimi AA, Ho TH, Hsieh J, Ittmann M, Kim WY, Krishnan B, Merino MJ, Mills Shaw KR, Reuter VE, Reznik E, Shelley CS, Shuch B, Signoretti S, Srinivasan R, Tamboli P, Thomas G, Tickoo S, Burnett K, Crain D, Gardner J, Lau K, Mallery D, Morris S, Paulauskis JD, Penny RJ, Shelton C, Shelton WT, Sherman M, Thompson E, Yena P, Avedon MT, Bowen J, Gastier-Foster JM, Gerken M, Leraas KM, Lichtenberg TM, Ramirez NC, Santos T, Wise L, Zmuda E, Demchok JA, Felau I, Hutter CM, Sheth M, Sofia HJ, Tarnuzzer R, Wang Z, Yang L, Zenklusen JC, Zhang J, Ayala B, Baboud J, Chudamani S, Liu J, Lolla L, Naresh R, Pihl T, Sun Q, Wan Y, Wu Y, Ally A, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Beroukhim R, Bodenheimer T, Buhay C, Butterfield YS, Carlsen R, Carter SL, Chao H, Chuah E, Clarke A, Covington KR, Dahdouli M, Dewal N, Dhalla N, Doddapaneni HV, Drummond JA, Gabriel SB, Gibbs RA, Guin R, Hale W, Hawes A, Hayes DN, Holt RA, Hoyle AP, Jefferys SR, Jones SJ, Jones CD, Kalra D, Kovar C, Lewis L, Li J, Ma Y, Marra MA, Mayo M, Meng S, Meyerson M, Mieczkowski PA, Moore RA, Morton D, Mose LE, Mungall AJ, Muzny D, Parker JS, Perou CM, Roach J, Schein JE, Schumacher SE, Shi Y, Simons JV, Sipahimalani P, Skelly T, Soloway MG, Sougnez C, Tam A, Tan D, Thiessen N, Veluvolu U, Wang M, Wilkerson MD, Wong T, Wu J, Xi L, Zhou J, Bedford J, Chen F, Fu Y, Gerstein M, Haussler D, Kasaian K, Lai P, Ling S, Radenbaugh A, Van Den Berg D, Weinstein JN, Zhu J, Albert M, Alexopoulou I, Andersen JJ, Auman JT, Bartlett J, Bastacky S, Bergsten J, Blute ML, Boice L, Bollag RJ, Boyd J, Castle E, Chen YB, Cheville JC, Curley E, Davies B, DeVolk A, Dhir R, Dike L, Eckman J, Engel J, Harr J, Hrebinko R, Huang M, Huelsenbeck-Dill L, Iacocca M, Jacobs B, Lobis M, Maranchie JK, McMeekin S, Myers J, Nelson J, Parfitt J, Parwani A, Petrelli N, Rabeno B, Roy S, Salner AL, Slaton J, Stanton M, Thompson RH, Thorne L, Tucker K, Weinberger PM, Winemiller C, Zach LA, Zuna R (2016) Comprehensive molecular characterization of papillary renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 374:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505917
Xu Y, Kong W, Cao M, Wang J, Wang Z, Zheng L, Wu X, Cheng R, He W, Yang B, Dong B, Pan J, Chen Y, Huang J, Jiang C, Zhai W, Li F, Chen R, Zhou X, Wu G, Geng X, Chen J, An H, Yuan Y, Xu T, Chen D, Lin D, Xu L, Huang K, Peng L, Yu Y, Tai S, Qi H, Luo K, Kang X, Wang H, Huang Y, Zhang J, Xue W (2022) Genomic profiling and response to immune checkpoint inhibition plus tyrosine kinase inhibition in FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.029
Nickerson ML, Jaeger E, Shi Y, Durocher JA, Mahurkar S, Zaridze D, Matveev V, Janout V, Kollarova H, Bencko V, Navratilova M, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Mates D, Mukeria A, Holcatova I, Schmidt LS, Toro JR, Karami S, Hung R, Gerard GF, Linehan WM, Merino M, Zbar B, Boffetta P, Brennan P, Rothman N, Chow WH, Waldman FM, Moore LE (2008) Improved identification of von Hippel-Lindau gene alterations in clear cell renal tumors. Clin Cancer Res 14:4726–4734. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4921
Jonasch E, Donskov F, Iliopoulos O, Rathmell WK, Narayan VK, Maughan BL, Oudard S, Else T, Maranchie JK, Welsh SJ, Thamake S, Park EK, Perini RF, Linehan WM, Srinivasan R, Investigators MK (2021) Belzutifan for renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease. N Engl J Med 385:2036–2046. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2103425
Choueiri TK, Bauer TM, Papadopoulos KP, Plimack ER, Merchan JR, McDermott DF, Michaelson MD, Appleman LJ, Thamake S, Perini RF, Zojwalla NJ, Jonasch E (2021) Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha in renal cell carcinoma with belzutifan: a phase 1 trial and biomarker analysis. Nat Med 27:802–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01324-7
Choueiri TK, McDermott DF, Merchan J, Bauer TM, Figlin R, Heath EI, Michaelson MD, Arrowsmith E, D’Souza A, Zhao S, Roy A, Perini R, Vickery D, Tykodi SS (2023) Belzutifan plus cabozantinib for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma previously treated with immunotherapy: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 24:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00097-9
Mitchell TJ, Turajlic S, Rowan A, Nicol D, Farmery JHR, O'Brien T, Martincorena I, Tarpey P, Angelopoulos N, Yates LR, Butler AP, Raine K, Stewart GD, Challacombe B, Fernando A, Lopez JI, Hazell S, Chandra A, Chowdhury S, Rudman S, Soultati A, Stamp G, Fotiadis N, Pickering L, Au L, Spain L, Lynch J, Stares M, Teague J, Maura F, Wedge DC, Horswell S, Chambers T, Litchfield K, Xu H, Stewart A, Elaidi R, Oudard S, McGranahan N, Csabai I, Gore M, Futreal PA, Larkin J, Lynch AG, Szallasi Z, Swanton C, Campbell PJ, Consortium TRR (2018) Timing the landmark events in the evolution of clear cell renal cell cancer: TRACERx Renal. Cell 173:611-623 e617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.020
Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Horswell S, Chambers T, O'Brien T, Lopez JI, Watkins TBK, Nicol D, Stares M, Challacombe B, Hazell S, Chandra A, Mitchell TJ, Au L, Eichler-Jonsson C, Jabbar F, Soultati A, Chowdhury S, Rudman S, Lynch J, Fernando A, Stamp G, Nye E, Stewart A, Xing W, Smith JC, Escudero M, Huffman A, Matthews N, Elgar G, Phillimore B, Costa M, Begum S, Ward S, Salm M, Boeing S, Fisher R, Spain L, Navas C, Gronroos E, Hobor S, Sharma S, Aurangzeb I, Lall S, Polson A, Varia M, Horsfield C, Fotiadis N, Pickering L, Schwarz RF, Silva B, Herrero J, Luscombe NM, Jamal-Hanjani M, Rosenthal R, Birkbak NJ, Wilson GA, Pipek O, Ribli D, Krzystanek M, Csabai I, Szallasi Z, Gore M, McGranahan N, Van Loo P, Campbell P, Larkin J, Swanton C, Consortium TRR (2018) Deterministic evolutionary trajectories influence primary tumor growth: TRACERx Renal. Cell 173:595-610 e511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.043
Quddus MB, Pratt N, Nabi G (2019) Chromosomal aberrations in renal cell carcinoma: an overview with implications for clinical practice. Urol Ann 11:6–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_32_18
Nagao K, Yoshihiro S, Matsuyama H, Yamaguchi S, Oba K, Naito K (2002) Clinical significance of allelic loss of chromosome region 5q22.3 approximately q23.2 in nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 136:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00511-3
Argani P, Hawkins A, Griffin CA, Goldstein JD, Haas M, Beckwith JB, Mankinen CB, Perlman EJ (2001) A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by epithelioid morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45 immunoreactivity, and t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation. Am J Pathol 158:2089–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64680-9
Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 70:93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029
Hemesath TJ, Steingrimsson E, McGill G, Hansen MJ, Vaught J, Hodgkinson CA, Arnheiter H, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Fisher DE (1994) microphthalmia, a critical factor in melanocyte development, defines a discrete transcription factor family. Genes Dev. 8:2770–2780. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.22.2770
Argani P (2022) Translocation carcinomas of the kidney. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 61:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.23007
Caliò A, Harada S, Brunelli M, Pedron S, Segala D, Portillo SC, Magi-Galluzzi C, Netto GJ, Mackinnon AC, Martignoni G (2021) TFEB rearranged renal cell carcinoma. A clinicopathologic and molecular study of 13 cases. Tumors harboring MALAT1-TFEB, ACTB-TFEB, and the novel NEAT1-TFEB translocations constantly express PDL1. Mod Pathol 34:842–850. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-00713-6
Argani P, Lae M, Hutchinson B, Reuter VE, Collins MH, Perentesis J, Tomaszewski JE, Brooks JS, Acs G, Bridge JA, Vargas SO, Davis IJ, Fisher DE, Ladanyi M (2005) Renal carcinomas with the t(6;11)(p21;q12): clinicopathologic features and demonstration of the specific alpha-TFEB gene fusion by immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and DNA PCR. Am J Surg Pathol 29:230–240. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000146007.54092.37
Xia Q-Y, Wang X-T, Fang R, Wang Z, Zhao M, Chen H, Chen N, Teng X-D, Wang X, Wei X, Ye S-B, Li R, Ma H-H, Lu Z-F, Zhou X-J, Rao Q (2020) Clinicopathologic and molecular analysis of the TFEB fusion variant reveals new members of TFEB translocation renal cell carcinomas (RCCs): expanding the genomic spectrum. Am J Surg Pathol 44:477–489. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000001408
Williamson SR, Grignon DJ, Cheng L, Favazza L, Gondim DD, Carskadon S, Gupta NS, Chitale DA, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Palanisamy N (2017) Renal cell carcinoma with chromosome 6p amplification including the TFEB gene: a novel mechanism of tumor pathogenesis? Am J Surg Pathol 41:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000776
Argani P, Reuter VE, Zhang L, Sung Y-S, Ning Y, Epstein JI, Netto GJ, Antonescu CR (2016) TFEB-amplified renal cell carcinomas: an aggressive molecular subset demonstrating variable melanocytic marker expression and morphologic heterogeneity. Am J Surg Pathol 40:1484–1495. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000720
Harada S, Caliò A, Janowski KM, Morlote D, Rodriguez Pena MD, Canete-Portillo S, Harbi D, DeFrank G, Magi-Galluzzi C, Netto GJ, Martignoni G, Mackinnon AC (2021) Diagnostic utility of one-stop fusion gene panel to detect TFE3/TFEB gene rearrangement and amplification in renal cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol 34:2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00858-y
Birchmeier C, Birchmeier W, Gherardi E, Vande Woude GF (2003) Met, metastasis, motility and more. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1261
Zbar B, Glenn G, Merino M, Middelton L, Peterson J, Toro J, Coleman J, Pinto P, Schmidt LS, Choyke P, Linehan WM (2007) Familial renal carcinoma: clinical evaluation, clinical subtypes and risk of renal carcinoma development. J Urol 177:461–465; discussion 465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.09.037
Albiges L, Heng DYC, Lee JL, Walker S, Mellemgaard A, Ottesen L, Frigault MM, L’Hernault A, Wessen J, Choueiri T, Cancel M, Signoretti S (2022) Impact of MET status on treatment outcomes in papillary renal cell carcinoma: a pooled analysis of historical data. Eur J Cancer 170:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.021
Chami R, Yin M, Marrano P, Teerapakpinyo C, Shuangshoti S, Thorner PS (2015) BRAF mutations in pediatric metanephric tumors. Hum Pathol 46:1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2015.03.019
Wobker SE, Matoso A, Pratilas CA, Mangray S, Zheng G, Lin MT, Debeljak M, Epstein JI, Argani P (2019) Metanephric adenoma-epithelial Wilms tumor overlap lesions: an analysis of BRAF Status. Am J Surg Pathol 43:1157–1169. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001240
Argani P, Lee J, Netto GJ, Zheng G, Tseh-Lin M, Park BH (2016) Frequent BRAF V600E mutations in metanephric stromal tumor Am. J Surg Pathol 40:719–722. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000603
Brunelli M, Eble JN, Zhang S, Martignoni G, Cheng L (2003) Gains of chromosomes 7, 17, 12, 16, and 20 and loss of Y occur early in the evolution of papillary renal cell neoplasia: a fluorescent in situ hybridization study. Mod Pathol 16:1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.MP.0000090924.90762.94
Fischer J, Palmedo G, von Knobloch R, Bugert P, Prayer-Galetti T, Pagano F, Kovacs G (1998) Duplication and overexpression of the mutant allele of the MET proto-oncogene in multiple hereditary papillary renal cell tumours. Oncogene 17:733–739. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1201983
DiNatale RG, Gorelick AN, Makarov V, Blum KA, Silagy AW, Freeman B, Chowell D, Marcon J, Mano R, Sanchez A, Attalla K, Weng S, Voss M, Motzer RJ, Russo P, Coleman JA, Reuter VE, Chen YB, Chan TA, Reznik E, Tickoo SK, Hakimi AA (2021) Putative drivers of aggressiveness in TCEB1-mutant renal cell carcinoma: an emerging entity with variable clinical course. European Urol Focus 7:381–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.013
Batavia AA, Rutishauser D, Sobottka B, Schraml P, Beerenwinkel N, Moch H (2023) Biallelic ELOC-inactivated renal cell carcinoma: molecular features supporting classification as a distinct entity. Mod Pathol 36:100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100194
Presti JC Jr, Wilhelm M, Reuter V, Russo P, Motzer R, Waldman F (2002) Allelic loss on chromosomes 8 and 9 correlates with clinical outcome in locally advanced clear cell carcinoma of the kidney. J Urol 167:1464–1468
Kim WY, Sharpless NE (2006) The regulation of INK4/ARF in cancer and aging. Cell 127:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.003
Popov N, Gil J (2010) Epigenetic regulation of the INK4b-ARF-INK4a locus: in sickness and in health. Epigenetics 5:685–690. https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.5.8.12996
Yang C, Cimera RS, Aryeequaye R, Jayakumaran G, Sarungbam J, Al-Ahmadie HA, Gopalan A, Sirintrapun SJ, Fine SW, Tickoo SK, Epstein JI, Reuter VE, Zhang Y, Chen YB (2021) Adverse histology, homozygous loss of CDKN2A/B, and complex genomic alterations in locally advanced/metastatic renal mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 34:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-00667-9
Mieulet V, Lamb RF (2010) Tuberous sclerosis complex: linking cancer to metabolism. Trends Mol Med 16:329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2010.05.001
Mehra R, Vats P, Cao X, Su F, Lee ND, Lonigro R, Premkumar K, Trpkov K, McKenney JK, Dhanasekaran SM, Chinnaiyan AM (2018) Somatic bi-allelic Loss of TSC genes in eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 74:483–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.007
He H, Trpkov K, Martinek P, Isikci OT, Maggi-Galuzzi C, Alaghehbandan R, Gill AJ, Tretiakova M, Lopez JI, Williamson SR, Montiel DP, Sperga M, Comperat E, Brimo F, Yilmaz A, Pivovarcikova K, Michalova K, Slouka D, Prochazkova K, Hora M, Bonert M, Michal M, Hes O (2018) “High-grade oncocytic renal tumor”: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 14 cases. Virchows Arch. 473:725–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2456-4
Chen YB, Mirsadraei L, Jayakumaran G, Al-Ahmadie HA, Fine SW, Gopalan A, Sirintrapun SJ, Tickoo SK, Reuter VE (2019) Somatic mutations of TSC2 or MTOR characterize a morphologically distinct subset of sporadic renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm. Am J Surg Pathol 43:121–131. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001170
Tjota M, Chen H, Parilla M, Wanjari P, Segal J, Antic T (2020) Eosinophilic renal cell tumors with a TSC and MTOR gene mutations are morphologically and immunohistochemically heterogenous: clinicopathologic and molecular study. Am J Surg Pathol 44:943–954. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001457
de Oliveira D, Dall’Oglio MF, Reis ST, Zerati M, Souza IC, Leite KR, Srougi M (2014) Chromosome 9p deletions are an independent predictor of tumor progression following nephrectomy in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 32:601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.008
Worby CA, Dixon JE (2014) Pten. Annu Rev Biochem 83:641-669. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-082411-113907
Gupta S, Erickson LA (2020) Renal neoplasia in Cowden Syndrome. Mayo Clin Proc 95:2808–2809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.09.016
Nuevo-Tapioles C, Philips MR (2022) The role of KRAS splice variants in cancer biology. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:1033348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2022.1033348
Tong K, Zhu W, Fu H, Cao F, Wang S, Zhou W, Liu C, Chen D, Fan S, Hu Z (2020) Frequent KRAS mutations in oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with inverted nuclei. Histopathology 76:1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14084
Lobo J, Ohashi R, Helmchen BM, Rupp NJ, Ruschoff JH, Moch H (2021) The morphological spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma and prevalence of provisional/emerging renal tumor entities with papillary growth. Biomedicines 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9101418
Kim SS, Cho YM, Kim GH, Kee KH, Kim HS, Kim KM, Kim JH, Choi C (2020) Recurrent KRAS mutations identified in papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity-a comparative study with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 33:690–699. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0420-8
Olivier M, Hollstein M, Hainaut P (2010) TP53 mutations in human cancers: origins, consequences, and clinical use Cold Spring. Harb Perspect Biol 2:a001008. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001008
Turajlic S, Xu H, Litchfield K, Rowan A, Chambers T, Lopez JI, Nicol D, O'Brien T, Larkin J, Horswell S, Stares M, Au L, Jamal-Hanjani M, Challacombe B, Chandra A, Hazell S, Eichler-Jonsson C, Soultati A, Chowdhury S, Rudman S, Lynch J, Fernando A, Stamp G, Nye E, Jabbar F, Spain L, Lall S, Guarch R, Falzon M, Proctor I, Pickering L, Gore M, Watkins TBK, Ward S, Stewart A, DiNatale R, Becerra MF, Reznik E, Hsieh JJ, Richmond TA, Mayhew GF, Hill SM, McNally CD, Jones C, Rosenbaum H, Stanislaw S, Burgess DL, Alexander NR, Swanton C, Peace, Consortium TRR (2018) Tracking cancer evolution reveals constrained routes to metastases: TRACERx Renal. Cell 173:581–594 e512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.057
Linehan WM, Spellman PT, Ricketts CJ, Creighton CJ, Fei SS, Davis C, Wheeler DA, Murray BA, Schmidt L, Vocke CD, Peto M, Al Mamun AAM, Shinbrot E, Sethi A, Brooks S, Rathmell WK, Brooks AN, Hoadley KA, Robertson AG, Brooks D, Bowlby R, Sadeghi S, Shen H, Weisenberger DJ, Bootwalla M, Baylin SB, Laird PW, Cherniack AD, Saksena G, Haake S, Li J, Liang H, Lu Y, Mills GB, Akbani R, Leiserson MDM, Raphael BJ, Anur P, Bottaro D, Albiges L, Barnabas N, Choueiri TK, Czerniak B, Godwin AK, Hakimi AA, Ho TH, Hsieh J, Ittmann M, Kim WY, Krishnan B, Merino MJ, Mills Shaw KR, Reuter VE, Reznik E, Shelley CS, Shuch B, Signoretti S, Srinivasan R, Tamboli P, Thomas G, Tickoo S, Burnett K, Crain D, Gardner J, Lau K, Mallery D, Morris S, Paulauskis JD, Penny RJ, Shelton C, Shelton WT, Sherman M, Thompson E, Yena P, Avedon MT, Bowen J, Gastier-Foster JM, Gerken M, Leraas KM, Lichtenberg TM, Ramirez NC, Santos T, Wise L, Zmuda E, Demchok JA, Felau I, Hutter CM, Sheth M, Sofia HJ, Tarnuzzer R, Wang Z, Yang L, Zenklusen JC, Zhang J, Ayala B, Baboud J, Chudamani S, Liu J, Lolla L, Naresh R, Pihl T, Sun Q, Wan Y, Wu Y, Ally A, Balasundaram M, Balu S, Beroukhim R, Bodenheimer T, Buhay C, Butterfield YSN, Carlsen R, Carter SL, Chao H, Chuah E, Clarke A, Covington KR, Dahdouli M, Dewal N, Dhalla N, Doddapaneni HV, Drummond JA, Gabriel SB, Gibbs RA, Guin R, Hale W, Hawes A, Hayes DN, Holt RA, Hoyle AP, Jefferys SR, Jones SJM, Jones CD, Kalra D, Kovar C, Lewis L, Li J, Ma Y, Marra MA, Mayo M, Meng S, Meyerson M, Mieczkowski PA, Moore RA, Morton D, Mose LE, Mungall AJ, Muzny D, Parker JS, Perou CM, Roach J, Schein JE, Schumacher SE, Shi Y, Simons JV, Sipahimalani P, Skelly T, Soloway MG, Sougnez C, Tam A, Tan D, Thiessen N, Veluvolu U, Wang M, Wilkerson MD, Wong T, Wu J, Xi L, Zhou J, Bedford J, Chen F, Fu Y, Gerstein M, Haussler D, Kasaian K, Lai P, Ling S, Radenbaugh A, Van Den Berg D, Weinstein JN, Zhu J, Albert M, Alexopoulou I, Andersen JJ, Auman JT, Bartlett J, Bastacky S, Bergsten J, Blute ML, Boice L, Bollag RJ, Boyd J, Castle E, Chen Y-B, Cheville JC, Curley E, Davies B, DeVolk A, Dhir R, Dike L, Eckman J, Engel J, Harr J, Hrebinko R, Huang M, Huelsenbeck-Dill L, Iacocca M, Jacobs B, Lobis M, Maranchie JK, McMeekin S, Myers J, Nelson J, Parfitt J, Parwani A, Petrelli N, Rabeno B, Roy S, Salner AL, Slaton J, Stanton M, Thompson RH, Thorne L, Tucker K, Weinberger PM, Winemiller C, Zach LA, Zuna R (2016) Comprehensive molecular characterization of papillary renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 374:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505917
Treger TD, Chowdhury T, Pritchard-Jones K, Behjati S (2019) The genetic changes of Wilms tumour. Nat Rev Nephrol 15:240–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-019-0112-0
Bergamaschi D, Gasco M, Hiller L, Sullivan A, Syed N, Trigiante G, Yulug I, Merlano M, Numico G, Comino A, Attard M, Reelfs O, Gusterson B, Bell AK, Heath V, Tavassoli M, Farrell PJ, Smith P, Lu X, Crook T (2003) p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell 3:387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00079-5
Balint I, Szponar A, Jauch A, Kovacs G (2009) Trisomy 7 and 17 mark papillary renal cell tumours irrespectively of variation of the phenotype. J Clin Pathol 62:892–895. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2009.066423
Cooper GW, Hong AL (2022) SMARCB1-deficient cancers: novel molecular insights and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Cancers (Basel) 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153645
Agaimy A (2014) The expanding family of SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient neoplasia: implications of phenotypic, biological, and molecular heterogeneity. Adv Anat Pathol 21:394–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000038
Agaimy A, Amin MB, Gill AJ, Popp B, Reis A, Berney DM, Magi-Galluzzi C, Sibony M, Smith SC, Suster S, Trpkov K, Hes O, Hartmann A (2018) SWI/SNF protein expression status in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: immunohistochemical analysis of 32 tumors from 28 patients. Hum Pathol 77:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2018.04.004
Cheng L, Xu Y, Song H, Huang H, Zhuo D (2020) A rare entity of primary Ewing sarcoma in kidney. BMC Surg 20:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00948-9
Alghamdi MHA, Alawad SA, Alharbi MG, Alabdulsalam AK, Almodhen F, Alasker A (2020) A rare case of Ewing’s sarcoma of the kidney. Urol Case Reports 29:101094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2019.101094
Risi E, Iacovelli R, Altavilla A, Alesini D, Palazzo A, Mosillo C, Trenta P, Cortesi E (2013) Clinical and pathological features of primary neuroectodermal tumor/ewing sarcoma of the kidney. Urology 82:382–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.015
Stoll G, Surdez D, Tirode F, Laud K, Barillot E, Zinovyev A, Delattre O (2013) Systems biology of Ewing sarcoma: a network model of EWS-FLI1 effect on proliferation and apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:8853–8871. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt678
Fukuda H, Kato I, Furuya M, Tanaka R, Takagi T, Kondo T, Nagashima Y (2019) A novel partner of TFE3 in the Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological analyses and detection of EWSR1-TFE3 fusion. Virchows Arch 474:389–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-018-2509-8
Lang M, Vocke CD, Ricketts CJ, Metwalli AR, Ball MW, Schmidt LS, Linehan WM (2021) Clinical and molecular characterization of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF)-related renal cell carcinoma. Urology 149:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.025
Perret R, Lefort F, Bernhard JC, Baud J, Le Loarer F, Yacoub M (2022) Thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation and an aggressive clinical course: a case report confirming the presence of the EWSR1::PATZ1 fusion gene. Histopathology 80:745–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14589
Eble JNSG, Epstein J, Sesterhenn I (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. ed. 3
Ellis CL, Eble JN, Subhawong AP, Martignoni G, Zhong M, Ladanyi M, Epstein JI, Netto GJ, Argani P (2014) Clinical heterogeneity of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: impact of fusion subtype, age, and stage. Mod Pathol 27:875–886. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.208
Bakouny Z, Sadagopan A, Ravi P, Metaferia NY, Li J, AbuHammad S, Tang S, Denize T, Garner ER, Gao X, Braun DA, Hirsch L, Steinharter JA, Bouchard G, Walton E, West D, Labaki C, Dudani S, Gan C-L, Sethunath V, Carvalho FLF, Imamovic A, Ricker C, Vokes NI, Nyman J, Berchuck JE, Park J, Hirsch MS, Haq R, Mary Lee G-S, McGregor BA, Chang SL, Feldman AS, Wu CJ, McDermott DF, Heng DYC, Signoretti S, Van Allen EM, Choueiri TK, Viswanathan SR (2022) Integrative clinical and molecular characterization of translocation renal cell carcinoma. Cell Reports 38:110190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110190
Kauffman EC, Ricketts CJ, Rais-Bahrami S, Yang Y, Merino MJ, Bottaro DP, Srinivasan R, Linehan WM (2014) Molecular genetics and cellular features of TFE3 and TFEB fusion kidney cancers Nature reviews. Urology 11:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.162
Rizzo M, Pezzicoli G, Santoni M, Caliò A, Martignoni G, Porta C (2022) MiT translocation renal cell carcinoma: a review of the literature from molecular characterization to clinical management. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Rev Cancer 1877:188823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188823
Tretiakova MS, Wang W, Wu Y, Tykodi SS, True L, Liu YJ (2020) Gene fusion analysis in renal cell carcinoma by FusionPlex RNA-sequencing and correlations of molecular findings with clinicopathological features. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 59:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22798
Argani P, Zhang L, Reuter VE, Tickoo SK, Antonescu CR (2017) RBM10-TFE3 renal cell carcinoma: a potential diagnostic pitfall due to cryptic intrachromosomal Xp11.2 inversion resulting in false-negative TFE3 FISH. Am J Surg Pathol 41:655–662. https://doi.org/10.1097/pas.0000000000000835
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Zurich
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xingming Zhang and Hella A Bolck wrote the manuscript. Niels J Rupp and Holger Moch actively participated in addressing the raised concerns and played a significant role in editing the manuscript. All authors have provided substantial contributions to this review, endorsed the final version for submission, and committed to taking responsibility for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The writing of this review article was in full compliance with ethical standards.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Bolck, H.A., Rupp, N.J. et al. Genomic alterations and diagnosis of renal cancer. Virchows Arch 484, 323–337 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03700-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-023-03700-9