Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction to: Planta (2019) 250:1703–1715 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-019-03258-4
In this article Fig. 5c y-axis panel should read as “µg ml−1”, not “mg ml−1”. The corrected Fig. 5 is given below.
Post-secretory adjustment of NT nectar, in vivo (black bars) and in vitro (grey bars). a brix; b sucrose:(fructose + glucose); c protein; d hydrogen peroxide; e phenolics. Bars represent mean ± SE (n = 15 for in vivo nectar and n = 8 for in vitro nectar). Statistical analysis was only performed within each data set, in in vivo or in vitro test. Significant differences (P < 0.05 according to one-way ANOVA) are indicated by different letters. Letters are in bold for in vivo tests and regular font for in vitro tests
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, X., Milne, R.I., Zhou, H. et al. Correction to: Proteomics and post‑secretory content adjustment of Nicotiana tabacum nectar. Planta 256, 81 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03988-y
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-03988-y