Skip to main content
Log in

Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Panoramic image differences can be used for view-based homing under natural outdoor conditions, because they increase smoothly with distance from a reference location (Zeil et al., J Opt Soc Am A 20(3):450–469, 2003). The particular shape, slope and depth of such image difference functions (IDFs) recorded at any one place, however, depend on a number of factors that so far have only been qualitatively identified. Here we show how the shape of difference functions depends on the depth structure and the contrast of natural scenes, by quantifying the depth- distribution of different outdoor scenes and by comparing it to the difference functions calculated with differently processed panoramic images, which were recorded at the same locations. We find (1) that IDFs and catchment areas become systematically wider as the average distance of objects increases, (2) that simple image processing operations—like subtracting the local mean, difference-of-Gaussian filtering and local contrast normalization—make difference functions robust against changes in illumination and the spurious effects of shadows, and (3) by comparing depth-dependent translational and depth-independent rotational difference functions, we show that IDFs of contrast-normalized snapshots are predominantly determined by the depth-structure and possibly also by occluding contours in a scene. We propose a model for the shape of IDFs as a tool for quantitative comparisons between the shapes of these functions in different scenes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley R (1997) The correlational structure of natural images and the calibration of spatial representations. Cogn Sci 21:351–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brünnert U, Kelber A, Zeil J (1994) Ground-nesting bees determine the distance of their nest from a landmark by other than angular size cues. J Comp Physiol A 175:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carandini M, Heeger D, Movshon J (1997) Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 17:8621–8644

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright B, Collett T (1983) Landmark learning in bees: experiments and models. J Comp Physiol 15:521–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright B, Collett T (1987) Landmark maps for honeybees. Biol Cybern 57:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chahl J, Srinivasan M (1997) Reflective surfaces for panoramic imaging. Appl Optics 36:8275–8285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collett T (1995) Making learning easy: the acquisition of visual information during the orientation flights of social wasps. J Comp Physiol A 177:737–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett T, Lehrer M (1993) Looking and learning: a spatial pattern in the orientation flight of the wasp Vespula vulgaris. Proc R Soc Lond B 252:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett T, Zeil J (1997a) Flights of learning. Curr Dir Psych Sci 5: 149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett T, Zeil J (1997b) Selection and use of landmarks by insects. In: Lehrer M (ed) Orientation and communication in arthropods. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 41–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett T, Zeil J (1998) Places and landmarks: an arthropod perspective. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representation in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 18–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleet D, Heeger D, Wagner H (1996) Modeling binocular neurons in primary visual cortex. In: Jenkin M, Harris L (eds) Computational and biological mechanisms of visual coding. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 103–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz M, Mallot H (2000) Biomimetic robot navigation. Rob Auton Syst 30:133–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz M, Schölkopf B, Mallot H, Bülthoff H (1998) Where did I take that snapshot? Scene based homing by image matching. Biol Cybern 79:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaussier P, Joulain C, Banquet J, Leprêtre S, Revel A (2000) The visual homing problem: an example of robotics/biology cross fertilization. Rob Auton Syst 30:155–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giurfa M, Capaldi E (1999) Vectors, routes and maps: new discoveries about navigation in insects. Trends Neurosci 22:237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Hateren H (1992) Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs. J Comp Physiol A 171:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hateren H (1993) Three modes of spatiotemporal processing by eyes. J Comp Physiol A 172:583–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junger W (1991) Waterstriders (Gerris paludum F.) compensate for drift with a discontinuously working visual position servo. J Comp Physiol A 169:633–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer M (1993) Why do bees turn back and look?. J Comp Physiol A 172:549–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer M, Collett T (1994) Approaching and departing bees learn different cues to the distance of a landmark. J Comp Physiol A 175: 171–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möller R (2002) Insects could exploit UV-green contrast for landmark navigation. J Theor Biol 214:619–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson D, Judd S, Cartwritght B, Collett T (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202:1831–1838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osorio D, Vorobyev M (2005) Photoreceptor spectral sensitivities in terrestrial animals: adaptations for luminance and colour vision. Proc R Soc B 272:1745–1752

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan M, Laughlin S, Dubs A (1982) Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 216:427–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szenher M (2005) Visual homing in natural environments. In: Nehmzow U, Melhuish C, Witkowski M (eds) Towards autonomous robotic systems (TAROS-05), p 221

  • Vardy A, Möller R (2005) Biologically plausible visual homing methods based on optical flow techniques. Connect Sci 17:47–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vladusich T, Hemmi J, Srinivasan M, Zeil J (2005) Interactions of visual odometry and landmark guidance during food search in honeybees. J Exp Biol 208:4123–4135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Voss R, Zeil J (1998) Active vision in insects: an analysis of object-directed zig-zag flights in a ground-nesting wasp (Odynerus spinipes, Eumenidae). J Comp Physiol A 182:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanker J, Zeil J (2005) Movement-induced motion signal distributions in outdoor scenes. Netw Comp Neural Syst 16:357–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J (1993a) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): I. Description of flight. J Comp Physiol A 172:189–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J (1993b) Orientation flights of solitary wasps (Cerceris; Sphecidae; Hymenoptera): II. Similarities between orientation and return flights and the use of motion parallax. J Comp Physiol A 172: 207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Wittmann D (1993) Landmark orientation during the approach to the nest in the stingless bee Trigona (Tetragonisca) angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Sociaux 40:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Kelber A, Voss R (1996) Structure and function of learning flights in bees and wasps. J Exp Biol 199:245–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Hofmann M, Chahl J (2003) Catchment areas of panoramic snapshots in outdoor scenes. J Opt Soc Am A 20(3):450–469

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang Stürzl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stürzl, W., Zeil, J. Depth, contrast and view-based homing in outdoor scenes. Biol Cybern 96, 519–531 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0147-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0147-3

Keywords

Navigation