Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    A theory is presented that utilizes the structure of natural images, and how they change in time, to produce spatiotemporal filters that maximize information flow through a noisy channel of limited dynamic range. For low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) the filter has low-pass, and for high SNRs band-pass characteristics, both in space and time.

  2. 2.

    Theoretical impulse responses are compared to measurements in Large Monopolar Cells (LMCs) in the fly (Calliphora vicina) brain. Two different spatial stimuli (point source and wide field) were given at background intensities over a 5.5 log unit wide range. Theory and experiment correspond well, and they share the following properties: impulse responses get much faster and more biphasic with increasing background intensity (SNR); they show larger off-transients for wide field stimuli than for point sources; the half-width of the spatial receptive field changes only slightly with increased intensity, and lateral inhibition increases; contrast efficiency increases with intensity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LMC :

Large Monopolar Cell

SNR :

signal-to-noise ratio

References

  • Barlow HB (1961) Possible principles underlying the transformations of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith WA (ed) Sensory communication. MIT Press, Cambridge Mass, pp 217–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB (1981) The Ferrier Lecture, 1980. Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B 212:1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow HB (1983) Understanding natural vision. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracewell RN (1978) The Fourier transform and its applications. McGraw-Hill

  • Burton GJ, Moorhead IR (1987) Color and spatial structure in natural scenes. Appl Optics 26:157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubs A (1982) The spatial integration of signals in the retina and lamina of the fly compound eye under different conditions of luminance. J Comp Physiol 146:321–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubs A, Laughlin SB, Srinivasan MV (1981) Single photon signals in fly photoreceptors and first order interneurons at behavioural threshold. J Physiol (Lond) 317:317–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Field DJ (1987) Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. J Opt Soc Am A 4:2379–2394

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz RM (1991) Motion detection and adaptation in crayfish photoreceptors. J Gen Physiol 97:777–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman S (1953) Information theory. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Götz KG (1965) Die optischen Übertragungseigenschaften der Komplexaugen von Drosophila. Kybernetik 2:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie RC, Weckström M (1990) Three classes of potassium channels in large monopolar cells of the blowfly Calliphora vicina. J Comp Physiol A 167:723–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris FJ (1978) On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc IEEE 66:51–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1984) Waveguide theory applied to optically measured angular sensitivities of fly photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 154:761–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1986) Electrical coupling of neuro-ommatidial photoreceptor cells in the blowfly. J Comp Physiol A 158:795–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1987) Neural superposition and oscillations in the eye of the blowfly. J Comp Physiol A 161:849–855

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van (1989) Photoreceptor optics, theory and practice. In: Stavenga DG, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 74–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Hateren JH van, Laughlin SB (1990) Membrane parameters, signal transmission, and the design of a graded potential neuron. J Comp Physiol A 166:437–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengstenberg R, Sandeman DC, Hengstenberg B (1986) Compensatory head roll in the blowfly Calliphora during flight. Proc R Soc Lond B 227:455–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J, Snyder AW (1983) Transduction as a limitation on compound eye function and design. Proc R Soc Lond B 217:287–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J, Dubs A, Payne R (1984) The dynamics of phototransduction in insects. J Comp Physiol A 154:707–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Turcotte DL (1990) Fractal image analysis: application to the topography of Oregon and synthetic images. J Opt Soc Am A 7:1124–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Humpherys DS (1970) The analysis, design, and synthesis of electrical filters. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansonius NM, Hateren JH van (1991) Fast temporal adaptation of on-off units in the first optic chiasm of the blowfly. J Comp Physiol A 168:631–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly DH (1979) Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. J Opt Soc Am 69:1340–1349

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschfeld K (1967) Die Projektion der optischen Umwelt auf das Raster der Rhabdomere im Komplexauge von Musca. Exp Brain Res 3:248–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Land MF, Collett TS (1974) Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). J Comp Physiol 89:331–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1980) Neural principles in the visual system. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII/6B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 133–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1981) A simple coding procedure enhances a neuron's information capacity. Z Naturforsch 36c:910–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1983) Matching coding to scenes to enhance efficiency. In: Braddick OJ, Sleigh AC (eds) Physical and biological processing of images. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB (1987) Form and function in retinal processing. Trends Neurosci 10:478–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB, Hardie RC (1978) Common strategies for light adaptation in the peripheral visual systems of fly and dragonfly. J Comp Physiol 128:319–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB, Osorio D (1989) Mechanisms for neural signal enhancement in the blowfly compound eye. J Exp Biol 144:113–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin SB, Howard J, Blakeslee B (1987) Synaptic limitations to contrast coding in the retina of the blowfly Calliphora. Proc R Soc Lond B 231:437–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillywhite PG, Laughlin SB (1979) Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature 277:569–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwich KH, Valter McConville KM (1991) An informational approach to sensory adaptation. J Comp Physiol A 168:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim AV, Lim JS (1981) The importance of phase in signals. Proc IEEE 69:529–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Osorio D (1992) Patterns of function and evolution in the arthropod optic lobe. In: Cronly-Dillon JR, Gregory R (eds) Vision and visual dysfunction, Vol II. Evolution of the eye and visual system. Macmillan, London, pp 203–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT (1989) Numerical recipes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruyter van Steveninck RR de (1986) Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system. Thesis, University of Groningen

  • Smakman JGJ, Hateren JH van, Stavenga DG (1984) Angular sensitivity of blowfly photoreceptors: intracellular measurements and wave-optical predictions. J Comp Physiol A 155:239–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder AW, Stavenga DG, Laughlin SB (1977) Spatial information capacity of compound eyes. J Comp Physiol 116:183–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A (1982) Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proc R Soc Lond B 216:427–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MV, Pinter RB, Osorio D (1990) Matched filtering in the visual system of the fly: large monopolar cells of the lamina are optimized to detect moving edges and blobs. Proc R Soc Lond B 240:279–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka H, Ammermüller J (1991) Temporal resolving power of blowfly visual system: effects of decamethonium and hyperpolarization on responses of laminar monopolar neurons. J Comp Physiol A 168:129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Strausfeld NJ, Lee J-K (1991) Neuronal basis for parallel visual processing in the fly. Visual Neuroscience 7:13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1986 a) Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.). I. Organization of the flight motor. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:527–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1986 b) Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.). II. Pursuit of targets. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:553–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner H (1986 c) Flight performance and visual control of flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica L.). III. Interactions between angular movement induced by wide and smallfield stimuli. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 312:581–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziel A van der (1970) Noise. Sources, characterization, measurement. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biophysics, University of Groningen, Westersingel 34, NL-9718, CM Groningen, The Netherlands

    J. H. van Hateren

Authors
  1. J. H. van Hateren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hateren, J.H. Theoretical predictions of spatiotemporal receptive fields of fly LMCs, and experimental validation. J Comp Physiol A 171, 157–170 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188924

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00188924

Key words

Search

Navigation