Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Correction: European Journal of Applied Physiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05346-6
The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes. The corrected details are provided below: Affiliations 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 were incorrectly given as
1LAMHESS, Sciences et Techniques des Activites Physiques et Sportives, Université Cote d’Azur, 261 Bd du Mercantour, 06200 Nice, France
2Centre VADER, Universite Cote d’Azur, Nice, France
3Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
4Lab I3S, Universite Cote d’Azur, CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
6LJAD, Universite Cote d’Azur, CNRS, Nice, France
but should have been
1Université Côte d’Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France
2Université Côte d’Azur, Centre VADER, Nice, France
3Centre for Human Performance, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
4Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, I3S, Sophia-Antipolis, France
6Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, LJAD, Nice, France
In the introduction section, third sentence of the second paragraph which previously read:
As such, older endurance-trained individuals represent a model of successful physiological and healthy aging (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003). (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003).
Should read:
As such, older endurance-trained individuals represent a model of successful physiological and healthy aging (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003).
In the “Study limitations” section, fifth and sixth sentences of third paragraph which previously read:
However, the assessment of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) is considered a valid noninvasive method for assessing respiratory muscle fatigue, as acknowledged by the American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory guidelines Respiratory (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory 2002) (Brown and Kilding 2011; Coast et al. 1999; Oueslati et al. 2018; Ozkaplan et al. 2005; Ross et al. 2008; Volianitis et al. 2001). and its frequent use in the literature to evaluate exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue. Finally, this study specifically involved male master athletes, and our findings may not be directly applicable to master female athletes.
Should read:
However, the assessment of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) is considered a valid noninvasive method for assessing respiratory muscle fatigue, as acknowledged by the American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory guidelines Respiratory (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory 2002) (Brown and Kilding 2011; Coast et al. 1999; Oueslati et al. 2018; Ozkaplan et al. 2005; Ross et al. 2008; Volianitis et al. 2001) and its frequent use in the literature to evaluate exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue. Finally, this study specifically involved male master athletes, and our findings may not be directly applicable to female master athletes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haddad, T., Mons, V., Meste, O. et al. Correction: Breathing a low-density gas reduces respiratory muscle force development and marginally improves exercise performance in master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 124, 667–668 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05383-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05383-1