Correction: European Journal of Applied Physiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05346-6


The original version of this article unfortunately contained some mistakes. The corrected details are provided below: Affiliations 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 were incorrectly given as

1LAMHESS, Sciences et Techniques des Activites Physiques et Sportives, Université Cote d’Azur, 261 Bd du Mercantour, 06200 Nice, France

2Centre VADER, Universite Cote d’Azur, Nice, France

3Centre for Exercise and Sport Science Research, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia

4Lab I3S, Universite Cote d’Azur, CNRS, Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France

6LJAD, Universite Cote d’Azur, CNRS, Nice, France


but should have been

1Université Côte d’Azur, LAMHESS, Nice, France

2Université Côte d’Azur, Centre VADER, Nice, France

3Centre for Human Performance, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

4Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, I3S, Sophia-Antipolis, France

6Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, LJAD, Nice, France

In the introduction section, third sentence of the second paragraph which previously read:

As such, older endurance-trained individuals represent a model of successful physiological and healthy aging (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003). (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003).

Should read:

As such, older endurance-trained individuals represent a model of successful physiological and healthy aging (Hawkins and Wiswell 2003; Tanaka and Seals 2003).

In the “Study limitations” section, fifth and sixth sentences of third paragraph which previously read:

However, the assessment of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) is considered a valid noninvasive method for assessing respiratory muscle fatigue, as acknowledged by the American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory guidelines Respiratory (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory 2002) (Brown and Kilding 2011; Coast et al. 1999; Oueslati et al. 2018; Ozkaplan et al. 2005; Ross et al. 2008; Volianitis et al. 2001). and its frequent use in the literature to evaluate exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue. Finally, this study specifically involved male master athletes, and our findings may not be directly applicable to master female athletes.

Should read:

However, the assessment of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) is considered a valid noninvasive method for assessing respiratory muscle fatigue, as acknowledged by the American Thoracic Society/ European Respiratory guidelines Respiratory (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory 2002) (Brown and Kilding 2011; Coast et al. 1999; Oueslati et al. 2018; Ozkaplan et al. 2005; Ross et al. 2008; Volianitis et al. 2001) and its frequent use in the literature to evaluate exercise-induced respiratory muscle fatigue. Finally, this study specifically involved male master athletes, and our findings may not be directly applicable to female master athletes.