Skip to main content
Log in

Breathing a low-density gas reduces respiratory muscle force development and marginally improves exercise performance in master athletes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 30 January 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Introduction

We tested the hypothesis that breathing heliox, to attenuate the mechanical constraints accompanying the decline in pulmonary function with aging, improves exercise performance.

Methods

Fourteen endurance-trained older men (67.9 ± 5.9 year, \(\dot{V}\)O2max: 50.8 ± 5.8 ml/kg/min; 151% predicted) completed two cycling 5-km time trials while breathing room air (i.e., 21% O2–79% N2) or heliox (i.e., 21% O2–79% He). Maximal flow–volume curves (MFVC) were determined pre-exercise to characterize expiratory flow limitation (EFL, % tidal volume intersecting the MFVC). Respiratory muscle force development was indirectly determined as the product of the time integral of inspiratory and expiratory mouth pressure (∫Pmouth) and breathing frequency. Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure maneuvers were performed pre-exercise and post-exercise to estimate respiratory muscle fatigue.

Results

Exercise performance time improved (527.6 ± 38 vs. 531.3 ± 36.9 s; P = 0.017), and respiratory muscle force development decreased during inspiration (− 22.8 ± 11.6%, P < 0.001) and expiration (− 10.8 ± 11.4%, P = 0.003) with heliox compared with room air. EFL tended to be lower with heliox (22 ± 23 vs. 30 ± 23% tidal volume; P = 0.054). Minute ventilation normalized to CO2 production (\(\dot{V}\)E/\(\dot{V}\)CO2) increased with heliox (28.6 ± 2.7 vs. 25.1 ± 1.8; P < 0.001). A reduction in MIP and MEP was observed post-exercise vs. pre-exercise but was not different between conditions.

Conclusions

Breathing heliox has a limited effect on performance during a 5-km time trial in master athletes despite a reduction in respiratory muscle force development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

EFL:

Expiratory flow limitation

\(\dot{V}\)O2max :

Maximal oxygen consumption

ml:

Milliliters

L:

Liters

kg:

Kilogram

sec:

Second

min:

Minute

h:

Hour

W:

Watt

rpm:

Rotation per minute

PPO:

Peak power output

Pmouth :

Mouth pressure

MIP:

Maximal inspiratory pressure

MEP:

Maximal expiratory pressure

km:

Kilometer

TT:

Time trial

MFVC:

Maximal flow–volume curve

TLC:

Total lung capacity

RV:

Residual volume

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FEF:

Forced expiratory flow

IC:

Inspiratory capacity

EELV:

End-expiratory lung volume

EILV:

End-inspiratory lung volume

\(\dot{V}\) E :

Minute ventilation

FB :

Breathing frequency

VT :

Tidal volume

IRV:

Inspiratory reserve volume

∫Pm:

Integrated Pmouth signal over time

∫Pm × FB :

Respiratory muscle force development

Hz:

Hertz

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

PET :

End-tidal partial pressure

SpO2 :

Hemoglobin oxygen saturation

HR:

Heart rate

\(\dot{V}\)CO2 :

Carbon dioxide production

\(\dot{V}\) E/\(\dot{V}\)CO2 :

Minute ventilation normalized to CO2 production

CI:

Confidence interval

SD:

Standard deviation

WOB:

Work of breathing

PAV:

Proportional assisted ventilation

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank NHS Laboratoires Menarini (France) for funding the experiment. The authors declare no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TH, VM, GB, JB, and JD contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by TH, VM, GB, OM, JD, and CA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TH and GB. VM, OM, CA, JB, and JD commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toni Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Communicated by Susan Hopkins .

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad, T., Mons, V., Meste, O. et al. Breathing a low-density gas reduces respiratory muscle force development and marginally improves exercise performance in master athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 124, 651–665 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05346-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-023-05346-6

Keywords

Navigation