Abstract
Purpose
To assess the relationship between the distribution of intra-retinal hyper-reflective foci (IHRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD) over 2 years.
Methods
Cirrus OCT volumes of the macula of subjects enrolled in the Amish Eye Study with 2 years of follow-up were evaluated for the presence of iAMD and IHRF at baseline. The IHRF were counted in a series of 5 sequential en face slabs from outer to inner retina. The number of IHRF in each slab at baseline and the change in IHRF from baseline to year 2 were correlated with progression to late AMD at 2 years.
Results
Among 120 eyes from 71 patients with iAMD, 52 eyes (43.3%) of 42 patients had evidence of both iAMD and IHRF at baseline. Twenty-three eyes (19.0%) showed progression to late AMD after 2 years. The total IHRF count increased from 243 at baseline to 604 at 2 years, with a significant increase in the IHRF number in each slab, except for the innermost slab 5 which had no IHRF at baseline or follow-up. The IHRF count increased from 121 to 340 in eyes that showed progression to late AMD. The presence of IHRF in the outermost retinal slabs 1 and 2 was independently associated with a significant risk of progression to late AMD. A greater increase in IHRF count over 2 years in these same slabs 1 and 2 was also associated with a higher risk of conversion to late AMD.
Conclusions
The risk of progression to late AMD appears to be significantly associated with the distribution and extent of IHRF in the outermost retinal layers. This observation may point to significant pathophysiologic differences of IHRF in inner versus outer layers of the retina.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intra-retinal hyper-reflective foci (IHRF) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) have been increasingly implicated as one of the most important predictors for progression to late-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD), commonly defined as atrophy and/or macular neovascularization (MNV) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. First reported by Khanifer et al. in 2008 [12], these OCT biomarkers have been defined as discrete, > 3-pixel size, well-circumscribed hyper-reflective lesions within the neurosensory retina, having a reflectivity at least comparable to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) band [13, 14].
Migration of stressed RPE cells into the retina as well as inflammatory cells has been proposed as potential originating sources of these lesions [15]. Microglial cell proliferation and subsequent trans-retinal migration from the outer retina inwards during the course of inflammation in various disease processes including AMD have been proposed as a mechanism by which IHRF may arise [16, 17]. Other investigators have proposed RPE as a more plausible source of origin of these foci, especially those eyes that are destined to develop late AMD [18,19,20]. Previous reports have also shown that migration of RPE cells towards the deep capillary plexus (DCP) is a critical initial event in the development of intraretinal neovascularization (type 3 MNV) over time [19, 20]. Furthermore, a recent study by Cao et al. [21] conceptualized the origin of IHRF from “sloughed retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells” and proposed a progression sequence based on the available literature, OCT evidence, and immune-histochemical analysis of donor eyes [19,20,21,22,23,24].
Given the apparent prognostic and pathophysiologic importance of IHRF [4], understanding their prevalence, distribution, and evolution of these lesions over time would appear to be of importance. The Amish Eye Study provides a useful resource for the study of AMD biomarkers over time as multimodal imaging data was collected prospectively at baseline and 2 years using a standardized protocol, and the Amish represent a relatively homogenous population with regard to both environmental and genetic factors which minimizes confounding factors [25,26,27].
Thus, in this study, we analyze the extent and distribution of IHRF over 2 years in eyes with intermediate AMD (iAMD) [28, 29] from elderly Amish individuals, and evaluate the association of these IHRF parameters with the development of late AMD [30, 31].
Methods
In this retrospective longitudinal, Institutional Review Board-approved (University of Pennsylvania, University of Miami, Case Western Reserve University, and University of California—Los Angeles) study, we analyzed en face spectral-domain OCT images at baseline and 24 months later. The study was performed in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Subject enrollment
Elderly subjects were recruited from three settlements in Ohio, Indiana, and Pennsylvania, as a part of Amish Eye Study. To be enrolled in the study, subjects had to have age ≥50 years, self-identify as being Amish, and be a member of a sibship in which at least one individual was reported to have AMD. The characteristics of this cohort have been described in previous reports [11, 25].
All subjects underwent volume OCT scans of both eyes using the Cirrus high-definition (HD)-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA; 512×128 macular cube; 6×6 mm scan region centered at the fovea) at baseline and at month 24. All images were de-identified and exported and sent to the Doheny Image Reading and Research Lab (Pasadena, CA, USA) for analysis by certified reading center graders.
Overall, OCT volume data from 120 eyes of 71 patients with iAMD were evaluated for the presence and distribution of IHRF in various retinal slabs (as described in the next section) at baseline and was followed up over a 2-year period. When analyzing IHRF, all eyes with evidence of retinal disease other than iAMD (evidence of late AMD, diabetic retinopathy, epiretinal membrane etc.), as well as eyes with gross segmentation errors which could impact retinal slab selection, were excluded from the final analysis. Late AMD was graded using the color fundus pictures and OCT scans [28, 30, 31].
IHRF analysis protocol
A five-step process was used for the IHRF analysis:
-
1.
Identification of the IHRF on structural OCT B-scans.
-
2.
Generation of 5 en face slabs from the mid-retina.
-
3.
Thresholding and binarization of slabs using ImageJ.
-
4.
Manual removal of hyper-reflective artifacts surrounding the IHRF.
-
5.
Quantification of IHRF (number) from each slab (Fig. 1).
Identification of IHRF on structural OCT B-scans
All structural OCT B-scans in the volume were reviewed for the presence of IHRF as described previously [5]. Briefly, IHRF were defined as discrete, well-circumscribed hyperreflective lesions at least 3 pixels in size, located within different layers of the neurosensory retina, and a reflectivity equal or more than that of the retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) band [21]. The assessment for presence of IHRF was performed by two independent masked graders (AV and YH), and a IHRF was deemed to be present if the grader had >90% confidence that it was present in at least one B-scan image, as per the reading center guidelines. In regions where there were clusters of IHRF, each IHRF was counted as a separate lesion as long as the individual foci were clearly separated by intervening normal reflectivity. Discrepancies between graders resolved by open adjudication or by the senior reading center investigator (SRS) for cases where the graders could not come to an agreement.
Generation of sequential en face retinal slabs
The Cirrus OCT provides automatic segmentation of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and inner RPE surface and allows the user to adjust surface positions to generate custom slabs. In order to allow the frequency of IHRF at different levels of the retina to be quantified, a series of 5 sequential slabs each representing 20% of the retinal thickness were generated between the RPE and ILM, with the inner surface of the slab following the ILM contour and the outer surface following the RPE contour. Slab 1 was located just above the RPE (spanning roughly from the external limiting membrane (ELM) to the RPE), slab 2 spanned roughly from the inner border of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) to the ELM, slab 3 spanned roughly from the middle of the inner nuclear layer (INL) to the inner border of the ONL, slab 4 spanned roughly from the inner border of the IPL to the middle of the INL, and slab 5 was just below the ILM (spanning from roughly from the ILM to the inner border of the IPL).
Thresholding and binarization of extracted slabs
Before exporting the slabs, graders confirmed the precise location of IHRF on each slab by correlation with the B-scans, in order to differentiate IHRF from confounding sources of hyper-reflectivity such as focal regions of RPE elevation that were inadvertently included in the slab or blood vessels. The 5 slabs were exported from the OCT device and imported into ImageJ (version 1.50; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/index.html) for further analysis [32]. In case the IHRF was located at the boundary between two slabs, it was counted as twice, once in each slab (as it appeared on the en face image).
As the en face ellipsoid zone (EZ) normalized reflectivity has been measured and reported previously [33], the same threshold was applied to each retinal slab to isolate the IHRF lesions (which given that they are defined to be as bright as the RPE band, exceeded this EZ reflectivity threshold). Graders also reconfirmed that the IHRF were not due to confounders (e.g., bright spots due to segmentation artifact or retinal blood vessels) by inspection of the corresponding B-scans. Threshold values were adjusted accordingly to try to further minimize these apparent artifactitious IHRF lesions without disappearance of true IHRF lesions. Any residual IHRF artifacts were manually removed, using the free hand selection tool in order to generate an artifact-free threshold-refined slab for binarization.
Quantification of IHRF [6, 7, 34]
After binarization of this threshold-refined slab, the number of IHRF in each slab was then calculated using the “particle analysis” tab. IHRF counts were obtained for each slab and for each eye with IHRF at baseline and at 24 months.
Statistical analysis
All analyses were performed using statistical software (SPSS Statistics v 21.0; IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA). The numbers of IHRFs and the change in IHRF over 2 years were considered as continuous variables, whereas the conversion from iAMD to late AMD was considered as a nominal and dichotomous variable. The normalcy of distribution of data was confirmed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Paired t test was used to analyze the difference in the IHRF count between baseline and 24-month follow-up. Univariate, followed by multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk association of IHRF location (qualitative), and frequency and change (quantitative) in different retinal slabs as independent variables, on the development of late AMD at 2 years as the dependent variable to generate odd’s ratio. Inter-grader agreement [intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)] for IHRF quantification between two independent graders (AV and YH) was assessed. P values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
The mean age ± standard deviation [SD] (range) of the 71 patients with iAMD at baseline was 72.27 ± 10.52 (51–97) years, 36 (50.7%) were female. Of these, 52 eyes (43.3%) of 42 patients had the evidence of both iAMD and IHRF, which were included in the final analysis [mean age ± SD (range) = 74.17 ± 9.37 (52–97) years, 24 were female]. IHRF were present bilaterally in 10 patients (20 eyes), and unilaterally in 32 patients (16 in the right eye and 16 in the left eye). Twenty-three eyes (19.0 %) showed progression to late AMD at the 2-year follow-up period. Figure 2 illustrates an example of a drusen with overlying IHRF which evolves to a region of atrophy by month 24. Additionally, 28 eyes with intermediate AMD which did not have IHRF at baseline developed IHRF over the 2-year period. Individuals who progressed were significantly older (76.30 ± 6.01 years), compared to the subjects who did not progress to late AMD (65.19 ± 10.14 years); P <0.001.
Quantitative analysis of this IHRF subgroup revealed a total of 243 IHRF lesions (average 4.6 per eye) at baseline, and 604 (11.6 per eye) [increase by ×2.48] at the 2-year follow-up. In those eyes that showed progression to late AMD, however, the IHRF count increased from 121 to 340 [increase by ×2.86]. Figure 3 shows the distribution of IHRF in various retinal slabs at baseline and at 2 years, in eyes that progressed to late AMD and in those that did not.
With regard to IHRF distribution, the IHRF count (average ± standard deviation, SD) at baseline by slab was as follows (Table 1): slab 1 = 58 (0.04 ± 0.35); slab 2 = 132 (0.1 ± 0.88); slab 3 = 49 (0.04 ± 0.49); slab 4 = 4 (0.0 ± 0.07); and slab 5 = 0. At the 2-year follow-up, the counts were as follows: slab 1 = 194 (0.14 ± 1.35); slab 2 = 287 (0.21 ± 1.77); slab 3 = 100 (0.07 ± 0.79); slab 4 = 23 (0.02 ± 0.26); and slab 5 = 0. There was a statistically significant increase in IHRF counts in slabs 1 (P=0.001), 2 (P=0.001), 3 (P<0.001), and 4 (P=0.02) over 2 years, though at both baseline and year 2, slab 4 had significantly fewer IHRF compared to outer slabs located closer to the RPE. The unweighted k value for intergrader repeatability was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80–0.95; P <0.001) for IHRF quantification.
Progression analysis
Risk of progression to late AMD with baseline quantitative IHRF distribution (Table 2)
The quantitative analysis (considering the distribution of IHRF in each slab, as continuous variables) showed that there was a significant risk of progression from iAMD to late AMD (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07–1.38, P = 0.003). When considering the distribution of IHRF lesions in each slab by univariate regression analysis, a significant association was noted between the presence of IHRF at baseline in slab 1 (P<0.001) and slab 2 (P=0.002) with the development of late AMD over 2 years. On multivariate analysis, only IHRF in slabs 1 (P=0.02) and 2 (P=0.04) were independently associated with the significant risk of progression to late AMD over 2 years.
Change in the IHRF number over 2 years and risk of progression to late AMD (Table 3)
There was a significant association between the increase in IHRF count over 2 years for slabs 1 (P=0.001) and slab 2 (P=0.001) and progression to late AMD at 2 years. Notably, the presence of IHRF in slab 4, the innermost slab with IHRF present, was not associated with progression. However, multivariate regression analysis revealed that IHRF increases in the same slabs, i.e., slab 1 (P=0.02) and slab 2 (P=0.05) were independent predictors of progression to late AMD.
Risk of progression to late AMD with baseline qualitative IHRF distribution (Table 4)
Univariate analysis showed that although the presence of IHRF (as categorical variables) in slabs 1 and 2 were equally significant risk factors for progression, multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of IHRF in slab 2 (P<0.001) carried a higher risk as compared to slab 1 (P=0.03).
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the extent and distribution of IHRF over time and their impact on the risk for progression from intermediate AMD to late AMD over 2 years. We observed that IHRF are more extensive in the outer retinal layers compared to the inner retina and that IHRF more than double in number over a 2-year period. We also observed that that the risk of progression to late AMD over 2 years is significantly increased with the number of IHRF in slab 1 (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.40–3.25; P=<0.001) and 2 (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.14–1.86; P=0.002) spanning from roughly the inner border of ONL to the outer most portion of the neurosensory retina (Table 2). Also, the distribution of IHRF in each slab bears a significant risk of progression from iAMD to late AMD (OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.07–1.38, P = 0.003). Furthermore, IHRF distribution in the same slabs [slab 1 (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.10–2.75; P=0.02) and 2 (OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.02–1.87; P=0.04)] appeared to be associated with the greatest risk and were the only independent predictors of progression. Similar trend of risk association was observed with the change in IHRF in each retinal slab over 2 years (Table 3). These findings highlight the fact that not only the presence but also the distribution of IHRF is important in terms of the risk for progression to late AMD.
The lack of an association between IHRF in one of the innermost slabs (slab 4) and progression to late AMD may be a finding of particular interest. On the one hand, if one assumes that these slab 4 IHRF are migrated RPE cells and further assumes that a greater distance between these foci and the RPE implies a greater duration of migration time, one might anticipate that such an eye may be more prone to late AMD since IHRF would have been present in the eye for a longer time [11, 21]. On the other hand, this finding may suggest that IHRF that are located in the inner retina may be distinct and of a different source of origin than IHRF in the outer retina (slabs 1–3) [19, 21,22,23]. For example, IHRF in the outer retinal layers may be more likely to be distressed RPE cells that have migrated into the retina [35, 36]. We have observed that the choriocapillaris is more severely impaired in regions in which there are IHRF and have hypothesized that this relative ischemia may trigger these cells to migrate into the retina to seek nourishment from the deep capillary plexus (DCP) of the retina [19, 37,38,39]. Furthermore, we have hypothesized that these RPE cells stimulate the DCP to produce type 3 MNV, which is typically preceded by the presence of IHRF [38, 39]. If the intended target of migrating RPE cells is the retinal DCP, there may not be significant drive for these cells to migrate further internally and may explain why the major risk for progression to advanced AMD is conferred by IHRF in the outer retina [19]. In contrast, IHRF located in the inner retina (slab 4 in our case) may be inflammatory cells, microglia, or other cells that have arrived from the retinal circulation rather than having come from the RPE layer [15,16,17]. Testing these hypotheses, however, will likely require prospective studies with higher-resolution novel imaging devices (e.g., adaptive optics combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging) which are not currently available. It is notable that IHRF were never observed in the innermost slab (slab 5) which is primarily composed of the ganglion cell layer and nerve fiber layer. It is uncertain what properties of these innermost layers preclude the development of migration of IHRF to this location.
Although the number of IHRF in the inner retina at baseline was not a significant predictor of progression, an increase in IHRF over 2 years was associated with higher risk for progression to late AMD over 2 years on univariate analysis. While this was not an independent predictor on multivariate analysis, this does suggest that increasing IHRF in the inner retina may still be a biomarker of disease progression. It should be noted that increasing IHRF in the outer retina was also associated with progression to late AMD, and an increase in the outer most slabs (slabs 1 and 2) was both independent risk factors for progression.
Similar to previous studies, our eye level analysis indicated that the presence of any IHRF was associated with a higher risk for progression to late AMD [7, 11, 13, 21]. Because of this increased risk, subjects with intermediate AMD and IHRF have been suggested as potential candidates for early intervention trials of potential dry AMD therapies. Recently, post hoc analyses have shown that both pegcetocoplan (FDA approved) and avacincaptad can reduce the conversion from incomplete RPE and outer retinal atrophy (iRORA) to complete (cRORA) [40]. Thus, there has been interest in determining whether treatment could slow eyes with IHRF from progressing to iRORA and/or cRORA [40,41,42,43]. The rate of these conversions within 2 years, however, may be relatively low, which may make these biomarkers unfeasible for use as clinical trial endpoints. Of note, our study demonstrated that IHRF can dramatically increase in number over a 2-year period. As increasing numbers of IHRF are associated with a greater risk for progression, preventing this increase with potential therapeutic agents may provide an alternative and more clinically feasible endpoint.
Our study has some limitations which must be considered when assessing our findings. First, although the OCT data was collected as part of prospective cohort study, the analysis in this report was not pre-specified. Second, while we quantified the number of IHRF, other morphometric parameters such as the shape and size of these lesions were not considered. Third, IHRF were quantified in somewhat arbitrary slabs that were based on a percentage of the retinal thickness and not in specific retinal layers. Although we considered segmenting the various retinal layers and quantifying the IHRF in each layer, the thickness of the layers varies throughout the macula, and important characteristics like reflectivity of certain layers like Henle’s layer may be impacted by underlying pathology such as drusen. This can decrease the confidence of graders to assess the accuracy of segmentation and further IHRF analysis. Furthermore, the advantage of only requiring segmentation of the RPE and ILM boundaries is that these structures can be evaluated more reliably, and segmentation errors can be readily identified and corrected or excluded. Fourth, while the Amish population offers some advantages with regard to relatively uniform genetic and environmental (e.g., no smoking, similar diet) background, our observations in the Amish may not necessarily extrapolate to the general population. Finally, although we counted a large number of IHRF, the number of eyes was relatively small. Our study also has several strengths including a standardized OCT protocol and the use of certified graders with demonstrated high grading reproducibility.
In summary, the extent, distribution, and progression of IHRF appear to be associated with the risk for progression to late AMD. Once IHRF are apparent, their numbers can dramatically increase, even over a 2-year period. IHRF are most prevalent in the outer retinal layers and these outer IHRF seem to be associated with the greatest risk for progression to late AMD. The cellular origin of IHRF at different levels of the retina warrants further study.
References
Ouyang Y, Heussen FM, Hariri A, Keane PA, Sadda SR (2013) Optical coherence tomography-based observation of the natural history of drusenoid lesion in eyes with dry age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 120(12):2656–2665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.029
Ho J, Witkin AJ, Liu J, Chen Y, Fujimoto JG, Schuman JS, Duker JS (2011) Documentation of intraretinal retinal pigment epithelium migration via high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 118(4):687–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.010
Schmidt-Erfurth U, Waldstein SM, Klimscha S, Sadeghipour A, Hu X, Gerendas BS, Osborne A, Bogunovic H (2018) Prediction of individual disease conversion in early AMD using artificial intelligence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(8):3199–3208. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24106
Christenbury JG, Folgar FA, O’Connell RV, Chiu SJ, Farsiu S, Toth CA (2013) Age-related Eye Disease Study 2 Ancillary Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Study Group. Progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration with proliferation and inner retinal migration of hyperreflective foci. Ophthalmology 120(5):1038–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.018
Lei J, Balasubramanian S, Abdelfattah NS, Nittala MG, Sadda SR (2017) Proposal of a simple optical coherence tomography-based scoring system for progression of age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255(8):1551–1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3693-y
Sleiman K, Veerappan M, Winter KP, McCall MN, Yiu G, Farsiu S, Chew EY, Clemons T, Toth CA (2017) Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 Ancillary Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Study Group. Optical coherence tomography predictors of risk for progression to non-neovascular atrophic age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 124(12):1764–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.032
Nassisi M, Fan W, Shi Y, Lei J, Borrelli E, Ip M, Sadda SR (2018) Quantity of intraretinal hyperreflective foci in patients with intermediate age-related macular degeneration correlates with 1-year progression. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59(8):3431–3439. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24143
Wang JJ, Foran S, Smith W, Mitchell P (2003) Risk of age-related macular degeneration in eyes with macular drusen or hyperpigmentation: the Blue Mountains Eye Study cohort. Arch Ophthalmol 121(5):658–663. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.5.658
Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson MD, Meuer SM, Swift M, Gangnon RE (2007) Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 114(2):253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.040
Ferris FL, Davis MD, Clemons TE, Lee LY, Chew EY, Lindblad AS, Milton RC, Bressler SB, Klein R (2005) Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Research Group. A simplified severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 18. Arch Ophthalmol 123(11):1570–1574. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.11.1570
Nittala MG, Corvi F, Maram J, Velaga SB, Haines J, Pericak-Vance MA, Stambolian D, Sadda SR (2022) Risk factors for progression of age-related macular degeneration: population-based Amish eye study. J Clin Med 11(17):5110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175110
Khanifar AA, Koreishi AF, Izatt JA, Toth CA (2008) Drusen ultrastructure imaging with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 115(11):1883–1890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.041
Nassisi M, Lei J, Abdelfattah NS, Karamat A, Balasubramanian S, Fan W, Uji A, Marion KM, Baker K, Huang X, Morgenthien E, Sadda SR (2019) OCT risk factors for development of late age-related macular degeneration in the fellow eyes of patients enrolled in the HARBOR study. Ophthalmology 126(12):1667–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.05.016
Ho AC, Busbee BG, Regillo CD, Wieland MR, Van Everen SA, Li Z, Rubio RG, Lai P (2014) HARBOR Study Group. Twenty-four-month efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg ranibizumab in patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 121(11):2181–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.009
Wu J, Zhang C, Yang Q, Xie H, Zhang J, Qiu Q, Liu K, Luo D, Liu F, Zhang J (2021) Imaging hyperreflective foci as an inflammatory biomarker after anti-VEGF treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients with optical coherence tomography angiography. Biomed Res Int 2021:6648191. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6648191
Karlstetter M, Scholz R, Rutar M, Wong WT, Provis JM, Langmann T (2015) Retinal microglia: just bystander or target for therapy? Prog Retin Eye Res 45:30–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2014.11.004
Sun Y, Gao L, Hou W, Wu J (2020) β-Sitosterol alleviates inflammatory response via inhibiting the activation of ERK/p38 and NF-κB pathways in LPS-exposed BV2 cells. Biomed Res Int 27(2020):7532306. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7532306
Pang C, Messinger JD, Zanzottera EC, Freund KB, Curcio CA (2015) The onion sign in neovascular age-related macular degeneration represents cholesterol crystals. Ophthalmology 122:2316–2326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.008
Li M, Dolz-Marco R, Messinger JD, Wang L, Feist RM, Girkin CA, Gattoussi S, Ferrara D, Curcio CA, Freund KB (2018) Clinicopathologic correlation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treated type 3 neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 125:276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.019
Balaratnasingam C, Messinger JD, Sloan KR, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB, Curcio CA (2017) Histologic and optical coherence tomographic correlations in drusenoid pigment epithelium detachment in age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 124:644–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016
Cao D, Leong B, Messinger JD, Kar D, Ach T, Yannuzzi LA, Freund KB, Curcio CA (2021) Hyperreflective foci, optical coherence tomography progression indicators in age-related macular degeneration, include transdifferentiated retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 62(10):34. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.62.10.34
Zanzottera EC, Messinger JD, Ach T, Smith RT, Freund KB, Curcio CA (2015) The Project MACULA retinal pigment epithelium grading system for histology and optical coherence tomography in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:3253–3268. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-16431
Zanzottera EC, Messinger JD, Ach T, Smith RT, Curcio CA (2015) Subducted and melanotic cells in advanced age-related macular degeneration are derived from retinal pigment epithelium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:3269–3278. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-16432
Jopling C, Boue S, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2011) Dedifferentiation, trans differentiation and reprogramming: three routes to regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3043
Nittala MG, Song YE, Sardell R, Adams LD, Pan S, Velaga SB, Horst V, Dana D, Caywood L, Laux R, Fuzzell D, Fuzzell S, Scott WK, Cooke Bailey JN, Igo RP Jr, Haines J, Pericak-Vance MA, Sadda SR, Stambolian D (2019) Amish Eye Study: baseline spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 39(8):1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002210
Hahs DW, McCauley JL, Crunk AE, McFarland LL, Gaskell PC, Jiang L, Slifer SH, Vance JM, Scott WK, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Johnson SR, Jackson CE, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL (2006) A genome-wide linkage analysis of dementia in the Amish. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 141B(2):160–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30257
McCauley JL, Hahs DW, Jiang L, Scott WK, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Jackson CE, Vance JM, Pericak-Vance MA, Haines JL (2006) Combinatorial Mismatch Scan (CMS) for loci associated with dementia in the Amish. BMC Med Genet 7:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-7-19
Ferris FL 3rd, Wilkinson CP, Bird A, Chakravarthy U, Chew E, Csaky K, Sadda SR (2013) Beckman Initiative for Macular Research Classification Committee. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 120(4):844–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.036
García-Layana A, Cabrera-López F, García-Arumí J, Arias-Barquet L, Ruiz-Moreno JM (2017) Early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration: update and clinical review. Clin Interv Aging 12:1579–1587. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S142685
Sadda SR, Guymer R, Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Curcio CA, Bird AC, Blodi BA, Bottoni F, Chakravarthy U, Chew EY, Csaky K, Danis RP, Fleckenstein M, Freund KB, Grunwald J, Hoyng CB, Jaffe GJ, Liakopoulos S, Monés JM et al (2018) Consensus definition for atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration on OCT: classification of atrophy report 3. Ophthalmology 125(4):537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.028
Guymer RH, Rosenfeld PJ, Curcio CA, Holz FG, Staurenghi G, Freund KB, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Sparrow J, Spaide RF, Tufail A, Chakravarthy U, Jaffe GJ, Csaky K, Sarraf D, Monés JM, Tadayoni R, Grunwald J, Bottoni F, Liakopoulos S et al (2020) Incomplete retinal pigment epithelial and outer retinal atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: classification of atrophy meeting report 4. Ophthalmology 127(3):394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.09.035
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
Borrelli E, Abdelfattah NS, Uji A, Nittala MG, Boyer DS, Sadda SR (2017) Postreceptor neuronal loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 181:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.005
Tiosano L, Byon I, Alagorie AR, Ji YS, Sadda SR (2020) Choriocapillaris flow deficit associated with intraretinal hyperreflective foci in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258(11):2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04837-y
Waldstein SM, Vogl W-D, Bogunovic H, Sadeghipour A, Riedl S, Schmidt-Erfurth U (2020) Characterization of drusen and hyperreflective foci as biomarkers for disease progression in age-related macular degeneration using artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol 138:740–747. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.1376
Schuman SG, Koreishi AF, Farsiu S, Jung S, Izatt JA, Toth CA (2009) Photoreceptor layer thinning over drusen in eyes with age related macular degeneration imaged in vivo with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 116:488-496.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.006
Flores R, Carneiro Â, Neri G, Fradinho AC, Quenderra B, Barata MJ, Tenreiro S, Seabra MC (2022) Choroidal vascular impairment in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Diagnostics (Basel) 12(5):1290. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051290
Borrelli E, Souied EH, Freund KB, Querques G, Miere A, Gal-Or O, Sacconi R, Sadda SR, Sarraf D (2018) Reduced choriocapillaris flow in eyes with type 3 neovascularization and age-related macular degeneration. Retina 38(10):1968–1976. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002198
Borrelli E, Uji A, Sarraf D, Sadda SR (2017) Alterations in the choriocapillaris in intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58(11):4792–4798. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-22360
Nittala MG, Metlapally R, Ip M, Chakravarthy U, Holz FG, Staurenghi G, Waheed N, Velaga SB, Lindenberg S, Karamat A, Koester J, Ribeiro R, Sadda S (2022) Association of pegcetacoplan with progression of incomplete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: a post hoc analysis of the FILLY randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol 140(3):243–249. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.6067
Liao DS, Grossi FV, El Mehdi D, Gerber MR, Brown DM, Heier JS, Wykoff CC, Singerman LJ, Abraham P, Grassmann F, Nuernberg P, Weber BHF, Deschatelets P, Kim RY, Chung CY, Ribeiro RM, Hamdani M, Rosenfeld PJ, Boyer DS et al (2020) Complement C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a randomized phase 2 trial. Ophthalmology 127(2):186–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.011
Wykoff CC, Rosenfeld PJ, Waheed NK, Singh RP, Ronca N, Slakter JS, Staurenghi G, Monés J, Baumal CR, Saroj N, Metlapally R, Ribeiro R (2021) Characterizing new-onset exudation in the randomized phase 2 FILLY trial of complement inhibitor pegcetacoplan for geographic atrophy. Ophthalmology 128(9):1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.02.025
Steinle NC, Pearce I, Monés J, Metlapally R, Saroj N, Hamdani M, Ribeiro R, Rosenfeld PJ, Lad EM (2021) Impact of baseline characteristics on geographic atrophy progression in the FILLY trial evaluating the complement C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan. Am J Ophthalmol 227:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.031
Funding
This study was funded by NEI grants RO1EY023164 and 1R01EY030614.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the (University of Pennsylvania, University of Miami, Case Western Reserve University, and University of California—Los Angeles) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the following: University of Pennsylvania, University of Miami, Case Western Reserve University, and University of California—Los Angeles.
Conflict of interest
AV, YH, MNG, MN, JLH, MAP-V, DS: none; GC: Nidek (speaker fee); SRS: 4DMT consultant/advisor; Alexion consultant/advisor; Allergan, Inc. consultant/advisor; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals consultant/advisor; Amgen Inc. consultant/advisor; Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consultant/advisor; Astellas consultant/advisor; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals consultant/advisor; Carl Zeiss Meditec consultant/advisor, lecture fees/speakers bureau, grant support; Catalyst Pharmaceuticals Inc. consultant/advisor; Centervue, Inc. consultant/advisor; GENENTECH consultant/advisor; Gyroscope Therapeutics consultant/advisor; Heidelberg Engineering consultant/advisor, lecture fees/speakers bureau, grant support; Iveric Bio consultant/advisor; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consultant/advisor; Merck & Co., Inc. consultant/advisor; Nanoscope consultant/advisor; Nidek Incorporated lecture fees/speakers bureau; Novartis Pharma AG consultant/advisor, lecture fees/speakers bureau; Optos, Inc. consultant/advisor; Oxurion/Thrombogenics consultant/advisor; Pfizer, Inc. consultant/advisor; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. consultant/advisor; Samsung Bioepis consultant/advisor; Topcon Medical Systems Inc. lecture fees/speakers bureau; Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated consultant/advisor.
Disclaimer
Although the co-author (Vas Sadda) is an editor of the journal, there was no involvement with the peer-review process for this article.
Additional information
This study has not been presented anywhere.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Verma, A., Corradetti, G., He, Y. et al. Relationship between the distribution of intra-retinal hyper-reflective foci and the progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 261, 3437–3447 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06180-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06180-4