Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) presents with visuospatial impairment and falls. It is critical to understand how subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) modulates visuospatial perception. We hypothesized that DBS has different effects on visual and vestibular perception of linear motion (heading), a critical aspect of visuospatial navigation; and such effects are specific to modulated STN location. Two-alternative forced-choice experiments were performed in 14 PD patients with bilateral STN DBS and 19 age-matched healthy controls (HC) during passive en bloc linear motion and 3D optic-flow in immersive virtual reality measured vestibular and visual heading. Objective measure of perception with Weibull psychometric function revealed that PD has significantly lower accuracy [L: 60.71 (17.86)%, R: 74.82 (17.44)%] and higher thresholds [L: 16.68 (12.83), R: 10.09 (7.35)] during vestibular task in both directions compared to HC (p < 0.05). DBS significantly improved vestibular discrimination accuracy [81.40 (14.36)%] and threshold [4.12 (5.87), p < 0.05] in the rightward direction. There were no DBS effects on the slopes of vestibular psychometric curves. Visual heading perception was better than vestibular and it was comparable to HC. There was no significant effect of DBS on visual heading response accuracy or discrimination threshold (p > 0.05). Patient-specific DBS models revealed an association between change in vestibular heading perception and the modulation of the dorsal STN. In summary, DBS may have different effects on vestibular and visual heading perception in PD. These effects may manifest via dorsal STN putatively by its effects on the cerebellum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloem BR, Grimbergen YAM, Cramer M et al (2001) Prospective assessment of falls in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 248:950–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004150170047
Bloem BR, Hausdorff JM, Visser JE, Giladi N (2004) Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease: a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena. Mov Disord 19:871–884. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.20115
Davidsdottir S, Wagenaar R, Young D, Cronin-Golomb A (2008) Impact of optic flow perception and egocentric coordinates on veering in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 131:2882–2893. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn237
Young DE, Wagenaar RC, Lin C-C et al (2010) Visuospatial perception and navigation in Parkinson’s disease. Vision Res 50:2495–2504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.029
Seichepine DR, Neargarder S, Davidsdottir S et al (2015) Side and type of initial motor symptom influences visuospatial functioning in Parkinson’s disease. J Park Dis 5:75–83. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-140365
Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P et al (2006) A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 355:896–908. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa060281
Konczak J, Krawczewski K, Tuite P, Maschke M (2007) The perception of passive motion in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 254:655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-006-0426-2
Wright WG, Gurfinkel V, King L, Horak F (2007) Parkinson’s disease shows perceptuomotor asymmetry unrelated to motor symptoms. Neurosci Lett 417:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.016
Bronstein AM, Hood JD, Gresty MA, Panagi C (1990) Visual control of balance in cerebellar and parkinsonian syndromes. Brain 113:767–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/113.3.767
Barbato L, Rinalduzzi S, Laurenti M et al (1994) Color VEPs in Parkinson’s disease. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Potentials Sect 92:169–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(94)90057-4
Armstrong RA (2011) Visual Symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. Park Dis 2011:908306. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/908306
Harris MG, Carré G (2001) Is optic flow used to guide walking while wearing a displacing prism? Perception 30:811–818. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3160
Warren WHW Jr, Kay BA, Zosh WD et al (2001) Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nat Neurosci 4:213. https://doi.org/10.1038/84054
Kearns MJ, Warren WH, Duchon AP, Tarr MJ (2002) Path integration from optic flow and body senses in a homing task. Perception 31:349–374. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3311
Bertolini G, Wicki A, Baumann CR et al (2015) Impaired tilt perception in Parkinson’s disease: a central vestibular integration failure. PLoS ONE 10:e0124253. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124253
Yousif N, Bhatt H, Bain PG et al (2016) The effect of pedunculopontine nucleus deep brain stimulation on postural sway and vestibular perception. Eur J Neurol 23:668–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12947
Beylergil SB, Ozinga S, Walker MF et al (2019) Vestibular heading perception in Parkinson’s disease. Prog Brain Res 249:307–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.034
Yakubovich S, Israeli-Korn S, Halperin O et al (2020) Visual self-motion cues are impaired yet overweighted during visual–vestibular integration in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Commun 2:fcaa035. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa035
Karimi M, Golchin N, Tabbal SD et al (2008) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation-induced regional blood flow responses correlate with improvement of motor signs in Parkinson disease. Brain 131:2710–2719. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn179
McNeely ME, Hershey T, Campbell MC et al (2011) Effects of deep brain stimulation of dorsal versus ventral subthalamic nucleus regions on gait and balance in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82:1250–1255. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.232900
Hill KK, Campbell MC, McNeely ME et al (2013) Cerebral blood flow responses to dorsal and ventral STN DBS correlate with gait and balance responses in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol 241:105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.12.003
Rascol O, Sabatini U, Fabre N et al (1997) The ipsilateral cerebellar hemisphere is overactive during hand movements in akinetic parkinsonian patients. Brain 120:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.1.103
Yu H, Sternad D, Corcos DM, Vaillancourt DE (2007) Role of hyperactive cerebellum and motor cortex in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroimage 35:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.047
Moers-Hornikx VMP, Vles JSH, Tan SKH et al (2011) Cerebellar nuclei are activated by high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Neurosci Lett 496:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2011.03.094
Bremmer F, Klam F, Duhamel J-R et al (2002) Visual–vestibular interactive responses in the macaque ventral intraparietal area (VIP). Eur J Neurosci 16:1569–1586. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02206.x
Hoshi E, Tremblay L, Féger J et al (2005) The cerebellum communicates with the basal ganglia. Nat Neurosci 8:1491–1493. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1544
Gu Y, DeAngelis GC, Angelaki DE (2007) A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nat Neurosci 10:1038–1047. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1935
Shaikh AG, Straumann D, Palla A (2017) Motion illusion—evidence towards human vestibulo-thalamic projections. Cerebellum 16:656–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-017-0844-y
Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR et al (2008) Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord 23:2129–2170. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22340
Powell LE, Myers AM (1995) The activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. J Gerontol Ser A 50A:M28–M34. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/50A.1.M28
Jacobs JV, Horak FB, Tran VK, Nutt JG (2006) Multiple balance tests improve the assessment of postural stability in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:322–326. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.068742
Wichmann FA, Hill NJ (2001) The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63:1293–1313. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194544
Butson CR, Noecker AM, Maks CB, McIntyre CC (2007) StimExplorer: deep brain stimulation parameter selection software system. In: Sakas DE, Simpson BA (eds) Operative neuromodulation, vol 2. Neural networks surgery. Springer, Vienna, pp 569–574
Noecker AM, Choi KS, Riva-Posse P et al (2018) StimVision software: examples and applications in subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for depression. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 21:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12625
Hamani C, Florence G, Heinsen H et al (2017) Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: basic concepts and novel perspectives. eNeuro. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0140-17.2017
Cooke JD, Brown JD, Brooks VB (1978) Increased dependence on visual information for movement control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci J Can Sci Neurol 5:413–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0317167100024197
Azulay J-P, Mesure S, Amblard B, Pouget J (2002) Increased visual dependence in Parkinson’s disease. Percept Mot Skills 95:1106–1114. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.95.3f.1106
Azulay J-P, Mesure S, Amblard B et al (1999) Visual control of locomotion in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 122:111–120
Azulay J-P, Mesure S, Blin O (2006) Influence of visual cues on gait in Parkinson’s disease: contribution to attention or sensory dependence? J Neurol Sci 248:192–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.008
Putcha D, Ross RS, Rosen ML et al (2014) Functional correlates of optic flow motion processing in Parkinson’s disease. Front Integr Neurosci 8:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00057
Beylergil SB, Petersen M, Gupta P et al (2021) Severity-dependent effects of Parkinson’s disease on perception of visual and vestibular heading. Mov Disord 36:360–369
Shaikh AG, Meng H, Angelaki DE (2004) Multiple reference frames for motion in the primate cerebellum. J Neurosci 24:4491–4497. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0109-04.2004
Dieterich M, Bense S, Lutz S et al (2003) Dominance for vestibular cortical function in the non-dominant hemisphere. Cereb Cortex 13:994–1007. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.9.994
Kinsbourne M (1977) Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization. Raven Press, New York, pp 41–49
Seemungal BM, Rizzo V, Gresty MA et al (2008) Posterior parietal rTMS disrupts human path integration during a vestibular navigation task. Neurosci Lett 437:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.067
Kaski D, Quadir S, Nigmatullina Y et al (2016) Temporoparietal encoding of space and time during vestibular-guided orientation. Brain 139:392–403. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv370
Montgomery P, Silverstein P, Wichmann R et al (1993) Spatial updating in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Cogn 23:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1993.1050
Angelaki DE, Shaikh AG, Green AM, Dickman JD (2004) Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion. Nature 430:560–564. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02754
Shaikh AG, Green AM, Ghasia FF et al (2005) Sensory convergence solves a motion ambiguity problem. Curr Biol 15:1657–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.009
Shaikh AG, Ghasia FF, Dickman JD, Angelaki DE (2005) Properties of cerebellar fastigial neurons during translation, rotation, and eye movements. J Neurophysiol 93:853–863. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00879.2004
Bertolini G, Ramat S, Bockisch CJ et al (2012) Is vestibular self-motion perception controlled by the velocity storage? Insights from patients with chronic degeneration of the vestibulo-cerebellum. PLoS ONE 7:e36763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036763
Bostan AC, Strick PL (2010) The cerebellum and basal ganglia are interconnected. Neuropsychol Rev 20:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-010-9143-9
Bostan AC, Dum RP, Strick PL (2010) The basal ganglia communicate with the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:8452–8456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000496107
Akbarian S, Grüsser O-J, Guldin WO (1992) Thalamic connections of the vestibular cortical fields in the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Neurol 326:423–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903260308
Middleton FA, Strick PL (2000) Basal ganglia output and cognition: evidence from anatomical, behavioral, and clinical studies. Brain Cogn 42:183–200. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1999.1099
Yakusheva TA, Blazquez PM, Chen A, Angelaki DE (2013) Spatiotemporal properties of optic flow and vestibular tuning in the cerebellar nodulus and uvula. J Neurosci 33:15145–15160. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2118-13.2013
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by American Academy of Neurology Career Award (Shaikh), American Parkinson’s Disease Association George C Cotzias Memorial Fellowship (Shaikh), Dystonia Medical Research Foundation Research Grant (Shaikh), and philanthropic funds to the Department of Neurology at University Hospitals (The Allan Woll Fund and The Fox Fund). Dr. Shaikh has Penni and Stephen Weinberg Research Chair in Brain Health.
Funding
This work was supported by American Academy of Neurology Career Award (Shaikh), American Parkinson’s Disease Association George C Cotzias Memorial Fellowship (Shaikh), Dystonia Medical Research Foundation Research Grant (Shaikh), and philanthropic funds to the Department of Neurology at University Hospitals (The Allan Woll Fund). Dr. Shaikh has Penni and Stephen Weinberg Chair in Brain Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SBB: collected data, conceptualized analysis, performed analysis, and written and edited manuscript; AN: performed analysis and edited manuscript; CCM: performed analysis and edited manuscript; MP: performed analysis and edited manuscript; PG: collected data and edited manuscript; CK: collected data and edited manuscript; SO: conceptualized analysis, performed analysis, and edited manuscript; MW: conceptualized analysis and project, and edited manuscript; AGS: conceptualized project, analysis, collected data, performed analysis, and written and edited manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
CCM is paid consultant for Boston Scientific Neuromodulation. CK has received honoraria from Medtronic Inc to serve as an advisor.
Data and code availability
Deidentified data and software codes will be made available to the interested party after preparing appropriate institutional agreements and approvals.
Ethics approval
Institutional Review Boards at Cleveland VA Medical Center and University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center approved this study.
Consent to participate
The subjects signed informed consent form prior to participating in the study.
Consent to publish
Authors consented to publish their work. Patients consented to publish their deidentified data.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
415_2021_10616_MOESM1_ESM.tiff
Supplemental Fig. 1. Individual Weibull psychometric curves of HC for vestibular (solid line) and visual heading (dotted line) in the leftward (left half of the plot) and rightward heading direction (right half of the plot). Filled and open circles represent the subject’s percent correct responses in the vestibular and visual heading task, respectively. 75% threshold value, psychometric slope, as well as the goodness-of-fit (R2) value of each individual’s Weibull psychometric function are denoted and for each modality and heading direction (TIFF 5043 KB)
415_2021_10616_MOESM2_ESM.tiff
Supplemental Fig. 2. Individual Weibull psychometric curves of PD for vestibular (solid line) and visual heading (dotted line) in the leftward (left half of the plot) and rightward heading direction (right half of the plot). Psychometric curves in DBS-ON (red) and DBS-OFF (navy) conditions are plotted with average HC curves (black). Filled and open circles represent the subject’s percent correct responses in the vestibular and visual heading task, respectively. Dashed black horizontal line designates the 75% accuracy level. 75% threshold value, psychometric slope, as well as the goodness-of-fit (R2) value of each individual’s Weibull psychometric function are denoted and for each modality, DBS condition and heading direction (TIFF 3834 KB)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beylergil, S.B., Noecker, A.M., Petersen, M. et al. Subthalamic deep brain stimulation affects heading perception in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 269, 253–268 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10616-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-021-10616-4