Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the accuracy of forensic age estimation where there is no legal basis for carrying out x-ray examinations, it would be useful to establish non-x-ray imaging techniques. The objective of this study was to provide reference data for the magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluation of the ossification stage of the distal radius. Furthermore, we tested a new criterion of the maturity of the distal radial epiphysis for determining whether an individual has completed the age of 18. We investigated 668 MRI scans of the distal radial epiphysis from 333 female and 335 male subjects ranging in age from 12 to 24. To determine the ossification stage, we used the clavicular ossification staging systems described by Schmeling et al. and Kellinghaus et al. Ossification stage IV as described by Schmeling et al. was divided into two sub-stages, IVa and IVb, depending on whether or not it was possible to identify a triple-banded meta-epiphyseal zone of calcification. All study subjects were able to be assigned to an ossification stage without ambiguity. We present statistics relating to the distribution of ossification stages divided by sex. The age of the youngest female subject assessed as ossification stage IVb was 16.8, the age of the youngest male subject 18.6. The youngest age at which female subjects were assessed as ossification stage V was 22.3; for male subjects it was 23.1. Further independent studies should be carried out to determine whether ossification stage IVb can indeed be used to reliably determine whether a male subject has completed the age of 18.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dünkel F, Grzywa J, Horsfield P, Pruin I (2010) Juvenile justice systems in Europe. Forum, Godesberg

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beh P, Payne-James J (2010) Clinical and legal requirements for age determination in the living. In: Black S, Aggrawal A, Payne-James J (eds) Age estimation in the living. The practitioner’s guide. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 30–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, Reisinger W, Riepert T, Ritz-Timme S, Rösing FW, Rötzscher K, Geserick G (2008) Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med 122:457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schulz R, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2014) Sonographische Untersuchungen verschiedener Skelettregionen. Forensische Altersdiagnostik bei lebenden Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. Rechtsmedizin 24:480–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players. Br J Sports Med 41:45–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt S, Mühler M, Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Schulz R (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 121:321–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jopp E, Schröder I, Maas R, Adam G, Püschel K (2010) Proximale Tibiaepiphyse im Magnetresonanztomogramm. Neue Möglichkeit zur Altersbestimmung bei Lebenden? Rechtsmedizin 20:464–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillewig E, De Tobel J, Cuche O, Vandemaele P, Piette M, Verstraete K (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of the medial extremity of the clavicle in forensic bone age determination: a new four-minute approach. Eur Radiol 21:757–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dedouit F, Auriol J, Rousseau H, Rougé D, Crubézy E, Telmon N (2012) Age assessment by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: a preliminary study. For Sci Int 217:232.e1–232.e7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krämer JA, Schmidt S, Jürgens KU, Lentschig M, Schmeling A, Vieth V (2014) Forensic age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of the distal femur. Int J Legal Med 128:509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vieth V, Schulz R, Brinkmeier P, Dvorak J, Schmeling A (2014) Age estimation in U-20 football players using 3.0 tesla MRI of the clavicle. Forensic Sci Int 241:118–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Timme M, Dvorak J, Schmeling A (2014) Magnetic resonance imaging of the iliac crest: age estimation in under-20 soccer players. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 10:198–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumann P, Widek T, Merkens H, Boldt J, Petrovic A, Urschler M, Kirnbauer B, Jakse N, Scheurer E (2015) Dental age estimation of living persons: comparison of MRI with OPG. Forensic Sci Int 253:76–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo Y, Olze A, Ottow C, Schmidt S, Schulz R, Heindel W, Pfeiffer H, Vieth V, Schmeling A (2015) Dental age estimation in living individuals using 3.0 T MRI of lower third molars. Int J Legal Med 129:1265–1270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmeling A, Dettmeyer R, Rudolf E, Vieth V, Geserick G (2016) Forensic age estimation. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113:44–50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tomei E, Sartori A, Nissman D, Al Ansari N, Battisti S, Rubini A, Stagnitti A, Martino M, Marini M, Barbato E, Semelka RC (2014) Value of MRI of the hand and the wrist in evaluation of bone age: preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1198–1205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Serinelli S, Panebianco V, Martino M, Battisti S, Rodacki K, Marinelli E, Zaccagna F, Semelka RC, Tomei E (2015) Accuracy of MRI skeletal age estimation for subjects 12–19. Potential use for subjects of unknown age. Int J Legal Med 129:609–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt S, Vieth V, Timme M, Dvorak J, Schmeling A (2015) Examination of ossification of the distal radial epiphysis using magnetic resonance imaging. New insights for age estimation in young footballers in FIFA tournaments. Sci Justice 55:139–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Mühler M, Wernecke KD, Geserick G (2004) Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphyseal cartilage in conventional radiography. Int J Legal Med 118:5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kellinghaus M, Schulz R, Vieth V, Schmidt S, Pfeiffer H, Schmeling A (2010) Enhanced possibilities to make statements on the ossification status of the medial clavicular epiphysis using an amplified staging scheme in evaluating thin-slice CT scans. Int J Legal Med 124:321–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thiemann H-H, Nitz I, Schmeling A (2006) Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1983) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method), 2. Aufl. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dvorak J, George J, Junge A, Hodler J (2007) Application of MRI of the wrist for age determination in international U-17 soccer competitions. Br J Sports Med 41:497–500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. George J, Nagendran J, Azmi K (2012) Comparison study of growth plate fusion using MRI versus plain radiographs as used in age determination for exclusion of overaged football players. Br J Sports Med 46:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Serin J, Rérolle C, Pucheux J, Dedouit F, Telmon N, Savall F, Saint-Martin P (2016) Contribution of magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist and hand to forensic age assessment. Int J Legal Med 130:1121–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G (2000) Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med 113:253–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G (2001) Der Einfluß der Ethnie auf die bei strafrechtlichen Altersschätzungen untersuchten Merkmale. Rechtsmedizin 11:78–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Rösing FW (2006) The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med 120:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the European Refugee Fund, the German Federal Office for Migration and Refugees and the Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Schmeling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Timme, M., Ottow, C., Schulz, R. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis: a new criterion of maturity for determining whether the age of 18 has been completed?. Int J Legal Med 131, 579–584 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1502-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1502-5

Keywords

Navigation