Abstract
The aim of our work has been to evaluate the different options of tracheoesophageal voice rehabilitation in over 70-year-old patients, who had undergone laryngectomy, assessing advantages and drawbacks of this method of vocal recovery. A retrospective study has been carried out. This has included 40 subjects, all aged more than 70 years old, who have been referred to tracheoesophageal voice rehabilitation. It has been realized a phonatory fistula between trachea and esophagus with prosthesis positioning by means of a primary puncture in 18 cases and it has been realized a secondary puncture in 22 cases. The results gathered in these patients were compared with data obtained from a group made of 39 patients, less than 70 years of age that therefore represented our control group. In primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP), the short-term success was 67 %, while in the 22 cases who underwent secondary TEP, the short-term success was 64 %. After 2 years from TEP, the long-term success was 82.5 %. In the control group, the short-term success was 65 % in primary TEP and 73 % in secondary TEP. After 2 years from TEP, the long-term success was 77 %. The evaluation of the results has shown the absence of a statistically significant difference both as regards complications incidence, during and after surgery (p > 0.9) and as regards overall success ratio of prosthesis implants between the two groups (p > 0.7). The possibilities of tracheoesophageal recovery of elderly patients do not show dissimilarities in comparison with the results in younger subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrer Ramírez MJ, Guallart Doménech F, Brotons Durbán S, Carrasco Llatas M, Estellés Ferriol E, López Martínez R (2001) Surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy: long-term results. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258(9):463–466
Op de Coul BM, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ, Tan IB, van den Hoogen FJ, van Tinteren H (2000) A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single institution’s experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126(11):1320–1328
Chone CT, Gripp FM, Spina AL, Crespo AN (2005) Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for speech rehabilitation in total laryngectomy: long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133(1):89–93
Hall FT, O’Brien CJ, Clifford AR, McNeil EB, Bron L, Jackson MA (2003) Clinical outcome following total laryngectomy for cancer. ANZ J Surg 73(5):300–305
Iseli TA, Agar NJ, Dunemann C, Lyons BM (2007) Functional outcomes following total laryngopharyngectomy. ANZ J Surg 77(11):954–957
Cakli H, Ozudogru E, Cingi E, Kecik C, Gürbüz K (2005) Near total laryngectomy: the problems influencing functions and their solutions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 262(2):99–102
Bernáldez R, García-Pallarés M, Morera E, Lassaletta L, Del Palacio A, Gavilán J (2003) Oncologic and functional results of near-total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(5):700–705
Blom ED, Hamaker RC (1996) Tracheoesophageal voice restoration following total laryngectomy. In: Myers EN, Suen JY (eds) Cancer of the head and neck, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 839–852
Kao WW, Mohr RM, Kimmel CA, Getch C, Silverman C (1994) The outcome and techniques of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120(3):301–307
Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC (1985) An improved esophageal insufflation test. Arch Otolaryngol 111:211–212
Shultz JR, Harrison J (1992) Defining and predicting tracheoesophageal puncture success. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:811–816
Garth RJ, McRae A, Rhŷs Evans PH (1991) Tracheo-oesophageal puncture: a review of problems and complications. J Laryngol Otol 105(9):750–754
Pawar PV, Sayed SI, Kazi R, Jagade MV (2008) Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy. J Cancer Res Ther 4(4):186–191
Boscolo-Rizzo P, Zanetti F, Carpené S, Da Mosto MC (2008) Long-term results with tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: primary versus secondary TEP. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:73–77
Lequeux T, Badreldin A, Saussez S, Thill MP, Oujjan L, Chantrain G (2003) A comparison of survival lifetime of the Provox and the Provox2 voice prosthesis. J Laryngol Otol 117(11):875–878
Moerman M, Vermeersch H, Heylbroeck P (2004) A simple surgical technique for tracheoesophageal fistula closure. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261(7):381–385
Lorenz KJ, Groll K, Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Maier H (2007) Hands-free speech after surgical voice rehabilitation with a Provox voice prosthesis: experience with the Provox FreeHands HME tracheostoma valve system. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264(2):151–157
Herranz González-Botas J, Suárez T, García Carreira B, Martínez Morán A (2001) Experience with the HME-Provox Stomafilter in laryngectomized patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 52(3):221–225
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cocuzza, S., Bonfiglio, M., Grillo, C. et al. Post laryngectomy speech rehabilitation outcome in elderly patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1879–1884 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2430-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2430-3