Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: A Regional Cancer Centre Experience and Review of Literature

  • Other Articles
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alaryngeal speech in laryngectomees has revolutionized the patient outlook toward the morbid procedure and the concept of permanent stoma unlike olden era when stigma of stoma with loss of voice was rampant. To analyse acceptance of voice rehabilitation options and their success and management of complications in a tertiary care centre. All patients who underwent laryngectomy from August 2014 to 2018 June at our institution were included in the study. The voice rehabilitation options like oesophageal speech, tracheao-oesophageal puncture and voice prosthesis insertion (TEP), and electrolarynx were explained to the patients. The options put forward to the patients, the importance of Taub test, Interval between treatment and secondary TEP insertion, life span of the prosthesis, Patients acceptance and success rates and the troubleshooting were noted. A total of 96 patients underwent total laryngectomy, 72 patients were willing for rehabilitation. 15% (11) patients had primary TEP, 22% (16) had secondary TEP insertion, esophageal speech in 36% (26) patients and 27% (19) patients opted for the electrolarynx. The rest 24 patients were not keen on any further interventions after laryngectomy. Speech rehabilitation is an integral part in surgical management of carcinoma of the larynx. Alaryngeal speech in laryngectomees have revolutionized the patient outlook towards the morbid procedure. Esophageal speech is the least successful method of rehabilitation but still the cheapest method and requires a lot of motivation. Primary and Secondary TEP insertions have similar success rates. Successful treatment for cancer of larynx ends with successful voice rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bien S, Rinaldo A, Silver CE et al (2008) History of voice rehabilitation following laryn-gectomy. Laryngoscope 118(3):4538

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weir N (1990) Otolaryngology. An illustrated history. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gussenbauer C (1874) Ueber die erste durch Th. Billroth am Menschen ausgeführte Kehlkopf-Exstirpation und die Anwendung eines künstlichen Kehlkopfes. Arch Klin Chir 17:34356

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singer MI, Blom ED (1980) An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 89:529–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babin E, Beynier D, Le Gall D et al (2009) Psychosocial quality of life in patients after total laryngectomy. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 130(1):29–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singer S, Danker H, Dietz A et al (2008) Sexual problems after total or partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 118(12):2218–2224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Blom ED (2000) Current status of voice restoration following total laryngectomy. Oncology (Williston Park) 14(6):915–922 (discussion: 927–8, 931)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pawar PV, Sayed SI, Kazi R, Jagade MV (2008) Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy. J Cancer Res Ther 4:186–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Finizia C, Bergman B (2001) Health-related quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer: a post-treatment comparison of different modes of communication. Laryngoscope 111(5):918–923

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eadie TL, Doyle PC (2005) Quality of life in male TE speakers. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:115–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Varghese BT, Mathew A, Sebastian P et al (2011) Comparison of quality of life between voice rehabilitated and nonrehabilitated laryngectomies in a developing world community. Acta Otolaryngol 131(3):310–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer S, Merbach M, Dietz A, Schwarz R (2007) Psychosocial determinants of successful voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. J Chin Med Assoc 70:407–423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jassar P, England RJ, Stafford ND (1999) Restoration of voice after laryngectomy. J R Soc Med 92:299–302

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. De Raucourt D, Rame JP, Daliphard F, Le Pennec D, Béquignon A, Luquet A (1998) Voice rehabilitation with a voice prosthesis. Study of 62 patients with 5 years follow-up. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 119:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  15. Van den Hoogen FJ, Van den Berg RJ, Oudes MJ, Manni JJ (1998) A prospective study of speech and voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy with the low-resistance Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses. Clin Otolaryngol 23:425–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Labruna A, Klatsky I, Huo J, Weiss MH (1995) Tracheoesophageal puncture in irradiated patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 104:279–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trudeau MD, Schuller DE, Hall DA (1989) The effects of radiation on tracheoesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 115:1116–1117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blom ED (2000) Tracheoesophageal voice restoration: origin – evolution – state-of-the-art. Folia Phoniatr Logop 52:14–23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000021508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Myers EN, Suen JY (eds) (1996) Cancer of the head and neck, 3rd edn. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 839–852

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quer M, Burgués-Vila J, Garcia-Crespillo P (1992) Primary tracheoesophageal puncture vs esophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118:188–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RC (1986) A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:440–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McIvor J, Evans PF, Perry A, Cheesman AD (1990) Radiological assessment of post laryngectomy speech. Clin Radiol 41:312–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Izdebsky K, Reed CG, Ross JC, Hilsinger RL (1994) Problems with tracheoesophageal fistula voice restoration in totally laryngectomized patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:840–845

    Google Scholar 

  24. Willians SE, Watson JB (1987) Speaking proficiency variation according to method of alaryngeal voicing. Laryngoscope 97:737–739

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cornu AS, Vlantis AC, Elliott H, Gregor RT (2003) Voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy with the Provox voice prosthesis in South Africa. J Laryngol Otol 117:56–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hilgers FJ, Schouwenburg PF (1990) A new low-resistance, self- retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 100:1202–1207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Carpentier JP, Ryder WD, Saeed SR, Woolford TJ (1996) Survival times of Provox valves. J Laryngol Otol 110:37–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Laccourreye O, Ménard M, Crevier-Buchman L, Couloigner V, Brasnu D (1997) In situ lifetime, causes for replacement, and complications of the Provox voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope 107:527–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Heaton JM, Parker AJ (1994) Indwelling tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses post-laryngectomy in Sheffield, UK: a 6-year review. Acta Otolaryngol 114:675–678

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Meeuwis CA et al (1999) Multi-institutional assessment of the Provox 2 voice prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:167–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Graville D, Gross N, Andersen P, Everts E, Cohen J (1999) The long-term indwelling tracheoesophageal prosthesis for alaryngeal voice rehabilitation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:288–292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Op de Coul BM, Hilgers FJ, Balm AJ, Tan IB, van den Hoogen FJ, van Tinteren H (2000) A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients: a single institution’s experience with consistent application of provox indwelling voice prostheses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:1320–1328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schafer P, Klutzke N, Schwedtfeger FP (2001) Voice restoration with voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Assessment of survival time of 378 Provox-1, Provox-2 and Blom-Singer voice prosthesis. Laryngorhinootologie 80:667–681

    Google Scholar 

  34. Free RH, Busscher HJ, Elving GJ, van der Mei HC, van Weissenbruch R, Albers FW (2001) Biofilm formation on voice prostheses: in vitro influence of probiotics. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:946–951

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lequeux T, Badreldin A, Saussez S, Thill MP, Oujjan L, Chantrain G (2003) A comparison of survival lifetime of the Provox and the Provox2 voice prosthesis. J Laryngol Otol 117:875–878

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramalingam W, Chikara D, Rajagopal G, Mehta AR, Sarkar S (2007) Tracheo-esophageal puncture (TEP) for voice rehabilitation in laryngectomised patients Blom-singer® vs Provox® prosthesis: our experience. Med J Armed Forces India 63:15–18

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yenigun A, Eren SB, Ozkul MH, Tugrul S, Meric A (2015) Factors influencing the longevity and replacement frequency of Provox voice prostheses. Singap Med J 56:632–636

    Google Scholar 

  38. Krishnamurthy A, Khwajamohiuddin S (2018) Analysis of factors affecting the longevity of voice prosthesis following total laryngectomy with a review of literature. Indian J Surg Oncol 9(1):39–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Simpson CB, Postma GN, Stone REJ, Ossoff RH (1997) Speech outcomes after laryngeal cancer management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 30(2):189–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moukarbel RV, Doyle PC, Yoo JH, Franklin JH, Day AMB, Fung K (2011) Voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL) outcomes in laryngectomees. Head Neck 33:31–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ptok M (1990) Objektive Meßverfahren zur Bewertung der postoperativen Stimmqualität nach Kehlkopfoperationen bei Malignompatienten. Sprache-Stimme-Gehör 14:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  42. Makitie AA, Niemensivu R, Juvas A et al (2003) Post laryngectomy voice restoration using a voice prosthesis: a single institution’s ten-year experience. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:1007–1010

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chone CT, Gripp FM, Spina AL et al (2005) Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for speech rehabilitation in total laryngectomy: long-term results with indwelling voice prosthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:89–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Maniglia AJ, Lundy DS, Casiano RC, Swim SC (1989) Speech restoration and complications of primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 99:489–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Trudeau MD, Hirsch SM, Schuller DE (1986) Vocal restorative surgery: why wait? Laryngoscope 96:975–977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Aust MR, McCaffrey TV (1997) Early speech results with the Provox prosthesis after laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:966–968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Akbas Y, Dursun G (2003) Voice restoration with low pressure blom singer voice prosthesis after total laryngectomy. Yonsei Med J 44:615–618

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fagan JJ, Lentin R, Oyarzabal MF, Isaacs S, Sellars SL (2002) Tracheoesophageal speech in a developing world community. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:50–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695011, India

    Elizabeth Mathew Iype, Deepak Janardhanan, Shirish Patil, Sandeep Suresh, Bipin T. Varghese & Shaji Thomas

Authors
  1. Elizabeth Mathew Iype
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepak Janardhanan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shirish Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sandeep Suresh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bipin T. Varghese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shaji Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shirish Patil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iype, E.M., Janardhanan, D., Patil, S. et al. Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: A Regional Cancer Centre Experience and Review of Literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 72, 518–523 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01707-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-019-01707-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation