Skip to main content

Surgery of Larynx and Trachea: Voice Restoration and Total Laryngectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Surgery of Larynx and Trachea
  • 667 Accesses

Abstract

Successful voice restoration is a very important aspect for the quality of life of patients after total laryngectomy. Modern voice prostheses in a tracheoesophageal puncture are the golden standard to achieve good voice with reasonable effort. Scientific developments like an artificial larynx or a larynx transplantation have been published, but they did not change everyday care for laryngectomized patients. Detailed knowledge about voice prostheses, physiology of tracheoesophageal speech, technical aspects, and management of complications give health professionals the tools to guide patients through years of untroubled postlaryngectomy voice restoration. If voice prostheses are not available or cannot be used, fallback options for voice restorations like the electro-larynx and esophageal speech are shown. Due to modern chemo-radiation protocols, the number of laryngectomized patients is receding in many industrialized countries and patients with a primary laryngectomy become rare. As a consequence, the management of complications like leaking shunts and pharynx strictures becomes more and more challenging and requires the development of specialized centers to care for these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ackerstaff AH, Hilgers FJ, Aaronson NK, Balm AJ. Communication, functional disorders and lifestyle changes after total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994;19(4):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1994.tb01234.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilgers FJ, Ackerstaff AH, Aaronson NK, Schouwenburg PF, Van Zandwijk N. Physical and psychosocial consequences of total laryngectomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1990;15(5):421–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.1990.tb00494.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mozolewski E. Surgical rehabilitation of voice and speech following laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Pol. 1972;26(6):653–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Singer MI, Blom ED. Medical techniques for voice restoration after total laryngectomy. CA Cancer J Clin. 1990;40(3):166–73. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.40.3.166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Sluis KE, van der Molen L, van Son RJJH, Hilgers FJM, Bhairosing PA, den Brekel v. Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. MWM Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(1):11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4790-6. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deschler DG, Gray ST. Tracheoesophageal speech following laryngopharyngectomy and pharyngeal reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2004;37(3):567–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendelsohn M, Morris M, Gallagher R. A comparative study of speech after total laryngectomy and total laryngopharyngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(5):508–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Balm AJ, van den Brekel MW, Tan IB, Hilgers FJ., The indwelling voice prosthesis for speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a safe approach., Otolaryngol Pol 2011;65(6):402–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6657(11)70731-4

  9. ISO/DIS 21917 Anesthetic and respiratory equipment—Voice prostheses.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen JF, Lansaat L, Timmermans AJ, van der Noort V, Hilgers FJM, van den Brekel MWM. Postlaryngectomy prosthetic voice rehabilitation outcomes in a consecutive cohort of 232 patients over a 13-year period. Head Neck. 2019;41(3):623–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25364. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Blom ED. Some comments on the escalation of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis dimensions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(4):500–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.129.4.500-b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luu K, Chang BA, Valenzuela D, Anderson D. Primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture for voice rehabilitation in laryngectomy patients: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(5):1250–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13138. Epub 2018 May 31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guttman D, Mizrachi A, Hadar T, Bachar G, Hamzani Y, Marx S, Shvero J. Post-laryngectomy voice rehabilitation: comparison of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013;15(9):497–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singer MI, Blom ED. Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(11):670–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1981.00790470018005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bayles SW, Deschler DG. Operative prevention and management of voice-limiting pharyngoesophageal spasm. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2004;37(3):547–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2004.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Medina JE, Reiner SA. Pharyngeal myotomy for voice restoration: a midline approach. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(3):309–12. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199003000-00019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deschler DG, Doherty ET, Reed CG, Hayden RE, Singer MI. Prevention of pharyngoesophageal spasm after laryngectomy with a half-muscle closure technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(5):514–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940010900513.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blom ED, Pauloski BR, Hamaker RC. Functional outcome after surgery for prevention of pharyngospasms in tracheoesophageal speakers. Part I: speech characteristics. Laryngoscope. 1995;105(10):1093–103. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-199510000-00016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanasono MM, Lin D, Wax MK, Rosenthal EL. Closure of laryngectomy defects in the age of chemoradiation therapy. Head Neck. 2012;34(4):580–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Richmon JD, Samji HA, Deschler DG. National laryngopharyngectomy and reconstructive surgery survey. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(8):1472–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sweeny L, Golden JB, White HN, Magnuson JS, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL. Incidence and outcomes of stricture formation postlaryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3):395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewin JS, Barringer DA, May AH, et al. Functional outcomes after circumferential pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2005(115, 7):1266–71.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lewin JS, Barringer DA, May AH, et al. Functional outcomes after laryngopharyngectomy with anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction. Head Neck. 2006;28(2):142–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu P, Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ, et al. Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap after total laryngopharyngectomy. Cancer. 2010;116(7):1718–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deschler DG, Doherty ET, Reed CG, Singer MI. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of tracheoesophageal voice after pectoralis major flap reconstruction of the neopharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;118(6):771–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinclair CF, Rosenthal EL, McColloch NL, et al. Primary versus delayed tracheoesophageal puncture for laryngopharyngectomy with free flap reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(7):1436–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leonhard M, Schneider-Stickler B. Voice prostheses, microbial colonization and biofilm formation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015;830:123–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11038-7_8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Somogyi-Ganss E, Chambers MS, Lewin JS, Tarrand JJ, Hutcheson KA. Biofilm on the tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis: considerations for oral decontamination. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(1):405–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4193-0. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Free RH, Van der Mei HC, Dijk F, Van Weissenbruch R, Busscher HJ, Albers FW. Biofilm formation on voice prostheses: influence of dairy products in vitro. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000;120(1):92–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164800760370918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Galli J, Calo L, Meucci D, Giuliani M, Lucidi D, Paludetti G, Torelli R, Sanguinetti M, Parrilla C. Biofilm in voice prosthesis: a prospective cohort study and laboratory tests using sonication and SEM analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;43(5):1260–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13141. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Talpaert MJ, Balfour A, Stevens S, Baker M, Muhlschlegel FA, Gourlay CW. Candida biofilm formation on voice prostheses. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(Pt 3):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.078717-0. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leonhard M, Zatorska B, Tan Y, Moser D, Schneider-Stickler B. In vitro biofilm growth on modern voice prostheses. Head Neck. 2018;40(4):763–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25053. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kress P, Schäfer P, Schwerdtfeger FP, Rösler S. Are modern voice prostheses better? A lifetime comparison of 749 voiceprostheses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(1):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2611-0. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hilgers FJ, Ackerstaff AH, Balm AJ, Van den Brekel MW, Bing Tan I, Persson JO. A new problem-solving indwelling voice prosthesis, eliminating the need for frequent Candida- and “underpressure”-related replacements: Provox ActiValve. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123(8):972–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480310015371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kress P, Schäfer P, Schwerdtfeger FP. The custom-fit voice prosthesis, for treatment of periprothetic leakage after tracheoesophageal voice restoration. Laryngorhinootologie. 2006;85(7):496–500. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-925081. Epub 2006 Feb 21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hutcheson KA, Sturgis EM, Lewin JS. Early risk factors for enlargement of the tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy: nodal metastasis and extent of surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138(9):833–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hamaker RC, Blom ED. Botulinum neurotoxin for pharyngeal constrictor muscle spasm in tracheoesophageal voice restoration. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(9):1479–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200309000-00010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramachandran K, Arunachalam PS, Hurren A, Marsh RL, Samuel PR. Botulinum toxin injection for failed tracheo-oesophageal voice in laryngectomees: the Sunderland experience. J Laryngol Otol. 2003;117(7):544–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/002221503322112978.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lorenz KJ, Ehrhart T, Grieser L, Maier H. Coincidence of fistula enlargement and supra-oesophageal reflux in patients after laryngectomy and prosthetic voice restoration. HNO. 2009;57(12):1253–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-009-1956-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lorenz KJ, Kraft K, Graf F, Pröpper C, Steinestel K. Role of reflux-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice rehabilitation. Head Neck. 2015;37(4):530–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23622. Epub 2014 Apr 9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cocuzza S, Bonfiglio M, Chiaramonte R, Serra AJ. Relationship between radiotherapy and gastroesophageal reflux disease in causing tracheoesophageal voice rehabilitation failure. Voice. 2014;28(2):245–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lorenz KJ, Maier H. Pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using a heat and moisture exchanger (HME). Laryngorhinootologie. 2009;88(8):513–22. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1225619. Epub 2009 Jul 30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zuur JK, Muller SH, de Jongh FH, van Zandwijk N, Hilgers FJ. The physiological rationale of heat and moisture exchangers in post-laryngectomy pulmonary rehabilitation: a review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-0969-3. Epub 2005 Jul 7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bień S, Okła S, van As-Brooks CJ, Ackerstaff AH. The effect of a heat and moisture exchanger (Provox HME) on pulmonary protection after total laryngectomy: a randomized controlled study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267(3):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1018-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hilgers FJ, Ackerstaff AH, Van As CJ, Balm AJ, Van den Brekel MW, Tan IB. Development and clinical assessment of a heat and moisture exchanger with a multi-magnet automatic tracheostoma valve (Provox FreeHands HME) for vocal and pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2003;123(1):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0036554021000028083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hashiba M, Sugai Y, Izumi T, Ino S, Ifukube T. Development of a wearable electro-larynx for laryngectomees and its evaluation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2007;2007:5267–70. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2007.4353530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Globlek D, Stajner-Katusic S, Musura M, Horga D, Liker M. Comparison of alaryngeal voice and speech. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004;29(2):87–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430410033218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Green G, Hults M. Preferences for three types of alaryngeal speech. J Speech Hear Disord. 1982;47(2):141–5. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4702.141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cox SR, Doyle PC. The influence of electrolarynx use on postlaryngectomy voice-related quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(6):1005–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814524704. Epub 2014 Feb 21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kaye R, Tang CG, Sinclair CF. The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017;10:133–40. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S133225. eCollection 2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Kress .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kress, P. (2022). Surgery of Larynx and Trachea: Voice Restoration and Total Laryngectomy. In: Remacle, M., Eckel, H.E. (eds) Textbook of Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09621-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09621-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09620-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09621-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics