Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and postlaryngectomy tracheoesophageal fistula

  • Laryngology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of pathologic gastroesophageal reflux in laryngectomized patient with phonatory prosthesis, analyzing potential related problems and appraising, at the same time, the effectiveness of a therapeutic protocol. A retrospective study was conducted on 43 phonatory prosthesis patients who had problems with regard to recurrent tracheoesophageal granulations, the need of frequent prosthesis replacement, within a 3-month period, and unsatisfactory vocal results. Such patients underwent physical examination of the fistula region and of the neopharynx and were submitted to esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Moreover the group of patients underwent a therapeutic protocol and were re-evaluated posttreatment, examining fistula region both on the tracheal side and on the esophageal side through videolaryngostroboscopy. Of the 43 recruited patients 13 (30%) presented tracheoesophageal granulations, 20 (46.5%) unsatisfactory vocal results and 10 (23.5%) frequent prosthesis replacement, within a 3-month period, due to abnormal biofilm development. In particular, of the 13 patients who had recurrent granulations, the evaluation results revealed the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 6 cases (46%). In the group of patients presenting unsatisfactory vocal results GERD was shown in 13 cases (65%). In the third group of patients GERD was found in two cases (20%). The overall analysis of the data gathered, allowed to identify GERD in 21 (49%) of the 43 patients submitted to the study. The results posttreatment indicated, in the first group, the disappearance or a significant (>75%) volume reduction of such formation in five cases (38%, p = 0.002). In the second group an overall improvement in the quality of voice was displayed at least for 12 patients (60%, p = 0.0001). Finally in the last group an increase of the prosthesis life was recorded in four (40%, p = 0.05) of the ten patients who had the need of prosthesis replacement within 3 months. Also the 22 GERD negative cases (51%) underwent the treatment, therefore representing the control group, whose posttreatment results showed substantial modifications in just two cases (9%). The data obtained suggest a high degree of correlation between the presence of pathologic gastric reflux and the partial or total prosthesis failure. The introduction of a specific therapeutic protocol has allowed to improve the quality of prosthesis (QoP) in 22 of the 43 patients (p < 0.001) who had a pathologic condition of the fistula and of the prosthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Formenti A, Brambilla S (2008) Le Manifestazioni faringo-laringee della patologia da reflusso. OGM 62–63

  2. Dennish GW, Castell DO (1971) Inhibitory effect of smoking on the lower esophageal sphincter. N Engl J Med 284:1136–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smit CF, Tan J, Lisbeth MH et al (1998) High incidence of gastropharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux after total laryngectomy. Head Neck 20:619–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koufman JA (1991) The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope. 101(4 Pt 2 Suppl 53):1–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boscolo Rizzo P, Marchiori C, Gava A, Da Mosto MC (2008) The impact of radiotherapy and GERD on in situ lifetime of indwelling voice prostheses. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265(7):791–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Reichel O, Durst F, Rasp G, Berghaus A (2007) Repeated dual-probe pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool to control therapy for laryngopharyngeal reflux. HNO 55:798–803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi EC, Hong WP, Kim CB et al (2003) Changes of esophageal motility after total laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:691–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Welch RW, Luckmann K, Ricks PM, Drake ST, Gates GA (1979) Manometry of the normal upper esophageal sphincter and its alteration in laryngectomy. J Clin Invest 63:1036–1041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pattani MK, Morgan M, Nathan CAO (2009) FACS: reflux as a cause of tracheoesophageal puncture failure. Laryngoscope 119:121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Korsten MA, Rosman AS, Fishbein S, Shlein RD, Goldberg HE, Biener A (1991) Chronic xerostomia increases esophageal acid exposure and is associated with esophageal injury. Am J Med 90:701–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerwin JM, Culton GL, Gerwin KS (1997) Hiatal hernia and reflux complicating prosthetic speech. Am J Otol 18:66–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lorenz KJ, Ehrhart T, Grieser L, Maier H (2009) Coincidence of fistula enlargement and supra-oesophageal reflux in patients after laryngectomy and prosthetic voice restoration. HNO 57:1253–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jobe BA, Rosenthal E, Wiesberg TT et al (2002) Surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux and outcome after laryngectomy in patients using tracheoesophageal speech. Am J Surg 183:539–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz KJ, Grieser L, Ehrhart T, Maier H (2011) The management of periprosthetic leakage in the presence of supra-oesophageal reflux after prosthetic voice rehabilitation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:695–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenz KJ, Grieser L, Ehrhart T, Maier H (2010) Prosthetic voice restoration after laryngectomy. The management of fistula complications with anti-reflux medications. HNO 58:919–926

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathis JG, Lehman GA, Shanks JC, Blom ED, Brunelle RL (1983) Effects of gastroesophageal reflux on esophageal speech. J Clin Gastroenterol 5:503–507

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenz KJ, Grieser L, Ehrhart T, Maier H (2011) Laryngectomised patients with voice prostheses. Influence of supra-esophageal reflux on voice quality and quality of life. HNO 59:179–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

No financial and material support has been received for this work or any related project.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salvatore Cocuzza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cocuzza, S., Bonfiglio, M., Chiaramonte, R. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and postlaryngectomy tracheoesophageal fistula. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269, 1483–1488 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1938-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-1938-2

Keywords

Navigation