Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The postoperative patella height: a comparison of additive and subtractive high tibial osteotomy in correcting the genu varum

  • Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Intraligamentary correctional operations like a high tibial osteotomy were performed in genua valga to prevent later medial gonarthrosis especially in younger patients. An unwanted effect of this method seems to be the inferiorization of the patella. This is feared because of the complications in case of subsequent alloarthroplasty. Besides the classical Coventry method as a subtractive osteotomy the hemicallotasis has been established as a sustainable additive procedure. This means a gradual open wedge correction using an external fixateur.

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the position of the patella pre- and postoperatively and in follow-ups with subtractive versus additive intraligamentary high tibial osteotomies on the basis of five radiological parameters. It was expected that an additive osteotomy leads to an inferiorized patella position whereas a subtractive osteotomy leads postoperative to a higher position of the tibia.

Method

Between 1990 and 2001, 54 patients (61 legs) had undergone an operation due to a genu varum either by the subtractive osteotomy (n = 30) according to Coventry’s method or the additive gradually hemicallotasis (n = 31) with an external fixator.

Results

In coherence with the Coventry’s osteotomy a significant inferiorization of the postoperative patella position with all five radiological parameters was observed, the hemicallotasis showed no operation-related significant alteration of the patella height. Instancing the Insall–Salvati Index there were four (12.9%) preoperative and three (9.7%) postoperative patella baja positions detected. Along with the subtractive osteotomy there were 5 preoperative patellae baja (16.7%) and 11 postoperative patellae baja (36.7%) positions. Furthermore a significant interrelation was noticed between the extent of the correctional angle and the postoperative alteration of the patella.

Conclusion

The results are surprising, contrary was expected. First this can be explained by its gradual, additive correctional property in contrast to the spontaneous correction by the conventional method according to Coventry, second by the postoperative treatment, which allows an early mobilization and active remedial gymnastics, provided an impact resistant osteosynthesis by a fixateur externe is given. In the case of the additive hemicallotasis an intraligamentary osteotomy is recommended. Technically expensive step cuts in order to osteotomize below the tuberositas tibiae are not necessary. Due to the low quota of complications and the small operative expense the continuous distraction is preferential to ad hoc correction. A postoperative patella baja position has not to be afraid in hemicallotasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baums MH, Esenwein SA, Klinger HM (2005) An open wedge tibial head osteotomy using continuous callus distraction. An alternative method for the treatment of varus arthrosis. Unfallchirurg 108:43–48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Berg EE, Mason SL, Lucas MJ (1996) Patellar height ratios: a comparison of four measurement methods. Am J Sports Med 24:218–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackburne JS, Peel TE (1977) A new method of measuring patellar height. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 59:241–242

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caton J (1989) Methode de mesure de la hauteur de la rotule. Acta Orthop Belg 55:385–386

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Closkey RF, Windsor RE (2001) Alterations in the patella after high tibial or distal femoral osteotomy. Clin Orthop 389:51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coventry MB (1979) Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis: the evolution of the operation in the last 18 years and long term results. Orthop Clin North Am 10:191–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75A:196–201

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman DS, Madan SS, Ruchelsman DE, Sala DA, Lehman WB (2006) Accuracy of correction of tibia vara acute versus gradual correction. J Pediatr Orthop 26:794–798

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grelsamer RP, Meadows S (1992) The modified Insall–Salvati ratio for assessment of patellar height. Clin Orthop 282:170–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grelshamer RP, Proctor CS, Bazos AN (1994) Evaluation of patellar shape in the sagittal plane: a clinical analysis. Am J Sports Med 22:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Insall J, Joseph DH, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66A:1040–1048

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kitson J, Weale AE, Lee AS, MacEachern AG (2001) Patellar tendon length following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using an external fixator with particular reference to later total knee replacement. Injury 32:140–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinger HM, Lorenz F, Härer T (2001) Open wedge tibial osteotomy by hemicallotasis for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:245–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner J, Zoch W (2004) Open valgus alignment osteotomy of the proximal tibia with fixation by medial plate fixator. Orthopade 33:153–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (1998) Open wedge tibial osteotomy by callus distraction in gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 69:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (1999) Hemicallotasis open-wedge osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81B:449–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miura H, Kawamura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Iwamoto Y (1997) Is patellar height really lower after high tibial osteotomy. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 88:261–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohsawa S, Hukuda K, Inamori Y, Yasui N (2006) High tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee with varus deformity utilizing the hemicallotasis method. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:588–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scuderi GR, Windsor RE, Insall JN (1989) Observations on patellar height after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71A:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seil R, Muller B, Georg T, Kohn D, Rupp S (2000) Reliability and interobserver variability in radiological patellar height ratios. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:231–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM (2005) A 2-year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes in patients operated on for knee osteoarthritis with tibial osteotomy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weale AE, Lee AS, MacEachern AG (2001) High tibial osteotomy using a dynamic axial external fixator. Clin Orthop 382:154–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest. None of the authors received financial support for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Schiedel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiedel, F., Probst, A., Buller, T.C. et al. The postoperative patella height: a comparison of additive and subtractive high tibial osteotomy in correcting the genu varum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1271–1277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0824-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0824-x

Keywords

Navigation