Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
In the comment to our recent study on Pineal Parenchymal Tumors of Intermediate Differentiation (PPTID) [3], the author raised important issues regarding the classification of pineal tumors. Indeed, the typing of tumors arising in this region needs to be revisited in a larger effort. In our cohort, we specifically focused on tumors that were, based on the current WHO classification CNS5, compatible with PPTID and had been diagnosed as such before [2]. A clinically annotated, similarly sized cohort of pineocytoma was not available, hence comparison towards this pole of the classification spectrum is limited.
However, our findings may still provide similarly strong arguments against a designation as pineocytoma as the comment argues in favour of it:
The current WHO classification includes “low proliferative/mitotic activity” as an essential criterion of pineocytoma. Including the proposed PPTID-C group, which according to our data has at least moderate proliferative activity, into pineocytoma would thus necessitate abandoning this so far decisive criterion. In fact, CNS5 has just emphasized the role of proliferative/mitotic activity over other morphological criteria compared to the revised CNS4 (summarized in [1]). Indeed, this is further supported by the wide spectrum and overlap in morphology within the cases of our study from pineocytoma to PPTID-A, B through the proposed PPTID-C.
Despite the diverging interpretation of the data available so far, we strongly agree that the classification of pineal tumors needs more insight into the biology of these tumors, since, exactly as the comment notes, the currently established and proposed types and subtypes are still enriched for specific markers and morphological features, but not defined by these alterations.
References
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D et al (2021) The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 23:1231–1251. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106
Rahmanzade R, Pfaff E, Banan R, Sievers P, Suwala AK, Hinz F et al (2023) Genetical and epigenetical profiling identifies two subgroups of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) with distinct molecular, histological and clinical characteristics. Acta Neuropathol 146:853–856. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-023-02638-1
Vasiljevic A (2023) Pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: in need of a stringent definition to avoid confusion. Scientific Commentary on ‚Genetical and epigenetical profiling identifies two subgroups of pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID) with distinct molecular, histological and clinical characteristics‘. Acta Neuropathol 147: in press
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rahmanzade, R., Sahm, F. Reply: pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation: in need of a stringent definition to avoid confusion. Acta Neuropathol 147, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02685-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-024-02685-2