Skip to main content

Neuropathological evaluation of a vertebrate brain aged ~ 245 years

Aging of the human and primate brain is associated with a wide range of distinct alterations affecting cell physiology, tissue integrity and architecture of the central nervous system (CNS) [15]. The limited self-renewal capacity of postmitotic neurons through adult neurogenesis [12] renders these key cells more susceptible to various exogenous and endogenous threats such as toxic agents, pathophysiological conditions throughout a life time. Similarly, non-neuronal cells such as microglia and other CNS-associated macrophages have been proven to be relatively long-lived in human and rodent brains with relatively low rates of homeostatic proliferation [8, 16, 21] making them equally susceptible to environmental stimuli.

A number of changes observed in aged human brains are attributed to increased levels of local oxidative stress during senescence [7]. Furthermore, several intra- or extracellular depositions, i.e. lipofuscin, typically accumulate with age [9]. Most age-related neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s disease exhibit potential toxic aggregations as histopathological hallmarks (e.g. extracellular amyloid beta or intraneuronal alpha-synuclein), resulting in loss of neurons in defined anatomical regions.

To gain further insight into the mechanisms of aging, we identified an exceptionally aged brain of a Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus) as the perfect candidate. These rare vertebrates are known for their extreme longevity of up to 392 ± 150 years of life expectancy accompanied by a relatively isolated hermit-like life style preserving their CNS from desperate environmental stress factors [11, 14]. We report for the first time the structural features of a ~ 245 ± 38 years old brain from a female Greenland shark that was caught with bottom trawl deep off West Iceland (62.39.32°N and 24.39.31°W at depth of 722 m) during an annual autumn survey of the Icelandic Marine and Freshwater Institute in November 2017. The age of the Greenland shark was estimated according to the correlating body length of 460 cm [14].

Macroscopically, the CNS was symmetrically structured and exhibited no obvious pathological alterations (Fig. 1a). At a histological level, the brain surfaces of the telencephalon were covered by normal appearing leptomeninges (Fig. 1b). Within deeper cortical layers next to smaller cells, presumably presenting neurons, larger triangle-shaped neurons with a size of around 50 µm were observed that mimicked morphologically pyramidal neurons known from humans (Fig. 1c). Further, regularly interspersed smaller round nuclei (10–15 µm) with dense chromatin were detected which could be attributed to oligodendrocytes. In contrast, microglia are known to present more elongated bean-shaped nuclei with a typical heterochromatin pattern [10]. These typical microglia-like cells were easily detectable in the sections and were characteristically located in a close proximity to neurons, as known from the human brain (Fig. 1c). Just recently, microglia have been systematically examined and genetically profiled in several species but sharks were not included in this study [6]. However, this cross-species comparison highlighted several evolutionary conserved and divergent transcriptional features of microglia [6]. Notably, within the Virchow-Robin spaces numerous cells with thin and elongated nuclei with typical heterochromatin pattern were found, potentially resembling perivascular macrophages as described in other species (Fig. 1g).

Fig. 1
figure1

Macroscopic and histomorphological findings of a ~ 245 years old CNS. a Macroscopic few on an approximately 245 years aged Greenland shark brain. b Haematoxylin & eosin (H&E)—stained histological specimen of the telencephalon. Scale bar: 200 µm. c H&E-stained slide. Putative microglial cells with bean-shaped nucleus and typical heterochromatin pattern are marked with asterisk (*). Insert: Neurons and microglial cell (asterisk). Scale bar: 50 µm. d Cresyl violet (CV)—stained section. Scale bar: 50 µm. e H&E-stained specimen. Insert: Magnification of ependymal layer. Scale bar: 50 µm. f H&E—stained tissue sample. Scale bar: 100 µm. g Elastica-van-Gieson (EVG)—stained section. Vessels, Virchow-Robin space and putative perivascular macrophage (PVMɸ) are indicated. Insert: Vessel with PVMɸ. Size bar: 100 µm. h Tibor PAP (TP) silver—stained section. Scale bar: 100 µm. i Prussian blue-staining. Scale bar: 100 µm. Insert: positive control. Scale bar: 50 µm. j PAS-stained section. Scale bar: 100 µm. k LFB-PAS—stained tissue specimen. Scale bar: 200 µm. l Bielschowsky silver–staining. Scale bar: 100 µm. m Congo red—staining. Scale bar: 100 µm. Insert: positive control. Scale bar: 100 µm. n Immunohistochemistry for APP. Scale bar: 100 µm. Insert: scale bar: 50 µm

Importantly, virtually all age-related changes commonly found in elderly human brains, such as protein depositions, vascular or parenchymal calcifications were completely absent in the Greenland shark CNS. Furthermore, classical signs of neurodegeneration were not identifiable in various telencephalic regions (Fig. 1) and in the medial pallidum (Suppl. Figure 1), suggesting that the brain of vertebrates can be morphologically preserved for an extremely long time as it was described for human centenarians [13, 20].

We speculate that this finding might be caused by the specific environmental factors of this animal. Greenland sharks are reported to live predominantly in 4°C cold waters in the Arctic deep sea with remarkably slow movements [2] with potential low aerobic metabolism and little mitochondrial oxidative stress as well as and high concentrations of e.g. trimethylamine that might be neuroprotective. It is further suggested that Greenland sharks feature a relatively low blood pressure compared to other sharks [18] that might reduce the risk of hypertension-related CNS damage such as stroke or cognitive decline [5]. Up to now, information about genetics from Greenland sharks are largely missing [4, 17]. Further, we investigated the CNS of three additional chondrichthyan species that were caught in the same habitat: Amblyraja radiata (thorny skate), Centroscyllium fabricii (black dogfish) and Chimaera monstrosa (rabbit fish). There were no macro- and microscopical lesions detectable, although the known life expectancy is rather short compared to Greenland sharks (Suppl. Figures 2, 3) [1, 3, 14, 19].

In summary, our study suggests that the CNS integrity can be preserved in vertebrates for centuries, while the precise impact of intrinsic and environmental factors for the process of brain aging will need to be determined in future studies.

References

  1. 1.

    Calis E, Jackson E, Nolan C, Jeal F (2005) Preliminary age and growth estimates of the rabbitfish, Chimaera monstrosa, with implications for future resource management. J Northwest Atlantic Fishery Sci 35:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Campana SE, Fisk AT, Peter Klimley A (2015) Movements of Arctic and northwest Atlantic Greenland sharks (Somniosus microcephalus) monitored with archival satellite pop-up tags suggest long-range migrations. Deep Sea Res Part II 115:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Campana SE, Jones C, McFarlane GA, Myklevoll S (2006) Bomb dating and age validation using the spines of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Environ Biol Fishes 77:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9107-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Edwards JE, Hiltz E, Broell F, Bushnell PG, Campana SE, Christiansen JS et al (2019) Advancing research for the management of long-lived species: a case study on the greenland shark. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gasecki D, Kwarciany M, Nyka W, Narkiewicz K (2013) Hypertension, brain damage and cognitive decline. Curr Hypertens Rep 15:547–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-013-0398-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Geirsdottir L, David E, Keren-Shaul H, Weiner A, Bohlen SC, Neuber J et al (2019) Cross-species single-cell analysis reveals divergence of the primate microglia program. Cell 179(1609–1622):e1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gemma C, Vila J, Bachstetter A, Bickford PC (2007) Oxidative stress and the aging brain: from theory to prevention. In: Riddle DR (ed) Brain aging: models, methods, and mechanisms. Frontiers in neuroscience. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Goldmann T, Wieghofer P, Jordao MJ, Prutek F, Hagemeyer N, Frenzel K et al (2016) Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat Immunol 17:797–805. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3423

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Goyal VK (1982) Lipofuscin pigment accumulation in human brain during aging. Exp Gerontol 17:481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0531-5565(82)80010-7

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kierdorf K, Erny D, Goldmann T, Sander V, Schulz C, Perdiguero EG et al (2013) Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways. Nat Neurosci 16:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3318

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    MacNeil MA, McMeans BC, Hussey NE, Vecsei P, Svavarsson J, Kovacs KM et al (2012) Biology of the greenland shark Somniosus microcephalus. J Fish Biol 80:991–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03257.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ming GL, Song H (2011) Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron 70:687–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mizutani T, Shimada H (1992) Neuropathological background of twenty-seven centenarian brains. J Neurol Sci 108:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(92)90047-o

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nielsen J, Hedeholm RB, Heinemeier J, Bushnell PG, Christiansen JS, Olsen J et al (2016) Eye lens radiocarbon reveals centuries of longevity in the Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus). Science 353:702–704. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf1703

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Peters R (2006) Ageing and the brain. Postgrad Med J 82:84–88. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2005.036665

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Reu P, Khosravi A, Bernard S, Mold JE, Salehpour M, Alkass K et al (2017) The lifespan and turnover of microglia in the human brain. Cell Rep 20:779–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Santaquiteria A, Nielsen J, Klemetsen T, Willassen NP, Præbel K (2017) The complete mitochondrial genome of the long-lived Greenland shark (Somniosus microcephalus): characterization and phylogenetic position. Conserv Genet Resources 9:351–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-016-0676-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shadwick RE, Bernal D, Bushnell PG, Steffensen JF (2018) Blood pressure in the Greenland shark as estimated from ventral aortic elasticity. J Exp Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.186957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sulikowski JA, Kneebone J, Elzey S, Jurek J, Danley PD, Howell WH, Tsang PCW (2005) Age and growth estimates of the thorny skate (Amblyraja radiata) in the western Gulf of Maine. Fish Bull 103:161–168

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Takao M, Hirose N, Arai Y, Mihara B, Mimura M (2016) Neuropathology of supercentenarians—four autopsy case studies. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0368-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tay TL, Mai D, Dautzenberg J, Fernandez-Klett F, Lin G, Sagar Datta M et al (2017) A new fate mapping system reveals context-dependent random or clonal expansion of microglia. Nat Neurosci 20:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4547

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Eileen Barleon and Andrea Frömming for excellent technical assistance. Further, we thank Laufey Geirsdottir for the organization of the tissue sample. D.E. is supported by the DFG (SFB/TRR167). K.B.J. is thankful for the entire staff of the Marine and Freshwater Research Institute, Iceland. M.P. was supported by the Sobek Foundation, the Ernst-Jung Foundation, the DFG (SFB 992, SFB1160, SFB/TRR167, Reinhart-Koselleck-Grant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz-Prize), Alzheimer Forschung Initiative e.V. (AFI) and the Ministry of Science, Research and Arts, Baden-Wuerttemberg (Sonderlinie “Neuroinflammation”). This study was supported by the DFG under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CIBSS – EXC-2189 – Project ID390939984). M.P. dedicates this work to the 50th birthday of Prof. Josef Priller, Berlin/Munich, an outstanding friend, a pioneer in glia research, a great supporter for many years and an eternal inspiration for fascinating experiments. May his brain stay well preserved as the described one for many forthcoming years!

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Prinz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erny, D., Jakobsdóttir, K.B. & Prinz, M. Neuropathological evaluation of a vertebrate brain aged ~ 245 years. Acta Neuropathol 141, 133–136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02237-4

Download citation