Skip to main content
Log in

Fractional modelling of functionalized CNT suspensions

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Rheologica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental findings and rheological modelling of chemically treated single-wall carbon nanotubes suspended in an epoxy resin were addressed in a recent publication (Ma et al., J Rheol 53:547–573, 2009). The shear-thinning behaviour was successfully modelled by a Fokker-Planck-based orientation model. However, the proposed model failed to describe linear viscoelasticity using a single mode as well as the relaxation after applying a finite step strain. Both experiments revealed a power-law behaviour for the storage and relaxation moduli. In this paper, we show that a single-mode fractional diffusion model is able to predict these experimental observations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abisset-Chavanne E, Mezher R, Le Corre S, Ammar A, Chinesta F (2013) Kinetic theory microstructure modeling in concentrated suspensions. Entropy 15:2805–2832. doi:10.3390/e15072805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abisset-Chavanne E, Chinesta F, Ferec J, Ausias G, Keunings, R (2014) On the multiscale description of dilute suspensions of non-Brownian rigid clusters composed of rods. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.08.014

  • Advani S, Tucker CL (1987) The use of tensors to describe and predict fiber orientation in short fiber composites. J Rheol 31:751–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Advani S, Tucker CL (1990) Closure approximations for three-dimensional structure tensors. J Rheol 34:367–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amari T, Watanabe K (1980) Stress relaxation of carbon black-linseed oil suspensions. J Soc Rheol Jpn 8:80–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter LF (1967) A study of the rheology of suspensions of rod-shaped particles in a Navier-Stokes liquid. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  • Chinesta F (2013) From single-scale to two-scales kinetic theory descriptions of rods suspensions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 20:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cueto E, Ma AWK, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2008) Numerical simulation of spin coating processes involving functionalised carbon nanotube suspensions. Int J Mater Form 1:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cueto E, Monge R, Chinesta F, Poitou A, Alfaro I, Mackley MR (2010) Rheological modeling and forming process simulation of CNT nanocomposites. Int J Mater Form 3:1327–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Illoul L, Chinesta F, Regnier G (2010) Effects of a bent structure on the linear viscoelastic response of carbon nanotube diluted suspensions. Rheologica Acta 49:1141–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz C, Chinesta F, Regnier G (2012) Review on the Brownian dynamics simulation of bead-rod-spring models encountered in computational rheology. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19/2:227–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupret F, Verleye V (1999) Modelling the flow of fibre suspensions in narrow gaps. In: Siginer DA, De Kee D, Chabra RP (eds) Advances in the flow and rheology of non-newtonian fluids, rheology series. Elsevier, pp 1347–1398

  • Ganani E, Powell RL (1986) Rheological properties of rodlike particles in a Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid. J Rheol 30:995–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaishankar A, McKinley GH (2012) Power-law rheology in the bulk and at the interface: quasi-properties and fractional constitutive equations. Proc R Soc. doi:10.1098/rspa.2012.0284

  • Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc London A102:161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbas A, Srivastava H M, Trujillo J J (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier

  • Kroger M, Ammar A, Chinesta F (2008) Consistent closure schemes for statistical models of anisotropic fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 149:40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma A, Chinesta F, Mackley MR, Ammar A (2008) The rheological modelling of carbon nanotube (CNT) suspensions in steady shear flows. Int J Mater Form 2:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma A, Chinesta F, Ammar A, Mackley MR (2008) Rheological modelling of carbon nanotube aggregate suspensions. J Rheol 52/6:1311–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma A, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2009) The rheology and modelling of chemically treated carbon nanotube suspensions. J Rheol 53/3:547–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mewis J, Meire C (1984) Yielding in weakly flocculated systems. In: Mena B, Garcia-Rejon A, Rangel-Nafaille C (eds) Advances in rheology, volume 2: fluids. Elsevier

  • Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahatekar SS, Koziol KK, Butler SA, Elliott JA, Shaffer MSP, Mackley MR, Windle AH (2006) Optical microstructure and viscosity enhancement for an epoxy resin matrix containing multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Rheol 50:599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song YK, Youn JR (2005) Influence of dispersion states of Carbon Nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 43:1378–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu JS, Chatterjee S, Koelling KW, Wang Y, Bechtel SE (2005) Shear and extensional rheology of carbon nanofibers suspensions. Rheol Acta 44:537–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearsley KM, Mackley MR, Chinesta F, Leygue A (2012) The rheology of multiwalled carbon nanotube and carbon black suspensions. J Rheol 56:1465–1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Chinesta.

Appendices

Appendix: A: On fractional derivatives

There are many books on fractional calculus and fractional differential equations (e.g. Kilbas et al. 2006; Podlubny 1999). We summarize here the main concepts needed to understand the developments carried out in this paper.

We start with the formula usually attributed to Cauchy for evaluating the nth integration, \(n \in \mathbb {N}\), of a function f(t)

$$ J^{n}f(t):=\int {\cdots} {\int}_{\!\!\!\!0}^{t} f(\tau) \ d\tau = \frac{1}{(n-1)!} {\int}_{\!\!\!\!0}^{t} (t-\tau)^{n-1} f(\tau) \ d\tau. $$
(43)

This can be rewritten as

$$ J^{n}f(t) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(n)} {{\int}_{\!\!\!\!0}^{t}} (t-\tau)^{n-1} f(\tau) \ d\tau $$
(44)

where Γ(n) = (n−1)! is the gamma function. In the latter being in fact defined for any real value \(\alpha \in \mathbb {R}\), we can define the fractional integral from

$$ J^{\alpha} f(t) := \frac{1}{\Gamma(\alpha)} {{\int}_{\!\!\!\!0}^{t}} (t-\tau)^{\alpha-1} f(\tau) \ d\tau. $$
(45)

Now, if we consider the fractional derivative order (α), we select an integer \(m \in \mathbb {N}\) such that m− 1 < α < m, and it suffices to consider an integer m-order derivative combined with a (mα) fractional integral. Obviously, we could take the derivative of the integral or the integral of the derivative, resulting in the left- and right-hand definitions of the fractional derivative usually denoted by D α f(t) and \(D^{\alpha }_{\ast } f(t)\), respectively.

Because these approaches to the fractional derivative began with an expression for the repeated integration of a function, one could consider a similar approach for the derivative. This was the route considered by Grunwald and Letnikov (GL) that defined the so-called ‘differintegral’ that leads to the fractional counterpart of the usual finite differences. In the present work, we use the GL definition of the fractional derivative.

It turns out that the composition of fractional derivatives follows a rule similar to that for standard derivatives. On the other hand, the Fourier transform of a fractional derivative of order α reads \(\mathcal {F}(g(t);\omega ) = (i\omega )^{\alpha }\mathcal {G}(\omega )\). This property is particularly useful when addressing harmonic responses as in the case of LVE experiments.

Appendix: B: Derivation of the fractional derivative of the orientation tensor

We discuss the contribution of fractional diffusion to the rod rotary velocity (the flow-induced contribution remains unchanged)

$$ \left . \frac{d^{\alpha} \mathbf{p}}{dt^{\alpha}} \right |^{B} = - D_{r} \frac{\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \mathbf {p}}}{\psi}. $$
(46)

Now, we consider the second-order orientation tensor

$$ \mathbf{a} = {\int}_{\!\!\!\!\mathcal{S}} \mathbf{p} \otimes \mathbf{p} \ \psi \ d\mathbf{p} $$
(47)

whose time derivative can be rewritten as

$$ \dot{\mathbf{a}} |^{B} = \frac{d^{1-\alpha}}{d^{1-\alpha}} \left\{ \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dt^{\alpha}} \left\{ {\int}_{\!\!\!\!\mathcal{S}} \left( \mathbf{p} \otimes \mathbf{p} + \mathbf{p} \otimes \mathbf{p} \right) \psi \ d\mathbf{p} \right\} \right\} $$
(48)

or

$$ \dot{\mathbf{a}} |^{B} = \frac{d^{1-\alpha}}{d^{1-\alpha}} \left\{ {\int}_{\!\!\!\!\mathcal{S}} \frac{d^{\alpha}}{dt^{\alpha}} \left( \mathbf{p} \otimes \mathbf{p} + \mathbf{p} \otimes \mathbf{p} \right) \psi \ d\mathbf{p} \right\}. $$
(49)

Considering the first term of Leibnitz’s rule related to the fractional derivative of a product of functions (it is easy to prove that the second one leads to the standard diffusion integer term, while the others can be neglected), we obtain

$$ \dot{\mathbf{a}} |^{B} \approx \frac{d^{1-\alpha}}{d^{1-\alpha}} \left\{ {\int}_{\!\!\!\!\mathcal{S}} \left( \frac{d^{\alpha} \mathbf{p}}{dt^{\alpha}} \otimes \mathbf{p} + \mathbf{p} \otimes \frac{d^{\alpha} \mathbf{p}}{dt^{\alpha}} \right) \psi \ d\mathbf p \right\} $$
(50)

or

$$ \dot{\mathbf{a}} |^{B} \approx -D_{r}\frac{d^{1-\alpha}}{d^{1-\alpha}} \left\{ {\int}_{\!\!\!\!\mathcal{S}} \left(\frac{\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial \mathbf{p}}}{\psi} \otimes\mathbf{p} + \mathbf{p} \otimes \frac{\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial\mathbf{p}}}{\psi} \right) \psi \ d\mathbf{p} \right\} , $$
(51)

which finally gives

$$ \dot{\mathbf{a}} |^{B} \approx -2 d D_{r}\frac{d^{1-\alpha}}{d^{1-\alpha}} \left( \mathbf{a} - \frac{\mathbf{I}}{d} \right) . $$
(52)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguado, J.V., Abisset-Chavanne, E., Cueto, E. et al. Fractional modelling of functionalized CNT suspensions. Rheol Acta 54, 109–119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0828-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0828-5

Keywords

Navigation