Abstract
Experimental findings and rheological modelling of chemically treated single-wall carbon nanotubes suspended in an epoxy resin were addressed in a recent publication (Ma et al., J Rheol 53:547–573, 2009). The shear-thinning behaviour was successfully modelled by a Fokker-Planck-based orientation model. However, the proposed model failed to describe linear viscoelasticity using a single mode as well as the relaxation after applying a finite step strain. Both experiments revealed a power-law behaviour for the storage and relaxation moduli. In this paper, we show that a single-mode fractional diffusion model is able to predict these experimental observations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abisset-Chavanne E, Mezher R, Le Corre S, Ammar A, Chinesta F (2013) Kinetic theory microstructure modeling in concentrated suspensions. Entropy 15:2805–2832. doi:10.3390/e15072805
Abisset-Chavanne E, Chinesta F, Ferec J, Ausias G, Keunings, R (2014) On the multiscale description of dilute suspensions of non-Brownian rigid clusters composed of rods. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2014.08.014
Advani S, Tucker CL (1987) The use of tensors to describe and predict fiber orientation in short fiber composites. J Rheol 31:751–784
Advani S, Tucker CL (1990) Closure approximations for three-dimensional structure tensors. J Rheol 34:367–386
Amari T, Watanabe K (1980) Stress relaxation of carbon black-linseed oil suspensions. J Soc Rheol Jpn 8:80–83
Carter LF (1967) A study of the rheology of suspensions of rod-shaped particles in a Navier-Stokes liquid. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Chinesta F (2013) From single-scale to two-scales kinetic theory descriptions of rods suspensions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 20:1–29
Cueto E, Ma AWK, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2008) Numerical simulation of spin coating processes involving functionalised carbon nanotube suspensions. Int J Mater Form 1:89–99
Cueto E, Monge R, Chinesta F, Poitou A, Alfaro I, Mackley MR (2010) Rheological modeling and forming process simulation of CNT nanocomposites. Int J Mater Form 3:1327–1338
Cruz C, Illoul L, Chinesta F, Regnier G (2010) Effects of a bent structure on the linear viscoelastic response of carbon nanotube diluted suspensions. Rheologica Acta 49:1141–1155
Cruz C, Chinesta F, Regnier G (2012) Review on the Brownian dynamics simulation of bead-rod-spring models encountered in computational rheology. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19/2:227–259
Dupret F, Verleye V (1999) Modelling the flow of fibre suspensions in narrow gaps. In: Siginer DA, De Kee D, Chabra RP (eds) Advances in the flow and rheology of non-newtonian fluids, rheology series. Elsevier, pp 1347–1398
Ganani E, Powell RL (1986) Rheological properties of rodlike particles in a Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid. J Rheol 30:995–1013
Jaishankar A, McKinley GH (2012) Power-law rheology in the bulk and at the interface: quasi-properties and fractional constitutive equations. Proc R Soc. doi:10.1098/rspa.2012.0284
Jeffery GB (1922) The motion of ellipsoidal particles immersed in a viscous fluid. Proc R Soc London A102:161–179
Kilbas A, Srivastava H M, Trujillo J J (2006) Theory and applications of fractional differential equations. Elsevier
Kroger M, Ammar A, Chinesta F (2008) Consistent closure schemes for statistical models of anisotropic fluids. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 149:40–55
Ma A, Chinesta F, Mackley MR, Ammar A (2008) The rheological modelling of carbon nanotube (CNT) suspensions in steady shear flows. Int J Mater Form 2:83–88
Ma A, Chinesta F, Ammar A, Mackley MR (2008) Rheological modelling of carbon nanotube aggregate suspensions. J Rheol 52/6:1311–1330
Ma A, Chinesta F, Mackley MR (2009) The rheology and modelling of chemically treated carbon nanotube suspensions. J Rheol 53/3:547–573
Mewis J, Meire C (1984) Yielding in weakly flocculated systems. In: Mena B, Garcia-Rejon A, Rangel-Nafaille C (eds) Advances in rheology, volume 2: fluids. Elsevier
Podlubny I (1999) Fractional differential equations. Academic, San Diego
Rahatekar SS, Koziol KK, Butler SA, Elliott JA, Shaffer MSP, Mackley MR, Windle AH (2006) Optical microstructure and viscosity enhancement for an epoxy resin matrix containing multi-wall carbon nanotubes. J Rheol 50:599–610
Song YK, Youn JR (2005) Influence of dispersion states of Carbon Nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 43:1378–1385
Xu JS, Chatterjee S, Koelling KW, Wang Y, Bechtel SE (2005) Shear and extensional rheology of carbon nanofibers suspensions. Rheol Acta 44:537–562
Yearsley KM, Mackley MR, Chinesta F, Leygue A (2012) The rheology of multiwalled carbon nanotube and carbon black suspensions. J Rheol 56:1465–1490
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix: A: On fractional derivatives
There are many books on fractional calculus and fractional differential equations (e.g. Kilbas et al. 2006; Podlubny 1999). We summarize here the main concepts needed to understand the developments carried out in this paper.
We start with the formula usually attributed to Cauchy for evaluating the nth integration, \(n \in \mathbb {N}\), of a function f(t)
This can be rewritten as
where Γ(n) = (n−1)! is the gamma function. In the latter being in fact defined for any real value \(\alpha \in \mathbb {R}\), we can define the fractional integral from
Now, if we consider the fractional derivative order (α), we select an integer \(m \in \mathbb {N}\) such that m− 1 < α < m, and it suffices to consider an integer m-order derivative combined with a (m−α) fractional integral. Obviously, we could take the derivative of the integral or the integral of the derivative, resulting in the left- and right-hand definitions of the fractional derivative usually denoted by D α f(t) and \(D^{\alpha }_{\ast } f(t)\), respectively.
Because these approaches to the fractional derivative began with an expression for the repeated integration of a function, one could consider a similar approach for the derivative. This was the route considered by Grunwald and Letnikov (GL) that defined the so-called ‘differintegral’ that leads to the fractional counterpart of the usual finite differences. In the present work, we use the GL definition of the fractional derivative.
It turns out that the composition of fractional derivatives follows a rule similar to that for standard derivatives. On the other hand, the Fourier transform of a fractional derivative of order α reads \(\mathcal {F}(g(t);\omega ) = (i\omega )^{\alpha }\mathcal {G}(\omega )\). This property is particularly useful when addressing harmonic responses as in the case of LVE experiments.
Appendix: B: Derivation of the fractional derivative of the orientation tensor
We discuss the contribution of fractional diffusion to the rod rotary velocity (the flow-induced contribution remains unchanged)
Now, we consider the second-order orientation tensor
whose time derivative can be rewritten as
or
Considering the first term of Leibnitz’s rule related to the fractional derivative of a product of functions (it is easy to prove that the second one leads to the standard diffusion integer term, while the others can be neglected), we obtain
or
which finally gives
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aguado, J.V., Abisset-Chavanne, E., Cueto, E. et al. Fractional modelling of functionalized CNT suspensions. Rheol Acta 54, 109–119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0828-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-014-0828-5