Skip to main content
Log in

On the sensitivity of interconversion between relaxation and creep

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Rheologica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interconversion equation of linear viscoelasticity defines implicitly the interrelations between the relaxation and creep functions G(t) and J(t). It is widely utilised in rheology to estimate J(t) from measurements of G(t) and conversely. Because different molecular details can be recovered from G(t) and J(t), it is necessary to work with both. This leads naturally to the need to identify whether it is better to first measure G(t) and then determine J(t) or conversely. This requires an understanding of the stability (sensitivity) of the recovery of J(t) from G(t) compared with that of G(t) from J(t). Although algorithms are available that work adequately in both directions, numerical experimentation strongly suggests that the recovery of J(t) from G(t) measurements is the more stable. An elementary theoretical rationale has been given recently by Anderssen et al. (ANZIAM J 48:C346–C363, 2007) for single exponential models of G(t) and J(t). It explicitly exploits the simple algebra of such functions. In this paper, corresponding bounds are derived that hold for arbitrary sums of exponentials. The paper concludes with a discussion, from a practical rheological perspective, about the implications and implementations of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderssen RS, Davies AR, de Hoog FR (2007) On the interconversion integral equation for relaxation and creep. ANZIAM J (E) 48:C346–C363

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderssen RS, Loy RJ (2002) Completely monotone fading memory relaxation modulii. Bull Austral Math Soc 65:449–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgaertel M, Winter HH (1989) Determination of discrete relaxation and retardation time spectra from dynamic mechanical data. Rheol Acta 28:511–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry J (1980) Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers, Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Honerkamp J, Weese J (1989) Determination of the relaxation spectrum by a regularization method. Macromolecules 22:4372–4377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins IL, Hamming RW (1957) On creep and relaxation. J Appl Phys 28:906–909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Husain SA, Anderssen RS (2005) Modelling the relaxation modulus of linear viscoelasticity using Kohlrausch functions. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 125:159–170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knoff WF, Hopkins IL (1972) An improved numerical interconversion for creep compliance and relaxation modulus. J Appl Polym Sci 16:2963–2972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EH, Rogers TG (1963) Solution of viscoelastic stress problems using measured creep or relaxation functions. J Appl Mech 30:127–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead DW (1994) Numerical interconversion of linear viscoelastic material functions. J Rheol 38:1769–1795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikonov A, Davies AR, Emri I (2005) The determination of creep and relaxation functions from a single experiment. J Rheol 49:1193–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SW, Kim YR (1999) Interconversion between relaxation modulus and creep compliance for viscoelastic solids. J Mater Civil Eng 11:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park SW, Schapery RA (1999) Methods of interconversion between linear viscoelastic material functions. Part I – A numerical method based on Prony series. Int J Solids Struct 36:1653–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plazek DJ, Echeverria I (2000) Don’t cry for me Charley Brown, or with compliance comes comprehension. J Rheol 44:831–841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plazek DJ (1992) What’s wrong with the moduli Charley Brown? or get the H out and go to L. J Rheol 36:1671–1689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plazek DJ, Raghupathi N, Osborn SJ (1979) Determination of dynamic storage and loss compliances from creep data. J Rheol 23:477–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schapery RA (1961) A simple collocation method for fitting viscoelastic models to experimental data. GALCIT SM 61-23A, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA

  • Tschoegl NW, Emri I (1992) Generating line spectra from experiment response. Part 3. Interconversion between relaxation and retardation behaviour. Int J Polymeric Mater 18:117–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Widder DV (1941) The Laplace transform. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The second author (Professor Russell Davies) wishes to acknowledge the financial support received from the CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Anderssen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderssen, R.S., Davies, A.R. & de Hoog, F.R. On the sensitivity of interconversion between relaxation and creep. Rheol Acta 47, 159–167 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-007-0223-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-007-0223-6

Keywords

Navigation