Abstract
Purpose
Bleeding after haemorrhoidectomy is common. Many surgical textbooks recommend insertion of an anal tampon in order to reduce postoperative bleeding. This practice, however, is bothersome and probably painful for patients. The effect of using a tamponade has not been validated in randomised controlled trials.
Methods
The study included 100 patients who were scheduled for Milligan–Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. During surgery, patients were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive an anal tampon at the end of the procedure. Data on pain, complications and wound care were collected. The trial was registered (DRKS00003116) and all analyses were by intention-to-treat.
Results
There were 48 patients in the group with tamponade, and 52 patients were left without tamponade. The trial's primary outcome and maximum pain intensity, averaged 6.1 and 4.2 in the two groups (P = 0.001). In the group with tamponade, a complication was recorded in seven patients (15 %), which was similar to the group without tamponade (21 %). Severe anal bleeding occurred in two and five patients, respectively. Bandage changes were less necessary often in the group treated without tamponade (P = 0.013). Hospital stay was 4 days in both groups.
Conclusions
Data indicate that insertion of an anal tampon after haemorrhoidectomy does not reduce postoperative bleeding but causes significantly more pain. After haemorrhoidectomy, anal tampons should not be used routinely but may be considered when specific indications justify its use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K, Riss T, Mittlbock M, Steiner G et al (2012) The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Color Dis 27:215–20
Milligan E, Morgan C, Jones L, Officer R (1937) Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatments of haemorrhoids. Lancet ii:1119–24
Jayaraman S, Colquhoun PH, Malthaner RA. Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006: CD005393
Laughlan K, Jayne DG, Jackson D, Rupprecht F, Ribaric G (2009) Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan–Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review. Int J Color Dis 24:335–44
Cheetham MJ, Phillips RK (2001) Evidence-based practice in haemorrhoidectomy. Color Dis 3:126–34
Hunt L, Luck AJ, Rudkin G, Hewett PJ (1999) Day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 86:255–8
Pigot F, Juguet F, Bouchard D, Castinel A, Vove JP (2011) Prospective survey of secondary bleeding following anorectal surgery in a consecutive series of 1,269 patients. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 35:41–7
Bouchard D, Abramowitz L, Castinel A, Suduca JM, Staumont G, Soudan D et al (2012) One-year outcome of haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective multicentre French study. Color Dis 15:719–26
Yano T, Matsuda Y, Asano M, Kawakami K, Nakai K, Nonaka M et al (2009) The outcome of postoperative hemorrhaging following a hemorrhoidectomy. Surg Today 39:866–9
Nicholson TJ, Armstrong D (2004) Topical metronidazole (10 percent) decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain and improves healing. Dis Colon Rectum 47:711–6
Pigot F, Juguet F, Bouchard D, Castinel A (2012) Do we have to stop anticoagulant and platelet-inhibitor treatments during proctological surgery? Color Dis 14:1516–20
Rosen L, Sipe P, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Trimpi HD (1993) Outcome of delayed hemorrhage following surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 36:743–6
Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM et al (2002) Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage: a single-institution prospective study of 4,880 consecutive closed hemorrhoidectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1096–9
Nienhuijs SW, de Hingh IH (2010) Pain after conventional versus Ligasure haemorrhoidectomy. A meta-analysis. Int J Surg 8:269–73
Myles LM, Aitken RJ, Griffiths JM (1994) Simple non-adherent dressing versus gelatin foam sponge plug after haemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 81:1385
Ingram M, Wright TA, Ingoldby CJ (1998) A prospective randomized study of calcium alginate (Sorbsan) versus standard gauze packing following haemorrhoidectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 43:308–9
Parks AG (1956) The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 43:337–51
Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, Chan VW (2005) The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain 117:412–20
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–96
Corman JM (2005) Colon and rectal surgery (5th edition). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Wienert V, Mlitz H, Raulf F (2008) Handbuch Hämorrhoidalleiden. Uni-Med, Bremen
Saik RP (1976) An improved rectal pack. Arch Surg 111:1406
Cantor AJ (1958) A new surgical dressing. Am J Proctol 9:499–500
Battista A, Novi A, Giamundo P, Battista RA, Picheo R, Dionigi P (2012) Local hemostatic effect of cellulose tampons (Tampax) after stapled hemorrhoidopexy. Int J Color Dis 27:545–6
Pescatori M (2012) Prevention and treatment of complications in proctological surgery. Springer, Milan
Acknowledgments
This study was partly supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF CHIR-Net grant No. 01GH0605).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Langenbach, M.R., Chondros, S. & Sauerland, S. Tamponade dressings may be unnecessary after haemorrhoidectomy: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 395–400 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1800-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1800-z