Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic resection of low rectal cancer poses significant technical difficulties for the surgeon. There is a lack of published follow-up data in relation to the surgical, oncological and survival outcomes in these patients.
Aim
The aim of this study is to evaluate the surgical, oncological and survival outcomes in all patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer.
Methods
Consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancers were included in the study. Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were recorded over a 4-year period. The mean follow-up was 25 months
Results
A total of 53 patients were included in the study, 30 of whom were males. The mean age was 64.14 years (range, 34–86 years). The mean hospital stay was 8.2 days (range, 4–42 days). Fifty were completed laparoscopically and three were converted to an open procedure. Thirty-eight were anterior resections and 15 were abdominoperineal resections. Twenty-four patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The total mesorectal excision was optimal in 51 (98%) cases. There were no anastomotic sequelae and no surgical mortality. There was no local recurrence detected. The overall survival (mean follow-up, 25 months) was 93.5%.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancers permits optimum oncological control. In our series, this technical approach is associated with excellent 4-year survival and clinical outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial). Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726
Tinmouth J, Tomlinson G, Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Fischler M, Nelson H, Sargent DJ (2004) Laparoscopically assisted versus open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 351:933–934
Kuhry E, COLOR Study Group et al (2005) Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer. Surg Endosc 19(5):687–692
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Piqué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242(1):83–91
Aziz O, Darzi AW (2008) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: evidence to date. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 17(3):519–531, viii
Delgado S, Momblán D, Salvador L, Bravo R, Castells A, Ibarzabal A, Piqué JM, Lacy AM (2004) Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 18(10):1457–1462
Delaney CP, Neary PC, Heriot AG, Senagore AJ (2006) Operative techniques in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Al Chalabi H, Kavanagh DO, Hassan L, Donnell KO, Nugent E, Andrews E, Keane FB, O’Riordain DS, Miller A, Neary P (2010) The benefit of an enhanced recovery programme following elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 25(6):761–766
Williams GT, Quirke P, Shepherd NA (2007) Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Dataset for colorectal cancer, 2nd edn. The Royal College of Pathologists, London
Taal BG, Van Tinteren H, Zoetmulder FAN (2001) Adjuvant 5FU plus levamisole in colonic or rectal cancer: improved survival in stage II and III. Br J Cancer 85:1437–1443. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2001.2117
Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997). N Engl J Med 336(14):980–987
Ridgway PF, Boyle E, Keane FB, Neary P (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy is cheaper than conventional open resection. Colorectal Dis 9(9):819–824
Soop M, Nelson H (2008) Laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: on trial. Ann Surg Oncol 15(9):2357–2359
Soop M, Nelson H (2008) Is laparoscopic resection appropriate for colorectal adenocarcinoma? Adv Surg 42:205–217
Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P (2007) Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol 25(18):2573–2579
Wichmann MW, Müller C, Meyer G, Strauss T, Hornung HM, Lau-Werner U, Angele MK, Schildberg FW (2002) Effect of pre-operative radiochemotherapy on lymph node retrieval after resection of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 137:206–210
Heald RJ, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1(8496):1479–1482
Hartley JE, Mehigan BJ, Qureshi AE, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR (2001) Total mesorectal excision: assessment of the laparoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 44(3):315–321
Quah HM, Jayne DG, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89(12):1551–1556
Morino M, Allaix ME, Giraudo G, Corno F, Garrone C (2005) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer: a prospective comparative study. Surg Endosc 19(11):1460–1467
Bärlehner E, Benhidjeb T, Anders S, Schicke B (2005) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 19(6):757
Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):8–9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moran, D.C., Kavanagh, D.O., Nugent, E. et al. Laparoscopic resection for low rectal cancer: evaluation of oncological efficacy. Int J Colorectal Dis 26, 1143–1149 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1221-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1221-9