Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There are few reports on laparoscopic rectum resection demonstrating its feasibility and efficacy in patients with rectal cancer. Most patient series are small, and results must be considered preliminary and medium-term. Our large prospective conducted study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a totally laparoscopic resection for rectum carcinoma with emphasis on perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes.

Methods

Between November 1992 and July 2003, 194 unselected patients were resected laparoscopically for rectal carcinoma. Patients with locally advanced rectum carcinoma (uT3/uT4) and no evidence of distant metastases were candidates for neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Adjuvant treatment was administered to patients with UICC stage II/III disease. All patients were followed up prospectively to evaluate complications and late outcomes. Survival probability analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Study selection was made by Medline search using the following key words: rectal cancer, rectal neoplasms, laparoscopy, and resection. Single case reports and abstracts were excluded. When surgical series were reported more than once, only the most recent reports were considered and listed.

Results

The most common procedures were low anterior resection with total mesorectum excision in 65.5% of patients and high anterior resection in 25.3%. Average operative time was 174 min. Average number of lymph nodes removed was 25.4 and length of specimen resected was 27.6 cm. Resection was curative in 145 patients and palliative in 49 cases. UICC tumor stages were as follows: stage I: 25.2%, stage II: 27.3%, stage III: 30.4%, and stage IV: 17%. Intraoperative complications were <1% for lesions of the ureter, urinary bladder, and deferent duct. Conversion to conventional surgery was necessary in two cases (1%). The most common postoperative complication was anastomotic leakage in 13.5% of patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Follow-up evaluation ranged from 1 to 128 months with a mean of 46.1 months. The most common late complication was incisional hernia in 3.6% of patients. Port-site metastases occurred in one patient (0.5%). Tumor recurrence developed in 23 of the 145 curative resected patients (11.7% distant metastases and 4.1% local recurrence). Overall local recurrence rate was 6.7% (4.1% after curative resection and 14.3% after palliative resection). Overall survival rate was 90.6% at 1 year, 74.5% at 3 years, and 66.3% at 5 years. Overall 5-year survival rate was 76.9% after curative resection and 31.8% after palliative resection. Cancer-related survival rate was 94% at 1 year, 82.4% at 3 years, and 78.9% at 5 years. At 5 years it was 87.7% after curative resection and 48.5% after palliative resection. At 5 years, the survival rate was 100% for stage I, 94.4% for stage II, 66.6% for stage III, and 44.6% for stage IV.

Conclusions

Our results and the literature review clearly demonstrate that laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is not associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Established oncological and surgical principles are respected and long-term outcomes are at least as good as those after open surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Anthuber A Fuerst F Elser R Berger KW Jauch (2003) ArticleTitleOutcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients Dis Colon Rectum 46 1047–1053 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7279-5 Occurrence Handle12907898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. E Bärlehner Decker Th Anders St B Heukrodt (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoskopische Chirurgie des Rektumkarzinoms. Onkologische Radikalität und Spätergebnisse Zentralbl Chir 126 302–306 Occurrence Handle10.1055/s-2001-14745 Occurrence Handle11370393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. SW Bell KG Walker MJFX Rickard G Sinclair OF Dent PH Chapuis EL Bokey (2003) ArticleTitleAnastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence Br J Surg 90 1261–1266 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4219 Occurrence Handle14515297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. JCC Chen JB Chen HM Wang (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic coloanal anstomosis for low rectal cancer J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6 345

    Google Scholar 

  5. A Darzi C Lewis N Menzies-Gow PJ Guillou JRT Monson (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic abdominoperineal excision of the rectum Surg Endosc 9 414–417 Occurrence Handle7660266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. F Feliciotti M Guerrieri AM Paganini A Sanctis ParticleDe R Campanacci S Perretta G D’Ambrosio G Lezoche E Lezoche (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results of laparoscopic vs open resections for rectal cancer for 124 unselected patients Surg Endosc 17 1530–1535 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8874-y Occurrence Handle12874687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. JW Fleshman SD Wexner M Anvari JF LaTulippe EH Birnbaum IJ Kodner TE Read JJ Nogueras EG Weiss (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic vs. open abdominoperineal resection for cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 930–939 Occurrence Handle10411441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. JE Hartley BJ Mehigan AE Qureshi GS Duthie PWRL Lee JRT Monson (2001) ArticleTitleTotal mesorectal excision: Assessment of the laparoscopic approach Dis Colon Rectum 44 315–321 Occurrence Handle11289275

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. RJ Heald BJ Moran RDH Ryall R Sexton JK MacFarlane (1998) ArticleTitleRectal cancer. The Basingstoke experience of total mesorectum excision Arch Surg 133 894–899 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894 Occurrence Handle9711965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AJN Iroatulam F Agachan O Alabaz EG Weiss JJ Nogueras SD Wexner (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer Am Surg 64 12–18 Occurrence Handle9457031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. E Kapiteijn CJ van-de-Velde (2002) ArticleTitleThe role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer Surg Clin North Am 82 995–1007 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6109(02)00040-3 Occurrence Handle12507205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. SW Larach MC Salomon PR Williamson E Goldstein (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic assisted abdominoperineal resection Surg Laparosc Endosc 3 115–118 Occurrence Handle8269230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. J Leroy F Jamali L Forbes M Smith F Rubino D Mutter J Marescaux (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery Surg Endosc 18 281–289 Occurrence Handle14691716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. KL Leung SPY Kwok SCV Lam JFY Lee RYC Yiu SSM Ng PBS Lai WY Lau (2004) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial Lancet 363 1187–1192 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15947-3 Occurrence Handle15081650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AL Martling T Holm LE Rutqvist BJ Moran RJ Heald B Cedermark InstitutionalAuthorNameStockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group InstitutionalAuthorNameBasingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the county of Stockholm Lancet 356 93–96 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02469-7 Occurrence Handle10963244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. M Morino U Parini G Giraudo M Salval RB Conral C Garrone (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision. A consecutive series of 100 patients Ann Surg 237 335–342 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200303000-00006 Occurrence Handle12616116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. M Pera S Delgado JC García-Valdecasas M Pera A Castells JM Piqué E Bombuy AM Lacy (2002) ArticleTitleThe management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques Surg Endosc 16 603–606 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9097-3 Occurrence Handle11972197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. A Pietrabissa C Moretto A Carobbi U Boggi F Ghilli F Mosca (2002) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection. Initial experience with a new procedure Surg Endosc 16 431–435 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9084-8 Occurrence Handle11928022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. EC Poulin CM Schlachta R Grégoire P Seshadri MO Cadeddu J Mamazza (2002) ArticleTitleLocal recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection for rectal adenocarcinoma Surg Endosc 16 989–995 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080182 Occurrence Handle12163970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. JR Ramos RH Petrosemolo EA Valory FC Polania R Pecanha (1997) ArticleTitleAbdominoperineal resection: laparoscopic versus conventional Surg Laparosc Endosc 7 148–152 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199704000-00017 Occurrence Handle9109247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. JA Reis Neto FA Quilici F Cordeiro JA Reis SuffixJr O Kagohara J Simoes Neto (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6 163–167

    Google Scholar 

  22. R Rullier A Sa Cunha P Couderc A Rullier R Gontier J Saric (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer Br J Surg 90 445–451 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4052 Occurrence Handle12673746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. H Scheidbach C Schneider E Baerlehner J Konradt F Koeckerling (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic anterior resection for rectal carcinoma Surg Oncol Clin North Am 10 599–609

    Google Scholar 

  24. H Scheidbach C Schneider J Konradt E Bärlehner L Köhler Wittekind Ch F Köckerling (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and anterior resection with curative intent for carcinoma of the rectum Surg Endosc 16 7–13 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8314-4 Occurrence Handle11961595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. H Scheidbach C Schneider O Hugel H Scheuerlein E Bärlehner J Konradt C Wittekind F Köckerling (2003) ArticleTitleOncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery Surg Endosc 17 903–910 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-8966-8 Occurrence Handle12632133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. O Schwandner THK Schiedeck C Killaitis HP Bruch (1999) ArticleTitleA case-control study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 14 158–163 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s003840050203 Occurrence Handle10460907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. CL Tang KW Eu BC Tai JGS Soh D Machin F Seow-Choen (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized clinical trial of the effect of open versus laparoscopically assisted colectomy on systemic immunity in patients with colorectal cancer Br J Surg 88 801–807 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01781.x Occurrence Handle11412248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. WWC Tsang CC Chung MKW Li (2003) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with colonic J-pouch reconstruction for mid and low rectal cancers Br J Surg 90 867–871 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4105 Occurrence Handle12854115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. I Uyama A Sugioka H Matsui J Fujita Y Komori T Hanai A Hasumi (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic lateral node dissection with autonomic nerve preservation for advanced lower rectal cancer J Am Coll Surg 193 579–584 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(01)01042-0 Occurrence Handle11708519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DW Weaver SR Eachempati (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopically assisted transsacral resection of rectal cancer with primary anastomosis. A preliminary review Surg Endosc 14 703–707 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640020085 Occurrence Handle10954813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. H Westhues (1934) Die pathologisch-anatomischen Grundlagen der Chirurgie des Rektumkarzinoms G Thieme Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  32. S Yamamoto M Watanabe H Hasegawa M Kitajima (2002) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoid and rectal carcinoma Dis Colon Rectum 45 1648–1654 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-7253-2 Occurrence Handle12473889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. ZG Zhou Z Wang YY Yu Y Shu Z Cheng L Li WZ Lei TC Wang (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total mesorectal excision of low rectal with preservation of anal sphincter: a report of 82 cases World J Gastroenterol 9 1477–1481 Occurrence Handle12854145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. O Zmora SD Wexner (2001) ArticleTitlePart I. Laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer Curr Probl Cancer 25 286–309 Occurrence Handle10.1067/mcn.2001.117697 Occurrence Handle11568735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are indebted to Prof. Peter Hohenberger (University of Mannheim) for his invaluable assistance in reviewing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Centre of Minimally Invasive Surgery, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin, Hobrechtsfelder Chaussee 100, D-13125, Berlin, Germany

    E. Bärlehner, T. Benhidjeb & S. Anders

  2. Tumorzentrum Berlin-Buch, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin, Hobrechtsfelder Chaussee 100, D-13125, Berlin, Germany

    B. Schicke

Authors
  1. E. Bärlehner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Benhidjeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Anders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Schicke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Benhidjeb.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bärlehner, E., Benhidjeb, T., Anders, S. et al. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: Outcomes in 194 patients and review of the literature. Surg Endosc 19, 757–766 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9134-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation