Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Constipation in 44 patients implanted with an artificial bowel sphincter

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Constipation with or without obstructed defecation (OD) is frequent in patients with artificial bowel sphincter (ABS). The aims of this study were (1) to evaluate the functional outcome of ABS based on postoperative constipation and (2) to assess pre-implantation data to predict post-implantation constipation.

Materials and methods

Thirteen men and 31 women were followed up. Both fecal incontinence and constipation with and without OD were assessed after implantation. Pre-implantation characteristics were compared in patients with and without postoperative constipation.

Results

After implantation, nine patients (20.4%) had constipation without OD, 16 patients (36.4%) had OD, and 19 patients (43.2%) had neither of these. Incontinence was significantly more frequent in patients with postoperative constipation with or without OD. In these patients, an increase in preoperative constipation, anismus, and ultraslow waves was noted.

Conclusion

Constipation with and without OD is frequent after implantation and interfere with the functional outcome of ABS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madoff RD (2004) Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126:S48–S54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller C, Belyaev O, Deska T, Chromik A, Weyhe D, Uhl W (2005) Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 390:544–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P (2003) Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution. Ann Surg 237:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE (2004) Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:665–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Michot F, Tuech J, Lefebure B, Bridoux V, Denis P (2007) A new implantation procedure of articifial sphincter for anal incontinence : the transvaginal approach. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1401–1404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P, Grise P, Leborgne J, Teniere P, Buzelin JM (1996) Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson WG, Longstreth GG, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Müller-Lissner SA (1999) Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut 45:II43–II47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmona R, Company RA, Vila JR, Bueno AS, Marti P. Long-term results of artificial bowel sphincter for the treatment of severe fecal incontinence. Are they what we hoped? Colorect Dis 2009 (in press)

  9. Altomare DF, Binda GA, Dodi G, La Torre F, Romano G, Rinaldi M, Melega E (2004) Disappointing long-term results of the artificial anal sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:1352–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarrett ME, Mowatt G, Glazener CM, Fraser C, Nicholls RJ, Grant AM, Kamm MA (2004) Systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation. Br J Surg 91:1559–1569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pena A, Guardino K, Tovilla JM, Levitt MA, Rodriguez G, Torres R (1998) Bowel management for fecal incontinence in patients with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 33:133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pena A, Hong A (2000) Advances in the management of anorectal malformations. Am J Surg 180:370–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christensen P, Bazzocchi G, Coggrave M, Abel R, Hultling C, Krogh K, Media S, Laurberg S (2006) A randomized, controlled trial of transanal irrigation versus conservative bowel management in spinal cord-injured patients. Gastroenterology 131:738–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heikenen JB, Werlin SL, Di Lorenzo C, Hyman PE, Cocjin J, Flores AF, Reddy SN (1999) Colonic motility in children with repaired imperforate anus. Dig Dis Sci 44:1288–1292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kenny SE, Connell MG, Rintala RJ, Vaillant C, Edgar DH, Lloyd DA (1998) Abnormal colonic interstitial cells of Cajal in children with anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 33:130–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE (1985) Anismus in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 30:413–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eckardt VF, Schmitt T, Bernhard G (1997) Anal ultra slow waves: a smooth muscle phenomenon associated with dyschezia. Dig Dis Sci 42:2439–2445

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshino H, Kayaba H, Hebiguchi T, Morii M, Ito W, Chihara J, Kato T (2007) Multiple clinical presentations of anal ultra slow waves and high anal pressure: megacolon, hemorrhoids and constipation. Tohoku J Exp Med 211:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Savoye G, Leroi AM, Denis P, Michot F (2000) Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter. Br J Surg 87:586–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marderstein EL, Delaney CP (2007) Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:552–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Benoist S, Panis Y, Michot F, Coffin B, Messing B, Valleur P (2005) Artificial sphincter with colonic reservoir for severe anal incontinence because of imperforate anus and short-bowel syndrome: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1978–1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leroi AM, Berkelmans I, Denis P, Hemond M, Devroede G (1995) Anismus as a marker of sexual abuse. Consequences of abuse on anorectal motility. Dig Dis Sci 40:1411–1416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Dale LEBREC for the translation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne-Marie Leroi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gallas, S., Leroi, AM., Bridoux, V. et al. Constipation in 44 patients implanted with an artificial bowel sphincter. Int J Colorectal Dis 24, 969–974 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0693-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0693-3

Keywords

Navigation