Skip to main content
Log in

Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence

Report of 14 consecutive implantations

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Fourteen AMS 800® (American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, MN) urinary artificial sphincters have been consecutively implanted in 13 patients with total incontinence for stool of various causes (traumatic or postoperative, 7; congenital, 3; neurologic, 2; idiopathic, 1). No proximal stoma was constructed but was already present in one patient before implantation. RESULTS: Sepsis occurred in two patients. Removal of sphincter and colostomy was necessary in three patients: one of these two had developed sepsis, one had perineal ulceration before activation of the sphincter in a severely scarred perineum, and one had severe pain in a radiation-injured anorectum. Sphincter-related failure occurred once by rupture of the cuff in a constipated woman after two years of satisfactory function. Reimplantation of a new cuff restored normal continence in this patient. After median follow-up of 20 (range, 4–60) months, nine of ten patients with a functioning sphincter were continent for stool, and five were also continent for gas. Failure occurred in one patient because the cuff was too large to occlude the anal canal. This patient is awaiting reimplantation. Four patients experienced easily controlled difficulties with evacuation of feces. Anal pressure with inflated cuff varied from 43 to 94 (mean, 58±12) cm H2O. CONCLUSION: These results show that an artificial sphincter has a role in the treatment of severe anal incontinence when local therapies are not applicable or have failed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Engel AF, Kamm MA, Sultan AH, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ. Anterior anal sphincter repair in patients with obstetric trauma. Br J Surg 1994;81:1231–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scheuer M, Kuijpers HC, Jacobs PP. Postanal repair restores anatomy rather than function. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:960–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leblanc I, Michot F, Ducrotté P, Scotté M, Denis P, Teniere P. In case of reeducation failure, should postanal repair be the treatment of idiopathic fecal incontinence? Dig Surg 1993;10:39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshioka K, Keighley MR. Clinical and manometric assessment of gracilis muscle transplant for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:767–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christiansen J, Ronholt Hansen C, Rasmussen O. Bilateral gluteus maximus transposition for anal incontinence. Br J Surg 1995;82:903–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams NS, Patel J, George BD, Hallan RI, Watkins ES. Development of an electrically stimulated neoanal sphincter. Lancet 1991;338:1166–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeten CG, Geerdes BP, Adang EM,et al. Anal dynamic graciloplasty in the treatment of intractable fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1995;332:1600–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987;2:244–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Christiansen J, Sparso B. Treatment of anal incontinence by an implantable prosthetic anal sphincter. Ann Surg 1992;215:383–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence: report of five cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1989;32:432–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denis P, Colin R, Galmiche JP,et al. Traitement de l'incontinence fécale de l'adulte: résultats en fonction des données cliniques et manométriques, et intérÊt de la réeducation par apprentissage instrumental. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1983;7:857–63.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Montague DK. The artificial urinary sphincter (AS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. J Urol 1992;147:380–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.

About this article

Cite this article

Lehur, PA., Michot, F., Denis, P. et al. Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 1352–1355 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054523

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02054523

Key words

Navigation