Abstract
Aim
Mucosal prolapse is a common complication following anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation. The symptoms such as soiling, staining, and pain significantly reduce the patients’ quality of life. Millard et al. (Plast Reconst Surg 69(3):399–411, 1982) reported the two-flap anoplasty that creates an anal canal using two perineal pedicle skin flaps to form a “deep anus”. We have used this procedure for mucosal prolapse since 1990. This study evaluated the long-term benefits of this method.
Methods
From 1990 to 2009, 18 patients suffering mucosal prolapse following anorectoplasty for high imperforate anus were treated using a two-flap anoplasty (TFARP) or just mucosal resection (MR). For each procedure, the long-term clinical follow-up (maximum of 20 years) was assessed by review of medical records against the frequency of recurrence, and the recurrence of preoperative symptoms postoperatively.
Results
Of the 18 patients, 8 presented with simple mucosal prolapse, 4 with bleeding, 3 with staining, 2 with incontinence, and 1 with pain. TFARP was performed for 14 patients and MR for 6 patients. In the MR group, during the maximum of 15 years follow-up, two patients (33 %) suffered a recurrence or failed to improve their symptoms such as bleeding and/or soiling. In the TFARP group, during the maximum of 20 years follow-up, there were no recurrences and their preoperative symptoms resolved completely. Furthermore, two patients in the TFARP group gained normal sensation prior to defecation.
Conclusion
The advantages of this procedure were no recurrences and complete resolution of preoperative symptoms. Moreover, it provides the possibility of gaining sensate defecation, possibly because the skin flap around the anus might help develop sensation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peña A (1995) Anorectal malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg 4(1):35–47
Ong TN, Beasley WS (1990) Comparison of clinical methods for the assessment of continence after repair of high anorectal anomalies. Pediatr Surg Int 5(4):233–237
Rintala R, Lindahl H, Louhimo I (1991) Anorectal malformations-results of treatment and long-term follow-up in 208 patients. Pediatr Surg Int 6(1):36–41
Belizon A, Levitt M, Shoshany G, Rodriguez G, Peña A (2005) Rectal prolapse following posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 40(1):192–196
Couette-Laberge L, Yazbeck S, Laberge JM et al (1987) Multiple flap anoplasty in the treatment of rectal prolaose after pullthrough operations for imperforate anus. J Pediatr Surg 22(1):65–67
Pescatori M, Boffi F, Russo A, Zbar AP (2006) Complications and recurrence after excision of rectal internal mucosal prolapse for obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21(2):160–165
Millard DR Jr, Rowe MI (1982) Plastic surgical principles in high imperforate anus. Plast Reconst Surg 69(3):399–411
Bass J, Rubin SZ, Walton JM, Cada M (2001) Combined posterior sagittal and three-flap anoplasty in the repair of anorectal anomaries. J Pediatr Surg 36(5):711–714
Amortegui JD, Solla JA (2008) Procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids for treatment of rectal mucosa prolapse following anorectoplasty for imperforate anus. Am Surg 74(5):443–446
Duthie HL, Gairns FW (1960) Sensory nerve-endings and sensation in the anal region of man. Br J Surg 47:585–595
Nixon HH (1984) Possibilities and results of management of bowel incontinence in children. Prog Pediatr Surg 17:105–114
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sato, H., Furuta, S., Kawase, H. et al. The long-term prognosis of two-flap anoplasty for mucosal prolapse following anorectoplasty for anal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int 28, 841–846 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3129-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3129-z