Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications and recurrence after excision of rectal internal mucosal prolapse for obstructed defaecation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RIMP) may cause obstructed defaecation and encouraging short-term results have been reported after its transanal excision. The objective of this retrospective study was to assess both clinical and functional outcome after this procedure alone for patients presenting with evacuatory difficulty.

Patients and methods

Forty patients (30 females, mean age 54 years), all suffering from obstructed defaecation, underwent RIMP excision at our unit during the last 11 years. RIMP was of first degree in three patients, of second degree in 21, and of third degree in 16 with 28/40 cases (70%) having associated anorectal pathology. The operation was carried out by hand suture (submucosal excision, Sarles endorectal excision, or the Delorme mucosectomy) in 26 patients, by circular stapled prolapsectomy in nine patients, or by combined manual and stapled techniques in five cases. Proctoscopy was carried out after 2 months for all patients, with anorectal manometry in 30 patients. Patients were independently assessed by state-trait anxiety scales for attendant anxiety and depression.

Results

Eighteen patients (45%) had significant postoperative complications with a surgical reintervention rate of 32.5%. Overall, 21 patients (52%) reported recurrent constipation and of these 14 (65%) had recurrent RIMP; six patients were treated successfully by rubber-band ligation alone. Two patients (5%) experienced new onset faecal incontinence. The recurrence rate of RIMP was unaffected by the type of operation, being 53% after manual techniques and 48% after combined procedures. There was no difference between postoperative manometric values in patients presenting with recurrent RIMP or constipation compared with those without RIMP or constipation on follow-up. Forty-eight percent of the patients with both recurrent constipation plus RIMP had manometric evidence of non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome compared with 26% with RIMP but without constipation (P<0.05). Ten of the 14 patients (71%) with anxiety and/or depression complained of recurrent constipation after surgery compared with nine of the 26 patients (24%) with normal psychological profiles (P<0.01). Patients with a preoperative rectocele were more likely to suffer from recurrent constipation than those without rectocele (eight out of 15, 53.3% vs. seven out of 25, 28%; P<0.05).

Conclusions

Primary excision of RIMP does not seem an effective treatment for obstructed defecation with predictive factors for an adverse outcome in terms of recurrence (RIMP and constipation) including the presence of preoperative non-relaxing puborectalis syndrome and a demonstrated anxiety or depression psychological profile. The technique of prolapsectomy does not seem to affect outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W (1995) Relationships between defecographic findings, rectal emptying and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut 26:907–912

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pomerri F, Zuliani M, Mazza C, Villarejo F, Scopece A (2001) Defecographic measurements of rectal intussusception and prolapse in patients and in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Roentgenol 176:641–645

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun WM, Read NW, Donnelly TC, Bannister JJ, Shorthouse AJ (1989) A common pathophysiology for full thickness rectal prolapse, anterior mucosal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer. Br J Surg 76:290–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pescatori M, Quondamcarlo C (1999) A new grading of rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RIMP) and its correlation with diagnosis and treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:245–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarles JC, Arnaud A, Selezneff I, Olivier S (1989) Endo-rectal repair of rectocele. Int J Colorectal Dis 4:167–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pescatori M, Favetta V, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsunoda A, Yatsuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M (2003) Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1260–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H, Beer-Gabel M, Pescatori M (2003) Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:369–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Devroede G, Girard G, Bouchoucha M et al (1989) Idiopathic constipation by colonic dysfunction: relationship with personality and anxiety. Dig Dis Sci 34:1428–1433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Renzi C, Pescatori M (2002) Family drawing in the clinical approach to patients with chronic constipation: preliminary data. Neurogastroenterology 2:54–57

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spielberg CD (1996) STAI, state-trait anxiety inventory. Mindgarden, Redwood City CA, OS Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze

  12. Chen HH, Ioratulam A, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2001) Associations of defecography and physiologic findings in male patients with rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 5:157–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D’Hoore A, Penninckx F (2003) Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis 5:280–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 29:681–685

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A (1992) A new grading and score of anal incontinence: evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 35:482–487

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsiaoussis J, Chrysos E, Glynos M, Vasiliakis JS, Xynos E (1998) Pathophysiology and treatment of anterior mucosal prolapse syndrome. Br J Surg 85:1699–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A (1997) Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 40:817–820

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen-Mersh TG, Henry MM, Nicholls RJ (1987) Natural history of anterior mucosal prolapse. Br J Surg 74:679–682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Sallustio PL, Martuo P, DeFazio M, Memeo V (2001) Long-term effects of stapled haemorrhoidectomy on internal anal sphincter function and sensitivity. Br J Surg 88:1487–1491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Araki Y, Ishibashi N, Kishimoto Y et al (2001) Circular stapling procedure for mucosal prolapse of the rectum and with outlet obstruction. Kurume Med J 48:201–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Renzi C, Pescatori M (2000) Psychological aspects in proctalgia. Dis Colon Rectum 43:35–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Devroede G, Bouchoucha M, Girard G (1989) Constipation, anxiety and personality: what comes first? In: Bueno L, Collins S, Junior JL (eds) Stress and digestive motility. John Libbey, London, pp 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leroi AM, Bernier C, Watier A et al (1995) Prevalence of sexual abuse among patients with functional disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:200–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garvey M, Noyes R, Yates W (1990) Frequency of constipation in major depression: relationship to other clinical variables. Psychosomatics 31:204–206

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nehra V, Bruce BK, Rath-Harvey DM, Pemberton JH, Camilleri M (2000) Psychological disorders in patients with evacuation disorders and constipation in a tertiary practice. Am J Gastroenterol 95:1755–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wald A, Hinds JP, Caruana BJ (1989) Psychological and physiological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology 97:932–937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mason HJ, Serrano-Ikkos E, Kamm MA (2002) Psychological state and quality of life in patients having behavioural treatment (biofeedback) for intractable constipation. Am J Gastroenterol 97:3154–3159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tjandra JJ, Ooi BS, Tang CL, Dwyer P, Carey M (1999) Transanal repair of rectocele corrects obstructed defecation if it is not associated with anismus. Dis Colon Rectum 42:1544–1550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sielezneff I, Malouf A, Cesari J, Bresset C, Sarles JC, Sastre B (1999) Selection criteria for internal rectal prolapse repair by Delorme’s transrectal excision. Dis Colon Rectum 42:367–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Stella Ayabaca for her helpful cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Pescatori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pescatori, M., Boffi, F., Russo, A. et al. Complications and recurrence after excision of rectal internal mucosal prolapse for obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 21, 160–165 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0758-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0758-x

Keywords

Navigation