Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantifying atmosphere and ocean origins of North American precipitation variability

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How atmospheric and oceanic processes control North American precipitation variability has been extensively investigated, and yet debates remain. Here we address this question in a 50 km-resolution flux-adjusted global climate model. The high spatial resolution and flux adjustment greatly improve the model’s ability to realistically simulate North American precipitation, the relevant tropical and midlatitude variability and their teleconnections. Comparing two millennium-long simulations with and without an interactive ocean, we find that the leading modes of North American precipitation variability on seasonal and longer timescales exhibit nearly identical spatial and spectral characteristics, explained fraction of total variance and associated atmospheric circulation. This finding suggests that these leading modes arise from internal atmospheric dynamics and atmosphere-land coupling. However, in the fully coupled simulation, North American precipitation variability still correlates significantly with tropical ocean variability, consistent with observations and prior literature. We find that tropical ocean variability does not create its own type of atmospheric variability but excites internal atmospheric modes of variability in midlatitudes. This oceanic impact on North American precipitation is secondary to atmospheric impacts based on correlation. However, relative to the simulation without an interactive ocean, the fully coupled simulation amplifies precipitation variance over southwest North America (SWNA) during late spring to summer by up to 90%. The amplification is caused by a stronger variability in atmospheric moisture content that is attributed to tropical Pacific sea surface temperature variability. Enhanced atmospheric moisture variations over the tropical Pacific are transported by seasonal mean southwesterly winds into SWNA, resulting in larger precipitation variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NSF awards OCE-16-57209 and AGS-19-34363. Discussions with Tom Delworth are much appreciated. Comments from three anonymous reviewers help clarify some overlooked issues. GPCC Precipitation data and NOAA-CIRES-DOE Twentieth Century reanalysis products are provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their Web site at https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. All modeling data used here will be available upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Honghai Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23.

Fig. 17
figure 17

Biases of monthly precipitation climatology (mm/day) in FLOR compared to the 1980–2010 CRU and GPCC observations. Shown here is FLOR–CRU. Stippling is a measure of insignificance, indicating either CRU or GPCC climatology is inside the range of a synthetic 33-member FLOR ensemble, which is constructed by sampling the 1000-year FLOR simulation with a 30-year non-overlapping period

Fig. 18
figure 18

Biases in year-to-year standard deviation of monthly precipitation (mm/day) over North America in FLOR compared to the 1980–2010 CRU and GPCC observations. Stippling is a measure of insignificance, indicating either CRU or GPCC standard deviation is inside the range of a synthetic 33-member FLOR ensemble, which is constructed by sampling the 1000-year FLOR simulation with a 30-year non-overlapping period

Fig. 19
figure 19

Correlation of monthly surface temperature with monthly precipitation averaged over southwestern North America (19°–40° N, 125°–96° W, indicated by a red box in each panel) as a function of calendar months in FLOR. Gray stippling denotes that the correlation is not significant at 5% level (based on a two-sided student t test). Note that this figure has been published in Zhang (2020, Fig. 13)

Fig. 20
figure 20

Fractional change (%) in year-to-year standard deviation of monthly precipitation in Globe_1-12 relative to AM2.5, (Globe_1-12—AM2.5)/Globe_1-12*100%, as a function of calendar month. Gray stippling indicates changes are not significant at the 1% level based on a two-sided Fisher test

Fig. 21
figure 21

The same as Fig. 20 but for CWV in Globe_1-12

Fig. 22
figure 22

The same as Fig. 20 but for Tropic_1-12

Fig. 23
figure 23

The same as Fig. 22 but for CWV in Tropic_1-12

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Seager, R., He, J. et al. Quantifying atmosphere and ocean origins of North American precipitation variability. Clim Dyn 56, 4051–4074 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05685-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-05685-0

Navigation