1 Erratum to: Clim Dyn DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3359-1

In the original publication of the article, Fig. 9 was published incorrectly. The correct version of Fig. 9 is given.

Fig. 9
figure 9

CCF between SST and P (upper panel) and CCF between Tair and P (lower panel), using 10–30 day filtered time series. Red horizontal dashed lines indicate 95 % significance level (N = 4744) and vertical dashed line shows R at zero lag. +ve x-axis values shows P lags SST/Tair and −ve values shows P leads SST/Tair

The original article has been updated accordingly.