Abstract
Background
Careful examination of motor-evoked potential (MEP) findings is critical to the safety of intraoperative neuromonitoring during neurosurgery. We reviewed the intraoperative MEP findings in a pediatric patient who had undergone hemispherotomy for refractory epilepsy.
Case description
The patient was a 4-year-and-2-month-old boy with extensive right cerebral hemisphere, drug-resistant epilepsy, left upper and lower extremity paralysis, and cognitive impairment. We examined intraoperative MEP results both before and after hemispherotomy. Post-hemispherotomy and MEPs were successfully elicited through transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) but not via direct cortical stimulation on the right side. Furthermore, TES on the right side, following hemispherotomy, led to a reduction in the MEP amplification effect resulting from tetanic stimulation of the left unilateral median and tibial nerves. Conversely, we observed the effects of MEP amplification during TES on the left side after tetanic stimulation of these nerves. Postoperatively, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram examinations, confirming the anatomical and electrophysiological completeness of the dissection. Notably, the seizures disappeared, and no apparent complications were observed.
Conclusion
Collectively, our findings suggest that TES can still activate deep structures and elicit MEPs, even in cases where the corticospinal connections to the posterior limb of the internal capsule are entirely severed. Thalamo-cortical interactions may affect the MEP amplification, observed during tetanic stimulation. Injury to the corticospinal tracts of the white matter may be obscured on conventional MEP findings; however, it may be identified by MEP changes in tetanic stimulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
References
Hayashi H, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Koizumi M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y, Furuya H (2008) The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs. Anesth Analg 107:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318177082e
Sasaki R, Tamura K, Yamazaki S, Kim TK, Takatani T, Hayashi H, Motoyama Y, Nakagawa I, Park YS, Kawaguchi M, Nakase H (2023) Effects of intraoperative motor-evoked potential amplification following tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve in pediatric craniotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 31:488–495. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.1.peds22505
Chung J, Park W, Hong SH, Park JC, Ahn JS, Kwun BD, Lee SA, Kim SH, Jeon JY (2018) Intraoperative use of transcranial motor/sensory evoked potential monitoring in the clipping of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of false-positive and false-negative cases. J Neurosurg 130:936–948. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.jns17791
Burke D, Hicks RG, Stephen JP (1990) Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 425:283–299
Rothwell J, Burke D, Hicks R, Stephen J, Woodforth I, Crawford M (1994) Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation. J Physiol 481:243–250
Sasaki R, Tamura K, Kim TK, Takatani T, Nakagawa I, Park YS, Nakase H (2023) Tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve amplifies intraoperative motor evoked potential in pediatric craniotomy. World Neurosurg 174:227–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.071
Nihashi T, Naganawa S, Sato C, Kawai H, Nakamura T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Aoki I (2005) Contralateral and ipsilateral responses in primary somatosensory cortex following electrical median nerve stimulation–an fMRI study. Clin Neurophysiol 116:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.011
Hautasaari P, Saloranta H, Savić AM, Korniloff K, Kujala UM, Tarkka IM (2020) Bilateral activations in operculo-insular area show temporal dissociation after peripheral electrical stimulation in healthy adults. Eur J Neurosci 52:4604–4612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13946
Luijten SPR, Groenendijk IM, Holstege JC, De Zeeuw CI, van der Zwaag W, Blok BFM (2020) Single subject and group whole-brain fMRI mapping of male genital sensation at 7 Tesla. Sci Rep 10:2487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58966-9
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.S. designed the study, the main conceptual ideas, and the proof outline. R.S. and T.T. collected the data. R.S. and K.T. aided in interpreting the results and worked on the manuscript. I.N. supervised the project. R.S. wrote the manuscript with support from Y.P. and I.N. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
IRB approval for a case report is waived at the Nara Medical University.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this case report and accompanying images.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sasaki, R., Tamura, K., Takatani, T. et al. Intraoperative motor-evoked potential with tetanic stimulation changes pre- and post-hemispherotomy. Childs Nerv Syst 40, 563–567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06170-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06170-1