Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative motor-evoked potential with tetanic stimulation changes pre- and post-hemispherotomy

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Careful examination of motor-evoked potential (MEP) findings is critical to the safety of intraoperative neuromonitoring during neurosurgery. We reviewed the intraoperative MEP findings in a pediatric patient who had undergone hemispherotomy for refractory epilepsy.

Case description

The patient was a 4-year-and-2-month-old boy with extensive right cerebral hemisphere, drug-resistant epilepsy, left upper and lower extremity paralysis, and cognitive impairment. We examined intraoperative MEP results both before and after hemispherotomy. Post-hemispherotomy and MEPs were successfully elicited through transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) but not via direct cortical stimulation on the right side. Furthermore, TES on the right side, following hemispherotomy, led to a reduction in the MEP amplification effect resulting from tetanic stimulation of the left unilateral median and tibial nerves. Conversely, we observed the effects of MEP amplification during TES on the left side after tetanic stimulation of these nerves. Postoperatively, the patient underwent magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalogram examinations, confirming the anatomical and electrophysiological completeness of the dissection. Notably, the seizures disappeared, and no apparent complications were observed.

Conclusion

Collectively, our findings suggest that TES can still activate deep structures and elicit MEPs, even in cases where the corticospinal connections to the posterior limb of the internal capsule are entirely severed. Thalamo-cortical interactions may affect the MEP amplification, observed during tetanic stimulation. Injury to the corticospinal tracts of the white matter may be obscured on conventional MEP findings; however, it may be identified by MEP changes in tetanic stimulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Hayashi H, Kawaguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Inoue S, Koizumi M, Ueda Y, Takakura Y, Furuya H (2008) The application of tetanic stimulation of the unilateral tibial nerve before transcranial stimulation can augment the amplitudes of myogenic motor-evoked potentials from the muscles in the bilateral upper and lower limbs. Anesth Analg 107:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318177082e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sasaki R, Tamura K, Yamazaki S, Kim TK, Takatani T, Hayashi H, Motoyama Y, Nakagawa I, Park YS, Kawaguchi M, Nakase H (2023) Effects of intraoperative motor-evoked potential amplification following tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve in pediatric craniotomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 31:488–495. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.1.peds22505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chung J, Park W, Hong SH, Park JC, Ahn JS, Kwun BD, Lee SA, Kim SH, Jeon JY (2018) Intraoperative use of transcranial motor/sensory evoked potential monitoring in the clipping of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of false-positive and false-negative cases. J Neurosurg 130:936–948. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.jns17791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burke D, Hicks RG, Stephen JP (1990) Corticospinal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol 425:283–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothwell J, Burke D, Hicks R, Stephen J, Woodforth I, Crawford M (1994) Transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex in man: further evidence for the site of activation. J Physiol 481:243–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasaki R, Tamura K, Kim TK, Takatani T, Nakagawa I, Park YS, Nakase H (2023) Tetanic stimulation of the pudendal nerve amplifies intraoperative motor evoked potential in pediatric craniotomy. World Neurosurg 174:227–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nihashi T, Naganawa S, Sato C, Kawai H, Nakamura T, Fukatsu H, Ishigaki T, Aoki I (2005) Contralateral and ipsilateral responses in primary somatosensory cortex following electrical median nerve stimulation–an fMRI study. Clin Neurophysiol 116:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hautasaari P, Saloranta H, Savić AM, Korniloff K, Kujala UM, Tarkka IM (2020) Bilateral activations in operculo-insular area show temporal dissociation after peripheral electrical stimulation in healthy adults. Eur J Neurosci 52:4604–4612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luijten SPR, Groenendijk IM, Holstege JC, De Zeeuw CI, van der Zwaag W, Blok BFM (2020) Single subject and group whole-brain fMRI mapping of male genital sensation at 7 Tesla. Sci Rep 10:2487. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58966-9

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.S. designed the study, the main conceptual ideas, and the proof outline. R.S. and T.T. collected the data. R.S. and K.T. aided in interpreting the results and worked on the manuscript. I.N. supervised the project. R.S. wrote the manuscript with support from Y.P. and I.N. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryota Sasaki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

IRB approval for a case report is waived at the Nara Medical University.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s parents for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 72 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasaki, R., Tamura, K., Takatani, T. et al. Intraoperative motor-evoked potential with tetanic stimulation changes pre- and post-hemispherotomy. Childs Nerv Syst 40, 563–567 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06170-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-023-06170-1

Keywords

Navigation