Skip to main content

Neurosurgical experience of managing optic pathway gliomas

Abstract

Background

Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs), also known as visual pathway gliomas, are debilitating tumors that account for 3–5% of all pediatric brain tumors. They are most commonly WHO grade 1 pilocytic astrocytomas and frequently occur in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. The location of these tumors results in visual loss and blindness, endocrine and hypothalamic dysfunction, hydrocephalus, and premature death. Their involvement of the visual pathways and proximity to other eloquent brain structures typically precludes complete resection or optimal radiation dosing without incurring significant neurological injury. There are various surgical interventions that can be performed in relation to these lesions including biopsy, cerebrospinal fluid diversion, and partial or radical resection, but their role is a source of debate. This study catalogues our surgical experience and patient outcomes in order to support decision-making in this challenging pathology.

Methods

A retrospective review of all cases of OPGs treated in a single center from July 1990 to July 2020. Data was collected on patient demographics, radiographic findings, pathology, and management including surgical interventions. Outcome data included survival, visual function, endocrine, and hypothalamic dysfunction.

Results

One hundred twenty-one patients with OPG were identified, and 50 of these patients underwent a total of 104 surgical procedures. These included biopsy (31), subtotal or gross total resection (20 operations in 17 patients), cyst drainage (17), Ommaya reservoir insertion (9), or cerebrospinal fluid diversion (27). During the study period, there was 6% overall mortality, 18% hypothalamic dysfunction, 20% endocrine dysfunction, and 42% had some cognitive dysfunction. At diagnosis 75% of patients had good or moderate visual function in at least one eye, and overall, this improved to 83% at the end of the study period. In comparison the worst eye had good or moderate visual function in 56%, and this reduced to 53%. Baseline and final visual function were poorer in patients who had a surgical resection, but improvements in vision were still found—particularly in the best eye.

Discussion/conclusion

OPG are debilitating childhood tumor that have lifelong consequences in terms of visual function and endocrinopathies/hypothalamic dysfunction; this can result in substantial patient morbidity. Decisions regarding management and the role of surgery in this condition are challenging and include cerebrospinal fluid diversion, biopsy, and in highly select cases cystic decompression or surgical resection. In this paper, we review our own experience, outcomes, and surgical philosophy.

Introduction

Optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) are debilitating tumors that account for 3–5% of all pediatric brain tumors. Histologically they are frequently the World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1 juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas (JPA), with a smaller proportion being pilomyxoid astrocytomas (PXA) [1, 2]. They are common in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), with up to 20% of these patients developing an OPG at a mean age of 4.5–5 years old [3]. The implicated genetic culprit is typically related to aberrations in the RAS/Raf/MAPK pathway such as loss of NF1 product (neurofibromin)-related suppression of RAS, B-Raf activation by the KIAA1549-BRAF fusion product, or less commonly as a function of BRAF-V600E point mutation [3,4,5,6]. Such mutations are unusual among gliomas in that they are sufficient to induce tumorigenesis in isolation [7].

OPGs can occur anywhere along the optic pathway but most commonly arise at the chiasmatic-hypothalamic region [8]. The location of these tumors means that up to half may present initially with visual dysfunction or progress to blindness. Also common are endocrine and hypothalamic dysfunction and hydrocephalus. Many of the sequelae of OPG are lifelong and can result in substantial patient morbidity [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Prognostication is unreliable, but the female sex, a location posterior to the optic chiasm, and presentation at an early (<2 years) or late age (>10 years) seem to have more aggressive trajectories, while association with NF 1 is generally considered a favorable prognostic marker [16,17,18]. The effect of an OPG on overall survival is variable, and tumor stabilization, progression, or regression can all occur unpredictably. Key aspects of their behavior including their natural history are incompletely understood [19].

The complexity of symptomatology and the close relationship to key structures make the treatment of OPG highly challenging. Their involvement of the visual pathways and proximity to other eloquent brain structures typically precludes complete resection or optimal radiation dosing without incurring significant neurological injury. Therefore, OPG management is necessarily highly individualized. Many patients undergo a period of observation with serial imaging unless there is progressive tumor growth or visual symptoms. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical intervention are all options. Decision-making is multidisciplinary as standard and may involve neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, radiation oncologists, endocrinologists, ophthalmologists, pathologists, neuropsychology, pediatricians, geneticists, and a host of allied health professionals. This multifaceted care underlines the complexity of the disease. Chemotherapy with a “Packer” regimen of carboplatin and vincristine is often the first line, although alternatives such as single agent vinblastine, TPCV (thioguanine, procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine), and bevacizumab containing regimens may be used [20, 21]. Radiotherapy is typically avoided where possible in younger children and due to risks of toxicity, but it is an option in the setting of refractory disease with progressive visual loss occurring despite systemic therapy [22,23,24]. More recently clinical trials of oral targeted small molecule MAPK inhibitors such as dabrafenib and selumetinib have shown preliminary activity in pediatric low-grade glioma, and randomized upfront studies of these novel therapies versus standard chemotherapy are ongoing or planned [25, 26].

The perceived role of surgery in OPGs has varied over time, and across published series and consensus remains elusive. The are several potential surgical interventions that can be performed in relation to these lesions including biopsy, cerebrospinal fluid diversion, cyst drainage, and partial or complete resection. However, their role continues to be a source of debate and controversy [27, 28]. This study aims to catalogue our surgical experience and patient outcomes in OPGs to help support decision.

Methods

A retrospective review of all OPGs treated between July 1990 and July 2020 at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) was carried out. GOSH is a dedicated pediatric tertiary center in London, UK. Electronic patient records and case notes were reviewed, and data was collected on demographics including age at presentation, gender, ethnicity, presenting features, radiographic and histological findings, NF1 status, and interventions including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. Outcome data was collated on survival, visual function, endocrine, and hypothalamic dysfunction. As this was a retrospective observational study, there was no a priori specified treatment strategy.

Results

One hundred twenty-two patients with OPG were identified over a 30-year period (July 1990 to July 2020) at GOSH. Fifty-one of these patients had undergone at least one related surgical intervention with 10 of these being resections.

The summary demographics of these patients are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Summary demographic details

Details regarding treatments including surgery are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Summary treatment details

Details regarding outcomes are presented in Table 3

Table 3 Summary outcome details

Details regarding visual outcomes are presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Summary of baseline and repeat visual outcomes classified by treatment group (resective surgery, non-resective surgery, or no surgery) and stratified by the eye with best and worst vision. The initial baseline visual assessment refers to the earliest on record, and the repeat the most recent on record

The details of the 17 resection surgeries undertaken are presented in Table 4.

Table 4 Details of patients who underwent resection surgery

An example of pre- and post-operative imaging following a subtotal resection of a grade I pilocytic optic pathway astrocytoma is presented in Fig. 2. In this case, the OPG was involving the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk, and encasing the internal carotid arteries. Therefore, a conservative debulking of the frontal component was undertaken in order to minimize post-operative deficits. The patient also had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt inserted for obstructive hydrocephalus and was treated with several courses of chemotherapy.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Examples of pre- and post-operative imaging following subtotal surgical resection. Pre- and post-operative images of two patients (patient A and patient B) showing subtotal resection of an optic pathway glioma demonstrating conservative resection at the anterior skull base, and along the floor and posterior walls of the third ventricle where the hypothalamus is often indistinguishable from the tumor. Patient A also demonstrates drainage of a periventricular tumor cyst

Discussion

OPG is a complex and challenging disease. Although general consensus statements exist, there remains uncertainty around the optimal surgical strategy. The long-term efficacy of various treatments for newly diagnosed OPGs is also largely unknown. The timing and nature of the surgical approaches to OPGs have not been subjected to rigorous trial data, and ongoing studies are mainly focused on pharmaceutical interventions in recurrent/refractory disease, and to a lesser extent on diagnostics and assessment of social functioning [29]. Surgical options are broad and include biopsy, partial/subtotal resection, and radical resection, in addition to cerebrospinal fluid diversion for associated hydrocephalus [13]. Unlike pilocytic astrocytomas in non-eloquent locations, complete resection is rarely feasible due to the diffuse infiltrating nature of OPG and the proximity and involvement of eloquent brain structures. Due to the unpredictability of their behavior, and reported stability of a high proportion of OPGs, initial surveillance is often employed as an initial approach if there is no evidence of cerebrospinal fluid obstruction or visual deficit [28]. Most contemporaneous reports focus on the role of observation, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy with less focus on surgery. Published guidelines tend to recommend reservation of surgery for carefully selected cases where biopsy or debulking can be achieved with limited patient risk. It is important when deciding on therapeutic options to remain cognizant that these young patients often face a lifetime of morbidity relating to visual dysfunction, endocrinopathy, or any complications of treatment and that this can have long-term psychosocial consequences [30]. A summary of previously published guideline recommendations relating to surgical management of OPGs are presented in Table 5.

Table 5 Key published guidelines relating to surgical management of optic pathway glioma

Unfortunately, a proportion of OPGs will grow, even with maximal chemo-radiotherapeutic treatment. As such, it is suggested that some OPGs may benefit from surgery although the exact timing and role is not universally accepted. Some view surgery as having no place in treatment, and others take a more interventional aggressive stance advocating it as up-front chemotherapy sparing or as rescue therapy. Perhaps unsurprisingly given the inherent challenges of surgical trials in a rare childhood condition, prospective comparative clinical trials that directly explore the effects of surgery, and how it is optimally delivered, are lacking. A number of articles have been written on the subject, and key references are summarized in Table 6.

Table 6 Key publications of surgical management of optic pathway glioma

In terms of our surgical experience, we performed a total of 104 operations on 50 individuals during the study period. Many patients underwent several procedures. Our surgical strategy is summarized below, subclassified by operation type.

Biopsy

Thirty-one biopsies were undertaken in a total of 30 patients, and 4 of these went on to have resective surgery later. While some centers advocate biopsy for all suspected OPGs, in our unit a biopsy is generally reserved for NF1 negative cases with radiologically uncertain pathology where the information may guide treatment decisions, particularly in terms of chemotherapy regimen choice. OPG is not a single disease and can include several distinct tumor subtypes as evidenced by our data on histological diagnosis (Table 1). In most cases, we favor stereotactic biopsy for these deep-seated lesions, particularly expansile Dodge 2 or 3 tumors. In purely intraconal tumors, biopsy under direct vision is more appropriate.

Our unit treats children with OPG as per the Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (CCLG) pediatric low-grade glioma guidelines where standard first-line chemotherapy choice is typically carboplatin and vincristine (Packer regimen), vinblastine is second line, and bevacizumab and irinotecan are third line. This protocol was followed in all biopsy cases except one that was treated with temozolomide on the basis of high-grade glioma features and two patients with adverse reactions to carboplatin. Chemotherapeutic agent rechallenges were considered on an individual basis. Fourth line and subsequent treatments were more variable and included vinorelbine or TPCV combination treatment.

The rate of biopsies in our series has increased in recent years largely due to the availability of targeted inhibitors and emerging evidence of their efficacy in controlling these tumors [29]. The choice of molecular inhibitor, e.g., BRAF, MEK or FGFR depends on the underlying biology, and so biopsy is essential prior to commencing such specific agents in non-NF1 associated pediatric low-grade glioma. In this series, molecular testing permitted small molecule agents (dabrafenib and/or trametinib) to be used in 10 patients, all of whom had relapsed or progressive disease and had already received at least first line standard of care chemotherapy. Future trials, such as the LOGGIC study (low-grade glioma in children) run by the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE), are planned that will compare upfront standard chemotherapy to targeted molecular therapy with trametinib.

Resection—subtotal and gross total

The details of resected cases are presented in Table 4. A total of 17 patients had at least one resection, and gross total resection was achieved in 4 patients. This is the most controversial aspect of OPG management with strong proponents of both conservative and aggressive surgical approaches remaining. The consensus is currently shifted towards more conservative approaches because of the recognition of the significant harm that can be encountered in these cases, particularly by surgically exacerbated endocrine, visual, or hypothalamic dysfunction. OPGs are often diffusely infiltrative lesions, and the lack of clear margins makes complete resection challenging even when function can be preserved. Surgical experience is important when tackling this rare pathology. We propose that indications still exist for a more aggressive attempt at subtotal or gross total resection. In our experience, this is mainly indicated for lesions that are spatially divorced from the hypothalamic region, already associated with significant visual dysfunction, and show an aggressive local growth pattern with resulting mass effect. Classically this is the case when a single optic nerve is involved and causing progressive disfiguring proptosis or blindness. An alternative scenario is when mass effect is causing obstructive hydrocephalus and resection would potentially allow restoration of cerebrospinal fluid flow and avoidance of a shunt. In other scenarios, or less acute presentations, we generally prefer to defer surgery in these cases as long as clinically tolerated, and chemotherapy remains our first line in the majority of cases. Continued radiological or symptomatic progression despite multiple courses or lines of chemotherapy or biological therapy are also indications for resection surgery. It has previously been reported that decompression of the chiasm and the less involved optic nerve during tumor resection may improve vision in the less affected eye [8]. Our results support this position. Although total numbers were small, we did not find any difference in rates of cognitive dysfunction in the operated (including targeted resection) versus conservatively managed groups (77% v 83%). Rates of normal endocrine function were lower in patients who underwent resection (65%) versus those who underwent non-resective surgery (88%) or no surgery (80%). Unfortunately, it is not possible to determine causality and timing from our data (Table 3). Recurrence was defined as tumor regrowth following treatment. This occurred in 82% of resected cases and 23% of those who did not have surgery—likely reflecting the aggressive nature and prior failure of chemotherapeutic control of the cases on whom we operated.

The threshold for surgery in OPGs associated with a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 should be set highly. These patients tend to have diffuse disease and poorer response to surgery; furthermore, their disease can spontaneously stabilize at an older age in some cases [1]. In our series, only one patient undergoing resection had a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1. In cases of chemotherapy failure, then the choice between radiotherapy and surgery should be made in a multidisciplinary setting. It is important to recognize that there may be technical challenges of surgery undertaken after radiotherapy and wound healing may be impaired [43]. Cautious surgery is also often required in the context of hemorrhagic OPGs. Although rare this has been well-described [44]. Acute hemorrhage within OPGs can lead to a rapid deterioration in neurological condition, with acute hydrocephalus, hypothalamic failure, and dystonia. Depending on their clinical condition, urgent CSF diversion, followed by cautious tumor mass reduction, evacuation of the hematoma, and chemotherapy has in our experience led to a satisfactory long-term outcome.

Cyst drainage

This category includes both microscopic and endoscopic drainage of tumor cysts. The association of cysts with OPGs is an important aspect of their macroscopic pathology due to the potential for rapid volumetric changes and the option of cystic drainage/decompression. We performed 17 cyst drainages. Seven of these were primary procedures, and 10 were second- or third-line procedures. Management of cysts is challenging as they can be rapidly dynamic and often resistant to chemotherapy, and radiotherapy may also exacerbate cystic growth in some cases. Specific therapies to reduce cyst formation are required [45].

Ommaya reservoir insertion

It is our experience that in the case of cysts causing mass effect, a single drainage episode may not be sufficient and substantial relief can be afforded by Ommaya insertion with repeated aspirations as necessary. The highly proteinaceous nature of the fluid in most of these cysts often limits the long-term effectiveness of this strategy. We inserted an Ommaya reservoir on 4 occasions in this series.

Cerebrospinal fluid diversion

The association of OPG with hydrocephalus is well recognized. As previously discussed, some cases can be managed by tumor debulking or medical management to restore CSF flow. If this is unsuccessful, or if the hydrocephalus is acute, or if other surgery is deemed unfavorable, then direct CSF diversion may be required. In our series this required ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion on 22 occasions. In a single case, an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was performed.

As this was a retrospective observational study, there was no pre-specified treatment strategy for our patients. Our approach is one of pragmatic avoidance of harm and can be summarized as follows:

  1. 1.

    Optic pathway glioma is a complex pathology and patient treatment is individually tailored. Where possible decisions should be made with expert multidisciplinary consensus. Treatment decisions should consider age, neurofibromatosis status, tumor location, visual, endocrine and cognitive function, previous therapy, and patient wishes.

  2. 2.

    If there is acute symptomatic hydrocephalus, then this requires surgical intervention. Debulking surgery may restore flow in some cases; otherwise, placement of a VP shunt will be appropriate in most cases. In more indolent cases, then a trial of chemotherapy may be appropriate with suitably close monitoring for response or progression of hydrocephalus.

  3. 3.

    Until recently a radiological diagnosis was sufficient in most cases and remains the case on the background of NF1. However, with the advent of biologically targeted therapies or if there is any diagnostic uncertainty, biopsy in OPG if it can be performed safely should be considered, and then a stereotactic biopsy of the tumor is appropriate.

  4. 4.

    If there is mass effect from the tumor causing neurological compromise, then surgical resection should be considered, particularly if chemotherapy has failed or radiotherapy is not an option (e.g., due to young age).

  5. 5.

    The extent of resection depends on the tumor location and the existing neurological deficit. The goal is to preserve or improve neurological function, and therefore new deficits should be aggressively avoided.

  6. 6.

    Total resection is considered where this can be achieved without causing new deficits (e.g., in patients who have already lost vision) and in whom tumor is demonstrating progression despite the maximum tolerated chemoradiotherapy.

  7. 7.

    In selected cases where a cyst is causing mass effect, then placement of an Ommaya reservoir for drainage may be appropriate.

There are many important questions that remain to be answered with regards OPG. These include those listed in Table 7.

Table 7 Remaining questions in the surgical management of optic pathway glioma

Answering these questions in the context of a rare heterogeneous pathology is highly challenging and is likely to require a coordinated multicenter approach with comprehensive prospective recording of common data elements.

Study limitations

The main limitation in this study, as with most in OPGs, is the inherent heterogeneity of the condition. OPGs constitute a range of different pathological and molecular entities including NF1 status that profoundly impact the natural history of the disease and response to chemotherapy. Their location also varies widely as do the associated clinical deficits seen. As OPG is a rare disease, it is challenging to capture their full heterogeneity without diluting any series to the point of irrelevance. However, failure to recognize the inherent differences in this diversity will mask subgroup effects. The data presented here is retrospective and represents the experience of a single center over a long time period and with multiple surgeons. This introduces variability into the practice that limits direct correlation of interventions with outcomes. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, our report lacks detailed cognitive function assessment and quality of life measures. We present our personal experience but counsel caution in extrapolating data to the activity of other units with different populations or clinical service organization. The management of OPGs requires individualized treatment plans made in a multidisciplinary fashion with the patient and their family at the core of the process.

Conclusion

OPGs are a debilitating childhood tumor that causes substantial suffering. As our understanding of this disease is incomplete, and there is often a chronic history with high treatment burden and impaired functional outcomes, we need to develop better evidence based management strategies [1, 46]. Here we present our experience in managing surgical aspects of this challenging and heterogeneous disease.

Abbreviations

CCLG:

Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group

ETV:

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

GOSH:

Great Ormond Street Hospital

JPA :

Juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas

LOGGIC:

Low-grade glioma in children study

NF1:

Neurofibromatosis type 1

OPG:

Optic pathway glioma

PXA:

Pilomyxoid astrocytomas

SIOPE :

European Society for Paediatric Oncology

TPCV :

Thioguanine, procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine

VPS:

Ventriculoperitoneal shunt

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Binning MJ, Liu JK, Kestle JRW, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML (2007) Optic pathway gliomas: a review. Neurosurg Focus 23:E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Helfferich J, Nijmeijer R, Brouwer OF et al (2016) Neurofibromatosis type 1 associated low grade gliomas: a comparison with sporadic low grade gliomas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 104:30–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Horbinski C (2013) To BRAF or not to BRAF: is that even a question anymore. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 72:2–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacob K, Albrecht S, Sollier C, Faury D, Sader E, Montpetit A, Serre D, Hauser P, Garami M, Bognar L, Hanzely Z, Montes JL, Atkinson J, Farmer JP, Bouffet E, Hawkins C, Tabori U, Jabado N (2009) Duplication of 7q34 is specific to juvenile pilocytic astrocytomas and a hallmark of cerebellar and optic pathway tumours. Br J Cancer 101:722–733

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibney GT, Smalley KSM (2013) An unholy alliance: cooperation between BRAF and NF1 in melanoma development and BRAF inhibitor resistance. Cancer Discov 3:260–263

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim KY, Ju WK, Hegedus B, Gutmann DH, Ellisman MH (2010) Ultrastructural characterization of the optic pathway in a mouse model of neurofibromatosis-1 optic glioma. Neuroscience. 170:178–188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aquilina K, Daniels DJ, Spoudeas H, Phipps K, Gan HW, Boop FA (2015) Optic pathway glioma in children: does visual deficit correlate with radiology in focal exophytic lesions. Childs Nerv Syst 31:2041–2049

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rasool N, Odel JG, Kazim M (2017) Optic pathway glioma of childhood. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28:289–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grill J, Laithier V, Rodriguez D et al (2000) When do children with optic pathway tumours need treatment? An oncological perspective in 106 patients treated in a single centre. Eur J Pediatr 159:692–696

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gan H-W, Phipps K, Aquilina K, Gaze MN, Hayward R, Spoudeas HA (2015) Neuroendocrine morbidity after pediatric optic gliomas: a longitudinal analysis of 166 children over 30 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:3787–3799

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert-Boire V, Rosca L, Samson Y, Ospina LH, Perreault S (2017) Clinical presentation and outcome of patients with optic pathway glioma. Pediatr Neurol 75:55–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidalgo ET, Kvint S, Orillac C et al (2019) Long-term clinical and visual outcomes after surgical resection of pediatric pilocytic/pilomyxoid optic pathway gliomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taddei M, Erbetta A, Esposito S et al (2019) Brain tumors in NF1 children: influence on neurocognitive and behavioral outcome. Cancers (Basel) 11:1172

    Google Scholar 

  15. Papini C, Dineen RA, Walker DA et al (2020) Neuropsychological outcomes of children with optic pathway glioma. Sci Rep 10:3344

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Campen CJ, Gutmann DH (2018) Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1. J Child Neurol 33:73–81

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dodgshun AJ, Elder JE, Hansford JR, Sullivan MJ (2015) Long-term visual outcome after chemotherapy for optic pathway glioma in children: site and age are strongly predictive. Cancer. 121:4190–4196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Falzon K, Drimtzias E, Picton S, Simmons I (2018) Visual outcomes after chemotherapy for optic pathway glioma in children with and without neurofibromatosis type 1: results of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) Low-Grade Glioma 2004 trial UK cohort. Br J Ophthalmol 102:1367–1371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Listernick R, Louis DN, Packer RJ, Gutmann DH (1997) Optic pathway gliomas in children with neurofibromatosis 1: consensus statement from the NF1 Optic Pathway Glioma Task Force. Ann Neurol 41:143–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sutton LN, Molloy PT, Sernyak H, Goldwein J, Phillips PL, Rorke LB, Moshang T, Lange B, Packer RJ (1995) Long-term outcome of hypothalamic/chiasmatic astrocytomas in children treated with conservative surgery. J Neurosurg 83:583–589

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas RP, Gibbs IC, Xu LW et al (2015) Treatment options for optic pathway gliomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17:333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Awdeh RM, Kiehna EN, Drewry RD, Kerr NC, Haik BG, Wu S, Xiong X, Merchant TE (2012) Visual outcomes in pediatric optic pathway glioma after conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:46–51

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsang DS, Murphy ES, Merchant TE (2017) Radiation therapy for optic pathway and hypothalamic low-grade gliomas in children. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 99:642–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Calixto NC, Simão GN, Dos Santos AC et al (2019) Monitoring optic chiasmatic-hypothalamic glioma volumetric changes by MRI in children under clinical surveillance or chemotherapy. Childs Nerv Syst 35:63–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hargrave DR, Bouffet E, Tabori U, Broniscer A, Cohen KJ, Hansford JR, Geoerger B, Hingorani P, Dunkel IJ, Russo MW, Tseng L, Dasgupta K, Gasal E, Whitlock JA, Kieran MW (2019) Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib in pediatric patients with BRAF V600 mutation–positive relapsed or refractory low-grade glioma: results from a phase I/IIa study. Clin Cancer Res 25:7303–7311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fangusaro J, Onar-Thomas A, Poussaint TY et al (2019) Selumetinib in paediatric patients with BRAF-aberrant or neurofibromatosis type 1-associated recurrent, refractory, or progressive low-grade glioma: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:1011–1022

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sawamura Y, Kamada K, Kamoshima Y, Yamaguchi S, Tajima T, Tsubaki J, Fujimaki T (2008) Role of surgery for optic pathway/hypothalamic astrocytomas in children. Neuro-Oncology 10:725–733

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodden J, Pizer B, Pettorini B, Williams D, Blair J, Didi M, Thorp N, Mallucci C (2014) The role of surgery in optic pathway/hypothalamic gliomas in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hill CS, Devesa SC, Ince W, Borg A, Aquilina K (2020) A systematic review of ongoing clinical trials in optic pathway gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 36:1869–1886

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. de Blank PMK, Fisher MJ, Lu L, Leisenring WM, Ness KK, Sklar CA, Stovall M, Vukadinovich C, Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Krull KR (2016) Impact of vision loss among survivors of childhood central nervous system astroglial tumors. Cancer. 122:730–739

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Brain tumours (primary) and brain metastases in adults (NG99). 2018

  32. Hessissen L, Parkes J, Amayiri N et al. (2017) SIOP PODC Adapted treatment guidelines for low grade gliomas in low and middle income settings. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 64 Suppl 5

  33. Society of British Neuro-Oncology. Rare Brain and CNS Tumours Guidelines in collaboration with the National Cancer Action Team: Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Optic Pathway Glioma (OPG). 2011

  34. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Improving Outcomes for People with Brain and Other CNS Tumours: The Manual. 2006

  35. Listernick R, Ferner RE, Liu GT, Gutmann DH (2007) Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis-1: controversies and recommendations. Ann Neurol 61:189–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bin Abdulqader S, Al-Ajlan Z, Albakr A et al (2019) Endoscopic transnasal resection of optic pathway pilocytic astrocytoma. Childs Nerv Syst 35:73–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu Y, Hao X, Liu W, Li C, Gong J, Ma Z, Tian Y (2018) Analysis of survival prognosis for children with symptomatic optic pathway gliomas who received surgery. World Neurosurg 109:e1–e15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. El Beltagy MA, Reda M, Enayet A et al (2016) Treatment and outcome in 65 children with optic pathway gliomas. World Neurosurg 89:525–534

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Millward CP (2015) Perez Da Rosa S, Avula S et al. The role of early intra-operative MRI in partial resection of optic pathway/hypothalamic gliomas in children. Childs Nerv Syst 31:2055–2062

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Leonard JR, Perry A, Rubin JB, King AA, Chicoine MR, Gutmann DH (2006) The role of surgical biopsy in the diagnosis of glioma in individuals with neurofibromatosis-1. Neurology. 67:1509–1512

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Khafaga Y, Hassounah M, Kandil A, Kanaan I, Allam A, el Husseiny G, Kofide A, Belal A, al Shabanah M, Schultz H, Jenkin D (2003) Optic gliomas: a retrospective analysis of 50 cases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56:807–812

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tenny RT, Laws ER, Younge BR, Rush JA (1982) The neurosurgical management of optic glioma. Results in 104 patients. J Neurosurg 57:452–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tibbs MK (1997) Wound healing following radiation therapy: a review. Radiother Oncol 42:99–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. van Baarsen K, Roth J, Serova N, Packer RJ, Shofty B, Thomale UW, Cinalli G, Toledano H, Michowiz S, Constantini S (2018) Optic pathway–hypothalamic glioma hemorrhage: a series of 9 patients and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 129:1407–1415

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Levenbaum E, Ellika S, Korones DN (2019) Bevacizumab in treating the cystic components of pediatric low-grade gliomas: a report of four patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66:e27917

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chan M-Y, Foong AP, Heisey DM, Harkness W, Hayward R, Michalski A (1998) Potential prognostic factors of relapse-free survival in childhood optic pathway glioma: a multivariate analysis. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:23–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ciaran S. Hill is supported by a National Institute for Health Research Academic Clinical Lectureship, an Academy of Medical Science Grant, and a Cancer Research UK Pioneer Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciaran Scott Hill.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, C.S., Khan, M., Phipps, K. et al. Neurosurgical experience of managing optic pathway gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 37, 1917–1929 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05060-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-021-05060-8

Keywords

  • Optic
  • Visual
  • Pathway
  • Glioma
  • Management