Opinion statement
Gliomas that affect the optic pathways are for the most part low-grade neoplasms that often, but not always, have good prognoses. Optimal treatment and management of optic pathway gliomas remains unclear and the decision hinges upon several factors including patient age, tumor location, and visual symptoms. We favor a treatment approach that is dependent on the location of tumor within anterior, chiasmal or posterior/hypothalamic visual pathways. In children who are minimally or not symptomatic, we recommend observation rather than early treatment intervention. Most of these patients will have neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) based on the natural history and their pilocytic astrocytoma histology. Serial magnetic resonance imaging studies and formal neuro-ophthalmology testing should enable close observation of these patients, with intervention being reserved for when tumor progression results in significant visual loss or proptosis. Chemotherapy is an accepted first line treatment, and a number of effective medications are available, although no agent has proven clearly superior. If progression is accompanied by the complete loss of vision, surgery can be utilized to help alleviate structural issues (ie, proptosis). Minimally symptomatic chiasmal or hypothalamic tumors that arise in the setting of NF1 can also be observed initially because of their favorable prognosis. Children with NF1 and chiasmal or posterior visual tumors who progress either on imaging or clinical grounds (ie, development of significant visual deficits) should be treated first with chemotherapy rather than radiation therapy to minimize the effects on the developing central nervous system. Individuals without NF1 presenting with a chiasmal or hypothalamic mass are candidates for biopsy to determine the underlying pathology of the lesion. Symptomatic patients with pilocytic astrocytoma should first receive chemotherapy. In contrast, other histologies including malignant optic pathway gliomas should be treated similar to other gliomas that occur in other locations with appropriate doses of radiation and chemotherapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Shapey J, Danesh-Meyer HV, Kaye AH. Diagnosis and management of optic nerve glioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2011;18(12):1585–91. Description of clinical history and current treatments for optic nerve gliomas.
Binning MJ, Liu JK, Kestle JR, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML. Optic pathway gliomas: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;23(5):E2.
Listernick R, Ferner RE, Liu GT, Gutmann DH. Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis-1: controversies and recommendations. Ann Neurol. 2007;61(3):189–98.
Boyd KP, Korf BR, Theos A. Neurofibromatosis type 1. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;6((1):1–14. quiz 15‒16.
Cirak B. Optic nerve glioma. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(2 Suppl):246. author reply 246.
Dewandel P, Demaerel P. Optic nerve glioma. JBR-BTR. 2001;84(2):61.
Gutmann DH, Listernick R, Ferner RE. Screening for symptomatic optic pathway glioma in children with neurofibromatosis type 1. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(6):818. author reply 818‒9.
Liu GT. Optic gliomas of the anterior visual pathway. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17(5):427–31.
Jahraus CD, Tarbell NJ. Optic pathway gliomas. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(5):586–96.
Lynch TM, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis 1. Neurol Clin. 2002;20(3):841–65.
Opocher E, Kremer LC, Da Dalt L, et al. Prognostic factors for progression of childhood optic pathway glioma: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(12):1807–16.
Diaz RJ, Laughlin S, Nicolin G, Buncic JR, Bouffet E, Bartels U. Assessment of chemotherapeutic response in children with proptosis due to optic nerve glioma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2008;24(6):707–12.
Balcer LJ, Liu GT, Heller G, et al. Visual loss in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 and optic pathway gliomas: relation to tumor location by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131(4):442–5.
Kelly JP, Leary S, Khanna P, Weiss AH. Longitudinal measures of visual function, tumor volume, and prediction of visual outcomes after treatment of optic pathway gliomas. Ophthalmology. 2012;119(6):1231–7.
Campagna M, Opocher E, Viscardi E, et al. Optic pathway glioma: long-term visual outcome in children without neurofibromatosis type-1. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55(6):1083–8.
Stafford P, Abdelwahab MG, do Kim Y, Preul MC, Rho JM, Scheck AC. The ketogenic diet reverses gene expression patterns and reduces reactive oxygen species levels when used as an adjuvant therapy for glioma. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010;10(7):74.
Rieger J, Bahr O, Maurer GD, Hattingen E, Franz K, Brucker D, et al. ERGO: a pilot study of ketogenic diet in recurrent glioblastoma. Int J Oncol. 2014;44(6):1843–52.
Gururangan S, Fisher MJ, Allen JC, Herndon II JE, Quinn JA, Reardon DA, et al. Temozolomide in children with progressive low-grade glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2007;9(2):161–8.
Laithier V, Grill J, Le Deley MC, Ruchoux MM, Couanet D, Doz F, et al. French Society of Pediatric Oncology. Progression-free survival in children with optic pathway tumors: dependence on age and quality of the response to chemotherapy –results of the first French prospective study for the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(24):4572–8.
Gutmann DH, Avery R, Ferner RE, Listernick R. Visual function and optic pathway glioma: a critical response. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(1):120–1.
Fard MA, Fakhree S, Eshraghi B. Correlation of optical coherence tomography parameters with clinical and radiological progression in patients with symptomatic optic pathway gliomas. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(10):2429–36.
Parsa CF. Why visual function does not correlate with optic glioma size or growth. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(4):521–2.
Avery RA, Ferner RE, Listernick R, Fisher MJ, Gutmann DH, Liu GT. Visual acuity in children with low grade gliomas of the visual pathway: implications for patient care and clinical research. J Neurooncol. 2012;110(1):1–7.
Taylor T, Jaspan T, Milano G, et al. Radiological classification of optic pathway gliomas: experience of a modified functional classification system. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(970):761–6.
Awdeh RM, Kiehna EN, Drewry RD, et al. Visual outcomes in pediatric optic pathway glioma after conformal radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84(1):46–51.
Marwaha G, Macklis R, Singh AD. Radiation therapy: orbital tumors. Dev Ophthalmol. 2013;52:94–101.
Xu D, Liu D, Zhang Z, et al. Gamma Knife surgery in the management of orbital tumors. J Neurosurg. 2010;113(Suppl):34–8.
Stieber VW. Radiation therapy for visual pathway tumors. J Neuroophthalmol. 2008;28(3):222–30.
Combs SE, Schulz-Ertner D, Moschos D, Thilmann C, Huber PE, Debus J. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of optic pathway gliomas: tolerance and long-term outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:814–9.
Debus J, Kocagoncu KO, Hoss A, Wenz F, Wannenmacher M. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for optic glioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;44:243–8.
Grabenbauer GG, Schuchardt U, Buchfelder M, Rödel CM, Gusek G, Marx M, et al. Radiation therapy of optico-hypothalamic gliomas (OHG)—radiographic response, vision and late toxicity. Radiother Oncol. 2000;54:239–45.
Tao ML, Barnes PD, Billett AL, Leong T, Shrieve DC, Scott RM, et al. Childhood optic chiasm gliomas: radiographic response following radiotherapy and long-term clinical outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;39(3):579–87.
Fuss M, Hug EB, Schaefer RA, Nevinny-Stickel M, Miller DW, Slater JM, et al. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) for pediatric optic pathway gliomas: comparison with 3D planned conventional photons and a standard photon technique. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45(5):1117–26.
Han SR, Kim KN, Yee GT, Choi CY, Lee DJ, Sohn MJ, et al. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using Novalis for confined intra-orbital optic nerve glioma in pediatric patient. Childs Nerv Syst. 2013;29(5):867–71.
Avery RA, Hwang EI, Jakacki RI, Packer RJ. Marked recovery of vision in children with optic pathway gliomas treated with bevacizumab. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(1):111–4. Highlights the use of bevacizumab as a new treatment optic pathway gliomas.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Reena Parada Thomas, Iris C. Gibbs, Linda Wei Xu, and Lawrence Recht declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurologic Ophthalmology and Otology
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, R.P., Gibbs, I.C., Xu, L.W. et al. Treatment Options for Optic Pathway Gliomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol 17, 2 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-014-0333-2
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11940-014-0333-2