Skip to main content
Log in

Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion in multisuture craniosynostosis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with Apert and Crouzon syndromes and craniofrontonasal dysplasia need a vault expansion within the first year of life to treat or prevent the development of raised intracranial pressure. Many craniofacial units perform a conventional posterior vault expansion as initial surgery; an alternative to this technique is the spring-assisted posterior vault expansion. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of spring-assisted posterior vault expansion and to compare this technique with the conventional method.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted among all consecutive patients who received a posterior vault expansion between 2006 and 2011. Patients treated with springs were compared with patients treated with the conventional technique for blood loss, duration of surgery, postoperative hospital admittance, increase in skull circumference and anterior-posterior length, and complications.

Results

Of the 31 included patients, 15 were treated with springs, and 16, with the conventional technique. Patients treated with springs had a significantly larger increase in skull circumference and anterior-posterior length, and not significant changes in blood loss compared with the conventional group. Complications in the conventional group were the following: minor dural tear in three patients, problematic wound healing in one patient, and insufficient expansion in one patient. Spring-related complications included skin perforation in two patients, a minor dural tear in two patients, and leakage of cerebrospinal fluid after an unnoticed dural tear during spring placement in one patient.

Conclusion

Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion has some advantages over the conventional technique and is, therefore, the preferred technique in our center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson PJ, Harkness WJ, Taylor W, Jones BM, Hayward RD (1997) Anomalous venous drainage in a case of non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 13(2):97–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnaud E, Marchac A, Jeblaoui Y, Renier D, Di Rocco F (2012) Spring-assisted posterior skull expansion without osteotomies. Childs Nerv Syst 28(9):1545–1549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis C, Lauritzen CG (2009) Frontobasal suture distraction corrects hypotelorism in metopic synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 20(1):121–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis C, MacFarlane MR, Wickremesekera A (2010) Occipital expansion without osteotomies in Apert syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst 26(11):1543–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Jong T, Bannink N, Bredero-Boelhouwer HH, van Veelen ML, Bartels MC, Hoeve LJ, Hoogeboom AJ, Wolvius EB, Lequin MH, van der Meulen JJ, van Adrichem LN, Vaandrager JM, Ongkosuwito EM, Joosten KF, Mathijssen IM (2010) Long-term functional outcome in 167 patients with syndromic craniosynostosis; defining a syndrome-specific risk profile. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(10):1635–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Jong T, Rijken BF, Lequin MH, van Veelen ML, Mathijssen IM (2012) Brain and ventricular volume in patients with syndromic and complex craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 28(1):137–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lauritzen C, Sugawara Y, Kocabalkan O, Olsson R (1998) Spring mediated dynamic craniofacial reshaping. Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 32(3):331–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lauritzen CG, Davis C, Ivarsson A, Sanger C, Hewitt TD (2008) The evolving role of springs in craniofacial surgery: the first 100 clinical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(2):545–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JA, Park DH, Yoon SH, Chung J (2008) Distractor breakage in cranial distraction osteogenesis for children with craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 44(3):216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marucci DD, Dunaway DJ, Jones BM, Hayward RD (2008) Raised intracranial pressure in Apert syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(4):1162–1168, discussion 1169-1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nowinski D, Di Rocco F, Renier D, Sainterose C, Leikola J, Arnaud E (2012) Posterior cranial vault expansion in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Comparison of current techniques. Childs Nerv Syst 28(9):1537–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nowinski D, Saiepour D, Leikola J, Messo E, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2011) Posterior cranial vault expansion performed with rapid distraction and time-reduced consolidation in infants with syndromic craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 27(11):1999–2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pyle J, Glazier S, Couture D, Sanger C, Gordon S, David L (2009) Spring-assisted surgery-a surgeon’s manual for the manufacture and utilization of springs in craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg 20(6):1962–1968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riley AA, Arakawa Y, Worley S, Duncan BW, Fukamachi K (2010) Circulating blood volumes: a review of measurement techniques and a meta-analysis in children. ASAIO J 56(3):260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutland P, Pulleyn LJ, Reardon W, Baraitser M, Hayward R, Jones B, Malcolm S, Winter RM, Oldridge M, Slaney SF et al (1995) Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes. Nat Genet 9(2):173–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Serlo WS, Ylikontiola LP, Lahdesluoma N, Lappalainen OP, Korpi J, Verkasalo J, Sandor GK (2011) Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis in craniosynostosis: estimated increases in intracranial volume. Childs Nerv Syst 27(4):627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sgouros S, Goldin JH, Hockley AD, Wake MJ (1996) Posterior skull surgery in craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 12(11):727–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinbacher DM, Skirpan J, Puchala J, Bartlett SP (2011) Expansion of the posterior cranial vault using distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(2):792–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, Schierle H, Malevez C (2001) Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: part 1: clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30(2):89–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson DN, Hayward RD, Harkness WJ, Bingham RM, Jones BM (1995) Lessons from a case of kleeblattschadel. Case report. J Neurosurg 82(6):1071–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tuncbilek G, Kaykcoglu A, Bozkurt G, Akalan N (2012) Spring-mediated cranioplasty in patients with multiple-suture synostosis and cloverleaf skull deformity. J Craniofac Surg 23(2):374–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. White N, Evans M, Dover MS, Noons P, Solanki G, Nishikawa H (2009) Posterior calvarial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis. Childs Nerv Syst 25(2):231–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Nuts Ohra foundation and Stichting Hoofdzaken.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. de Jong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Jong, T., van Veelen, M.L.C. & Mathijssen, I.M.J. Spring-assisted posterior vault expansion in multisuture craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 29, 815–820 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2033-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2033-8

Keywords

Navigation