Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of leading-edge protuberances on unsteady airfoil performance at low Reynolds number

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humpback whales have higher hydrodynamic maneuverability due to the unique protuberance structures on the leading edge of their flippers. The leading-edge protuberance, therefore, is regarded as an attractive flow control method. Although some results have shown the effect of the leading-edge protuberance on a static airfoil, its effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of dynamic airfoils is still not clear. In present study, direct force measurements are conducted on dynamic NACA 0012 wings with sinusoidal leading-edge protuberances as well as a baseline configuration at a low Reynolds number of 2 × 104. Three typical motions of the wing, including pitching, plunging, and combined pitching-plunging, are employed to examine the effect of motion styles on aerodynamic characteristics of airfoils. Under the static case, it is found that leading-edge protuberances delay the stall angle of attack of airfoils by about 67%, and increase the maximum lift coefficient, which are different from previous studies of thick straight wings, such as NACA 634–021, NACA 0020, and NACA 0021. Under dynamic cases, motion styles have a significant effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of airfoils. The lift coefficient of the modified airfoil becomes larger than the baseline airfoil mainly at upstroke phases for pitching motion, downstroke phases for plunging motion, and all phases for combined pitching-plunging motion, considering positive angles of attack. Compared to the static condition, the range of angles of attack where the lift of the modified airfoil is larger than the baseline airfoil extends; however, the lift difference between both airfoils decreases. Under pitching motion, phase-locked two-dimensional particle image velocimetry is performed to investigate the mechanism behind different aerodynamic characteristics between two dynamic airfoils. It is revealed that leading-edge protuberances inhibit formation of the secondary vortex, and weaken coherency of the leading-edge vortex (LEV). The flow acceleration effect of trough planes, different evolution of the LEV and the spanwise flow on the upper surface, are the main reasons that affect the aerodynamic characteristics of the modified airfoil.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baik YS, Bernal LP, Granlund K, Ol MV (2012) Unsteady force generation and vortex dynamics of pitching and plunging aerofoils. J Fluid Mech 709:37–68

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Benaissa M, Ibrahim IH, New TH, Ho WH (2017) Effect of leading edge protuberance on thrust production of a dynamically pitching airfoil. Top Probl Fluid Mech, Prague 2017:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus JM (1997) Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg J (2012) The effect of leading edge serrations on dynamic stall. Doctor’s thesis, University of Southampton

  • Carr LW (1988) Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall. J Aircr 25(1):6–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champagnat F, Plyer A, Le Besnerais G, Leclaire B, Davoust S, Le Sant Y (2011) Fast and accurate PIV computation using highly parallel iterative correlation maximization. Exp Fluids 50(4):1169–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver D, Wang Z, Gursul I (2010) Vortex mode bifurcation and lift force of a plunging airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 2010–390

  • Custodio D, Henoch CW, Johari H (2015) Aerodynamic characteristics of finite span wings with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA J 53(7):1878–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish FE, Battle JM (1995) Hydrodynamic design of the humpback whale flipper. J Morphol 225(1):51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen KL, Kelso RM, Dally BB (2012) Performance variations of leading-edge tubercles for distinct airfoil profiles. AIAA J 49(1):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen KL, Rostamzadeh N, Kelso RM, Dally BB (2016) Evolution of the streamwise vortices generated between leading edge tubercles. J Fluid Mech 788:730–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou YF, Li ZP (2020) Effect of bionic sinusoidal leading-edge on dynamic stall of airfoil. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica 41(1):123276 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrynuk JT, Bohl DG (2020) The effects of leading-edge tubercles on dynamic stall. J Fluid Mech 893:A5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johari H, Henoch C, Custodio D, Levshin A (2007) Effects of leading-edge protuberances on airfoil performance. AIAA J 45(11):2634–2642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Gerontakos P (2004) Investigation of flow over an oscillating airfoil. J Fluid Mech 512:313–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZY, Feng LH, Kissing J, Tropea C, Wang JJ (2020) Experimental investigation on the leading-edge vortex formation and detachment mechanism of a pitching and plunging plate. J Fluid Mech 901:A17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey WJ (1982) Unsteady airfoils. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 14:285–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklosovic DS, Murray MM, Howle LE, Fish FE (2004) Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys Fluids 16(5):L39–L42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulleners K, Raffel M (2013) Dynamic stall development. Exp Fluids 54(2):1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New DTH, Ng BF (2020) Flow control through bio-inspired leading-edge tubercles. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pan C, Xue D, Xu Y, Wang JJ, Wei RJ (2015) Evaluating the accuracy performance of Lucas-Kanade algorithm in the circumstance of PIV application. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 58(10):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffel M, Willert CE, Wereley ST, Kompenhans J (2007) Particle image velocimetry. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rostamzadeh N, Hansen KL, Kelso RM, Dally BB (2014) The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil’s performance with undulating leading-edge modification. Phys Fluids 26(10):107101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter J (2009) Lift enhancement at low Reynolds numbers using pop-up feathers. AIAA Paper 2009–4195

  • Skillen A, Revell A, Pinelli A, Piomelli U, Favier J (2014) Flow over a wing with leading-edge undulations. AIAA J 53(2):464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanway MJ (2008) Hydrodynamic effects of leading-edge tubercles on control surfaces and in flapping foil propulsion. Doctor’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Wang JJ, Feng LH (2019) Flow control techniques and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Hu W, Zhang S (2014) Performance of the bio-inspired leading edge protuberances on a static wing and a pitching wing. J Hydrodyn 26(6):912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber PW, Howle LE, Murray MM, Miklosovic DS (2011) Computational evaluation of the performance of lifting surfaces with leading-edge protuberances. J Aircr 48(2):591–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Z, New TH, Cui YD (2015) An experimental study on flow separation control of hydrofoils with leading-edge tubercles at low Reynolds number. Ocean Eng 108:336–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasuda T, Fukui K, Matsuo K, Minagawa H, Kurimoto R (2019) Effect of the Reynolds number on the performance of a NACA0012 wing with leading edge protuberance at low Reynolds numbers. Flow Turbul Combust 102:435–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SD, Hu WR (2015) The numerical study of bionic wavy leading-edge wing in dynamic stall control. J Hydrodyn: A 30(1):24–32 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MM, Wang GF, Xu JZ (2013) Aerodynamic control of low-Reynolds-number airfoil with leading-edge protuberances. AIAA J 51(8):1960–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Zhang MM, Xu JZ (2017) Numerical simulation of flow characteristics behind the aerodynamic performances on an airfoil with leading edge protuberances. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 11(1):193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM (1999) Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J Fluid Mech 387:353–396

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11972063, 11721202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fluid Mechanics Key Laboratory of Education Ministry, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 100191, People’s Republic of China

    Tong Wang, Li-Hao Feng & Zhen-Yao Li

Authors
  1. Tong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Li-Hao Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhen-Yao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-Hao Feng.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, T., Feng, LH. & Li, ZY. Effect of leading-edge protuberances on unsteady airfoil performance at low Reynolds number. Exp Fluids 62, 217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03310-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-021-03310-8

Search

Navigation