Skip to main content
Log in

The particle image velocimetry of vortical electrohydrodynamic flows of oil near a high-voltage electrode tip

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dual-domain particle image velocimetry (PIV) is employed to characterize the electrohydrodynamic flows arising in an oil bath with a grounded bottom near a high-voltage pin electrode with its tip close to the bottom. The applied voltage is varied to explore its effect on the arising flow field. Spatially, PIV observations are conducted using a dual-domain approach by synchronizing two cameras on the sampling plane. One camera is focused on the electrode tip and the second one on the fluid bulk. By capturing these synchronized domains, the velocity field is explored in its entirety, demonstrating a broad scope of morphology spanning the domain with the high velocity within the inter-electrode gap to the slow eddies in the fluid bulk. At high applied voltages, a transitional regime is observed in which the flow field bifurcates into toroidal Moffatt-like eddies. The experimental technique employed has its limitations. For example, at high applied voltages, the peak velocity domain could not be adequately resolved in every trial due to the deposition of fatty acids on the electrodes. Accordingly, the peak velocity has been measured only in the trials where fatty acid build-up did not interfere. Additionally, due to the axisymmetric geometry, reflections interfere with the observations of the near-surface velocity field.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adrian RJ, Westerweel J (2011) Particle image velocimetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Akatnov NI (1953) Propagation of planar laminar fluid jet along a solid wall. Proc Leningr Polytech Inst Tech Hydromech 5:24–31 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alj A, Denat A, Gosse JP, Gosse B, Nakamura I (1985) Creation of charge carriers in nonpolar liquids. IEEE Trans Electr Insulation 20:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atten P, Malraison B, Zahn M (1997) Electrohydrodynamic plumes in point-plane geometry. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 4:710–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos A (ed) (1998) Electrohydrodynamics. Springer, Wien

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Corach J, Sorichetti PA, Romano SD (2014) Electrical properties of vegetable oils between 20 Hz and 2 MHz. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:8754–8758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daaboul M, Louste C, Romat H (2009a) PIV measurements on charged plumes-influence of SiO2 seeding particles on the electrical behavior. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 16:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daaboul M, Louste C, Romat H (2009b) PIV measurements of the influence of seeding particles concentration on the velocity of an EHD flow. In: ESA/IEEE-IAS/IEJ/SFE joint conference on electrostatic 2009

  • Daaboul M, Traoré P, Vázquez P, Louste C (2017) Study of the transition from conduction to injection in an electrohydrodynamic flow in blade-plane geometry. J Electrost 88:71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazaryan A, Sitnikov A, Chirkov V, Stishkov Y (2017) A method for estimation of functional dependence of injection charge formation on electric field strength. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 53:3977–3981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glauert MB (1956) The wall jet. J Fluid Mech 1:625–643

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gouriou C, Louste C, Traoré P (2016) Influence of seeding particle type on velocity measurements in silicone oil under high voltage. In: Electrically-induced flows and electrokinetics I. Proceedings of the 2016 electrostatics joint conference, Purdue University

  • Haidara M, Atten P (1985) Role of EHD motion in the electrical conduction of liquids in a blade-plane geometry. IEEE Trans Ind Appl IA 21:709–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly AJ (2002) U.S. Patent No. 6,474,573. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

  • Kim W, Ryu JC, Suh YK, Kang HK (2011) Pumping of dielectric liquids using non-uniform-field induced electrohydrodynamic flow. Appl Phys Lett 99:224102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kourmatzis A, Shrimpton JS (2014) Electrohydrodynamic inter-electrode flow and liquid jet characteristics in charge injection atomizers. Exp Fluids 55:1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Bo-Fu W, Zhen-Hua W, Wu J, Zhang M (2019) Absolute and convective instabilities in electrohydrodynamic flow subjected to a Poiseuille flow: a linear analysis. J Fluid Mech 862:816–844

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Loitsyanskii LG (1966) Mechanics of liquids and gases. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Louste C, Romat H, Traoré P, Daaboul M, Vázquez P, Sosa R (2018) Electroconvective cavity flow patterns created by asymmetric electrode configuration. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54:4851–4856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmud S, Chen G, Golosnoy IO, Wilson G, Jarman P (2015) Experimental studies of influence of different electrodes on bridging in contaminated transformer oil. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22:2433–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra C, Weidman PD, Davis AMJ (2005) Nested toroidal vortices between concentric cones. J Fluid Mech 522:117–139

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt HK (1964) Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J Fluid Mech 18:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perri A, Sankaran A, Kashir B, Staszel C, Schick R, Mashayek F, Yarin AL (2020) Electrically-driven toroidal Moffatt vortices: experimental observations. J Fluid Mech 900:A12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran A, Staszel C, Sahu RP, Yarin AL, Mashayek F (2017) Evidence of faradaic reactions in electrostatic atomizers. Langmuir 33:1375–1384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran A, Staszel C, Mashayek F, Yarin AL (2018) Faradaic reactions’ mechanisms and parameters in charging of oils. Electrochim Acta 268:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran A, Staszel C, Belknap D, Yarin AL, Mashayek F (2019) Effect of atmospheric humidity on electrical conductivity of oil and implications in electrostatic atomization. Fuel 253:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar PN (2005) Moffatt eddies in the cone. J Fluid Mech 539:113–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stishkov YK, Chirkov VA (2008) Features of electrohydrodynamic flows in needle-plane electrode system. IEEE Int Conf Dielectr Liq 2008:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetervin N (1948) Laminar flow of a slightly viscous incompressible fluid that issues from a slit and passes over a flat plate. NACA TN 1644, Washington, p 40.

  • Traoré P, Daaboul M, Louste C (2010) Numerical simulation and PIV experimental analysis of electrohydrodynamic plumes induced by a blade electrode. J Phys D Appl Phys 43:225502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trau M, Sankaran S, Saville DA, Aksay IA (1995) Pattern formation in nonaqueous colloidal dispersions via electrohydrodynamic flow. Langmuir 11:4665–4672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss JF (eds) (2007) Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BM, Smith BL (2013) Uncertainty on PIV mean and fluctuating velocity due to bias and random errors. Meas Sci Technol 24:035302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarin AL (2007) Self-similarity. In: Tropea C, Yarin AL, Foss J (eds) Springer handbook of experimental fluid mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 57–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarin AL, Koombhongse S, Reneker DH (2001) Taylor cone and jetting from liquid droplets in electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Phys 90:4836–4846

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) GOALI Grant CBET-1505276.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AEP: conceptualization, methodology, experimentation, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. AS: conceptualization, methodology, experimentation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. CS: methodology, experimentation, writing—review and editing. RJS: resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. FM: resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. ALY: conceptualization, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander L. Yarin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

The near-wall errors are primarily due to a combination of how the streamlines are calculated and how the masking was performed post-calculation. In the present work, the PIV calculation was performed using the entire field of view (without masking), and then the rest of the analysis was performed in ParaView. Such a post-processing order was required due to the need for cleaning the surfaces of fatty acid build up between trials. Both the electrodes had to be removed, and the plate cleaned between trials; there were slight transitions of the vessel along the laser plane. Such a transition made the creation of complex mask within DaVis time consuming considering the number of trials performed. By performing the masking post-PIV calculation, vectors in erroneous regions, such as the reflections from the electrode, are considered as possible streamline components. These components, however, should be disregarded as the values correspond to a low or practically zero velocity magnitude. This caused the resulting streamlines to appear to stem from the plate joining with the main wall jet. For example, Fig. 

Fig. 15
figure 15

Streamlines overlaying a raw image sample for − 8 kV at a time step of 2500 µs for the small domain

15 is an overlaid image of the streamlines and a corresponding raw image from the test set. It shows that the most significant streamline errors occur due to the transition region near the electrode/plate boundary as it crosses over a laser reflection off the metal surface.

Inspecting the corresponding velocity profiles (Fig. 

Fig. 16
figure 16

Velocity magnitude (U) profiles in the flow along the plane counter-electrode at the cross-sections × where spurious streamline sections stem from the wall (see the inset). The colors of the curves depicting the velocity profiles in the main panel correspond to those of the spurious streamline sections at the wall in these cross-sections. The y coordinate is normal to the wall. The green curve reminds to some extent the velocity profile in the wall jet, whereas the other curves corresponding to the further cross-sections do not

16), however, it can be seen that the flow better approximates the flow field in the planar wall jet (Tetervin 1948; Akatnov 1953; Glauert 1956; cf. Loitsyanskii 1966, Yarin 2007) near the stagnation point of the impingement jet at the wall. As velocity profiles are measured farther away, the intensity significantly diminishes as the wall jet expands radially. For example, despite the relatively distant location from the stagnation point of the impingement jet at the wall (x = 5 mm or x = 7 mm), where some odd streamlines at the boundary are observed, the measured velocity profiles appear to be plausible.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perri, A.E., Sankaran, A., Staszel, C. et al. The particle image velocimetry of vortical electrohydrodynamic flows of oil near a high-voltage electrode tip. Exp Fluids 62, 27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03125-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-03125-z

Navigation