Abstract
A molecular tagging velocity (MTV) technique is developed to non-intrusively measure velocity in an integral effect test (IET) facility simulating a high-temperature helium-cooled nuclear reactor in accident scenarios. In these scenarios, the velocities are expected to be low, on the order of 1 m/s or less, which forces special requirements on the MTV tracer selection. Nitrous oxide \(({\rm N}_2{\rm O})\) is identified as a suitable seed gas to generate NO tracers capable of probing the flow over a large range of pressure, temperature, and flow velocity. The performance of \({\rm N}_2{\rm O}\)-MTV is assessed in the laboratory at temperature and pressure ranging from 295 to 781 K and 1 to 3 atm. MTV signal improves with a temperature increase, but decreases with a pressure increase. Velocity precision down to 0.004 m/s is achieved with a probe time of 40 ms at ambient pressure and temperature. Measurement precision is limited by tracer diffusion, and absorption of the tag laser beam by the seed gas. Processing by cross-correlation of single-shot images with high signal-to-noise ratio reference images improves the precision by about 10% compared to traditional single-shot image correlations. The instrument is then deployed to the IET facility. Challenges associated with heat, vibrations, safety, beam delivery, and imaging are addressed in order to successfully operate this sensitive instrument in-situ. Data are presented for an isothermal depressurized conduction cooldown. Velocity profiles from MTV reveal a complex flow transient driven by buoyancy, diffusion, and instability taking place over short \((<1\, {\rm s})\) and long (\(>30\) min) time scales at sub-meter per second speed. The precision of the in-situ results is estimated at 0.027, 0.0095, and 0.006 m/s for a probe time of 5, 15, and 35 ms, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
André MA, Bardet PM, Burns RA, Danehy PM (2017) Characterization of hydroxyl tagging velocimetry for low-speed flows. Meas Sci Technol 28(8):085202
Boedeker LR (1989) Velocity measurement by H2O photolysis and laser-induced fluorescence of OH. Opt Lett 14(10):473–475
Cussler E (2009) Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dam N, Klein-Douwel R, Sijtsema NM, Ter Meulen J (2001) Nitric oxide flow tagging in unseeded air. Opt Lett 26(1):36–38
Danehy P, O’Byrne S, Houwing A, Fox J, Smith D (2003) Flow-tagging velocimetry for hypersonic flows using fluorescence of nitric oxide. AIAA J 41(2):263–271
ElBaz A, Pitz R (2012) N2O molecular tagging velocimetry. Appl Phys B 106(4):961–969
Falco R, Chu C (1988) Measurement of two-dimensional fluid dynamic quantities using a photochromic grid tracing technique. Int Conf Photomech Speckle Metrol 814:706–710
Fuller EN, Schettler PD, Giddings JC (1966) New method for prediction of binary gas-phase diffusion coefficients. Ind Eng Chem 58(5):18–27
Gendrich C, Koochesfahani M (1996) A spatial correlation technique for estimating velocity fields using molecular tagging velocimetry (MTV). Exp Fluids 22(1):67–77
Gutowska I (2015) Study on depressurized loss of coolant accident and its mitigation method framework at very high temperature gas cooled reactor. Ph.D. thesis, Oregon State University
Hall CA, Ramsey MC, Knaus DA, Pitz RW (2017) Molecular tagging velocimetry in nitrogen with trace water vapor. Meas Sci Technol 28(8):085201
Hill R, Klewicki J (1996) Data reduction methods for flow tagging velocity measurements. Exp Fluids 20(3):142–152
Hudson R (1974) Absorption cross sections of stratospheric molecules. Can J Chem 52(8):1465–1478
Jiang N, Nishihara M, Lempert WR (2010) Quantitative NO2 molecular tagging velocimetry at 500 kHz frame rate. Appl Phys Lett 97(22):221103
Koochesfahani MM, Nocera DG (2007) Molecular tagging velocimetry. In: Handbook of experimental fluid dynamics, pp 362–382
Krüger S, Grünefeld G (1999) Stereoscopic flow-tagging velocimetry. Appl Phys B 69(5–6):509–512
Lempert W, Jiang N, Sethuram S, Samimy M (2002) Molecular tagging velocimetry measurements in supersonic microjets. AIAA J 40(6):1065–1070
Luque J, Crosley D (1999) LifBase: database and spectral simulation program (version 1.5). SRI international report MP 99(009)
Michael JB, Edwards MR, Dogariu A, Miles RB (2011) Femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging for quantitative velocity imaging in air. Appl Opt 50(26):5158–5162
Miles R, Connors J, Markovitz E, Howard P, Roth G (1989) Instantaneous profiles and turbulence statistics of supersonic free shear layers by raman excitation plus laser-induced electronic fluorescence (RELIEF) velocity tagging of oxygen. Exp Fluids 8(1):17–24
Miles R, Lempert W, Zhang B (1991) Turbulent structure measurements by RELIEF flow tagging. Fluid Dyn Res 8(1–4):9
Oh CH, Kim ES (2011) Air-ingress analysis: part 1. Theoretical approach. Nucl Eng Des 241(1):203–212
Oh CH, Kang HS, Kim ES (2011) Air-ingress analysis: part 2. Computational fluid dynamic models. Nucl Eng Des 241(1):213–225
Orlemann C, Schulz C, Wolfrum J (1999) NO-flow tagging by photodissociation of NO2. A new approach for measuring small-scale flow structures. Chem Phys Lett 307(1):15–20
Parziale N, Smith M, Marineau E (2015) Krypton tagging velocimetry of an underexpanded jet. Appl Opt 54(16):5094–5101
Paul P, Gray J, Durant J, Thoman J (1993) A model for temperature-dependent collisional quenching of NO A\(^2{\varSigma }^+\). App Phys B Lasers Opt 57(4):249–259
Pitz R, Wehrmeyer J, Ribarov L, Oguss D, Batliwala F, DeBarber P, Deusch S, Dimotakis P (2000) Unseeded molecular flow tagging in cold and hot flows using ozone and hydroxyl tagging velocimetry. Meas Sci Technol 11(9):1259
Pitz RW, DeBarber PA, Brown MS, Brown TM, Nandula SP, Segall J, Skaggs PA (1996) Unseeded velocity measurement by ozone tagging velocimetry. Opt Lett 21(10):755–757
Ramsey MC, Pitz RW (2011) Template matching for improved accuracy in molecular tagging velocimetry. Exp Fluids 51(3):811–819
Reyes J, Groome J, Woods B, Jackson B, Marshall T (2010) Scaling analysis for the high temperature gas reactor test section (GRTS). Nucl Eng Des 240(2):397–404
Salby ML (2012) Physics of the atmosphere and climate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Sánchez-González R, Srinivasan R, Bowersox RD, North SW (2011) Simultaneous velocity and temperature measurements in gaseous flow fields using the VENOM technique. Opt Lett 36(2):196–198
Schultz RR, Bayless PD, Johnson RW, Taitano WT, Wolf JR, McCreery GE (2010) Studies related to the Oregon State University high temperature test facility: scaling, the validation matrix, and similarities to the modular high temperature gas-cooled reactor. Technical report, Idaho National Laboratory (INL)
Selwyn G, Podolske J, Johnston HS (1977) Nitrous oxide ultraviolet absorption spectrum at stratospheric temperatures. Geophys Res Lett 4(10):427–430
Stier B, Koochesfahani M (1999) Molecular tagging velocimetry (MTV) measurements in gas phase flows. Exp Fluids 26(4):297–304
Utberg JE Jr (2013) Nitrogen concentration sensitivity study of the lock exchange phenomenon in the high temperature test facility. Master’s thesis, Oregon State University
Weissman S (1964) Estimation of diffusion coefficients from viscosity measurements: polar and polyatomic gases. J Chem Phys 40(11):3397–3406
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by a DOE NEUP Grant to Drs. Bardet, Danehy, and Woods.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
Funding was supported by U.S. Department of Energy (DE-NE0000662).
Appendices
Appendix A1: MTV processing algorithm
The pair of single-shot images recorded at t and \(t+\Delta t\) and shown in Fig. 14a, b have low SNR in the N2 region, as discussed in Sect. 4.1. Cross-correlating these two single-shot images, referred to as \(x_{t}\) and \(x_{t + \Delta t}\), results in weak correlation peaks, producing many outliers. Furthermore, there also exists differences between the two images in term of read pulse intensity and tracer line width (due to diffusion), which are detrimental to cross-correlation.
An attempt at mitigating these effects is performed here by including time-averaged reference images in the processing, as detailed below:
-
Prior to the beginning of a run, reference images are recorded at zero velocity (no flow) for the first and second read pulses, and averaged over 300 consecutive samples. These images are recorded with circulators turned off; thus, vibrations are negligible. This acquisition takes 30 s, time over which the beam drift is negligible (drift < 1 pixel/h, Sect. 4.4). Figure 14c, d shows such reference images for the first and second read pulses, respectively. This provides high SNR images of the undisplaced tracer for each read pulse, \(X_0\) and \(X_{\Delta t}\). This step is performed for each value of \(\Delta t\) used in the experiment. Note that diffusion has visibly increased the line width between Fig. 14c, d.
-
In order to reduce noise and improve the cross-correlation, each image is binned in the tag line direction using with a 160 pixel-wide window (with an overlap of \(75\%\)).
-
Every binned row in each single-shot image is cross-correlated with its respective reference image, i.e., \(X_0 \otimes x_{t}\) and \(X_{\Delta t} \otimes x_{t + \Delta t}\). Such correlation performs particularly well when diffusion is important because the two correlated images are for the same probe time delay. Furthermore, it is also unaffected by difference in intensity and spatial profile between first and second read pulses.
-
The width of the binning window is iteratively refined based on the unscaled cross-correlation value. For instance, a high value indicates a strong signal and well-defined tag line, enabling to decrease the binning window size and improve the spatial resolution. The binning window size is bounded between 40 and 160 pixels.
-
Once the window size has converged, the correlation peak is curve fitted to a Gaussian function to extract the displacement (cross-correlation lag) to a sub-pixel level between the single-shot image and its reference location for the first and second read pulses. The corresponding lag results for the first and second pulses, \(X_0 \otimes x_{t}\) and \(X_{\Delta t} \otimes x_{t + \Delta t}\), are displayed in Fig. 15a, b, respectively. Note that Fig. 15a is a direct measurement of the single-shot write beam wandering with respect the initial reference location, while Fig. 15b is a measurement of the single-shot tracer displacement with respect to the initial reference location.
-
The lag of \(X_{\Delta t} \otimes X_0\) is negligible, even at \(\Delta t=35\) ms, thus the reference location (\(X_0\) or \(X_{\Delta t}\)) can be assumed identical for first and second read pulses. Therefore, the final tracer instantaneous displacement between the two single-shot images is obtained by taking the difference between the two displacements obtained by cross-correlation as done in Fig. 15c. This requires interpolation because data from the two images are on a different grid as a consequence of the adaptive windowing.
As a dual-pulse technique, this method still accounts for beam wandering as shown in Fig. 15a. A drawback of this method would be that in some experiments, it is not possible to record reference images at zero velocity.
Using the data of Sect. 4, and performing an estimation of the precision as done in Sect. 4.3, the improvement in precision with this method is between 5 and \(15\%\) (for \(\Delta t=5\) and 35 ms) compared to the usual cross-correlation of single-shot image pairs (\(x_{t} \otimes x_{t + \Delta t}\)). As expected, the gain is more significant at longer \(\Delta t\) due to the effect of diffusion.
Appendix A2
The number density of \({\rm N}_2{\rm O}\) molecules dissociated in a control volume of length dL located at a distance L is obtained by combining Eqs. 2 and 3, and setting the beam energy entering the control volume to be \(E_0 {\rm e}^{-\sigma n_i L}\):
The maximum value of \(n_{\rm d}\) is found by solving \(\partial n_{\rm d} / \partial n_i=0\) for \(n_i\):
dL can be set arbitrarily small such as \(dL \ll L\), in which case Eq. 10 becomes:
Appendix A3
The adaptive interrogation window size algorithm refined the window size in the region of high SNR characterized by a high correlation peak. The window size for the second read pulse as a function of time and spatial location is shown in Fig. 16. The window size is larger near the top and bottom of the frame than near the center for the following reasons: image vignetting, reduced overlap of the read and write beams, larger diameter of the write pulse beam, and depth of field limited by the camera angle. The window size reaches the minimum of 40 pixels in the \({\rm N}_2{\rm O}\)-rich helium stream from the hot leg pipe after \(t=10\) s. After \(t\sim 80\) s, the \({\rm N}_2{\rm O}\) concentration of the helium/N2 mixture from the RPV is lower, and the window size increases to a minimum of 100 pixels for the rest of the run, with the exception of the interval where \(\Delta t\) was set to 35 ms between \(t=1055\) and 1095 s.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
André, M.A., Burns, R.A., Danehy, P.M. et al. Development of \({\rm N}_2{\rm O}\)-MTV for low-speed flow and in-situ deployment to an integral effect test facility. Exp Fluids 59, 14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2470-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-017-2470-3